Description of the 2020 NEMSIS Public-Release Research Dataset.

BACKGROUND: The National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) is a federally funded program designed to standardize Emergency Medical Services (EMS) patient care reporting and facilitate state and national data repositories for the assessment and improvement of EMS systems of care. This manuscript characterizes the 2020 submissions to the National EMS Database, detailing the strengths and limitations associated with use of these data for public health surveillance, improving prehospital patient care, critical resource allocation, clinician safety, system quality assurance and research purposes. METHODOLOGY: Using the 2020 NEMSIS Public-Release Research Dataset (NEMSIS dataset), we evaluated the dataset completeness (i.e., presence of missing/null values), dataset content and assessed data generalizability. The analysis focused on 9-1-1 EMS activations resulting in the treatment and transport of a patient, except for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests for which all patients were included regardless of transport status. RESULTS: In 2020, 43,488,767 EMS activations were reported to the National EMS Database by 12,319 agencies serving 50 states and territories. Of the 19,533,036 9-1-1 EMS activations reportedly treating and transporting a patient, the majority were attended by "non-volunteer" clinicians (77%) working in a fire-based EMS agency (35%) certified to offer Advanced Life Support (ALS) Paramedic service (80%) and located in an urban area (82%). 9-1-1 call centers most often dispatched EMS for "sick person" (20%), while EMS clinicians most likely reported asthenia (7%) as the patient's primary symptom as well as the clinician's primary impression (6%), and documented "fall on same level, slip, or trip" as the most common cause of injury (37%). The NEMSIS dataset demonstrates some "missingness" and element inconsistencies, but methods may be employed to mitigate these data limitations. CONCLUSIONS: The National EMS Database is a free and publicly available resource for evaluating EMS system utilization, response, and prehospital patient care. Understanding the characteristics of the underlying dataset and known data limitations will help ensure proper analysis and reporting of research and quality metrics based on nationally standardized NEMSIS data.

A comparison of covariate selection techniques applied to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) drug concentration data in men and transgender women at risk for HIV.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) containing antiretrovirals tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) can reduce the risk of acquiring HIV. Concentrations of intracellular tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) measured in dried blood spots (DBS) have been used to quantify PrEP adherence; although even under directly observed dosing, unexplained between-subject variation remains. Here, we wish to identify patient-specific factors associated with TFV-DP levels. Data from the iPrEX Open Label Extension (OLE) study were used to compare multiple covariate selection methods for determining demographic and clinical covariates most important for drug concentration estimation. To allow for the possibility of non-linear relationships between drug concentration and explanatory variables, the component selection and smoothing operator (COSSO) was implemented. We compared COSSO to LASSO, a commonly used machine learning approach, and traditional forward and backward selection. Training (N = 387) and test (N = 166) datasets were utilized to compare prediction accuracy across methods. LASSO and COSSO had the best predictive ability for the test data. Both predicted increased drug concentration with increases in age and self-reported adherence, the latter with a steeper trajectory among Asians. TFV-DP reductions were associated with increasing eGFR, hemoglobin and transgender status. COSSO also predicted lower TFV-DP with increasing weight and South American countries. COSSO identified non-linear relationships between log(TFV-DP) and adherence, weight and eGFR, with differing trajectories for some races. COSSO identified non-linear log(TFV-DP) trajectories with a subset of covariates, which may better explain variation and enhance prediction. Future research is needed to examine differences identified in trajectories by race and country.

Early posthospitalization recovery after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in survivors of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the influence of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 during the first 120 days after hospital discharge. METHODS: Five academic centers conducted a retrospective analysis of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 admitted during March through May 2020. Survivors had access to a multidisciplinary postintensive care recovery clinic. Physical, psychological, and cognitive deficits were measured using validated instruments and compared based on ECMO status. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty two mechanically ventilated patients were compared with 46 patients cannulated for venovenous ECMO. Patients receiving ECMO were younger and traveled farther but there was no significant difference in gender, race, or body mass index. ECMO patients were mechanically ventilated for longer durations (median, 26 days [interquartile range, 19.5-41 days] vs 13 days [interquartile range, 7-20 days]) and were more likely to receive inhaled pulmonary vasodilators, neuromuscular blockade, investigational COVID-19 therapies, blood transfusions, and inotropes. Patients receiving ECMO experienced greater bleeding and clotting events (P < .01). However, survival at discharge was similar (69.6% vs 70.6%). Of the 217 survivors, 65.0% had documented follow-up within 120 days. Overall, 95.5% were residing at home, 25.7% had returned to work or usual activity, and 23.1% were still using supplemental oxygen; these rates did not differ significantly based on ECMO status. Rates of physical, psychological, and cognitive deficits were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that COVID-19 survivors experience significant physical, psychological, and cognitive deficits following intensive care unit admission. Despite a more complex critical illness course, longer average duration of mechanical ventilation, and longer average length of stay, patients treated with venovenous ECMO had similar survival at discharge and outcomes within 120 days of discharge.

Tenofovir-diphosphate in peripheral blood mononuclear cells during low, medium and high adherence to emtricitabine/ tenofovir alafenamide vs. emtricitabine/ tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

OBJECTIVE: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) preferentially loads peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), resulting in higher PBMC tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). No studies have yet compared TFV-DP in PBMC from lower than daily dosing between prodrugs, which has potential implications for event-driven preexposure prophylaxis and pharmacologic forgiveness. DESIGN: Two separate randomized, directly observed therapy (DOT) crossover studies (DOT-DBS and TAF-DBS) were conducted to mimic low, medium and high adherence. METHODS: HIV-negative adults were randomized to two 12-week DOT regimens of 33, 67 or 100% of daily dosing with emtricitabine (F)/TAF 200 mg/25 mg (TAF-DBS) or F/TDF 200 mg/300 mg (DOT-DBS), separated by a 12-week washout. PBMC steady-state concentrations (Css) of TFV-DP and FTC-TP were estimated using nonlinear mixed models and compared between F/TAF and F/TDF. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants contributed to 33% (n = 23), 67% (n = 23) and 100% (n = 23) of daily F/TAF regimens. Forty-four contributed to 33% (n = 15), 67% (n = 16) and 100% (n = 32) of daily F/TDF regimens. PBMC TFV-DP Css were 7.3 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 6.4-8.2], 7.1 (5.9-8.2) and 6.7- (4.4-8.9) fold higher (P < 0.0001) following F/TAF vs. F/TDF; 593 vs. 81.7, 407 vs. 57.4, and 215 vs. 32.3 fmol/106 cells, respectively. TFV-DP was 2.6 (2.1-3.1) fold higher with 33% F/TAF vs. 100% F/TDF. Estimated half-lives (95% CI) of TFV-DP in PBMC were 2.9 (1.5-5.5) days for F/TAF and 2.1 (1.5-2.9) days for F/TDF. FTC-TP was similar in both studies (P = 0.119). CONCLUSION: F/TAF produced 6.7 to 7.3-fold higher TFV-DP in PBMC vs. F/TDF across adherence levels, supporting increased potency and pharmacologic forgiveness with F/TAF in the PBMC compartment.