A Model for Rapid Transition to Virtual Care, VA Connecticut Primary Care Response to COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, health care delivery in the USA has been structured around in-person visits. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced a shift to virtual care models in order to reduce patient exposure to high-risk environments and to preserve valuable health care resources. This report describes one large primary care system's model for rapid transition to virtual care (RTVC). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A RTVC model was implemented at the VA Connecticut Health Care System (VACHS), which delivers care to over 58,000 veterans. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The RTVC model included immediate virtual care conversion, telework expansion, implementation of virtual respiratory urgent care clinics, and development of standardized note templates. PROGRAM EVALUATION: Outcomes include the rates of primary encounter types, staff teleworking, and utilization of virtual respiratory urgent care clinics. In under 2 weeks, most encounters were transitioned from in-person to virtual care, enabling telework for over half of the medical staff. The majority of virtual visits were telephone encounters, though rates of video visits increased nearly 18-fold. DISCUSSION: The RTVC model demonstrates expeditious and sustained transition to virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our experiences help inform institutions still reliant on traditional in-person visits, and future pandemic response.

Screening for prostate cancer: are digital rectal examinations being performed?

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer is common and prostate cancer screening is controversial; this retrospective observational study was conducted to determine the prevalence of digital rectal examination (DRE) in those in whom a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test was performed. METHODS: A manual review was performed of the electronic medical record for male veterans in the VA Connecticut Healthcare System without a history of known prostate cancer aged between 50 and 74 years who underwent PSA testing. MAIN OUTCOMES: Documentation of DRE (or refusal) within 12 months before or after the performance of a PSA test. RESULTS: Less than half (47.6%) of patients underwent DRE. An additional 6.9% were offered DRE and refused. Although the provider gender was not associated with DRE, resident physicians were less likely to perform DRE than nonresidents; P = 0.01. Patients whose PSA was > 4.0 ng/mL were more likely to undergo DRE than those whose PSA was ≤ 4.0 ng/mL; P = 0.002. Those with body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m 2 were less likely to undergo DRE than those with BMI < 30 kg/m 2 ; P = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for prostate cancer remains controversial. We found a low rate of DRE among veterans in whom prostate cancer screening was entertained. Although the provider gender does not seem to influence DRE, resident physicians were less likely to perform DRE than other providers. Our finding that BMI > 40 kg/m 2 is associated with a lower rate of DRE than those with BMI < 30 kg/m 2 is consistent with screening for other cancers and should be explored further.