Molecular analysis of brazilian patients with combined pituitary hormone deficiency and orthotopic posterior pituitary lobe reveals eight different PROP1 alterations with three novel mutations.

BACKGROUND: Mutations in PROP1, HESX1 and LHX3 are associated with combined pituitary hormone deficiency (CPHD) and orthotopic posterior pituitary lobe (OPP). OBJECTIVE: To identify mutations in PROP1, HESX1 and LHX3 in a large cohort of patients with CPHD and OPP (35 Brazilian, two Argentinian). DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied 23 index patients with CPHD and OPP (six familial and 17 sporadic) as well as 14 relatives. PROP1 was sequenced by the Sanger method in all except one sporadic case studied using a candidate gene panel. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was applied to one familial case in whom PROP1 failed to amplify by PCR. In the 13 patients without PROP1 mutations, HESX1 and LHX3 were sequenced by the Sanger method. RESULTS: We identified PROP1 mutations in 10 index cases. Three mutations were novel: one affecting the initiation codon (c.1A>G) and two affecting splicing sites, c.109+1G>A and c.342+1G>C. The known mutations, c.150delA (p.Arg53Aspfs*112), c.218G>A (p.Arg73His), c.263T>C (p.Phe88Ser) and c.301_302delAG (p.Leu102Cysfs*8), were also detected. MLPA confirmed complete PROP1 deletion in one family. We did not identify HESX1 and LHX3 mutations by Sanger. CONCLUSION: PROP1 mutations are a prevalent cause of congenital CPHD with OPP, and therefore, PROP1 sequencing must be the first step of molecular investigation in patients with CPHD and OPP, especially in populations with a high frequency of PROP1 mutations. In the absence of mutations, massively parallel sequencing is a promising approach. The high prevalence and diversity of PROP1 mutations is associated with the ethnic background of this cohort.

Reliability of information on people with disabilities gathered by community health workers in highly consanguineous communities of Northeastern Brazil.

BACKGROUND: In Brazil, community health workers have gathered monthly information on people with disabilities to maintain the Primary Care Information System since 1998; however, few studies have used this database for scientific or public health policy purposes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of information on people with disabilities gathered by community health workers in primary care services. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional population-based study conducted in two highly consanguineous communities, involving a population of 18,458 inhabitants in Northeastern Brazil. To study the prevalence of people with disabilities, estimations performed by health workers were compared with those obtained by researchers who interviewed 15.6% of the total population. To study the agreement of the information, data on 106 people with disabilities completed independently by researchers and health workers were compared to evaluate the degree of agreement for 28 variables analysed. Kappa statistics (κ) were used to calculate the inter-rater agreement. RESULTS: The prevalence of disability estimated by community health workers was 3.01 and 2.00% for city A and B, respectively, while the percentages obtained by researchers were 6.72 and 5.65%, respectively, showing an underestimation of prevalence according to community health workers. The Kappa index value obtained for all data analysed (2,589 items excluding losses) was 0.808 (p < 0.01), indicating an almost perfect consistency of information collected by health workers compared to by researchers. CONCLUSION: Community health workers collected information with a high degree of reliability, although the identification of the prevalence of disabled individuals was potentially impaired due to the work process.