Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Radiosurgery: a Further Evolution in the Management of Brain Metastases.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent randomized evidence has supported the use of resection followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as standard of care for patients with a limited number of brain metastases. However, there are known toxicities, including a relatively high incidence of leptomeningeal disease. Neoadjuvant SRS has been proposed to minimize these potential sequalae. This review summarizes the current data and principles for neoadjuvant SRS. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently published studies have demonstrated neoadjuvant SRS to be feasible and to achieve similar oncological outcomes to postoperative SRS. A decreased incidence of leptomeningeal disease and radionecrosis has been observed. Additionally, neoadjuvant SRS can improve accuracy of target volume delineation and decrease the volume of irradiated normal tissue. Neoadjuvant SRS has emerged as a promising sequencing management approach. Its main advantages appear to be in reduction of toxicity. Ongoing trials will further explore this treatment method and establish which patients will benefit most from this technique.

Practical considerations of single-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy to the lung.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a well-established treatment for patients with medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pulmonary oligometastases. The use of single-fraction SABR in this setting is supported by excellent local control and safety profiles which appear equivalent to multi-fraction SABR based on the available data. The resource efficiency and reduction in hospital outpatient visits associated with single-fraction SABR have been particularly advantageous during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the increased interest, single-fraction SABR in subgroups of patients remains controversial, including those with centrally located tumours, synchronous targets, proximity to dose-limiting organs at risk, and concomitant severe respiratory illness. This review provides an overview of the published randomised evidence evaluating single-fraction SABR in primary lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases, the common clinical challenges faced, immunogenic effect of SABR, as well as technical and cost-utility considerations.

Long-term survival following chemoradiation for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To measure long-term survival following combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Two prospective Phase I/II studies in the multidisciplinary Lung Service of a dedicated cancer hospital in Victoria, commencing in 1996 and 1997-1998. PATIENTS: 33 patients referred for treatment of histologically or cytologically proven inoperable non-small cell lung cancer, who had no evidence of distant metastases, Karnofsky performance status > 70%, weight loss < 10%, and no prior treatment for lung cancer. Patients were followed until death or for a minimum of 9 years. INTERVENTIONS: Patients in both studies were treated concomitantly with chemotherapy and radiotherapy 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Chemotherapy in the first study (LURTCE) consisted of cisplatin and etoposide; in the second study (LURTCF), chemotherapy consisted of escalating doses of carboplatin and fluorouracil. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall survival. RESULTS: Six of 33 patients were still alive 9 years after commencement of treatment. Median survival for the whole group was 2.1 years (95% CI, 1.3-3.1 years), with 18% (95% CI, 8%-35%) of patients still alive at 5 years (plateau). CONCLUSION: Long-term survival can be achieved in some patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer treated by radical chemoradiation alone, suggesting the possibility of cure.