Eribulin in brain metastases of breast cancer: outcomes of the EBRAIM prospective observational trial.

Background: Eribulin shows some activity in controlling brain metastasis in breast cancer. Methods: This observational, multicenter study evaluated brain disease control rates, survival and safety in patients with brain metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin in clinical practice. Results: A total of 34 patients were enrolled (mean age 49 years, 91% with visceral metastases) and 29 were evaluable for brain disease. Fourteen achieved disease control and showed a longer time without progression: 10 months (95% CI: 2.3-17.7) versus 4 months (95% CI: 3.3-4.7) in the control group (p = 0.029). Patients with clinical benefits at 6 months had longer survival. Leukopenia and neutropenia were the most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities. Conclusion: Eribulin confirms its effectiveness in patients with brain metastatic breast cancer. Further studies on larger cohorts are needed to confirm the results.

Optimal Ki67 cut-off for luminal breast cancer prognostic evaluation: a large case series study with a long-term follow-up.

Although Ki67 index suffers from poor reproducibility, it is one of the most important prognostic markers used by oncologists to select the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer patients. In this study, we aim to establish the optimal Ki67 cut-offs for stratifying patient prognosis and to create a comprehensive prognostic index for clinical applications. A mono-institutional cohort of 1.577 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative/ER+ breast cancer patients having complete clinical, histological, and follow-up data was collected. The 14 and 20 % Ki67 cut-offs were correlated to disease-free interval (DFI) and disease-specific survival (DSS). To create a comprehensive prognostic index, we used independent variables selected by uni/multivariate analyses. In terms of DFI and DSS, patients bearing tumors with Ki67 < 14 % proliferation index did not differ from those with Ki67 values between 14 and 20 %. Patients with tumor with Ki67 > 20 % showed the poorest prognosis. Moreover, to tumor size, the number of metastatic lymph nodes and Ki67 > 20 % was given a score value, varying depending on definite cut-offs and used to create a prognostic index, which was applied to the population. Patients with a prognostic index ≥3 were characterized by significant risk of relapse [DFI: Hazard Ratio (HR) = 4.74, p < 0.001] and death (DSS: HR = 5.03, p < 0.001). We confirm that the 20 % Ki67 cut-off is the best to stratify high-risk patients in luminal breast cancers, and we suggest to integrate it with other prognostic factors, to better stratify patients at risk of adverse outcome.

Increased overall survival independent of RECIST response in metastatic breast cancer patients continuing trastuzumab treatment: evidence from a retrospective study.

Recent studies have reported the potential clinical utility for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients of continuing trastuzumab beyond progression. Based on those results, here the authors have examined the benefits of trastuzumab-continuation by specifically evaluating RECIST responses upon first line trastuzumab-treatment as a potential predictive marker for therapeutic effect of trastuzumab-continuation beyond metastatic disease progression. The authors carried out a retrospective analysis of 272 HER2 positive MBC patients under trastuzumab treatment at 22 different oncology Italian centers during the years of 2000 and 2001 who progressed under first line trastuzumab-treatment. The primary end point of the study was the survival from the date of first documented progression upon first line trastuzumab treatment of disease. Data analysis involved the use of matching on propensity score to balance variables between treated and untreated subjects and to reduce bias. Of the 272 HER2-positive MBC patients, 154 (56.6%) continued treatment. 79 (51.3%) of those 154 patients showed responses based on RECIST criteria during first-line trastuzumab-treatment. Of the 118 patients that suspended trastuzumab, RECIST responses had been observed in 44 (37.3%). Cox proportional hazards analysis of progressed patients, matched using propensity score, showed that discontinuation of trastuzumab at metastatic disease progression was a risk factor for significantly reduced overall survival in both responder (HR = 2.23; 95% CI = 1.03-4.82) and non-responder groups (HR = 3.53, 95% CI = 1.73-7.21), with no significant differences in the two estimated HRs (P-value of the likelihood-ratio test = 0.690). Continued trastuzumab treatment after disease progression has clinically and statistically significant effects in both RECIST responder and non-responder MBC patients.

