Diethylstilboestrol versus bicalutamide in hormone refractory prostate carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of diethylstilboestrol (DES) with bicalutamide in the treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer in relation to its effect on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and survival. METHODS: Patients on LHRH analogues for prostate carcinoma with evidence of biochemical or clinical progression were randomized into one of the treatment arms (n=58). The first group (group A, n=26) received 1 mg of DES with 75 mg of aspirin per day in addition to the primary hormonal treatment. The second group (group B, n=32) received bicalutamide at a dose of 50 mg/day in addition to the primary treatment. Patients were followed up every 3 months with their PSA being checked and were also monitored for any clinical progression and adverse effects as a result of treatment. Any adverse event occurring after patients were started on treatment was attributed to the drug and patients were clinically assessed at each visit. Failure of treatment was defined as a 50% or greater increase in PSA after commencing treatment. Once randomized, all patients were followed up for survival regardless of failure of second-line hormonal manipulation. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 76.7 years (60-88, SD 7.4) in group A and 76 years (67-86, SD 6.9) in group B. Twelve patients in each group had metastatic disease. The median follow-up periods for both groups were 24 months (range 6-48 in group A, range 3-54 in group B). 65% of the patients in group A (17/26) and 43.5% (14/32) in group B had a fall in their PSA levels (p=0.08, Fisher's exact test) with 23% (6/26) and 31% (10/32) having a >50% response respectively (p=0.34, Fisher's exact test). Mean PSA nadir in those who responded were 20.6 ng/ml (range 1.6-59.4) and 7.41 ng/ml (range 0.1-42.6) in groups A and B respectively. The median duration of response was 9 months (3-18 months) for group A and 12 months (3-18 months) for group B. Seven patients in group A and 6 in group B experienced adverse events. Three of the 7 in the group A experienced cardiovascular related adverse effects (1 congestive cardiac failure, 1 pulmonary embolism and 1 stroke). At the end of the study period, 14 (54%) of group A patients were alive and 12 (46%) were dead. In group B, 15 (47%) were alive, 16 (50%) were dead and 1 (3%) lost to follow-up. At the completion of the study, 3 patients in each group were still on treatment. CONCLUSION: Low-dose DES and 50 mg of bicalutamide per day are equally effective in hormone refractory prostate carcinoma with respect to biochemical response, although DES has more severe adverse effects. This is a small sample and larger multicentre trials are needed to give us a definite conclusion.

Results of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for stress incontinence: patient's perspective.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the results of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure (TVT) from a patient's perspective. METHODS: Between May 1999 and January 2002, 90 patients underwent a TVT for genuine stress incontinence (GSI) and mixed incontinence. Prior to the procedure, GSI was confirmed by clinical examination and urodynamic studies. Results were then audited from patient notes and the same patients were sent questionnaires to examine results from a patient perspective. RESULTS: Overall response rate to the questionnaire was 70 (77%). The mean age of the patients was 50.4 years (range 31-83 years). Sixty-one patients had spinal anesthesia, seven had general anesthesia and two had local anesthesia. Mean hospital stay was 3.36 days (range 2-14 days) and mean period from the operation to the time of the survey and audit was 16.34 months (range 3-28; SD 6.92). Thirty-nine (56%) of the 70 patients who answered said that the operation had cured their incontinence, 16 (23%) had an improvement in their symptoms, 7 (10%) had worsening of their symptoms and 8 (11%) felt that the operation did not make any difference. The overall success rate according to the patients' perspective was 79%, whereas our audit showed an overall success rate of 86% (77% and 82%, respectively, when we compared only the 66 patients who had both notes and replies available for analysis). CONCLUSION: Although a patient's perception regarding the success of TVT tends to differ from that of a clinician, it was not found to be statistically significant (P = 0.22, McNemar test). The TVT is a very successful operation, but realistic cure rates should be offered to patients.