Homcology: home chemotherapy delivery in a simultaneous care project for frail advanced cancer patients.

Homcology is a project that represents both an opportunity for patients who may benefit from chemotherapy so far, but present physical and social problems that prevent day-hospital access, and a model of "no-profit" contribution to the Public Health System. Our medical oncology department conducted the project from May 2014 to January 2019. We included frail patients (G-8 < 14), with advanced disease, treated with oral, subcutaneous, or parenteral biological agents, with limitations to day-hospital access, comorbidities, and at least 6-month life expectancy. A multidisciplinary team included three oncologists, four nurses, an anesthetist, a psychologist, and a physiotherapist. Satisfaction was evaluated with FAMCARE scale. A total of 188 patients (median age of 73 years, 38-87) were enrolled. Ninety percent of patients presented with metastatic disease and a median G-8 score of 8.8 (3-13.5). All of them received anticancer treatment and concomitant supportive care; 24 patients received two or more lines of treatment. The median duration of taking care was 175 days (7-1200). A median number of 254 (195-325) nursing and 164 (139-190) medical visits were performed a year, with an average of 1.9 and 1.2 visits a month per patient respectively. The median number of in-line patients was 20 (17-25). Hospitalization occurred in 18% of cases. One-third of them died at home. The others were referred to hospice. Our experience shows that the integration of home cancer treatment and supportive care is effective. Hospitalization rate is lower than data reported in the literature. Results need to be confirmed in prospective pharmacoeconomics studies.

Concurrent and sequential initiation of ovarian function suppression with chemotherapy in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: an exploratory analysis of TEXT and SOFT.

BACKGROUND: Recent breast cancer treatment guidelines recommend that higher-risk premenopausal patients should receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as part of adjuvant endocrine therapy. If chemotherapy is also given, it is uncertain whether to select concurrent or sequential OFS initiation. DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed 1872 patients enrolled in the randomized phase III TEXT and SOFT trials who received adjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and upon randomization to an OFS-containing adjuvant endocrine therapy, initiated gonadotropin-releasing-hormone-agonist triptorelin. Breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) was compared between patients who received OFS concurrently with chemotherapy in TEXT (n = 1242) versus sequentially post-chemotherapy in SOFT (n = 630). Because timing of trial enrollment relative to adjuvant chemotherapy differed, we implemented landmark analysis re-defining BCFI beginning 1 year after final dose of chemotherapy (median, 15.5 and 8.1 months from enrollment to landmark in TEXT and SOFT, respectively). As a non-randomized treatment comparison, we implemented comparative-effectiveness propensity score methodology with weighted Cox modeling. RESULTS: Distributions of several clinico-pathologic characteristics differed between groups. Patients who were premenopausal post-chemotherapy in SOFT were younger on average. The median duration of adjuvant chemotherapy was 18 weeks in both groups. There were 231 (12%) BC events after post-landmark median follow-up of about 5 years. Concurrent use of triptorelin with chemotherapy was not associated with a significant difference in post-landmark BCFI compared with sequential triptorelin post-chemotherapy, either in the overall population (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.72-1.72; P = 0.72; 4-year BCFI 89% in both groups), or in the subgroup of 692 women <40 years at diagnosis (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.69-1.84) who are less likely to develop chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea. CONCLUSION: Based on comparative-effectiveness modeling of TEXT and SOFT after about 5 years median follow-up, with limited statistical power especially for the subgroup <40 years, neither detrimental nor beneficial effect of concurrent administration of OFS with chemotherapy on the efficacy of adjuvant therapy that includes chemotherapy was detected. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00066690 and NCT00066703.

Randomized trial on adjuvant treatment with FOLFIRI followed by docetaxel and cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for radically resected gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Some trial have demonstrated a benefit of adjuvant fluoropirimidine with or without platinum compounds compared with surgery alone. ITACA-S study was designed to evaluate whether a sequential treatment of FOLFIRI [irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/LV)] followed by docetaxel plus cisplatin improves disease-free survival in comparison with 5-FU/LV in patients with radically resected gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were randomly assigned to either FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) day 1, LV 100 mg/m(2) as 2 h infusion and 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) as bolus, days 1 and 2 followed by 600 mg/m(2)/day as 22 h continuous infusion, q14 for four cycles) followed by docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) day 1, q21 for three cycles (sequential arm) or De Gramont regimen (5-FU/LV arm). RESULTS: From February 2005 to August 2009, 1106 patients were enrolled, and 1100 included in the analysis: 562 in the sequential arm and 538 in the 5-FU/LV arm. With a median follow-up of 57.4 months, 581 patients recurred or died (297 sequential arm and 284 5-FU/LV arm), and 483 died (243 and 240, respectively). No statistically significant difference was detected for both disease-free [hazard ratio (HR) 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-1.17; P = 0.974] and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.82-1.18; P = 0.865). Five-year disease-free and OS rates were 44.6% and 44.6%, 51.0% and 50.6% in the sequential and 5-FU/LV arm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A more intensive regimen failed to show any benefit in disease-free and OS versus monotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01640782.