Cardioprotective Strategy for Patients With Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer Who Are Receiving an Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Several studies have evaluated cardioprotective strategies to prevent myocardial dysfunction in patients who are receiving cardiotoxic therapies. However, the optimal approach still represents a controversial issue. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pharmacological cardioprevention could reduce subclinical heart damage in patients with breast cancer who are being treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The SAFE trial was a 4-arm, randomized, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, national multicentric study conducted at 8 oncology departments in Italy. It was a prespecified interim analysis on the first 174 patients who had completed cardiac assessment at 12 months. The study recruitment was conducted between July 2015 and June 2020. The interim analysis was performed in 2020. Patients were eligible for trial inclusion if they had indication to receive primary or postoperative systemic therapy using an anthracycline-based regimen. Patients with a prior diagnosis of cardiovascular disease were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Cardioprotective therapy (bisoprolol, ramipril, or both drugs compared with placebo) was administered for 1 year from the initiation of chemotherapy or until the end of trastuzumab therapy in case of ERBB2-positive patients. Doses for all groups were systematically up-titrated up to the daily target dose of bisoprolol (5 mg, once daily), ramipril (5 mg, once daily), and placebo, if tolerated. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was defined as detection of any subclinical impairment (worsening ≥10%) in myocardial function and deformation measured with standard and 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and global longitudinal strain (GLS). RESULTS: The analysis was performed on 174 women (median age, 48 years; range, 24-75 years) who had completed a cardiological assessment at 12 months and reached the end of treatment. At 12 months, 3D-LVEF worsened by 4.4% in placebo arm and 3.0%, 1.9%, 1.3% in the ramipril, bisoprolol, ramipril plus bisoprolol arms, respectively (P = .01). Global longitudinal strain worsened by 6.0% in placebo arm and 1.5% and 0.6% in the ramipril and bisoprolol arms, respectively, whereas it was unchanged (0.1% improvement) in the ramipril plus bisoprolol arm (P < .001). The number of patients showing a reduction of 10% or greater in 3D-LVEF was 8 (19%) in the placebo arm, 5 (11.5%) in the ramipril arm, 5 (11.4%) in the bisoprolol, arm and 3 (6.8%) in the ramipril plus bisoprolol arm; 15 patients (35.7%) who received placebo showed a 10% or greater worsening of GLS compared with 7 (15.9; ramipril), 6 (13.6%; bisoprolol), and 6 (13.6%; ramipril plus bisoprolol) (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The interim analysis of this randomized clinical trials suggested that cardioprotective pharmacological strategies in patients who were affected by breast cancer and were receiving an anthracycline-based chemotherapy are well tolerated and seem to protect against cancer therapy-related LVEF decline and heart remodeling. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT2236806.

Paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent head and neck cancer: clinical and unexpected pharmacokinetic interactions.

BACKGROUND: The combination of paclitaxel (PTX) with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is an interesting treatment for recurrent head and neck cancer. The pharmacokinetic behavior may depend on the interval between the intravenous administration of the two drugs. This study evaluates the clinical efficacy, toxicity and any possible interval-dependent pharmacokinetic interactions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were randomized to receive 80 mg/m2 PTX weekly and 12.5 mg/m2 PLD every two weeks at administration intervals of 0, 1, 3, 12 or 24 hours. Blood sampling was performed at day 1 and 15 and pharmacokinetics of PTX, PLD and Cremophor EL were evaluated by non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Neutropenia was the most frequent side-effect (100% of patients; 30% grade 3-4). Hand-foot syndrome was severe in only 3% of patients. Overall response rate was 30%, with 3% complete responses and 27% partial responses. Stable disease and progression were 43% and 27%, respectively. Median response duration and overall median survival were 5.5 and 10 months respectively. Co-administration of PLD markedly reduced Cmax and the area under the curve (AUC), and increased PTX clearance. The differences in the PTX AUC and clearance between the 0 h and the 24 h experimental arms were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The PTX/PLD combination plays a palliative role (clinical benefit in 73% of patients) and has good tolerability. The PTX pharmacokinetic profile was unexpectedly affected by different administration time intervals; in the 0 h arm the AUC was reduced to one fourth, therefore a schedule with PTX on day one, PLD on day two may be preferred.

Cisplatin+Vinorelbine Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Salivary Gland Malignancies (RMSGM): A Final Report on 60 Cases.

