The concomitant use of lapatinib and paracetamol - the risk of interaction.

Lapatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for the treatment of breast cancer. Paracetamol is an analgesic commonly applied to patients with mild or moderate pain and fever. Cancer patients are polymedicated, which involves high risk of drug interactions during therapy. The aim of the study was to assess the interaction between lapatinib and paracetamol in rats. The rats were divided into three groups of eight animals in each. One group received lapatinib + paracetamol (IL + PA), another group received lapatinib (IIL), whereas the last group received paracetamol (IIIPA). A single dose of lapatinib (100 mg/kg b.w.) and paracetamol (100 mg/kg b.w.) was administered orally. Plasma concentrations of lapatinib, paracetamol and its metabolites - glucuronide and sulphate, were measured with the validated HPLC-MS/MS method and HPLC-UV method, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters of both drugs were calculated using non-compartmental methods. The co-administration of lapatinib and paracetamol increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) of lapatinib by 239.6% (p = 0.0030) and 184% (p = 0.0011), respectively. Lapatinib decreased the paracetamol AUC0-∞ by 48.8% and Cmax by 55.7%. In the IL + PA group the Cmax of paracetamol glucuronide was reduced, whereas the Cmax of paracetamol sulphate was higher than in the IIIPA group. Paracetamol significantly affected the enhanced plasma exposure of lapatinib. Additionally, lapatinib reduced the concentrations of paracetamol. The co-administration of lapatinib decreased the paracetamol glucuronidation but increased the sulphation. The findings of this study may be of clinical relevance to patients requiring analgesic therapy.

THE EFFECT OF TOTAL AND PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY ON THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF INTRAVENOUS PARACETAMOL IN HUMANS.

Paracetamol is one of the most common analgesic and antipyretic drugs. Recently intravenous paracetamol has been widely used to treat moderate postoperative pain. Surgery is the main method of treatment of renal cancer. Total or partial nephrectomy can be performed, depending on the size and location of the tumor. Pharmacokinetics of drugs may depend on the type of surgery. The aim of the study was to compare the postinfusion pharmacokinetics of paracetamol in patients after total nephrectomy (TN) and nephron sparing surgery (NSS).The research was carried out on two groups of patients after nephrectomy: total (TN n = 37; mean [SD], age, 60.4 [10.9] years; BMI, 26.5 [3.8] kg/m2; creatinine clearance, Cl, 80.9 [37.1] mL/min) and nephron sparing surgery (NSS n = 17; 57.9 [16.5] years; BMI, 29.5 [5.3] kg/m2; Cl, 97.6 [27.8] mL/min). The patients were treated with paracetamol (PerfalganO Bristol-Myers Squibb) at an intravenous dose of 1.000 mg, which was infused for 15 minutes after surgery. The concentrations of paracetamol in the patients' plasma were determined by the HPLC method with UV detection (X = 261 run). The main pharmacokinetic parameters of paracetamol in the TN vs. NSS group were as follows: C.. 29.08 [17.39] vs. 27.54 [15.70] pg/mL (p = 0.6692); AUC5, 29.24 [13.86] vs. 34.85 [14.28] pg.h/mL (p = 0.2896); AUMC5,,,, 47.58 [26.08] vs. 62.02 [27.64] pg-h/mL (p = 0.1345); to. 2.34 [0.96] vs. 1.93 [0.50] h (p = 0.1415), respectively. In both groups the exposure to paracetamol was comparable. The t1/2 after nephron sparing surgery was shorter than after total nephrectomy. Therefore, these patients may demand more frequent drug administration. In the NSS group the C. of the analgesic was considerably reduced in men.

Influence of obesity on pharmacokinetics and analgesic effect of ketoprofen administered intravenously to patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Ketoprofen is an analgesic drug commonly applied in the postoperative period, e.g., to patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Many patients who undergo this procedure are obese. As pathophysiological changes are observed in obesity, the efficacy of ketoprofen may be altered in this group of patients. The aim of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters and analgesic effect of ketoprofen administered to obese and non-obese patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: The study was conducted on 41 patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, who were divided into two groups: obese (n = 21) and non-obese (n = 20). Ketoprofen was administered intravenously at a dose of 100 mg. Plasma ketoprofen concentrations were measured by means of validated high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the drug were calculated using the non-compartmental method. Additionally, pain intensity was assessed during the study using NRS scale. RESULTS: The obese patients had significantly lower AUC0-∞ (1.4-fold), AUMC0-t (1.8-fold), AUMC0-∞ (3.2-fold), MRT0-t (1.4-fold), MRT0-∞ (2.3-fold), t0.5 (2.3-fold) and Vz/kg (2.3-fold) and higher kel (2.2-fold) than the non-obese group. Moreover, 4 h and 6 h after the administration of the drug, pain intensity was significantly higher in the obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: The drug was eliminated faster and the analgesic effect of ketoprofen in the obese patients was decreased as compared with the non-obese subjects. However, pain intensity did not increase to the level, which required additional analgesic treatment. Therefore, it seems that dosage adjustment of intravenous ketoprofen is not necessary in obese patients.

Influence of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on the Pharmacokinetics of Tramadol After Single Oral Dose Administration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The number of overweight, obese and diabetic patients is constantly increasing. Metabolic disorders may affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs, e.g., by altering the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes. Tramadol is a commonly used analgesic metabolised mainly via CYP2D6 to its active metabolite, O-desmethyltramadol. The aim of the study was to assess the influence of overweight, obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus on tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol pharmacokinetics. METHODS: All patients received a single oral dose (100 mg) of tramadol. The plasma concentrations of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol were measured with the validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with fluorescence detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol were calculated by non-compartmental methods. RESULTS: After nephrectomy, the patients were divided into four groups-a control group (n = 12, mean [SD] age 61 [14] years, body mass index (BMI) 22 [2] kg/m2, CLcr (creatinine clearance) 74 [30] mL/min); an overweight group (n = 15, mean [SD] age 63 [11] years, BMI 27 [1] kg/m2, CLcr 81 [35] mL/min); an obese group (n = 12, mean [SD] age 57 [8] years, BMI 33 [4] kg/m2, CLcr 113 [51] mL/min); and an obese and diabetic group (n = 9, mean [SD] age 64 [10] years, BMI 33 [4] kg/m2, CLcr 87 [35] mL/min). Apart from the time to first occurrence of maximal concentration (tmax), there were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol among the groups. Moreover, there were no significant differences in the O-desmethyltramadol/tramadol ratios among the four groups of patients after nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were found in the pharmacokinetics of tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol, indicating that the opioid can be administered to overweight, obese and diabetic patients without dosage adjustment.

The Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Glucuronidation and Sulphation of Paracetamol in Patients with Febrile Neutropenia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Numerous studies have confirmed the influence of diabetes mellitus on the pharmacokinetics of drugs. Paracetamol (APAP) is an antipyretic that is commonly used in febrile neutropenia (FN) therapy. APAP is chiefly metabolised by glucuronidation and sulphation. This study assessed the influence of diabetes on the pharmacokinetics of paracetamol and its metabolites: glucuronide (APAP-glu) and sulfate (APAP-sulfate) in FN patients. METHODS: Patients with FN received single intravenous dose 1000 mg of APAP. The FN patients were allocated to one of two groups: diabetics (DG, n = 7) or non-diabetics (NDG, n = 11). The plasma concentrations of paracetamol and its metabolites were measured with the validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet (UV) detection. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters (mean [SD]) of APAP in the DG and NDG groups were as follows: Cmax (maximum comcentration) = 21.50 [11.23] vs. 23.42 [9.79] mg/L, AUC0-t (area under the concentration-time curve) = 44.23 [17.93] vs. 41.43 [14.57] mg·h/L, t1/2kel (elimination half-life) = 2.28 [0.80] vs. 2.11 [0.80] h. In both groups the exposure to APAP was comparable. The study did not reveal differences between the two groups in the pharmacokinetics of APAP-glu and APAP-sulfate. The Cmax and AUC0-t ratio between the metabolites and APAP were similar. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in the pharmacokinetics of APAP, APAP-glu and APAP-sulfate in patients with FN indicates that diabetes does not influence glucuronidation and sulfatation of paracetamol.

The pharmacokinetics of oral ketoprofen in patients after gastric resection.

BACKGROUND: Total and partial gastric resection may affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs, especially orally administered a few days after surgery. Ketoprofen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) broadly used to treat postoperative pain, including patients after gastric resection. The aim of the research was to analyse the pharmacokinetics (PK) of orally administered ketoprofen in patients after gastrectomy. METHODS: The research was carried out on two groups of patients after total (TG; Roux-Y procedure) and partial (PG; Billroth II procedure) gastrectomy. The patients in group TG (n=15; mean [SD] age 61.86 [14.15] years; and BMI 24.20 [3.73] kg/m2) and group PG (n=5; mean [SD] age 62.40 [16.80] years; and BMI 23.98 [3.45] kg/m2) received ketoprofen in a single oral dose of 100mg. The measurement of ketoprofen plasma concentrations was made by means of the HPLC (high performance liquid chromatography) method. RESULTS: The PK parameters in group TG and PG were as follows: maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), 3.42 [0.99] and 4.66 [0.81] mg/l (p=0.0220); area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞), 9.12 [2.78] and 9.17 [2.87] mg×h/ml (p=0.9734); area under the first moment curve from zero to the time of infinity (AUMC0-∞), 25.95 [8.52] and 26.53 [11.43] mg×h2/l (p=0.9056); time to reach maximum concentration (tmax), 0.47 [0.25] and 0.55 [0.27] h (p=0.5327), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lower concentrations of ketoprofen in patients after gastrectomy suggest that it might be necessary to apply higher dose of the analgesic.