Long-term outcome following Helicobacter pylori eradication in a retrospective study of 105 patients with localized gastric marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of MALT type.

BACKGROUND: Treatment aimed at eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection results in lymphoma remission in most localized gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas. The aim of this survey is to investigate the long-term effect of this therapeutic approach in a large series of patients. METHODS: One hundred and five patients with localized gastric MALT lymphoma were initially treated only with H. pylori eradication regimens. Lymphoma responses were graded using the Wotherspoon score. RESULTS: Helicobacter pylori, detected by histology in 81% of cases, was eradicated in all positive patients. Histological regression of the lymphoma was achieved in 78 of 102 assessable patients [76%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 67% to 84%] with complete remission (score 0-2) in 66 and partial remission (score 3) in 12. At a median follow-up time of 6.3 years, histological remission was consistently confirmed in 33 of 74 assessable patients, while 25 had score fluctuations (from 0 to 4) and 13 presented a lymphoma relapse (score 5). Only one patient had a distant progression. Transformation to a large-cell lymphoma was seen in two cases. The 5- and 10-year overall survival is 92% (95% CI: 84% to 96%) and 83% (95% CI: 70% to 91%), respectively. Only one patient died of lymphoma after transformation to a high-grade lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: Helicobacter pylori eradication resulted in complete lymphoma remission in the majority of cases. Long-term clinical disease control was achieved in most patients. A watch and wait policy appears to be safe in patients with minimal residual disease or histological-only local relapse.

Pemetrexed in combination with oxaliplatin as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-institutional phase II study.

BACKGROUND: This clinical trial assessed the efficacy of pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin (PEMOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with untreated AGC were enrolled to evaluate response rate (RR). Patients received pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)) with vitamin supplementation and oxaliplatin (120 mg/m(2)) every 21 days for six cycles or until disease progression occurred. RESULTS: Median age was 62 years (range 26-76). The majority of patients (93%) had metastatic disease. Sixteen of the 44 patients achieved confirmed response [RR 36%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 52%]; four complete responses and 12 partial responses (complete and partial responses according to the RECIST guidelines are the confirmed-responses observed in the study population). Median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 6.2 months (95% CI 4.3-7.5) and median survival was 10.8 months (95% CI 7.7-17.2). A total of 220 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles. Most common grade 3/4 toxic effects were neutropenia in 41% of patients (19% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia in 11% of patients (4% of cycles). Treatment delays or dose reductions for toxicity occurred in 10% and 5% of cycles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PEMOX is active and well tolerated in AGC. RR, TTP, and survival were comparable to those achieved in studies using different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-oxaliplatin combinations, without the inconvenience of prolonged 5-FU schedules.

Metronomic chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer patients in the real world practice: Final results of the VICTOR-6 study.

Metronomic chemotherapy (mCHT) refers to the minimum biologically effective dose of a chemotherapy agent given as a continuous dosing regimen, with no prolonged drug-free breaks, that leads to antitumor activity. Aim of the present study is to describe the use of mCHT in a retrospective cohort of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients in order to collect data regarding the different types and regimens of drugs employed, their efficacy and safety. Between January 2011 and December 2016, data of 584 metastatic breast cancer patients treated with mCHT were collected. The use of VRL-based regimens increased during the time of observation (2011: 16.8% - 2016: 29.8%), as well as CTX-based ones (2011: 17.1% - 2016: 25.6%), whereas CAPE-based and MTX-based regimens remained stable. In the 1st-line setting, the highest ORR and DCR were observed for VRL-based regimens (single agent: 44% and 88%; combination: 36.7% and 82.4%, respectively). Assuming VRL-single agent as the referee treatment (median PFS: 7.2 months, 95% CI: 5.3-10.3), the longest median PFS were observed in VRL-combination regimens (9.5, 95%CI 88.8-11.3, HR = 0.72) and in CAPE-single agent (10.7, 95%CI 8.3-15.8, HR = 0.70). The VICTOR-6 study provides new data coming from the real-life setting, by adding new information regarding the use of mCHT as an option of treatment for MBC patients.