OBJECTIVES: Recurrent or metastatic salivary gland malignancies (RMSGM) are not suitable for conventional treatment. We report the clinical outcomes of 60 patients affected by RMSGM who were treated with DDP+VNB as a first-line or second-line scheme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients between 2001 and 2008, affected by RMSGM were enrolled in this cohort prospective study; they received the following first-line or second-line chemotherapy (CT), for a maximum of 6 cycles: DDP at 80 mg/m on day 1+VNB at 25 mg/m on day 1 and 8, at 3-week intervals. RESULTS: Seventy percent of the patients received DDP+VNB as the first-line CT and 30% of them received it as the second-line CT. After 5 cycles (median) of first-line DDP+VNB, 7% of the patients achieved a complete response, 24% achieved a partial response, 33% achieved an no change, and 36% achieved a PD. After 4 cycles (median) of second-line CT, 0 patients achieved a CR, 5% achieved a PR, 33% achieved an NC, and 62% achieved a PD. The median overall survival period was 10 months for those who received the first-line CT and 4 months for those who received the second-line CT. The best ORR (54%) and median survival were observed, during first-line treatment, in adenocarcinomas, whereas undifferentiated tumours were unresponsive with a poor median survival (4.6 mo). CONCLUSIONS: Adenocarcinomas show the best response and prognosis with DDP+VNB scheme that seems to be an effective and well-tolerated first-line CT for RMSGM, whereas it has only low palliative activity as a second-line CT.

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in recurrent head and neck cancer: pharmacokinetic and clinical results.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters, efficacy and toxicity of a combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and vinorelbine (VNB) in recurrent heavily pre-treated squamous cell head and neck carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients previously treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (n = 13), surgery plus radiotherapy (n = 10) and surgery + concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (n = 1) were enrolled; 7 patients had received one or more courses of palliative chemotherapy. Twenty patients had a local-regional recurrence and 4 patients had metastases. The doses were 1200 mg/m2 for GEM and 30 mg/m2 for VNB on days 1 and 8 every 21 days; a maximum of 6 cycles was allowed. Pharmacokinetic investigations were performed on 9 patients receiving GEM and VNB. As a PK control, a second group of 5 patients was given GEM as single agent, at the same doses and with the same i.v. infusion length. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received a total of 135 cycles (median per patient, 5). Neutropenia was the most frequent side-effect (92% of patients; grade 3-4 in 50%). The overall response rate was 25% which included 1 of 24 complete responses (4%) and 4 of 24 partial responses (21%). Responses were observed only in patients with good prognostic characteristics. The median response duration was 5.5 months (2-16 months) and the overall median survival was 9 months (range, 2-25+). Vinorelbine serum levels showed no evidence of any pharmacokinetic interaction with GEM; most of all, no rebound in VNB disposition can be produced by GEM pre-administration. CONCLUSION: The GEM-VNB combination has a palliative role in patients with favourable characteristics; the results seem no better than those observed with VNB alone. Moreover, this drug association does not alter the pharmacokinetic profile of both drugs, also compared to GEM monotherapy.

Postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in older patients with head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: In head and neck cancer, the locoregional failure of patients with positive margins, vascular or perineural invasion, and extracapsular spread is high and results in poor survival. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in improving treatment outcomes among older patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing radical surgery (median age, 73.5 years [range, 70-78 years]) were enrolled (35 men and 5 women; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, grade 0-2). Disease sites included the oral cavity (10 patients), oropharynx (12 patients), hypopharynx (8 patients), and larynx (10 patients); pathological TNM classifications included T1 N2 (8 patients), T2 N1-2 (12 patients), T3 N0-2 (8 patients), and T4 N0-2 (12 patients), with the following poor prognostic factors: positive margins (6 patients), vascular invasion (14 patients), neural invasion (16 patients), and extracapsular spread (26 patients). All patients were treated with carboplatin (30 mg/m2 on days 1-5 of weeks 1, 3, and 5) concomitant with radiotherapy (54.0 Gy to all risk volumes plus 10.0 Gy to high-risk volumes; 5 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy each per week). RESULTS: No grade 4 toxicity was observed. Grade 3 toxicity included mucositis (10 patients), neutropenia (6 patients), dermatitis (2 patients), and thrombocytopenia (1 patient). The radiotherapy dose administered was 52.0 Gy to all risk volumes plus 10.0 Gy to high-risk volumes. Thirty-two patients (80%) received 3 cycles, 6 (15%) received 2 cycles, and 2 (5%) received 1 cycle. Three-year survival was as follows: disease-free survival, 58%; overall survival, 64%; and local control, 79%. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may be successful in fit older patients. The results of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were better than those observed in a comparable group treated with radiotherapy alone and were similar to those observed in a younger group with the same poor prognostic factors treated with adjuvant carboplatin plus radiotherapy.

Docetaxel and vinorelbine: an effective regimen in recurrent squamous cell esophageal carcinoma.

