A Danish national, multicentre evaluation of the new donor vigilance system among different staff groups.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Two years after implementing a new national donor vigilance system, the Danish Haemovigilance Committee conducted a nationwide survey to evaluate the implementation among different staff groups. We present the results here. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was designed as an anonymous online survey to evaluate the satisfaction with the new registration, understanding of the parameters used and the user-friendliness. The REDCap platform was used. The questionnaire consisted of 22 questions. Ordinal variables were answered using five-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). The data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Successful implementation was defined as mean overall satisfaction ≥4 and mean understanding of the individual components (adverse reaction category, severity and imputability) in the registration ≥4. RESULTS: In all, 104 staff members (77.9% donation staff) participated. The mean (SD) overall satisfaction among all participants was 3.96 (0.94), highest among medical doctors (4.43 (0.78)) and lowest for administrative or other personnel (2.78 (1.09)). The mean scores for understanding the adverse reaction categories, severity and imputability were 3.92 (0.94), 3.92 (0.94) and 3.88 (1.00), respectively. Experience with a previous donor vigilance system was associated with lower scores. The most successful implementation programme included a medical doctor for introduction and a contact person. CONCLUSION: The goal for successful implementation was not met. However, the overall attitude towards the new registration was positive and indicates that the system is suitable for different staff groups. Our results suggest that implementation could benefit from special attention to administrative staff and those accustomed to another donor vigilance system.

The new donor vigilance system in Denmark reveals regional differences in adverse reactions supposedly caused by variation in the registration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In recent years, there has been an increased focus among blood bank professionals on the health and safety of blood donors. In 2019, the Danish Haemovigilance Committee designed a national donor vigilance system to improve the registration of adverse reactions (AR) in blood donors. The new donor vigilance system was implemented on 1 January 2020 and we here present the results from the first year of registration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: AR categories, severity level and imputability score were defined based on the definitions from the International Society of Blood Transfusion, AABB and the European Commission directive 2005/61/EC, respectively. RESULTS: Across all severity levels, AR in Danish blood donors were found to be rare (1498 per 100,000 donations). Only 0.2% of the registered reactions were classified as serious (2.7 per 100,000 donations). Large regional differences were seen in the registration of citrate reactions and haematomas. CONCLUSION: Significant differences across regions in what to categorize as an AR were persistent even when including a severity score in the reporting. The Danish Haemovigilance Committee will commence a national work to align the definitions but suggests that this matter is raised to an international level as part of the current work to agree upon definitions for assessment of donor AR.

Reference intervals for platelet large cell ratio, platelet distribution width, plateletcrit and standard haematological parameters determined on the Sysmex XN-10 in a cohort of 30,917 Danish blood donors.

With the introduction of the Sysmex XN-10, new platelet indices reflecting platelet maturity can be obtained alongside with a full blood count. Therefore, the need for verified reference intervals is present. The purpose of this study was to establish reference intervals for the platelet indices: platelet large cell ratio (P-LCR), platelet distribution width (PDW) and plateletcrit (PCT) in a large Scandinavian cohort. Furthermore, we aimed to verify previously established reference intervals of haematological parameters included in a full blood count. Blood samples were obtained from healthy Danish blood donors and analysed by use of the Sysmex XN-10 analyser (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan). Non-parametric 95% reference intervals were determined as the 2.5 and 97.5 percentile and presented with 90% confidence intervals (CI). In total, 30,917 blood donors were included and the following reference intervals were established: P-LCR, ratio: 17.3 (90% CI: 17.2 - 17.5) - 46.2 (90% CI:45.9 - 46.4); P DW, fL:9.5 (90% CI: 9.5 - 9.5) - 17.2 (90% CI: 17.2 - 17.3) and PCT, fraction: 0.18 (0.18 - 0.18) - 0.38 (0.38 - 0.39). The reference intervals were stable across age and sex. Furthermore, reference intervals for the remaining haematological parameters included in a full blood count were verified and found in line with the previously established reference intervals.

Persistent Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection in Immunocompromised Host Displaying Treatment Induced Viral Evolution.

We report a coronavirus disease 2019 case with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) persisting beyond 333 days in an immunocompromised patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, asymptomatically carrying infectious SARS-CoV-2 at day 197 postdiagnosis. In addition, viral sequencing indicates major changes in the spike protein over time, temporally associated with convalescent plasma treatment.