5-year results of cisplatin-epirubicin-vinorelbine (PEV) combination as primary chemotherapy in T2-3, N0-2 breast cancer patients: a multicentre phase II study.

UNLABELLED: The aim this study was to assess the efficacy of cisplatin-epirubicin-vinorelbine, as primary chemotherapy, in reducing the tumour burden in T2-3 N0-2 breast carcinomas. Breast conservative surgery (BCS) rate, clinical and pathological complete response (pCR), toxicity and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight women with tumours > or =2.5 cm were treated with cisplatin (P) 50 mg/m2, epirubicin (E) 100 mg/m2 and vinorelbine (V) 25 mg/m2, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Fifty-six out of the 88 patients (63.6%) underwent BCS, notably including 12/23 patients with initial tumours >5 cm. The overall clinical response was 72.8% (cCR=11.4%), pCR 20.5% and pTO+pNO 17%. No cardiac toxicity was observed. Grade 3/4 adverse events were leukopenia (9.4%), neutropenia (7.9%), nausea and vomiting (7.3%). After a median follow-up of 5 years, 24 patients (27.3%) had developed local or distant metastases. The mean DFS and OS were 51.7 (SE 2.38) and 57.02 (SE 1.98) months, respectively, and were significantly higher in pCR patients in comparison to the others (63.05 vs. 48.76, p<0.01 and 64.59 vs. 55.04, p<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: The PEV regimen was highly effective in reducing the tumour burden, especially for large tumours. The rate of pCR was similar to that obtained by other, including taxane-based regimens, and was well-tolerated. The study demonstrated the feasibility of such a regimen even in small centres, and being of low cost this combination could be of value in the application of primary therapy.

Autografting followed by nonmyeloablative immunosuppressive chemotherapy and allogeneic peripheral-blood hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation as treatment of resistant Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To investigate the use of a nonmyeloablative fludarabine-based immunosuppressive regimen to allow engraftment of HLA-sibling donors' mobilized stem cells and induction of a graft-versus-lymphoma effect for patients with advanced resistant Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with Hodgkin's disease (n = 10) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 5) were studied. All patients received cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to mobilize autologous hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Subsequently, they received high-dose therapy with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan and reinfusion of HSCs. At a median of 61 days after engraftment, patients were given fludarabine 30 mg/m(2) with cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m(2) daily for 3 days. Donor-mobilized HSC collections were prepared for fresh infusion and were not T-cell depleted. Methotrexate and cyclosporine were used to prevent graft rejection and as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. RESULTS: Combined treatment was well tolerated. After mini-allografting, hematologic recovery was prompt. Thirteen patients had 100% donor cell engraftment. Eleven patients achieved complete remission (CR) after the combined procedure. Nine patients, who were in partial remission after autografting, achieved CR after mini-allografting. Seven patients developed >/= grade 2 acute GVHD (aGVHD) and two developed extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD). Three patients who received the highest number of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) developed grade 3 GVHD (two patients) and extensive cGVHD (one patient). Ten patients are currently alive, and five are in continuous CR. Seven patients received DLI, with five CRs. Five patients died: one of progressive disease, two of progressive disease combined with aGVHD or cGVHD, one of extensive cGVHD, and one of infection. CONCLUSION: Fludarabine/cyclophosphamide was well tolerated and allowed consistent engraftment in lymphoma allografted patients. Response rates were high in this group of refractory and heavily pretreated patients. This dual procedure seems to be most promising in patients with end-stage malignant lymphomas.

Patterns of outcome and prognostic factors in primary large-cell lymphoma of the testis in a survey by the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group.