Vinorelbine and docetaxel are two effective drugs in esophageal cancer; our purpose was to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of a combination of these drugs in recurrent squamous cell esophageal cancer. Twenty patients previously treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy (n = 14), surgery alone (n = 2), surgery plus radiotherapy (n = 2), or concomitant chemoradiotherapy + surgey (n = 2) were enrolled. Thirteen patients had a local-regional recurrence, two patients had metastases, and five patients had both. The doses were 80 mg/m(2) for docetaxel and 20 mg/m(2) for vinorelbine on d 1 every 21 d for a maximum of six cycles. Twenty patients received a total of 106 cycles (median per patient, 5). Neutropenia was the most frequent and severe side effect (grade 4 in 80%; grade 3 in 20%). The overall response rate was 60%, which included 3 of 20 complete responses (15%) and 9 of 20 partial responses (45%). Median response duration was 7 mo (2-50+). Overall median survival was 10.5 mo (range, 2-55+). A dysphagia improvement was observed in 81% of patients. In conclusion, the data from this phase II study indicate that this combination is effective in recurrent heavily pretreated patients with a short-lasting manageable toxicity.

Carboplatin plus taxol is an effective third-line regimen in recurrent undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a chemosensitive disease. Few third-line treatments have been reported. METHODS: Twelve patients (9 males, 3 females; median age 50 years, range, 20-62) with recurrent undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated with carboplatin AUC 5.5 + paclitaxel (175 mg/m2, 3-hr infusion) on day 1 every 3 weeks. All patients had been previously treated for recurrent disease with a first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy and a second-line therapy with low-dose continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil. RESULTS: Overall, 54 courses were given (median, 5; range, 2-6). Three patients (25%) obtained a partial response lasting 6, 10 and 26+ months, 1 (8.3%) a minimal response lasting 6 months, and 3 (25%) no change with a median duration of 5 months. The median survival time was 14 months for patients who had a partial or minimal response or no change, and 5 months for nonresponders. Median overall survival was 9.5 months (3-30+). The treatment was well tolerated, and toxicity was manageable. CONCLUSIONS: The combination has a good palliative role as third-line chemotherapy in recurrent undifferentiated nasopharyngeal cancer.

Induction chemotherapy with carboplatin and taxol followed by radiotherapy and concurrent weekly carboplatin + taxol in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Aim of this study was the clinical evaluation of carboplatin-taxol combination in a neoadjuvant and concomitant setting with conventional radiotherapy in loco-regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (A-NPC). METHODS: Thirty patients were treated with three cycles of carboplatin (AUC6) plus taxol (175 mg/m(2)) on day 1 every 3 weeks, followed by weekly carboplatin (AUC1) plus Taxol (60 mg/m2) and concomitant radiotherapy (70 Gy). RESULTS: We observed the objective complete response rates of 33% (after chemotherapy) and 87% (after chemo-radiotherapy). Treatment tolerability and toxicity were controllable. Three- and five-year progression-free survival were 80 and 75%, respectively, and 3- and 5-year overall survival were 85 and 80% (follow-up 49.5 months). Five-year loco-regional control was 90.3%, and five-year distant metastases-free survival was 85%. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with such protocol represents a feasible, efficient treatment for patients with A-NPC, ensuring excellent loco-regional disease control and overall survival with low incidence of distant metastases.

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: clinical and pharmacokinetic data.

OBJECTIVES: This phase 2 study evaluated clinical efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of combination gemcitabine (GEM) and oxaliplatin (OXA) in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Of 30 eligible patients, 20 had metastatic disease and 10 had nonmetastatic unresectable locally advanced disease. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 as a 10 mg/m2/min intravenous infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour intravenous infusion on day 2 were administered every 2 weeks. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated in 11 patients by administering the 2 drugs in opposing sequences GEM-OXA (GEM day 1, OXA day 2) and OXA-GEM (OXA day 1, GEM day 2). RESULTS: Of 30 patients evaluated, 9 had a partial response, 11 had disease stabilization, and 10 had disease progression. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.5 and 9.5 months, respectively. The 1-year survival was 37% for all patients. This study revealed no significant pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 drugs in the GEM-OXA or in the OXA-GEM sequence. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of GEM and OXA was well tolerated and showed a promising activity in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma; no sequence-dependent pharmacokinetic interaction occurred when comparing the GEM-OXA versus the OXA-GEM sequence, with a 24-hour interval.

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to or pretreated with both anthracyclines and taxanes: clinical and pharmacokinetic data.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy, the toxicity and the pharmacokinetics of a gemcitabine (GEM) and oxaliplatin (OXA) combination in metastatic breast cancer patients (MBC), previously treated with anthracycline and taxanes. METHODS: A total of 40 women were enrolled; 37 patients had visceral metastases as dominant site of disease, including 20 patients with liver metastases and 14 with multiple visceral metastases. Three patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, 13 patients adjuvant chemotherapy alone, 24 patients chemotherapy for MBC alone. Gemcitabine was given at 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 followed by oxaliplatin at 100 mg/m2 iv on day 2 every 2 weeks (GEM-OXA sequence). Possible pharmacokinetic interactions were studied in 10 patients, by administering on cycle 1 gemcitabine d1/oxaliplatin d2 (GEM-OXA) and on cycle 2 oxaliplatin d1/gemcitabine d2 (OXA-GEM). RESULTS: After a median of 8 cycles, 10 partial response (PR) (25%), 16 stable disease (SD) (40%), and 14 progressive disease (PD) (35%) were obtained. The median duration of response was 6 months (3-9) for responding patients and 4.9 months (2-7.5) for patients with stable disease. For PR, SD and PD patients, median survival was 18 (10-23+), 13 (8-18), and 6 months (4-13), respectively. G3-4 neutropenia occurred in 20% of patients (febrile G3 neutropenia in 2.5%), G3-4 thrombocytopenia and anemia in 15% and 7.5%. The most frequent G3-4 nonhematologic toxicity was represented by peripheral neuropathy (20%), always reversible. The GEM-OXA and OXA-GEM schedules showed a similar pharmacokinetic behavior, with no sequence-dependent interaction. CONCLUSIONS: The combination gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin has moderate activity in anthracycline and taxanes resistant/relapsed heavily treated patients, mild toxicity and no administration sequence-dependent pharmacokinetic interactions.

Clinical data and pharmacokinetics of a docetaxel-vinorelbine combination in anthracycline resistant/ relapsed metastatic breast cancer.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters, efficacy and toxicity of a docetaxel and vinorelbine combination in metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracycline. A population of 40 patients was analyzed; 30 patients (75%) had visceral metastases as the dominant site of disease, including 20 patients (50%) with liver metastases. Three or more organs were involved in 43% of patients. All patients had received prior anthracycline therapy. Five patients (12%) had primary resistant disease, 10 patients (25%) secondary resistant disease and 25 patients (63%) had progressive metastatic breast cancer after first-line chemotherapy. Docetaxel and vinorelbine were given at 80 mg/m2 and 20 mg/m2 i.v., respectively, on day 1 every 3 weeks. After a median of 5 cycles, it was found that 5 patients had a complete remission (13%), 19 a partial remission (48%), 9 had stable disease (22%) and 7 had progressive disease (17%). Response rates in patients with visceral and liver metastases were 57% and 50%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 24 months (13-36), median time to progression was 8.5 months and median overall survival 17 months. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 78% of courses (febrile neutropenia in 9%). Possible pharmacokinetic interactions were studied in 23 patients by administering docetaxel immediately followed by vinorelbine (protocol A) or vinorelbine followed by docetaxel (protocol B). Patients in protocol B had significantly higher vinorelbine plasma levels and more pronounced neutropenia. Docetaxel plus vinorelbine is an effective combination in anthracycline resistant/relapsed metastatic breast cancer. The administration sequence docetaxel --> vinorelbine is safer than the reverse order.

Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia for recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer.

Aggressive surgical cytoreduction has been shown to have a positive impact on survival of patients with ovarian cancer. After first-line chemotherapy, 47% of patients relapse within 5 years, and median survival after second line chemotherapy is 10-15 months. Adding intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (IPCH) to surgical cytoreduction could further control ceolomic spread of disease. The aim of this study was to determine morbidity and mortality, regional relapse-free survival and, preliminarily, overall survival after combining cytoreductive surgery with IPCH for the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian epithelial cancer relapsed after prior chemotherapy. Thirty women affected with such a relapse were included. Patients underwent extensive cytoreductive surgery including tumor resections and peritonectomy, followed by intraoperative IPCH with cisplatin. Complete surgical cytoreduction down to nodules less than 2.5 mm (CC0-CC1) was obtained in 23 patients (77%). One patient died postoperatively from a pulmonary embolism. Major postoperative morbidity was 5/30 (16.7%). We registered one case of anastomotic leakage, a spontaneous ileum perforation, a postoperative cholecystitis, a hydrothorax, and one patient with bone marrow toxicity. Kaplan-Meier estimates of median locoregional relapse-free survival and median overall survival were 17.1 months and 28.1 months, respectively. Patients with CC0-CC1 had locoregional relapse-free and overall survival rates of 24.4 and 37.8 months, whereas the remainder had survival rates of 4.1 and 11.0 months. We concluded that cytoreductive surgery combined with IPCH is feasible with acceptable morbidity and mortality and seems to promise good results in selected patients affected with peritoneal carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer.

