Outcomes of emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with cardiogenic shock: A multicenter retrospective study.

Rescue transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with cardiogenic shock is challenging, and there is limited literature on these critical patients. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR, feasibility and safety of the procedure, and 1-year mortality factors. Thirty-eight patients with severe aortic disease and cardiogenic shock admitted to two French hospitals from 2015 to 2019 were included. The patients were critical, 78.9% of them had a left ventricular ejection fraction of <30%, and all of them received inotropic support. "Valve-in-valve" procedures were performed in 15.8% and 13.2% underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty before TAVR. Edwards Sapien3® and Medtronic CoreValve EvolutR® were used. The survival probability remained reasonable for patients with cardiogenic shock who underwent rescue TAVR. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.9% and 21.1% at 1 year. No patient died during the intervention. The procedure was safe, with few complications except for acute kidney failure, the development of a left bundle branch block, and the need for pacemaker implantation. Both functional and echocardiographic results were good at 1 year, although 29% of the patients underwent rehospitalization within 1 year. The development of a left bundle branch block was found to be a mortality risk factor. This procedure is a safe and effective therapy with acceptable survivorship in critically ill patients. The benefits to their quality of life should be evaluated in future studies, and the need for providing early cardiac resynchronization therapy must be emphasized.

Mitral valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring procedures: Midterm outcomes in a French nationwide registry.

OBJECTIVES: Report contemporary outcomes in patients included in the Mitragister registry and treated with transcatheter mitral valve implantation for failed surgical annuloplasty rings or deteriorated bioprosthesis. BACKGROUND: Midterm survival rates have been reported, but little is known about contemporary morbimortality endpoints. METHODS: The primary safety outcome was the technical success rate. The primary efficacy composite endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalizations. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2021, 102 patients (median age: 81 [74;84] years, 61% female, Euroscore II 11.0% [7.8;16.0]) undergoing valve-in-valve (ViV; n = 89) or valve-in-ring (ViR; n = 13) procedures were consecutively included. At baseline, ViR group patients had worse left ventricular ejection fraction (50% vs. 60%; p = 0.004) and more frequently severe regurgitation (46% vs. 15%; p = 0.014). The primary safety outcome was 95%: 77% and 98% in the ViR and ViV populations, respectively, (p = 0.014). At intermediate follow-up (6-12 months) clinical improvement was notable, 88% of the patients were in NYHA class ≤ II (vs. 25% at baseline; p < 0.001). At a mean follow-up of 17.1 ± 11.0 months, the primary efficacy composite reached 27%. By multivariate analysis, paravalvular leak (PVL) was the only independent predictor (hazard ratio: 2.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-5.29; p = 0.031) while ViR was not found statistically associated (p = 0.456). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the safety and efficacy of the mitral ViV procedure. ViR patients appear at higher risk of procedural complications. The presence of PVL could be associated with markedly worse midterm prognosis. Whatever the intervention, procedural strategies to reduce PVL incidence remain to be assessed to prevent latter adverse outcomes.

Management and outcomes of ventricular septal defects after acute myocardial infarction: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The mortality rate of patients with post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal defects (VSDs) is high, and the benefit of surgery is unclear. We aimed to investigate the management and outcomes of post-MI VSD over a 10-year period in a large cohort. METHODS: Data of patients with post-MI VSD admitted in three French university hospitals from 2008 to 2019 were examined. The characteristics of those who underwent surgery were compared with those who received medical treatment. Mortality risk factors, survival curves, and outcomes at 30 days and 1 year after treatment were determined. RESULTS: Of the 92 patients whose data were examined, 50 underwent surgery and 42 received exclusive medical treatment. All patients were critically ill. Overall, 76.1% of patients received inotropic support, and 63% received mechanical ventilation. Circulatory assistance, mainly via intra-aortic balloon pump and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, was provided to 46.7% patients, with 14.1% requiring a second assistance. The median time to surgery was 4 days. At 1 year, mortality was 46% in those who underwent surgery and 83.3% in those treated medically (p < .001). Survival curves at 1 and 3 months showed major differences, and the survival rate showed little change 30 days after treatment. Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest emerged as risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our retrospective, multicenter study, the mortality resulting from post-MI VSD did not seem to improve over the last decade. Although surgery carried considerable risks, it improved survival.

Standardized fractal bench test evaluation of coronary stents: Performances in bifurcation lesions treated by the re-proximal optimization technique.

BACKGROUND: Bifurcation lesions in coronary arteries are complex to treat with coronary stents, which are not designed for that purpose and can be unproperly deployed. Moreover, devices are constantly evolving, and so are angioplasty techniques. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the performances of different stents in the treatment of bifurcation lesions using the re-proximal optimization technique (rePOT). METHODS: Eleven stent platforms were evaluated: Xience Sierra (Abbott), Xience Alpine (Abbott), Synergy (Boston), Coroflex Isar (Bbraun), Cobra PzF (Celonova), Ultimaster (Terumo), Resolute Integrity (Medtronic), Resolute Onyx (Medtronic), Optimax (Hexacath), Orsiro (Biotronik), and Absorb (Abbott). Stents were deployed in a silicone fractal bifurcation model using the rePOT. Micro-computed tomography was performed to assess side branch ostium coverage and strut malapposition, as well as the effect of rePOT on stent cell area. RESULTS: Our study showed significant differences between stent platforms regarding side branch ostium coverage (p = .002). The Synergy and Cobra PzF stents were the most performant devices to avoid ostium coverage. Strut malapposition varied significantly between devices (p = .008) but the percentage of malapposed struts was relatively low. Significant differences were observed between stents regarding the cell area before (p = .002) and also after rePOT (p = .003), and the increase in cell area caused by rePOT varied considerably between devices (p = .08). CONCLUSION: This study highlighted significant differences in the performances of stent platforms deployed in a fractal bifurcation model using rePOT, with a variable impact of the procedure on stent cell area.

Standardized Bench Test Evaluation of Biomechanical Characteristics of Stents Used in Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Revalvulation.

PURPOSE: Pre-stenting of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is commonly performed before percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI), to relieve obstruction, prevent valved stent fractures, and provide a landing zone. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of the stents currently used to perform pre-stenting of the RVOT. METHODS: We assessed five commercially available stents: Cheatham-Platinum Stent ("CP Stent"), AndraStent XL, AndraStent XXL, Optimus XL, and Optimus XXL. Following stent deployment at nominal pressure, radial and longitudinal elastic recoils and radial resistance were measured. The bending stiffness of the stents crimped onto the balloons was also evaluated. RESULTS: Three samples were tested for each stent. Our study showed no significant difference between the stent platforms in terms of radial elastic recoil, which was relatively low (< 10%). The longitudinal elastic recoil was also low for all the devices (< 5%). Significant differences were observed in radial resistance (P < 0.001). CP Stent and AndraStent XL exhibited the highest radial resistances. The bending stiffnesses of the stents crimped on their balloons were significantly different (P < 0.00001). Optimus XL and XXL were more flexible than the other stents. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the significant differences between the stents currently used in RVOT pre-stenting. Stents with good radial resistance are preferred, especially for calcified vessels, and flexibility is crucial for tortuous vessels. We proposed an algorithm for selecting the most suitable stent according to the need for radial force and flexibility, which will help inform clinicians considering RVOT revalvulation.

ECMO Alone Versus ECPELLA in Patients Affected by Cardiogenic Shock: The Multicenter EVACS Study.

The objective was to investigate the outcomes of concomitant venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and left ventricular unloading with Impella (ECPELLA) compared with ECMO alone to treat patients affected by cardiogenic shock. Data from patients needing mechanical circulatory support from 4 international centers were analyzed. Of 438 patients included, ECMO alone and ECPELLA were adopted in 319 (72.8%) and 119 (27.2%) patients, respectively. Propensity score matching analysis identified 95 pairs. In the matched cohort, 30-day mortality rates in the ECMO and ECPELLA were 49.5% and 43.2% ( P = 0.467). The incidences of complications did not differ significantly between groups ( P = 0.877, P = 0.629, P = 1.000, respectively). After a median follow-up of 0.18 years (interquartile range 0.02-2.55), the use of ECPELLA was associated with similar mortality compared with ECMO alone (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.54-1.20, P = 0.285), with 1-year overall survival rates of 51.3% and 46.6%, for ECPELLA and ECMO alone, respectively. ECMO alone and ECPELLA are both effective strategies in patients needing mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock, showing similar rates of early and mid-term survival.

