A Simulation Study to Evaluate Improvements in Anesthesia Work Environment Contamination After Implementation of an Infection Prevention Bundle.

BACKGROUND: Microbiological contamination of the anesthesia work environment (AWE) is a potential source of health care-associated infections. Medication syringes, stopcocks, and many other areas are routinely contaminated during anesthetic care, and adherence to hand hygiene recommendations is poor. Using a simulation model, we investigated whether AWE contamination could be reduced by implementing an intervention bundle focused on infection prevention. METHODS: Twenty-five anesthesia providers were enrolled in this nonrandomized simulation scenario crossover design study. Subjects were asked to complete 2 general anesthesia scenarios in a mock operating room: a baseline scenario and an intervention scenario in which the bundle was implemented. The bundle included: double gloving before intubation, confining all airway equipment to 1 area, and performing hand hygiene before touching the anesthesia cart. Before each scenario, a manikin's oropharynx and face were marked with ultraviolet fluorescent tracers. After each scenario, the AWE was inspected with a ultraviolet light source to detect contaminant, and all sites were photographed. A blinded observer scored the images for the presence or absence of tracer at 20 sites. Videos of the scenarios were analyzed for duration and number of hand hygiene and glove removal events. Data were analyzed using a mixed effects model. Subjects completed a survey about their experience and the value of the scenarios. RESULTS: The intervention was associated with a decreased subject contamination score of 4.0 (95% confidence interval, 2.2-5.6; P < .001), a 27% reduction in score between baseline and intervention scenarios. Some sites were universally contaminated despite the intervention (eg, laryngoscope handles). The intervention had a statistically significant impact on reducing contamination on medication syringes and the anesthesia cart. There was no significant difference in time needed to complete baseline and intervention scenarios. The majority of subjects felt that the simulations had significant value and would affect their future clinical behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the concept of an infection prevention bundle in reducing AWE contamination. Anesthesia providers deliver care in a unique environment in which "clean" and "contaminated" tasks are performed rapidly and often in parallel. Linking hand hygiene to specific high-impact tasks such as administering medications, designating areas for contaminated equipment, and double gloving before airway management are simple steps that can be implemented rapidly and are compatible with timely patient care. Our study has improved awareness of infection prevention issues in our department, and has highlighted simple and achievable actions that have the potential to reduce health care-associated infections.

Resurgence of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases in the United States: Anesthetic and Critical Care Implications.

Vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) such as measles and pertussis are becoming more common in the United States. This disturbing trend is driven by several factors, including the antivaccination movement, waning efficacy of certain vaccines, pathogen adaptation, and travel of individuals to and from areas where disease is endemic. The anesthesia-related manifestations of many VPDs involve airway complications, cardiovascular and respiratory compromise, and unusual neurologic and neuromuscular symptoms. In this article, we will review the presentation and management of 9 VPDs most relevant to anesthesiologists, intensivists, and other hospital-based clinicians: measles, mumps, rubella, pertussis, diphtheria, influenza, meningococcal disease, varicella, and poliomyelitis. Because many of the pathogens causing these diseases are spread by respiratory droplets and aerosols, appropriate transmission precautions, personal protective equipment, and immunizations necessary to protect clinicians and prevent nosocomial outbreaks are described.

Functional Recovery After Lung Resection: A Before and After Prospective Cohort Study of Activity.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative recovery is an important measure in thoracic operations. Personal activity monitors can be used to track progress in the preoperative and postoperative settings. This study investigates associations of preoperative activity, lung resection extent, and operative approach with inpatient and outpatient functional recovery as measured by activity monitors. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, patients undergoing lung resection at a single institution wore activity monitors 30 days before through 30 days after operation (between July 2015 and May 2017). Activity was recorded as steps per day, and each patient served as his or her own baseline. Patients were clustered into three activity level groups. Associations among preoperative and postoperative activity, length of stay (LOS), and operative approach were assessed by using generalized regression models with adjustment for patient demographic and clinical characteristics and operative details. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients comprised the study cohort and were grouped by average preoperative activity: low, 21 patients (31.8%); moderate, 27 patients (40.9%); and high, 18 patients (27.3%). The mean age was 66.1 ± 11.6 years; 32 patients (48.5%) were women. Sex, comorbidity, resection extent, and operative approach did not differ among groups. After adjustment for age, comorbidities, resection extent, operative approach, and complications, higher levels of preoperative activity were independently associated with higher postoperative activity in both inpatient and outpatient settings (ß = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.22, p = 0.04; ß = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.30, p = 0.001) but not LOS. CONCLUSIONS: LOS is not associated with measures of preoperative or postoperative physical activity after adjustment for several factors. However, the association between preoperative activity and postoperative activity, irrespective of age, operative approach, resection extent, and other factors, offers a potential framework for designing recovery trajectory pathways and intervention development in both postoperative inpatient and outpatient settings.

Anesthetic Challenges in an Adult with Pierre Robin Sequence, Severe Juvenile Scoliosis, and Respiratory Failure.

Anesthesiologists have the privilege and challenge of providing care for an extremely diverse population of patients, at times in urgent or emergent situations. We present a case of a 31-year-old woman with Pierre Robin sequence, severe juvenile scoliosis, and respiratory failure who underwent successful awake nasal fiberoptic intubation for tracheostomy at an adult tertiary care medical center. Familiarity with patient conditions infrequently encountered within our practice, as well as adherence to practice guidelines, proved essential to providing our patient with the safest care possible.

A standardized anesthetic and surgical clinical pathway for esophageal resection: impact on length of stay and major outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Esophageal cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide, and esophageal resection is associated with extremely high perioperative morbidity and mortality. A perioperative clinical pathway for esophagectomy patients in which anesthetic care is both integral and standardized has not been described previously. METHODS: A continuously refined clinical pathway for perioperative care of the esophagectomy patient has been developed at the Virginia Mason Medical Center over the past 22 years. Ongoing data collection records patient demographics, comorbidities, tumor stage, and various outcomes including intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, surgical complications, and morbidity and mortality rates. RESULTS: Over time, patients presenting for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer have had significantly higher Charlson comorbidity scores and a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, liver disease, and history of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. During the same period, intensive care unit and hospital length of stays have decreased, whereas most complication rates have remained stable despite more advanced tumor stage and increased use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates are well below national averages at 0.5% each. CONCLUSIONS: We present a detailed anesthetic and surgical perioperative pathway for esophageal resection, along with evidence of improved or stable patient outcomes despite an increase in comorbidity burden and increasingly advanced tumor stage.