Docetaxel, carboplatin and concomitant radiotherapy for unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: pharmacokinetic and clinical data of a phase I-II study.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy is the most effective treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer. Docetaxel and carboplatin are two active drugs that potentiate radiotherapy. Thirty patients (median age = 56 years; median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status = 1) received radiotherapy (70 Gy, 2 Gy/d, 5 d/wk) concurrent with carboplatin AUC 0.3 to 0.5 on day 1-5, weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, and docetaxel 15 to 25 mg/m2 on day 4 of weeks 2, 4, and 6. Site of unresectable squamous cell carcinoma was as follows: oropharynx, 41%; hypopharynx, 27%; oral cavity, 16%; and larynx, 16%. Stage was III in 13% and IV in 87%. In 11 patients, pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated. Acute G4 toxicity was as follows: neutropenia, 20%; mucositis, 33%. We had the following acute G3 toxicities: mucositis, 40%; neutropenia, 37%; dermatitis, 23%; and anemia, 13%. The maximum tolerated dosage was area under the curve 0.5 for carboplatin and 20 mg/m2 for docetaxel. Median radiotherapy dose was 69 Gy, and 175 out of 210 courses (83%) were administered. At the end of the treatment, we had 20 complete responses (CR) (67%), 9 partial responses (30%), and 1 no change (3%). After radial neck dissection, 2 patients achieved a CR (overall CR = 73%). After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, we had a 3-year local progression-free survival of 85%, failure-free survival of 69%, and overall survival of 60%. A significant increase of Cmax of carboplatin concentration was noted at the beginning of weeks 3, 5, and 7. Total plasma platinum raises during each course of 5 days of carboplatin without reaching a steady state. Carboplatin, docetaxel, and concomitant conventional radiotherapy is a feasible and effective treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer. The concurrent administration of two drugs does not alter pharmacokinetic drug behavior compared with single-agent data.

Docetaxel and vinorelbine in recurrent head and neck cancer: pharmacokinetic and clinical results.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetic parameters, efficacy, and toxicity of a combination of docetaxel (DTX) and vinorelbine (VNB) in recurrent heavily pretreated squamous cell head and neck cancer. Twenty-nine patients previously treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy (n = 14), surgery plus radiotherapy (n = 13), surgery+concomitant chemoradiotherapy (n = 1) and radiotherapy alone (n = 1) were enrolled; 9 patients had received 1 or more courses of palliative chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients had a local-regional recurrence, and 8 patients had metastases. The doses were 80 mg/m2 for DTX and 20 mg/m2 for VNB on day 1 every 21 days for a maximum of 6 cycles. Pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed on 24 patients; in a group of 12 patients, VNB administration immediately followed DTX infusion (schedule A), and in 12 patients VNB administration was immediately followed by DTX infusion (schedule B). Twenty-nine patients received a total of 137 cycles (median per patient, 5). Neutropenia was the most frequent and severe side effect (grade IV in 79%; grade III in 21%). Grade IV (7%) and III (14%) infections were observed in the first 12 patients; ciprofloxacin prophylaxis in the following 17 patients reduced the severe toxicity to 0%. The overall response rate was 49%, which included 3 of 29 complete responses (10%) and 11 of 29 partial responses (38%). Median complete and partial response durations were 20+ and 5.5 months, respectively. Overall median survival was 10 months (range, 2-30+). The mean values of area under the curve, mean residence time (MRT), and C(max) of VNB were significantly lower for schedule A than for schedule B. The mean values of VNB clearance were significantly higher for schedule A than for schedule B. Neutrophil count at the nadir was much lower for patients receiving schedule B. The DTX-VNB combination is effective in heavily pretreated patients with a short-lasting manageable toxicity. Pharmacokinetic evaluations suggested that the sequence DTX --> VNB is safer than the sequence VNB --> DTX.