Metron factor-1 prevents liver injury without promoting tumor growth and metastasis.

UNLABELLED: Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is the most powerful hepatotrophic factor identified so far. However, the ability of HGF to promote tumor cell "scattering" and invasion raises some concern about its therapeutic safety. We compared the therapeutic efficacy of HGF with that of Metron Factor-1 (MF-1), an engineered cytokine derived from HGF and the HGF-like factor macrophage stimulating protein (MSP), in mouse models of acute and chronic liver injury. At the same time, we tested the ability of HGF and MF-1 to promote tumor growth, angiogenesis, and invasion in several mouse models of cancer. We show that (1) MF-1 and HGF stimulate hepatocyte proliferation in vitro; (2) MF-1 and HGF protect primary hepatocytes against Fas-induced and drug-induced apoptosis; (3) HGF but not MF-1 induces scattering and matrigel invasion of carcinoma cell lines in vitro; (4) HGF but not MF-1 promotes migration and extracellular matrix invasion of endothelial cells in vitro; (5) MF-1 and HGF prevent CCl(4)-induced acute liver injury as measured by alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, histology, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick-end labeling (TUNEL) analysis, and phospho-histone-3 immunostaining; (6) MF-1 and HGF attenuate liver fibrosis caused by chronic CCl(4) intoxication and promote regeneration as measured by Sirius red staining, alpha-smooth muscle actin immunostaining, and Ki-67 analysis; (7) HGF but not MF-1 promotes tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis in a variety of xenograft models; (8) HGF but not MF-1 promotes intrahepatic dissemination of hepatocarcinoma cells injected orthotopically. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that MF-1 is as effective as HGF at preventing liver injury and at promoting hepatocyte regeneration, but therapeutically safer than HGF because it lacks proangiogenic and prometastatic activity.

VEGF and VEGFR-2 immunohistochemistry in human melanocytic naevi and cutaneous melanomas.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) play a key role in vasculogenesis and angiogenic sprouting, which are crucial for tumour development and metastasis. In order to determine their possible role in the acquisition of metastatic potential throughout melanocytic tumour progression, VEGF and VEGFR-2 immunohistochemical expression were evaluated in 36 human melanocytic tumours of the skin (24 malignant melanomas and 12 common naevi). Different VEGFR-2 immunostaining patterns were detected in the vast majority of melanomas (21/24; 88%). A nuclear membrane-like pattern was mainly associated with in situ and microinvasive melanomas, whereas a combined cytoplasmic membrane and nuclear membrane-like pattern was seen in invasive melanomas. A nuclear membrane-like pattern was also observed in 83% (10/12) of common naevi. Cytoplasmic immunostaining for VEGF was observed in 72% (8/11) of in situ/microinvasive melanomas, 84% (11/13) of invasive melanomas and 91% (11/12) of naevi. CD31 was also investigated as an immunohistochemical marker for microvessel density (MVD) evaluation. No associations were found between MVD and VEGF/VEGFR-2 expression. Taken together, these data indicate that VEGF production is a common event in benign melanocytic tumours, whereas VEGFR-2 expression, co-localized in the cytoplasmic and nuclear membrane, is associated with progression towards invasive melanoma. The role exerted by VEGF/VEGFR-2, however, seems to be independent of the development of a tumour-related capillary network.