Magnetic resonance perfusion-weighted imaging defines angiogenic subtypes of oligodendroglioma according to 1p19q and EGFR status.

1p19q LOH has been shown to predict radio- and chemosensitivity and prolonged survival in oligodendrogliomas (OLs). We have recently shown that magnetic resonance perfusion-weighted imaging (MR-PWI) may be useful in predicting the histopathological grade or cytogenetic type of oligodendroglial neoplasms. MR-PWI allows noninvasive determination of relative tumor blood volume (rTBV), which may reflect the degree of neoplastic angiogenesis and metabolism. The present study was aimed to correlate rTBV to the angiogenic markers and EGFR expression in oligodendroglial tumors with 1p/19q LOH or 1p LOH (Group 1) and 1p19q intact alleles or 19q LOH (Group 2), respectively. In WHO grade II neoplasms, Group 1 showed significantly greater rTBV than Group 2 (P = 0.013). However, the differences between Group 1 and Group 2 were not significant in grade III tumors. Probe-based real-time RT-PCR analyses showed that 12% of Group 2 high-grade tumors with intact 1p19q exhibited dramatic EGFR overexpression (designated EGFR-high). Grade III neoplasms showed a significantly higher rTBV than grade II neoplasms. Group 1 tumors showed significantly higher rTBV than Group 2 tumors, independent of the EGFR-high subtype. Real-time RT-PCR analyses showed increased expression of VEGF, CD31 and CD105 in Group 1 tumors as compared to Group 2 tumors, excluding the EGFR-high subtype. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed a significant association of rTBV with 1p19q LOH, and expression of EGFR and VEGF. Therefore, the combined use of extensive molecular profiling and advanced MR imaging modalities may improve the accuracy of tumor grading, provide prognostic information, and has the potential to influence treatment decisions.

Clinical evaluation of a portable near-infrared device for detection of traumatic intracranial hematomas.

The purpose of this multicenter observational clinical study was to evaluate the performance of a near-infrared (NIR)-based, non-invasive, portable device to screen for traumatic intracranial hematomas. Five trauma centers collected data using the portable NIR device at the time a computed tomography (CT) scan was performed to evaluate a suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI). The CT scans were read by an independent neuroradiologist who was blinded to the NIR measurements. Of 431 patients enrolled, 365 patients were included in the per-protocol population analyzed. Of the 365 patients, 96 were determined by CT scan to have intracranial hemorrhages of various sizes, depths, and anatomical locations. The NIR device demonstrated sensitivity of 88% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.9,95.0%), and specificity of 90.7% (95% CI 86.4,93.7%), in detecting the 50 intracranial hematomas that were large enough to be clinically important (larger than 3.5 mL in volume), and that were less than 2.5 cm from the surface of the brain. For all 96 cases with intracranial hemorrhage, regardless of size and type of hemorrhage, the sensitivity was 68.7% (CI 58.3,77.6%), and specificity was 90.7% (CI 86.4,93.7%). These results confirm the results of previous studies that indicate that a NIR-based portable device can reliably screen for intracranial hematomas that are superficial and of a size likely to be of clinical importance. The NIR device cannot replace CT scanning in the diagnosis of TBI, but the device might be useful to supplement clinical information used to triage TBI patients, and in situations in which CT scanning is not readily available.

A panel of neuron-enriched proteins as markers for traumatic brain injury in humans.

Surrogate markers have enormous potential for contributing to the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic evaluation of acute brain damage, but extensive prior study of individual candidates has not yielded a biomarker in widespread clinical practice. We hypothesize that a panel of neuron-enriched proteins measurable in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood should vastly improve clinical evaluation and therapeutic management of acute brain injuries. Previously, we developed such a panel based initially on the study of protein release from degenerating cultured neurons, and subsequently on rodent models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and ischemia, consisting of 14-3-3beta, 14-3-3zeta, three distinct phosphoforms of neurofilament H, ubiquitin hydrolase L1, neuron-specific enolase, alpha-spectrin, and three calpain- and caspase-derived fragments of alpha-spectrin. In the present study, this panel of 11 proteins was evaluated as CSF and serum biomarkers for severe TBI in humans. By quantitative Western blotting and sandwich immunoassays, the CSF protein levels were near or below the limit of detection in pre-surgical and most normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) controls, but following TBI nine of the 11 were routinely elevated in CSF. Whereas different markers peaked coordinately, the time to peak varied across TBI cases from 24-96 h post-injury. In serum, TBI increased all four members of the marker panel for which sandwich immunoassays are currently available: a calpain-derived NH(2)-terminal alpha-spectrin fragment and the three neurofilament H phosphoforms. Our results identify neuron-enriched proteins that may serve as a panel of CSF and blood surrogate markers for the minimally invasive detection, management, mechanistic, and therapeutic evaluation of human TBI.

Who will consent to emergency treatment trials for subarachnoid hemorrhage?

OBJECTIVES: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a devastating disorder that still requires much clinical study. However, the decision to participate in a randomized clinical trial, particularly a neuroemergency trial, is a complex one. The purposes of this survey were to determine who would participate in a randomized clinical trial that intended to examine transfusion practices after SAH, to identify who could serve as potential proxy decision-makers, and to find which patient characteristics were associated with the decision to participate. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire, composed of a brief description of the proposed trial followed by questions about participation using a 5-point Likert scale. Information sought included potential decision-maker, demographic data, setting and reason for current health care access, and personal or family history of neurologic injury. RESULTS: Nine-hundred five subjects were enrolled during emergency department (ED) visits, office visits, hospital admissions, or online, during a 1-month period: 63% were women and 46% were white. Nonneurologic problems were the leading reason (90%) for health care access, but 45% had a personal or family history of neurologic injury. Overall, 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 51% to 57%) of subjects stated they would definitely or probably consent to participate. No subject characteristics were associated with this decision: age (p = 0.28), sex (p = 0.16), race/ethnicity (p = 0.07), education (p = 0.44), religion (p = 0.42), clinical setting (p = 0.14), reason for visit (p = 0.58), and/or history of neurologic injury (p = 0.33). The vast majority (88%) identified a family member as the proxy decision-maker, again without differences among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Greater than half of respondents stated they would participate in a proposed emergency treatment trial for SAH. Our survey suggests that the decision to participate is highly individualized, because no demographic, pathologic, historical, or access-related predictors of choice were found. Educational materials designed for this type of trial would need to be broad-based. Family members should be considered as proxy decision-makers where permitted by federal and local regulations.