Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 19(1): 67, 2018 03 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29499666

RESUMO

The utility of nanotechnology in medicine, specifically within the field of orthopedics, is a topic of extensive research. Our review provides a unique comprehensive overview of the current and potential future uses of nanotechnology with respect to orthopedic sub-specialties. Nanotechnology offers an immense assortment of novel applications, most notably the use of nanomaterials as scaffolds to induce a more favorable interaction between orthopedic implants and native bone. Nanotechnology has the capability to revolutionize the diagnostics and treatment of orthopedic surgery, however the long-term health effects of nanomaterials are poorly understood and extensive research is needed regarding clinical safety.


Assuntos
Nanoestruturas/administração & dosagem , Nanotecnologia/métodos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Ortopedia/métodos , Doenças Ósseas/patologia , Doenças Ósseas/terapia , Humanos , Nanotecnologia/tendências , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/tendências , Ortopedia/tendências , Próteses e Implantes/tendências
2.
Sports Health ; 12(1): 94-98, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31665613

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mixed results exist regarding the benefit of orthobiologic injections. The purpose of this study was to assess the variability in costs for platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and stem cell (SC) injections and evaluate for variables that influence pricing. HYPOTHESIS: There will be significant variability in the cost of PRP and SC injections throughout the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: Calls were made to 1345 orthopaedic sports medicine practices across the United States inquiring into the availability of PRP or SC knee injections and associated costs. In addition to pricing, the practice type, number of providers, and population and income demographics were recorded. Univariate statistical analyses were used to identify differences in availability and cost between variables. RESULTS: Of the contacted offices that provided information on both PRP and SC availability (n = 1325), 268 (20.2%) offered both treatments, 550 (41.5%) offered only PRP injections, 20 (1.5%) offered only SC injections, and 487 (36.8%) did not offer either treatment. The mean ± SD cost of a PRP injection was $707 ± $388 (range, $175-$4973), and the mean cost of an SC injection was $2728 ± $1584 (range, $300-$12,000). Practices offering PRP and SC injections tended to be larger (PRP, 12.0 physicians per practice vs. 8.1 [P < 0.001]; SC, 13.6 vs 9.7 [P < 0.001]). Practices that offered PRP injections were located in areas with higher median household income (P = 0.047). Variables associated with higher cost of PRP injections included city population (P < 0.001) and median income of residents (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While the majority of sports medicine practices across the United States offer some type of orthobiologic injection, there exists significant variability in the cost of these injections. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates the significant variability in costs of orthobiologic injections throughout the country, which will allow sports medicine physicians to appreciate the value of these injections when counseling patients on available treatment options.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Traumatismos do Joelho/economia , Traumatismos do Joelho/terapia , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas , Células-Tronco , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Humanos , Renda , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Traumatismos do Joelho/epidemiologia , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA