Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 22 Suppl 3: 425-30, 2007 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18026812

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In populations with chronic illness, outcomes improve with the use of care models that integrate clinical information, evidence-based treatments, and proactive management of care. Health information technology is believed to be critical for efficient implementation of these chronic care models. Health care organizations have implemented information technologies, such as electronic medical records, to varying degrees. However, considerable uncertainty remains regarding the relative impact of specific informatics technologies on chronic illness care. OBJECTIVE: To summarize knowledge and increase expert consensus regarding informatics components that support improvement in chronic illness care. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature was performed. "Use case" models were then developed, based on the literature review, and guidance from clinicians and national quality improvement projects. A national expert panel process was conducted to increase consensus regarding information system components that can be used to improve chronic illness care. RESULTS: The expert panel agreed that informatics should be patient-centered, focused on improving outcomes, and provide support for illness self-management. They concurred that outcomes should be routinely assessed, provided to clinicians during the clinical encounter, and used for population-based care management. It was recommended that interactive, sequential, disorder-specific treatment pathways be implemented to quickly provide clinicians with patient clinical status, treatment history, and decision support. CONCLUSIONS: Specific informatics strategies have the potential to improve care for chronic illness. Software to implement these strategies should be developed, and rigorously evaluated within the context of organizational efforts to improve care.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/terapia , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Sistemas de Informação , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
2.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 14(2): 156-63, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17213491

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To understand information systems components important in supporting team-based care of chronic illness through a literature search. DESIGN: Systematic search of literature from 1996-2005 for evaluations of information systems used in the care of chronic illness. MEASUREMENTS: The relationship of design, quality, information systems components, setting, and other factors with process, quality outcomes, and health care costs was evaluated. RESULTS: In all, 109 articles were reviewed involving 112 information system descriptions. Chronic diseases targeted included diabetes (42.9% of reviewed articles), heart disease (36.6%), and mental illness (23.2%), among others. System users were primarily physicians, nurses, and patients. Sixty-seven percent of reviewed experiments had positive outcomes; 94% of uncontrolled, observational studies claimed positive results. Components closely correlated with positive experimental results were connection to an electronic medical record, computerized prompts, population management (including reports and feedback), specialized decision support, electronic scheduling, and personal health records. Barriers identified included costs, data privacy and security concerns, and failure to consider workflow. CONCLUSION The majority of published studies revealed a positive impact of specific health information technology components on chronic illness care. Implications for future research and system designs are discussed.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/terapia , Sistemas de Informação , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos , Análise Multivariada , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde
3.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 11(5): 344-50, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15187063

RESUMO

Information systems are increasingly important for measuring and improving health care quality. A number of integrated health care delivery systems use advanced information systems and integrated decision support to carry out quality assurance activities, but none as large as the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The VHA's Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) is a large-scale, multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative designed to ensure excellence in all areas where VHA provides health care services, including inpatient, outpatient, and long-term care settings. In this paper, we describe the role of information systems in the VHA QUERI process, highlight the major information systems critical to this quality improvement process, and discuss issues associated with the use of these systems.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Sistemas de Informação , Gestão da Qualidade Total , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administração , Benchmarking , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
4.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 21(12): 2231-41, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23064003

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Many veterans have dual Veterans Administration (VA) and Medicare healthcare coverage. We compared 3-year overall and cancer event-free survival (EFS) among patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer who obtained substantial portions of their care in both systems and those whose care was obtained predominantly in the VA or in the Medicare fee-for-service system. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of patients older than 65 years with stages I to III colon cancer diagnosed from 1999 to 2001 in VA and non-VA facilities. Dual use of VA and non-VA colon cancer care was categorized as predominantly VA use, dual use, or predominantly non-VA use. Extended Cox regression models evaluated associations between survival and dual use. RESULTS: VA and non-VA users (all stages) had reduced hazard of dying compared with dual users [e.g., for stage I, VA HR 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-0.56; non-VA HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38-0.78). For EFS, stage I findings were similar (VA HR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.35-0.62; non-VA HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47-0.86). Stage II and III VA users, but not non-VA users, had improved EFS (stage II: VA HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56-0.97; non-VA HR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.69-1.22; stage III: VA HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.94; non-VA HR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.62-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Improved survival among VA and non-VA compared with dual users raises questions about coordination of care and unmet needs. IMPACT: Additional study is needed to understand why these differences exist, why patients use both systems, and how systems may be improved to yield better outcomes in this population.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo/terapia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Observação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
J Rehabil Res Dev ; 47(8): 739-50, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21141302

RESUMO

Within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), anthropometric measurements entered into the electronic medical record are stored in local information systems, the national Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW), and in some regional data warehouses. This article describes efforts to examine the quality of weight and height data within the CDW and to compare CDW data with data from warehouses maintained by several of VHA's regional groupings of healthcare facilities (Veterans Integrated Service Networks [VISNs]). We found significantly fewer recorded heights than weights in both the CDW and VISN data sources. In spite of occasional anomalies, the concordance in the number and value of records in the CDW and the VISN warehouses was generally 97% to 99% or greater. Implausible variation in same-day and same-year heights and weights was noted, suggesting measurement or data-entry errors. Our work suggests that the CDW, over time and through validation, has become a generally reliable source of anthropometric data. Researchers should assess the reliability of data contained within any source and apply strategies to minimize the impact of data errors appropriate to their study population.


Assuntos
Estatura , Peso Corporal , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Índice de Massa Corporal , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organização & administração , Saúde dos Veteranos
6.
J Clin Oncol ; 28(15): 2571-6, 2010 May 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20406940

RESUMO

PURPOSE: US veterans have been shown to be a vulnerable population with high cancer rates, and cancer care quality in Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals is the focus of a congressionally mandated review. We examined rates of surgery and chemotherapy use among veterans with colon cancer at VA and non-VA facilities in California to gain insight into factors associated with quality of cancer care. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of incident colon cancer patients from the California Cancer Registry, who were > or = 66 years old and eligible to use VA and Medicare between 1999 and 2001, were observed for 6 months after diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 601 veterans with colon cancer, 72% were initially diagnosed and treated in non-VA facilities. Among veterans with stage I to III cancer, those diagnosed and initially treated in VA facilities experienced similar colectomy rates as those at non-VA facilities. Stage III patients diagnosed and initially treated in VA versus non-VA facilities had similar odds of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. In both settings, older patients had lower odds of receiving chemotherapy than their younger counterparts even when race and comorbidity were considered (age 76 to 85 years: odds ratio [OR] = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.46; age > or = 86 years: OR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.73). CONCLUSION: In California, older veterans with colon cancer used both VA and non-VA facilities for cancer treatment, and odds of receiving cancer-directed surgery and chemotherapy were similar in both systems. Among stage III patients, older age lowered odds of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in both systems. Further studies should continue to explore potential health system effects on quality of colon cancer care across the United States.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Veteranos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , California , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Hospitais de Veteranos/economia , Hospitais de Veteranos/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/economia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA