Comparison of Four Methods for Streptococcus pneumoniae Capsular Typing.

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal capsular-type identification is essential for monitoring the epidemiology of pneumococcal infections and for establishing the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccines. The objective of this work was to compare the accuracy of four methods of Streptococcus pneumoniae capsular typing. METHODS: A prospective blind study was carried out at Donostia University Hospital (northern Spain) to determine the capsular types of 50 pneumococcal clinical isolates using four techniques: a) S. PneumoStripTM: a reverse-hybridization strip-based commercial assay that detects 76 pneumococcal serotypes: 42 individually and 34 in pairs. b) FAF-mPCR: a single-step multiplex-PCR (polymerase chain reaction) assay combined with fragment analysis using automated fluorescent capillary electrophoresis, which can differentiate 92 serotypes in a single tube: 31 individually, 28 in pairs, and 33 in groups of 3 to 5 serotypes. c) PCRSeqTyping: which enables the detection of 91 serotypes after sequencing the regions of the cpsB gene in two steps: 59 directly and the remaining 32 serotypes in a second step. d) The Quellung reaction. RESULTS: The S. PneumoStripTM, FAF-mPCR and PCRSeqTyping identified the serotypes of all the 50 clinical isolates. With the Quellung reaction 46/50 (92%) isolates were correctly serotyped. The quickest technique was the S. PneumoStripTM, followed by the single-step multiplex PCR assay and PCRSeqTyping. The Quellung reaction was the slowest technique. CONCLUSIONS: The S. PneumoStripTM, PCRSeqTyping, and FAF-mPCR were very accurate techniques for pneumococcal serotyping, with S. PneumoStripTM obtaining results more rapidly. The combination of any of these S. pneumoniae molecular typing techniques and the Quellung reaction as confirmation reference method is a highly precise and fast strategy for the serotyping of high number of pneumococcal clinical isolates.

Antibacterial activity testing methods for hydrophobic patterned surfaces.

One strategy to decrease the incidence of hospital-acquired infections is to avoid the survival of pathogens in the environment by the development of surfaces with antimicrobial activity. To study the antibacterial behaviour of active surfaces, different approaches have been developed of which ISO 22916 is the standard. To assess the performance of different testing methodologies to analyse the antibacterial activity of hydrophobic surface patterned plastics as part of a Horizon 2020 European research project. Four different testing methods were used to study the antibacterial activity of a patterned film, including the ISO 22916 standard, the immersion method, the touch-transfer inoculation method, and the swab inoculation method, this latter developed specifically for this project. The non-realistic test conditions of the ISO 22916 standard showed this method to be non-appropriate in the study of hydrophobic patterned surfaces. The immersion method also showed no differences between patterned films and smooth controls due to the lack of attachment of testing bacteria on both surfaces. The antibacterial activity of films could be demonstrated by the touch-transfer and the swab inoculation methods, that more precisely mimicked the way of high-touch surfaces contamination, and showed to be the best methodologies to test the antibacterial activity of patterned hydrophobic surfaces. A new ISO standard would be desirable as the reference method to study the antibacterial behaviour of patterned surfaces.