PURPOSE: To determine clinical features and patterns of outcome of primary testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective international survey of 373 patients with primary testicular DLCL. RESULTS: Most patients presented with localized disease (stage I to II), and the median age at diagnosis was 66 years (range, 19 to 91 years). Anthracycline-based chemotherapy was administered to 255 patients (68%), and prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy was given to 68 patients (18%); 133 patients (36%) received prophylactic scrotal radiotherapy. Median overall survival was 4.8 years, and median progression-free survival was 4 years. The survival curves showed no clear evidence of a substantial proportion of cured patients. A favorable international prognostic index score (IPI), no B-symptoms, the use of anthracyclines, and prophylactic scrotal radiotherapy were significantly associated with longer survival at multivariate analysis. However, even for patients with stage I disease and good-risk IPI, the outcome seems worse than what was reported for DLCL at other sites. At a median follow-up of 7.6 years, 195 patients (52%) had relapsed. Extranodal recurrence was reported in 140 cases. Relapses in CNS were detected in 56 patients (15%) up to 10 years after presentation. A continuous risk of recurrence in the contralateral testis was seen in patients not receiving scrotal radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Testicular DLCL is characterized by a particularly high risk of extranodal relapse even in cases with localized disease at diagnosis. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy, CNS prophylaxis, and contralateral testicular irradiation seem to improve the outcome. Their efficacy is under evaluation in a prospective clinical trial.

DCEP (dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin) is an effective regimen for peripheral blood stem cell collection in multiple myeloma.

DCEP (dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin) has proved to be an effective salvage therapy for refractory-relapsed MM patients. Little is known, however, about its potential as mobilizing therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of DCEP in mobilizing PBSC and to define its toxicity. Fifty-five MM patients received DCEP followed by G-CSF as part of high-dose programs including autologous transplantation. At the time of mobilization, 40 patients had previously received VAD only, and 15 alkylating agents. Mobilization was successful (minimum number of CD34(+) cells 2 x 10(6)/kg) in 48/55 patients (87%), and 41/55 patients (75%) collected >4 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells. Of the seven patients who did not mobilize stem cells, five (71%) had been previously exposed to alkylating agents. The median number of CD34(+) cells harvested was 5.8 x 10(6)/kg (range 2.1-22.4). There was no treatment-related mortality. The side-effects of DCEP were always tolerable. No neutropenia <1000/microl nor thrombocytopenia <50,000/microl were observed. No patient required transfusion as a consequence of therapy, or hospitalization for septic complications. In conclusion, DCEP, in addition to its demonstrated anti-tumor activity, is an effective regimen for mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells in myeloma patients, with little or no side-effects. These properties render DCEP a useful regimen for the debulking and mobilization phase of high-dose programs for multiple myeloma.

Increased total serum IgE concentration in patients who have undergone splenectomy after trauma.

Serum immunoglobulin and complement concentrations were evaluated in 20 patients who had undergone splenectomy after trauma. The concentrations of IgE and IgA in the patients were significantly increased compared with those in controls. The IgE values were not correlated with the time after splenectomy or IgA, IgG, IgM, IgD, C3, and C4 values.

Clinical features, treatment and outcome in a series of 93 patients with low-grade gastric MALT lymphoma.

The purpose of this paper is to report the clinical characteristics and treatment outcome following different therapeutic approaches in a large series of patients with primary low-grade MALT lymphoma of the stomach. A total of ninety-three patients (median age 63 years) were reviewed. The patients were treated by different modalities (local treatment alone, combined treatment, chemotherapy, antibiotics alone); seven patients refused any treatment. The antibiotic-treated group of patients was prospectively followed with regular endoscopic biopsies, and their responses were histologically evaluated. The 5-years projected overall survival is 82% (95% C.I.; 67%-91%) in the series as a whole. Second tumors were observed in 21.5% of the patients in this series (95% CI 14%v to 31%). There was no apparent difference in overall survival and event-free survival between patients who received different treatments. In the antibiotic-treated group histologic regression of MALT lymphoma was documented in 67% of patients (95% CI 51% to 80%). In conclusion the indolent nature of the disease justifies a conservative approach. The use of antibiotics as first-line therapy may avert or at least postpone the indication for surgical resection in the majority of patients.

Phase II study of an all-oral combination of vinorelbine with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Combination of intravenous (i.v.) vinorelbine and capecitabine was shown to be feasible and effective in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In an effort to improve patient convenience and to prolong infusion-free survival, we investigated in first-line treatment a regimen combining oral vinorelbine and capecitabine in a phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients (median age, 60 years) with MBC received the combination consisting of oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) bid given from day 1 to day 14 in an open-label, multicentre phase II study [the recommended doses were established in a phase I study (Nolé et al. in Ann Oncol 17:332-339, 2006)]. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent of the patients had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and 81% presented with visceral involvement. The median number of administered cycles per patient was 7 (range 1-18). Twenty-three responses were documented and validated by an independent panel review, yielding response rates of 44.2% (95% CI, 30.5-58.7) in the 52 enrolled patients and 54.8% (95% CI, 38.7-70.2) in the 42 evaluable patients. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 8.4 and 25.8 months, respectively. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity but complications were uncommon, only one patient having experienced febrile neutropenia. Other frequently reported adverse events included, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and constipation, stomatitis and hand-foot syndrome, which were rarely severe. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen combining oral vinorelbine with capecitabine is effective and manageable in the first-line treatment of MBC. Oral vinorelbine on days 1, 8 and 15 with capecitabine from days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks represents a convenient option which offers an all-oral treatment to the patients and prolongs their infusion-free survival.

MGMT methylation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: validation of quantitative methylation-specific PCR and comparison with MGMT protein expression.

AIMS: (1) To validate a quantitative real time methylation specific PCR assay (MethyLight) for the detection of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene methylation status (MS) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). (2) To determine the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of the MGMT protein and correlate it with MS. Both IHC and MethyLight results were compared with patient's outcome. METHODS: 71 patients with primary nodal DLBCL were studied. MGMT immunoreactivity was detected using a specific monoclonal antibody. The MS of MGMT gene was analysed in 52/71 DLBCL using MethyLight. A selected subset of 40 DLBCL was also analysed using qualitative methylation-specific PCR (MSP). Statistical analysis of overall survival (OS), lymphoma-specific survival (LSS) and progression free survival (PFS) was performed according to IHC and MS results. RESULTS: 19/71 DLBCLs (27%) were MGMT-negative at IHC; all were analysed, together with 33/52 MGMT-positive DLBCLs. MethyLight showed a better performance than MSP. There was a good correlation between the presence of MGMT expression and the unmethylated status; the absence of IHC expression was poorly correlated with the presence of methylation. Better OS, LSS and PFS was found in DLBCLs with MGMT gene methylation. DLBCLs not expressing MGMT at IHC showed a longer PFS. CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative real-time methylation-specific PCR assay for the detection of MGMT gene hypermethylation has been validated for the first time in DLBCL. Immunohistochemistry seems to represent an useful preliminary test to identify unmethylated cases; MS analysis may be performed in non-immunoreactive cases to identify truly methylated DLBCLs, which bear a better prognosis.

Hepatic radiofrequency under CT-fluoroscopy guidance.

PURPOSE: This study was done to assess the effectiveness and advantages of computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy as a guide for locating and treating lesions that are not amenable to ultrasound (US) guidance, and to evaluate the CT signs of immediate technical success and the short-term results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over the past year, we selected 14 patients (four women and ten men; mean age 73, range 61-83 years) out of 103 candidates for hepatic radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The 14 lesions comprised seven residual tumours after combined embolisation and US-guided RFA of a large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which were indistinguishable from necrosis or surrounding healthy parenchyma; two HCC nodules in locations that were inaccessible by US; five metastases (two from renal carcinoma, two from colorectal adenocarcinoma and one from lung carcinoma), of which one could not be distinguished from the surrounding healthy parenchyma on US and four were inaccessible by US. Lesion diameters were between 1.4 and 3.5 cm. The procedures were performed in the CT room with anaesthesiological assistance using a coaxial LeVeen needle electrode (14 gauge, 2-to 4-cm array diameter). Immediate technical success was evaluated by multidetector CT (MDCT), and follow-up was carried out with MDCT at 3 and 6 months and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Immediate technical success was obtained in 13/14 patients; one case required further placement of the electrode due to incomplete ablation of a hypervascular lesion. In 2/3 metastatic lesions with portal vein supply, there were no recurrences at 3 and 6 months; in 1/3, we observed disease progression, with the appearance of additional nodules at 6 months. The two metastases with arterial supply showed no signs of recurrence at 3 months; one case developed a recurrence along the ablation margin, with the appearance of satellite nodules at 6 months. In two HCC nodules, there was immediate technical success and no recurrence at 3 and 6 months. Of the seven residual tumours of HCC, all treated with immediate technical success, we observed disease progression, with the appearance of satellite nodules at 3 months in one case, at 6 months in another and at 12 months in another; 3/7 patients were free of disease at 12-month follow-up; 1/7 died 5 months later due to causes unrelated to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: CT fluoroscopy is overcoming the limitations of CT in locating and treating lesions with different hepatic vascularisation and those unamenable to US; furthermore, it reduces the length of the procedure, thanks to the faster and more accurate placement of the needle electrode. MDCT proved to be a reliable method in the assessment of immediate and short-term results of RFA.

Uracil/ftorafur/leucovorin combined with irinotecan (TEGAFIRI) or oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of randomised phase II study.

This randomised phase II study evaluates the safety and efficacy profile of uracil/tegafur/leucovorin combined with irinotecan (TEGAFIRI) or with oxaliplatin (TEGAFOX). One hundred and forty-three patients with measurable, non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer were randomised in a multicentre study to receive TEGAFIRI (UFT 250 mg m(-2) day days 1-14, LV 90 mg day days 1-14, irinotecan 240 mg m(-2) day 1; q21) or TEGAFOX (UFT 250 mg m(-2) day days 1-14, LV 90 mg day days 1-14, oxaliplatin 120 mg m(-2) day 1; q21). Among 143 randomised patients, 141 were analysed (68 received TEGAFIRI and 73 TEGAFOX). The main characteristics of the two arms were well balanced. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (13% of cases with TEGAFIRI; 1% in the TEGAFOX group). Diarrhoea was prevalent in the TEGAFIRI arm (16%) vs TEGAFOX (4%). Six complete remission (CR) and 19 partial remission (PR) were recorded in the TEGAFIRI arm (odds ratio (OR): 41.7; 95% confidence limit (CL), 29.1-55.1%), and six CR and 22 PR were recorded in the TEGAFOX group, (OR: 38.9; 95% CL, 27.6-51.1). At a median time follow-up of 17 months (intequartile (IQ) range 12-23), a median survival probability of 20 and 19 months was obtained in the TEGAFIRI and TEGAFOX groups, respectively. Median time to progression was 8 months for both groups. TEGAFIRI and TEGAFOX are both effective and tolerable first-line therapies in MCRC patients. The employment of UFT/LV given in doublet combination is interesting and the presented data appear comparable to equivalent infusion regimens described in the literature. The safety profile of the two combinations also allows an evaluation with other biological agents such as monoclonal antibodies.

Patterns of survival in mantle cell lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The term mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) describes a subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that includes those lymphomas previously defined as centrocytic lymphoma, intermediate lymphocytic lymphoma, and mantle zone lymphoma. Since MCL has only recently been recognised as a distinct entity, the clinical literature is sparse and very little information is available about its treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively attempted to analyse the clinical features and outcome of 65 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) treated from 1979 to 1993 at two institutions in the same geographic area. Univariate (Log-rank test) and multivariate (Cox regression) analyses of the major prognostic factors were performed. RESULTS: At the time of analysis the median follow-up was 49 months. Median age was 64 years with a range of 27-85 years. The male to female ratio was 2:1. Forty-seven patients (72%) had stage IV at presentation and 20 (31%) had B-symptoms at presentation. The patients usually presented with generalised adenopathy (78% of cases) and bone marrow involvement (58%). Serum LDH were analysed at diagnosis in 61 patients and found to be elevated in 30%. beta 2-Microglobulin was determined at presentation in 42 patients and was higher than normal in 54% of them. In comparison with the other subtypes of NHLs in our series, MCL appears to have a very poor survival pattern. The median overall survival was 42 months. The CR rate was 51% with a median DFS of 44 months. Good performance status, normal LDH, normal beta 2-microglobulin, younger age (< 65 years), and a low prognostic risk according to the International Index were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with a better outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of the patients in this study appear to be in general agreement with those in most of the previously reported series except for the somewhat lower rate of bone marrow infiltration observed in this series. Despite the limitations of a retrospective analysis and the lack of randomization between the treatment options, this study seems to suggest a survival advantage with anthracycline-containing regimens in some patients with MCL. However, this benefit was evident only for the patients with favourable International Index prognostic scores (i.e., low- and to low-intermediate-risk disease) who may already have a better prognosis. Patients with intermediate-high and high-risk disease according to the International Index have a poor prognosis regardless of the type of therapy given.