Impella for the Management of Ventricular Septal Defect Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A European Multicenter Registry.

Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a rare but severe complication of myocardial infarction (MI). Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) can be used as a bridge to VSD closure, heart transplantation, or ventricular assist device. We describe the use of Impella device in this context based on a multicenter European retrospective registry (17 centers responded). Twenty-eight post-MI VSD patients were included (Impella device were 2.5 for 1 patient, CP for 20, 5.0 for 5, and unknown for 2). All patients were in cardiogenic shock with multiple organ failure (SAPS II 41 [interquantile range {IQR} = 27-53], lactate 4.0 ± 3.5 mmol/L) and catecholamine support (dobutamine 55% and norepinephrine 96%). Additional temporary MCS was used in 14 patients (50%), mainly extracorporeal life support (ECLS) (n = 9, 32%). Severe bleedings were frequent (50%). In-hospital and 1 year mortalities were 75%. Ventricular septal defect management was surgical for 36% of patients, percutaneous for 21%, and conservative for 43%. Only surgically managed patients survived (70% in-hospital survival). Type and combination of temporary MCS used were not associated with mortality (Impella alone or in combination with intra-aortic balloon pump [IABP] or ECLS, p = 0.84). Impella use in patients with post-MI VSD is feasible but larger prospective registries are necessary to further elucidate potential benefits of left ventricular unloading in this setting.

Sapien 3 Embolization From Ventricle to Aorta in the Setting of Noncalcified Aortic Regurgitation.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is currently used off-label for noncalcified aortic valve regurgitation and therefore is restricted to selected cases. In this setting we describe a rare complication of Sapien 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) embolization from the left ventricle to the descending aorta. Given their technical challenges, such procedures require specific considerations and management. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Adult-onset Still's disease revealed by a complete atrioventricular block, totally regressive under corticosteroid therapy.

We report the case of a 40-year-old veterinary surgeon who was admitted for spiking fevers, arthralgia, and a complete atrioventricular block. Tests revealed an inflammatory syndrome, hepatic cytolysis, neutrophilic leukocytosis, and increased troponin levels. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed a small myocarditis but no tissue abnormality on the conduction pathways. In the absence of evidence-based infection and favorable evolution under broad spectrum antibiotherapy, an adult-onset Still's disease was suspected and corticosteroid therapy administered. Evolution was then impressively favorable, with a persistent sinus heart rhythm 3 days later. Learning objective: Febrile conductive disorders occurring during a systemic disorder with negative infection and auto-immunity work-up should lead to consider an adult-onset Still's disease, which can be treated and cured, especially with steroids. Moreover, fever, polyarthritis, neutrophilic leukocytosis, pericarditis, and myocarditis should lead to consideration of adult-onset Still's disease.

Radiopacity of Coronary Stents, an In Vitro Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: Interventional cardiology devices and especially stents are constantly evolving. A good radiopacity is essential to properly position the stent and to reduce the risk of complications during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We wanted to assess the radiopacity of coronary stents. METHODS: 9 stents were evaluated. Stents were deployed in a silicon bifurcation model and several pulsed fluoroscopy acquisitions (7.5 and 15 pulses/s) of each device were performed in a catheterization laboratory. Quantitative radiopacity assessment was performed using a radiopacity visual scale and qualitative radiopacity assessment was performed by showing the images to three experienced operators, single-blind. RESULTS: Our study showed statistically significant differences between stents regarding radiopacity assessed in a quantitative analysis (p < 0.000001) or a qualitative analysis (p < 0.000001), whether the acquisitions were made in 7.5 or 15 pulses/s. Resolute Onyx and Synergy were the most radio-opaque in both qualitative and qualitative analysis. Moreover, there was a statistically significant correlation between the radiopacity of stents, their strut thickness (p < 0.0001) and the presence of platinum in their metallic alloy (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study highlighted significant differences in the radiopacity of coronary stents deployed in a bench test model. The strut thickness and the presence of platinum increased the radiopacity.