RESUMO
Differences in drug metabolism associated with UGT1A1 polymorphism could result in individualized local response to hepatic chemoembolization with irinotecan-eluting beads (DEBIRI) or predictable toxicities. Five patients with inoperable hepatic metastases from colorectal or anal malignancies treated with DEBIRI were assessed for UGT1A1 mutations. No difference in area under the curve (AUC) for SN38 in normal liver and tumor tissue samples was noted with variant or wild-type UBT1A1 (P = .16 and P = .05, respectively). Plasma SN-38 AUC was significantly lower in wild-type compared to variant patients (P < .0001). UGT1A1 genotype may not be predictive of hematologic toxicity after DEBIRI.
Assuntos
Quimioembolização Terapêutica/métodos , Irinotecano/farmacocinética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Inibidores da Topoisomerase I/farmacocinética , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioembolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Feminino , Genótipo , Glucuronosiltransferase/genética , Glucuronosiltransferase/metabolismo , Humanos , Irinotecano/administração & dosagem , Irinotecano/efeitos adversos , Irinotecano/sangue , Neoplasias Hepáticas/sangue , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Biológicos , Mutação , Testes Farmacogenômicos , Variantes Farmacogenômicos , Fenótipo , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Inibidores da Topoisomerase I/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Topoisomerase I/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Topoisomerase I/sangue , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine if the ≥ 15 mm threshold currently used to define PIRADS 5 lesions is the optimal size threshold for predicting high likelihood of clinically significant (CS) cancers. MATERIALS: Three hundred and fifty-eight lesions that may be changed from category 4 to 5 or vice versa on the basis of the size criterion (category 4: n = 288, category 5: n = 70) from 255 patients were evaluated. Kendall's tau-b statistic accounting for inter-lesion correlation, generalized estimation equation logistic regression, and receiver operating curve analysis evaluated two lesion size-metrics (lesion diameter and relative lesion diameter-defined as lesion diameter/prostate volume) for ability to identify CS (Gleason grade ≥ 3 + 4) cancer at targeted biopsy. Optimal cut-points were identified using the Youden index. Analyses were performed for the whole prostate (WP) and zone-specific sub-cohorts of lesions in the peripheral and transition zones (PZ and TZ). RESULTS: Lesion diameter showed a modest correlation with Gleason grade (WP: τB = 0.21, p < 0.0001; PZ: τB = 0.13, p = 0.02; TZ: τB = 0.32, p = 0.001), and association with CS cancer detection (WP: AUC = 0.63, PZ: AUC = 0.59, TZ: AUC = 0.74). Empirically derived thresholds (WP: 14 mm, PZ: 13 mm, TZ: 16 mm) performed similarly to the current ≥ 15 mm standard. Lesion relative lesion diameter improved identification of CS cancers compared to lesion diameter alone (WP: τB = 0.30, PZ: τB = 0.24, TZ: τB = 0.42, all p < 0.0001). AUC also improved for WP and PZ lesions (WP: AUC = 0.70, PZ: AUC = 0.68, and TZ: AUC = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: The current ≥ 15 mm diameter threshold is a reasonable delineator of PI-RADS category 4 and category 5 lesions in the absence of extraprostatic extension to predict CS cancers. Additionally, relative lesion diameter can improve identification of CS cancers and may serve as another option for distinguishing category 4 and 5 lesions.
Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Idoso , Biópsia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estudos Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Próstata/patologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
The National Institutes of Health has established a clinical transplant research program focusing on translational research in kidney transplantation. The program has been developed with a multidisciplinary approach under a common administrative structure that integrates transplant physicians and surgeons with clinical laboratory and data analysis support personnel. The program has achieved excellent clinical outcomes despite focusing exclusively on investigational methods and serving a diverse and medically complex patient population. Novel approaches toward consenting, computer integration, and tissue acquisition have been layered over interventional and observational studies to serve the scientific mission while delivering quality transplant care.