High throughput screening identifies dasatinib as synergistic with trametinib in low grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Low grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a distinct histotype of ovarian cancer characterised high levels of intrinsic chemoresistance, highlighting the urgent need for new treatments. High throughput screening in clinically-informative cell-based models represents an attractive strategy for identifying candidate treatment options for prioritisation in clinical studies. METHODS: We performed a high throughput drug screen of 1610 agents across a panel of 6 LGSOC cell lines (3 RAS/RAF-mutant, 3 RAS/RAF-wildtype) to identify novel candidate therapeutic approaches. Validation comprised dose-response analysis across 9 LGSOC models and 5 high grade serous comparator lines. RESULTS: 16 hits of 1610 screened compounds were prioritised for validation based on >50% reduction in nuclei counts in over half of screened cell lines at 1000 nM concentration. 11 compounds passed validation, and the four agents of greatest interest (dasatinib, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; disulfiram, aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor; carfilzomib, proteasome inhibitor; romidepsin, histone deacetylase inhibitor) underwent synergy profiling with the recently approved MEK inhibitor trametinib. Disulfiram demonstrated excellent selectivity for LGSOC versus high grade serous ovarian carcinoma comparator lines (P = 0.003 for IC50 comparison), while the tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib demonstrated favourable synergy with trametinib across multiple LGSOC models (maximum zero interaction potency synergy score 46.9). The novel, highly selective Src family kinase (SFK) inhibitor NXP900 demonstrated a similar trametinib synergy profile to dasatinib, suggesting that SFK inhibition is the likely driver of synergy. CONCLUSION: Dasatinib and other SFK inhibitors represent novel candidate treatments for LGSOC and demonstrate synergy with trametinib. Disulfiram represents an additional treatment strategy worthy of investigation.

Ovarian carcinosarcoma is highly aggressive compared to other ovarian cancer histotypes.

Background: Ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) is an unusual ovarian cancer type characterized by distinct carcinomatous and sarcomatous components. OCS has been excluded from many of the pan-histotype studies of ovarian carcinoma, limiting our understanding of its behavior. Methods: We performed a multi-cohort cross-sectional study of characteristics and outcomes in ovarian cancer patients from Scotland (n=2082) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (SEER, n=44946) diagnosed with OCS or one of the other major histotypes: high grade serous (HGSOC), endometrioid (EnOC), clear cell (CCOC), mucinous (MOC) or low grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC). Differences in overall survival were quantified using Cox regression models to calculate hazard ratios (HR). Results: Across both cohorts, OCS patients were significantly older at diagnosis compared to all other histotypes (median age at diagnosis 69 and 67 in Scottish and SEER cohorts) and demonstrated the shortest survival time upon univariable analysis. Within the Scottish cohort, 59.3% and 16.9% of OCS patients presented with FIGO stage III and IV disease, respectively; this was significantly higher than in EnOC, CCOC or MOC (P<0.0001 for all), but lower than in HGSOC (P=0.004). Multivariable analysis accounting for other prognostic factors identified OCS as independently associated with significantly shorter survival time compared to HGSOC, EnOC, LGSOC and MOC in both the Scottish (multivariable HR vs OCS: HGSOC 0.45, EnOC 0.39, LGSOC 0.26, MOC 0.43) and SEER cohorts (multivariable HR vs OCS: HGSOC 0.59, EnOC 0.34, LGSOC 0.30, MOC 0.81). Within the SEER cohort, OCS also demonstrated shorter survival compared to CCOC (multivariable HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.58-0.68), but this was not replicated within the Scottish cohort (multivariable HR for CCOC: 1.05, 95% CI 0.74-1.51). Within early-stage disease specifically (FIGO I-II or SEER localized stage), OCS was associated with the poorest survival of all histotypes across both cohorts. In the context of late-stage disease (FIGO III-IV or SEER distant stage), OCS, MOC and CCOC represented the histotypes with poorest survival. Conclusion: OCS is a unique ovarian cancer type that affects older women and is associated with exceptionally poor outcome, even when diagnosed at earlier stage. New therapeutic options are urgently required to improve outcomes.

The survival benefit associated with complete macroscopic resection in epithelial ovarian cancer is histotype-specific.

BACKGROUND: Complete macroscopic resection (CMR) is a key factor associated with prolonged survival in ovarian cancer. However, most evidence derives from high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and the benefit of CMR in other histotypes is poorly characterised. We sought to determine which histotypes derive the greatest benefit from CMR to better inform future decisions on radical cytoreductive efforts. METHODS: We performed multivariable analysis of disease-specific survival (DSS) across two independent patient cohorts to determine the magnitude of benefit associated with CMR within each histotype. RESULTS: Across both cohorts (Scottish, n = 1622; SEER, n = 18947), CMR was associated with prolonged DSS; this was more marked in the Scottish cohort (multivariable HR 0.44, 95%CI 0.37-0.52 vs 0.59, 95%CI 0.57-0.62 in SEER). In both cohorts, clear cell ovarian carcinoma (CCOC) was among the histotypes to benefit most from CMR (multivariable HR 0.23 and 0.50 in Scottish and SEER cohorts); HGSOC cases demonstrated highly significant and clinically meaningful survival benefit, but this was of lower magnitude than in CCOC and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EnOC) across both cohorts. The benefit derived in low grade serous ovarian carcinoma is also high (multivariable HR 0.27 in Scottish cohort). CMR was associated with prolonged survival in mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) patients in the SEER cohort (multivariable HR 0.65), but the associated failed to reach statistical significance in the Scottish cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The overall ovarian cancer patient population demonstrates significant survival benefit associated with CMR; however, the magnitude of benefit differs between histotypes.