Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Clin Nucl Med ; 45(3): e169-e170, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31876826

RESUMO

We report herein the case of a 33-year-old woman who was referred for FDG PET/CT staging prior to pregnancy after a 4-year lost to follow-up for a breast invasive ductal carcinoma (pT2N1 SBRII). FDG PET/CT revealed right supraclavicular lymphadenopathy potentially caused by breast carcinoma recurrence. No additional site was involved. Supraclavicular ultrasonography showed typical "snowstorm" appearance. MRI revealed signs of breast implant intracapsular rupture and signal intensity of silicone within a supraclavicular node. Fine-needle aspiration and microbiopsy of adenopathy finally confirmed silicone granuloma and ruled out breast cancer recurrence.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Granuloma/diagnóstico por imagem , Granuloma/etiologia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Silicones/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia por Agulha Fina , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Feminino , Seguimentos , Granuloma/patologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Cancer Imaging ; 20(1): 58, 2020 Aug 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32787923

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To assess whether whole-body (WB) bone SPECT/CT provides additional diagnostic information over [18F]-FCH PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in the setting of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (PC-BR). METHODS: Patients referred for a PC-BR and whom benefited from a WB bone SPECT/CT and FCH PET/CT were retrospectively included. Tests were classified as positive, equivocal, or negative for bone metastases. A best valuable comparator (BVC) strategy including imaging and follow-up data was used to determine the metastatic status in the absence of systematic histological evaluation. RESULTS: Between January 2011 and November 2017, 115 consecutive patients with a PC-BR were evaluated. According to the BVC, 30 patients had bone metastases and 85 patients did not present with bone lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were respectively 86.7% [69.3-96.2], 98.8% [93.6-100.0], 96.3% [78.7-99.5], and 95.5% [89.4-98.1] for WB bone SPECT/CT and 93.3% [77.9-99.2], 100.0% [95.8-100.0], 100.0 and 97.7% [91.8-99.4] for FCH PET/CT. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy of bone metastases between WB Bone SPECT/CT (AUC 0.824 [0.74-0.90]) and FCH PET/CT (AUC 0.829 [0.75-0.90], p = 0.41). CONCLUSION: Despite good performances for the diagnosis of bone metastases in PC-BR, WB bone SPECT/CT does not provide additive diagnostic information over concomitant FCH PET/CT.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Colina/análogos & derivados , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/normas , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Tomografia Computadorizada com Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/normas , Idoso , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA