Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transfusion ; 59(11): 3461-3467, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31483876

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients requiring chronic apheresis treatments typically lack sufficient peripheral venous access to support long-term therapy. Historically, central venous tunneled catheters, septum-bearing subcutaneous ports, and fistulas were used to obtain required blood flow rates for apheresis procedures. In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the first intravascular device specifically designed for apheresis therapy, the PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV Port. METHODS: Several preimplementation meetings with key hospital stakeholders were held to determine the most efficient and safest strategy for integrating the PowerFlow device into our practice. Interventional radiologists implanted the apheresis port in patients meeting specified criteria. Performance metrics and adverse events were evaluated over a 2-year period, July 2017 through June 2019. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent apheresis therapy using the PowerFlow port. The most common apheresis therapy provided was extracorporeal photopheresis, followed by therapeutic plasma exchange and low-density lipoprotein apheresis. Flow rates up to 90 mL/min were obtained; the rates were limited by patient tolerance for the apheresis procedure. Complications included infection, obstruction due to fibroblastic sleeve, and migration of the vascular device. The estimated risk of PowerFlow-associated bloodstream infection in the study population was 0.18 per 1000 intravascular device days. CONCLUSION: The PowerFlow Implantable Apheresis IV Port can achieve flow rates necessary for all apheresis therapies and is a promising alternative vascular access device for patients undergoing apheresis.


Assuntos
Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/instrumentação , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentação , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateteres de Demora , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA