Characterizing the risk of human leukocyte antigen-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation in older recipients.

Older compatible living donor kidney transplant (CLDKT) recipients have higher mortality and death-censored graft failure (DCGF) compared to younger recipients. These risks may be amplified in older incompatible living donor kidney transplant (ILDKT) recipients who undergo desensitization and intense immunosuppression. In a 25-center cohort of ILDKT recipients transplanted between September 24, 1997, and December 15, 2016, we compared mortality, DCGF, delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), and length of stay (LOS) between 234 older (age ≥60 years) and 1172 younger (age 18-59 years) recipients. To investigate whether the impact of age was different for ILDKT recipients compared to 17 542 CLDKT recipients, we used an interaction term to determine whether the relationship between posttransplant outcomes and transplant type (ILDKT vs CLDKT) was modified by age. Overall, older recipients had higher mortality (hazard ratio: 1.632.072.65, P < .001), lower DCGF (hazard ratio: 0.360.530.77, P = .001), and AR (odds ratio: 0.390.540.74, P < .001), and similar DGF (odds ratio: 0.461.032.33, P = .9) and LOS (incidence rate ratio: 0.880.981.10, P = 0.8) compared to younger recipients. The impact of age on mortality (interaction P = .052), DCGF (interaction P = .7), AR interaction P = .2), DGF (interaction P = .9), and LOS (interaction P = .5) were similar in ILDKT and CLDKT recipients. Age alone should not preclude eligibility for ILDKT.

Delayed graft function and acute rejection following HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation.

Incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients (ILDKTr) have pre-existing donor-specific antibody (DSA) that, despite desensitization, may persist or reappear with resulting consequences, including delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR). To quantify the risk of DGF and AR in ILDKT and downstream effects, we compared 1406 ILDKTr to 17 542 compatible LDKT recipients (CLDKTr) using a 25-center cohort with novel SRTR linkage. We characterized DSA strength as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF); positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC); or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC). DGF occurred in 3.1% of CLDKT, 3.5% of PLNF, 5.7% of PFNC, and 7.6% of PCC recipients, which translated to higher DGF for PCC recipients (aOR = 1.03 1.682.72 ). However, the impact of DGF on mortality and DCGF risk was no higher for ILDKT than CLDKT (p interaction > .1). AR developed in 8.4% of CLDKT, 18.2% of PLNF, 21.3% of PFNC, and 21.7% of PCC recipients, which translated to higher AR (aOR PLNF = 1.45 2.093.02 ; PFNC = 1.67 2.403.46 ; PCC = 1.48 2.243.37 ). Although the impact of AR on mortality was no higher for ILDKT than CLDKT (p interaction = .1), its impact on DCGF risk was less consequential for ILDKT (aHR = 1.34 1.621.95 ) than CLDKT (aHR = 1.96 2.292.67 ) (p interaction = .004). Providers should consider these risks during preoperative counseling, and strategies to mitigate them should be considered.

Statins Protect against Thrombosis of Cannulated Radiocephalic Fistulas in Diabetic Patients.

BACKGROUND: Radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCAVF) creation is the preferred first line hemodialysis access procedure. Analysis of diabetic rat arteriovenous fistula model indicates improved vascular function with HMG-CoA-Reductase Inhibitor (statin) use. We predict similar outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing primary RCAVF placement. METHODS: A Veterans Administration Hospital dialysis access database over a 15-year period was queried identifying all RCAVF placements in diabetic patients. Patients were stratified into statin medication usage or not at RCAVF creation. Outcomes examined include rate of successful cannulation, functional patency duration, interventions per access, and rates of access thrombosis. Thrombosis-free survival of cannulated RCAVFs were compared using Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank analysis followed by univariate, stepwise logistic regression and ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: Total number of 123 RCAVF cases were performed in 122 diabetic male patients. At the time of RCAVF placement, 92 cases were performed on patients that were taking statin medication and 31 cases were performed on patients that were not taking statin medication. There was no difference in terms of rate of successful cannulation, functional patency duration, and number of interventions per access between the statin and non-statin groups. However, rate of RCAVF thrombosis once accessed was significantly lower in the statin group compared to the non-statin group (P = 0.0005). Kaplan-Meier survival curve for each group were compared using log-rank test to reveal that diabetic patients who were on statin therapy at the time of operation had significantly higher access survival over time against thrombosis once it was cannulated for dialysis treatment compared to those who were not on statin therapy (P = 0.0003). Univariate, stepwise logistic regression model indicated statin use as the only significant factor associated with lack of thrombosis (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Statins appear to have protective effects against RCAVF thrombosis as predicted in animal models for diabetic patients undergoing primary RCAVF placements. There were similar functional outcomes in terms of rate of successful cannulation, functional patency duration, and number of interventions per access. These data should encourage further investigation of statins and their role in hemodialysis access.

Survival Benefit with Kidney Transplants from HLA-Incompatible Live Donors.

BACKGROUND: A report from a high-volume single center indicated a survival benefit of receiving a kidney transplant from an HLA-incompatible live donor as compared with remaining on the waiting list, whether or not a kidney from a deceased donor was received. The generalizability of that finding is unclear. METHODS: In a 22-center study, we estimated the survival benefit for 1025 recipients of kidney transplants from HLA-incompatible live donors who were matched with controls who remained on the waiting list or received a transplant from a deceased donor (waiting-list-or-transplant control group) and controls who remained on the waiting list but did not receive a transplant (waiting-list-only control group). We analyzed the data with and without patients from the highest-volume center in the study. RESULTS: Recipients of kidney transplants from incompatible live donors had a higher survival rate than either control group at 1 year (95.0%, vs. 94.0% for the waiting-list-or-transplant control group and 89.6% for the waiting-list-only control group), 3 years (91.7% vs. 83.6% and 72.7%, respectively), 5 years (86.0% vs. 74.4% and 59.2%), and 8 years (76.5% vs. 62.9% and 43.9%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons with the two control groups). The survival benefit was significant at 8 years across all levels of donor-specific antibody: 89.2% for recipients of kidney transplants from incompatible live donors who had a positive Luminex assay for anti-HLA antibody but a negative flow-cytometric cross-match versus 65.0% for the waiting-list-or-transplant control group and 47.1% for the waiting-list-only control group; 76.3% for recipients with a positive flow-cytometric cross-match but a negative cytotoxic cross-match versus 63.3% and 43.0% in the two control groups, respectively; and 71.0% for recipients with a positive cytotoxic cross-match versus 61.5% and 43.7%, respectively. The findings did not change when patients from the highest-volume center were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study validated single-center evidence that patients who received kidney transplants from HLA-incompatible live donors had a substantial survival benefit as compared with patients who did not undergo transplantation and those who waited for transplants from deceased donors. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.).

Hospital readmissions following HLA-incompatible live donor kidney transplantation: A multi-center study.

Thirty percent of kidney transplant recipients are readmitted in the first month posttransplantation. Those with donor-specific antibody requiring desensitization and incompatible live donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) constitute a unique subpopulation that might be at higher readmission risk. Drawing on a 22-center cohort, 379 ILDKTs with Medicare primary insurance were matched to compatible transplant-matched controls and to waitlist-only matched controls on panel reactive antibody, age, blood group, renal replacement time, prior kidney transplantation, race, gender, diabetes, and transplant date/waitlisting date. Readmission risk was determined using multilevel, mixed-effects Poisson regression. In the first month, ILDKTs had a 1.28-fold higher readmission risk than compatible controls (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.46; P < .001). Risk peaked at 6-12 months (relative risk [RR] 1.67, 95% CI 1.49-1.87; P < .001), attenuating by 24-36 months (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10-1.40; P < .001). ILDKTs had a 5.86-fold higher readmission risk (95% CI 4.96-6.92; P < .001) in the first month compared to waitlist-only controls. At 12-24 (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.95; P = .002) and 24-36 months (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.84; P < .001), ILDKTs had a lower risk than waitlist-only controls. These findings of ILDKTs having a higher readmission risk than compatible controls, but a lower readmission risk after the first year than waitlist-only controls should be considered in regulatory/payment schemas and planning clinical care.

Outcomes of kidney transplants and risk of infection transmission from increased infectious risk donors.

Concern over transmission of viral infections has been reported to result in higher discard rates of high infectious risk kidneys (HIR) although data on actual viral transmission rates are lacking. At our center, we performed 89 HIR and 533 non-HIR kidney transplants (KTs) between 2004 and 2011. Follow-up screening labs in recipients of HIR kidneys tested for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus did not reveal any cases of viral transmission over median follow-up of 4.3 years. Patient and graft outcomes were similar at 5 years between HIR and non-HIR KTs. An updated analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) registry of deceased-donor kidney transplants between 2008 and 2012 included 57 526 transplants was performed. Retrospective calculation of KDRI (kidney donor risk index) differed (P<.001) between all groups with median KDRI of 0.99 for HIR kidneys, 1.07 for non-HIR standard criteria donor kidneys, and 1.81 for non-HIR expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys. This was reflected in the significantly improved 5-year graft survival for HIR KTs when compared with non-HIR ECD KTs (84% vs 78%; P<.001). Our data can guide counseling of KT candidates about the safety and benefits of HIR kidneys.

Local allograft irradiation as an adjunct for treating severe resistant rejection after liver transplantation in adults.

Acute rejection after liver transplantation occurs in one-third of all recipients and can be managed with conventional rejection therapy in the majority of cases. In rare instances, patients with severe acute rejection may be refractory to or have contraindications for conventional therapies. This case series evaluates the role of local allograft irradiation (LAI) as an adjunct for patients with rejection that is refractory to or contraindicated for conventional therapies. Additionally, the literature on the use of radiation therapy for reversing rejection in solid organ transplantation is reviewed. Five patients underwent 9 LAI treatments: 2 had refractory rejection, and 1 each had a malignancy, a concurrent life-threatening infection, and serum sickness with antibody therapy. Conventional rejection therapies included steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and antithymocyte globulin. LAI consisted of 3 cycles of 1.5 Gy directed toward the liver allograft. Two of the 5 patients remained alive with excellent graft function. Six of the 9 treatments were successful in rescuing the liver allograft (reversing the rejection episode). Treatment success was associated with lower pretreatment serum bilirubin levels and higher pretreatment alanine aminotransferase levels. Compared with patients with immunosuppression-responsive severe acute rejection, those requiring LAI trended toward a later onset of first rejection. In conclusion, local irradiation of liver allografts can be a useful adjunct in patients for whom conventional options have been exhausted or cannot be used. The ability of LAI to reverse allograft dysfunction and promote patient survival appears to be greatest before the onset of severe cholestatic injury.

Substitution of tenofovir/emtricitabine for Hepatitis B immune globulin prevents recurrence of Hepatitis B after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) with or without nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) inhibitors has been shown to prevent recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, the use of HBIg has many disadvantages. AIMS: The present study was performed to determine if converting patients from HBIg ± NA to combination NA therapy could prevent recurrence of HBV. METHODS: Twenty-one recipients without evidence of HBV recurrence on HBIg ± NA for ≥ 6 months were enrolled. Patients received their last injection of HBIg at the time they initiated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC; Truvada(®) ) and were followed up for 31.1 ± 9.0 [range 15-47] months. RESULTS: After 1 year, 3 patients (14%) had detectable HBsAg, one of whom was non-compliant. Two of 3 with recurrence cleared HBsAg by last follow-up on TDF/FTC; the non-compliant patient became HBV DNA-undetectable with re-institution of TDF/FTC. TDF/FTC saved $12,469/year over our standard-of-care, monthly intramuscular HBIg/lamivudine. There was no evidence of a general adverse effect of TDF/FTC on renal function. However, 3 patients developed reversible acute renal failure; on renal biopsy, 1 had possible TDF/FTC-induced acute tubular necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Substitution of TDF/FTC for HBIg prevented recurrence of HBV DNA in 100% (20/20) of patients who were compliant with the medication and led to substantial cost savings over HBIg-containing regimens.

Pretransplant transcriptome profiles identify among kidneys with delayed graft function those with poorer quality and outcome.

Robust biomarkers are needed to identify donor kidneys with poor quality associated with inferior early and longer-term outcome. The occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF) is most often used as a clinical outcome marker to capture poor kidney quality. Gene expression profiles of 92 preimplantation biopsies were evaluated in relation to DGF and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to identify preoperative gene transcript changes associated with short-term function. Patients were stratified into those who required dialysis during the first week (DGF group) versus those without (noDGF group) and subclassified according to 1-month eGFR of >45 mL/min (eGFR(hi)) versus eGFR of ≤45 mL/min (eGFR(lo)). The groups and subgroups were compared in relation to clinical donor and recipient variables and transcriptome-associated biological pathways. A validation set was used to confirm target genes. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar between the DGF versus noDGF groups. A total of 206 probe sets were significant between groups (P < 0.01), but the gene functional analyses failed to identify any significantly affected pathways. However, the subclassification of the DGF and noDGF groups identified 283 probe sets to be significant among groups and associated with biological pathways. Kidneys that developed postoperative DGF and sustained an impaired 1-month function (DGF(lo) group) showed a transcriptome profile of significant immune activation already preimplant. In addition, these kidneys maintained a poorer transplant function throughout the first-year posttransplant. In conclusion, DGF is a poor marker for organ quality and transplant outcome. In contrast, preimplant gene expression profiles identify "poor quality" grafts and may eventually improve organ allocation.

Center-level Variation in HLA-incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization protocols for HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) vary across centers. The impact of these, as well as other practice variations, on ILDKT outcomes remains unknown. METHODS: We sought to quantify center-level variation in mortality and graft loss following ILDKT using a 25-center cohort of 1358 ILDKT recipients with linkage to Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for accurate outcome ascertainment. We used multilevel Cox regression with shared frailty to determine the variation in post-ILDKT outcomes attributable to between-center differences and to identify any center-level characteristics associated with improved post-ILDKT outcomes. RESULTS: After adjusting for patient-level characteristics, only 6 centers (24%) had lower mortality and 1 (4%) had higher mortality than average. Similarly, only 5 centers (20%) had higher graft loss and 2 had lower graft loss than average. Only 4.7% of the differences in mortality (P < 0.01) and 4.4% of the differences in graft loss (P < 0.01) were attributable to between-center variation. These translated to a median hazard ratio of 1.36 for mortality and 1.34 of graft loss for similar candidates at different centers. Post-ILDKT outcomes were not associated with the following center-level characteristics: ILDKT volume and transplanting a higher proportion of highly sensitized, prior transplant, preemptive, or minority candidates. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike most aspects of transplantation in which center-level variation and volume impact outcomes, we did not find substantial evidence for this in ILDKT. Our findings support the continued practice of ILDKT across these diverse centers.

Incidence of prolonged length of stay after orthotopic liver transplantation and its influence on outcomes.

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the only effective treatment for end-stage liver disease. Although most patients do well and are discharged promptly, some require prolonged length of stay (PLOS). The prevalence of PLOS, associated factors, and their impact on survival are not well defined. We reviewed our adult OLT database for patients who survived > 30 days. PLOS was defined as hospitalization > 30 days following OLT. Of 521 OLT recipients, 68 (13%) had PLOS with a median duration of 50 days versus only 10 days for patients discharged within 30 days. Significant differences in pre-OLT variables between patients with and without PLOS included the mean wait list time (P = 0.001), hospitalization at the time of OLT (P = 0.001), and prior OLT (P = 0.041). Factors independently associated with PLOS included intensive care unit status at the time of OLT [odds ratio (OR), 4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.6-10.4], OLT prior to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease implementation (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.04-5.26), in-hospital post-OLT bacterial infection (OR, 9.34; 95% CI, 4.65-18.86), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.4-14.08), renal failure (OR, 10.86; 95% CI, 5.07-23.25), and allograft rejection (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.23-11.11). One-year graft survival and patient survival were significantly less in those with PLOS (for both, P < 0.0001). Among PLOS patients, factors independently associated with increased 1-year mortality were donor age (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.009-1.13), primary diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (OR, 6.89; 95% CI, 1.40-34.48), in-hospital post-OLT bacterial infection (OR, 13.3; 95% CI, 2.11-83.33), and cardiac complications (OR, 20.4; 95% CI, 1.51-250; c-statistic for the model, 0.85). In conclusion, PLOS following OLT is associated with a significant decrease in survival despite a marked increase in cost and resource utilization. Efforts to modify those factors that contribute to PLOS may reduce this event, improve survival, and reduce OLT-associated costs.

Effect of hyponatraemia on outcomes following orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hyponatraemia increases risk of adverse outcomes following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), but it is unclear whether improvement of pretransplant hyponatraemia ameliorates post-transplant complications. AIMS: To assess impact of pretransplant hyponatraemia on post-transplant outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 213 patients with cirrhosis who underwent liver transplantation. Patients with serum sodium 130 mEq/L at transplantation ('resolved hyponatraemia'; n=56) and to those without history of hyponatraemia before transplantation ('never hyponatraemic'; n=123). Primary endpoint was survival at 180 days post-OLT. Secondary outcomes included time until discharge alive, complications during hospitalization, length of time ventilated and length of post-transplant intensive care unit stay. RESULTS: There was no survival difference at 180 days post-OLT between groups. After transplantation, patients with either hyponatraemia at OLT or resolved hyponatraemia had longer time until discharge alive and had higher rates of delirium, acute renal failure, acute cellular rejection and infection than those who were never hyponatraemic. As compared with patients with hyponatraemia at OLT, those with resolved hyponatraemia were more likely to be discharged alive within 3 weeks, but other outcomes, including survival, did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that hyponatraemia at any time before liver transplantation is associated with adverse post-transplant outcome, even when hyponatraemia has resolved.

Adult living donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation: a 10-year prospective single center experience.

It has been 4 years since the first, long-term (> 3 years) prospective comparison of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A2ALLTx) to adult deceased donor liver transplantation (ADDLTx) was reported. In this follow up, prospective, IRB approved, 10-year comparison of A2ALLTx to ADDLTx we expand on our initial observations. This data includes: age, gender, ethnicity, primary liver disease, waiting time, pretransplant CTP/MELD score, cold ischemia time (CIT), perioperative mortality, acute and chronic rejection, graft and patient survival, charges and post-transplant complications. In 10 years, 465 ADDLTx (81.3%) and 107 A2ALLTx (18.7%) were performed at VCUHS. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) was the most common reason for transplantation in both groups (54.5% vs. 48.2%). Data regarding overall patient and graft survival and retransplantation rates were similar. Comparison of patient/graft survivals, retransplantation rates in patients with and without HCV were not statistically different. A2ALLTx patients had less acute rejection (9.6% vs. 21.7%) and more biliary complications (27.1% vs. 17.6%). In conclusion, A2ALLTx is as durable a liver replacement technique as the ADDLTx. Patients with A2ALLTx were younger, had lower MELD scores, less acute rejection and similar histological HCV recurrence. Biliary complications were more common in A2ALLTx but were not associated with increased graft loss compared to ADDLTx.

Gene expression patterns in deceased donor kidneys developing delayed graft function after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation (KTx) ranges between 2% and 50%. The mechanisms leading to DGF deserve special interest because DGF exerts negative influences on long-term outcomes. We studied gene expression profiles in deceased donor kidney (DDK) biopsies with and without DGF. METHODS: Gene expression profiling was performed on donor kidney tissues from 33 DDK with the use of microarrays. DDK were classified as grafts with immediate function (non-DGF; n=21) and grafts with DGF (n=12). DGF was defined as a dialysis requirement in the first week after transplantation. Demographic donor and recipient information was collected. The robust-multiarray average method was used to estimate probe set expression summaries. Logistic regression was used to identify genes significantly associated with DGF development. RESULTS: Patients were followed for 3 months after KTx. Thirty-eight probe sets (n=36 genes) were univariably differentially expressed in DDK with DGF when compared with DDK with non-DGF (alpha=0.001). Sixty-nine probe sets (n=65 genes) were differentially expressed in DDK with DGF when compared with DDK with non-DGF after adjusting for cold ischemia time (alpha=0.001). Gene ontology terms classified the overexpressed genes in DDK with DGF as principally related to cell cycle/growth (e.g., IGFBP5, CSNK2A2), signal transduction (e.g., RASGRP3), immune response (e.g., CD83, BCL3, MX1), and metabolism (e.g., ENPP4, GBA3). TNFRSF1B was overexpressed in DDK with DGF. CONCLUSIONS: Cold ischemia time was a predictor of DGF independently of the preservation method. We identified a set of 36 genes candidates of DGF in DDK, with genes involved in the inflammatory response being the more important.

Prophylaxsis against recurrance of hepatitis B virus after liver transplantation: a retrospective analysis spanning 20 years.

Liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is associated with a high rate of graft loss and poor survival, unless re-infection can be prevented. Human hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) has long been utilized to prevent re-infection. More recently, an anti-viral agent has been utilized along with HBIG. However, the regimens utilized have varied considerably among LT programmes and the optimal regimen has never been defined. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 41 patients who underwent LT for HBV at our centre since 1985 and received either HBIG with or without an anti-viral agent. The mean age of these patients was 46 years; 81% were male and 88% white. The mean and maximal follow-up were 5.9 and 15 years respectively. Eight out of 15 E-antigen-positive patients who received HBIG alone developed recurrence after a mean of 17 months. In contrast, none of 10 E-Ag-negative patients who received HBIG alone and none of the 10 E-antigen-positive patients who received both HBIG and either lamivudine or adefovir developed recurrence. As long as the anti-HB surface remained detectable, no absolute minimum serum level appeared to lead to recurrent HBV. We concluded that recurrence of HBV following LT can be prevented in E-antigen-positive patients with a combination of HBIG and an anti-viral agent. In contrast, recurrence can be prevented in E-antigen-negative patients with HBIG alone. Maintaining a serum anti-HB surface level above a minimum arbitrary titre of 200 pg/mL did not appear to be necessary for effective HBIG prophylaxis.

Hepatitis C virus infection and kidney transplantation: predictors of patient and graft survival.

BACKGROUND: The effect of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KTx) is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of our HCV+/end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patient population based on the therapeutic option including KTx or continuation in dialysis. METHODS: KTx performed at Virginia Commonwealth University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2004 were tracked prospectively. Forty-three out of a total of 394 KTx patients included in the analysis were HCV+. A group of 52 contemporaneous HCV+/ESRD patients listed, but never transplanted, was also analyzed. HCV-negative transplanted patients were used as the control group. RESULTS: Patient survival posttransplantation was 81.4% and 68.5% at 1 and 3 years in the HCV+ group, and 97.1% and 92.9% at 1 and 3 years in the HCV- group, respectively (P=0.001). Graft survival was 81.2% and 64.1% at 1 and 3 years in the HCV+ group, and 93.2% and 84.1% at 1 and 3 years posttransplantation in the HCV- group (P=0.01). Univariate analysis identified Knodell score as a predictor of mortality in HCV+ patients (P=0.04). Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis identified deceased donor (P=0.02), previous kidney transplant (P=0.007), pretransplant diabetes (P=0.05), and Knodell Score (P=0.012) as predictors of patient mortality. Patient survival was superior in HCV+ patients undergoing KTx versus remaining on dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESRD/HCV+ benefit from KTx without achieving the excellent survival of HCV-/ESRD patients. Liver biopsy is a useful tool to identify advanced liver disease at pretransplantation time.

Establishing the molecular pathways involved in chronic allograft nephropathy for testing new noninvasive diagnostic markers.

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a cause of graft loss. The multistage processes that result in CAN are poorly understood. Noninvasive assays for detecting allograft dysfunction and predicting long-term outcomes are a priority in transplantation (Tx). METHODS: Renal tissue from kidney transplant patients (KTP) with CAN (n=11) and normal kidneys (NK; n=7) were studied using microarrays. Markers resulting from the microarray analysis (transforming growth factor [TGF]-beta, epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR], angiotensinogen [AGT]) were tested in urine (Ur) and peripheral blood (PB) samples from the CAN patients (collected at the biopsy time) using reverse-transcriptase real-time polymerase chain reaction. Ur and PB samples from long-term KTP with stable renal function (SRF; n=20) were used as control. RESULTS: Assuming unequal variances between CAN and NK, using a false discovery rate of 0.005, and running 1,000 of all possible permutations, 728 probe sets were differentially expressed. Genes related to fibrosis and extracellular matrix deposition (i.e., TGF-beta, laminin, gamma 2, metalloproteinases-9, and collagen type IX alpha 3) were up-regulated. Genes related to immunoglobulins, B cells, T-cell receptor, nuclear factor of activated T cells, and cytokine and chemokines receptors were also upregulated. EGFR and growth factor receptor activity (FGFR)2 were downregulated in CAN samples. AGT, EGFR, and TGF-beta levels were statistical different in urine but not in blood samples of CAN patients when compared to KTP with SRF (P<0.001, P=0.04, and P<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Genes related to fibrosis, extracellular matrix deposition, and immune response were found up-regulated in CAN. Markers resulting from the microarray analysis were differentially expressed in Ur samples of the CAN patients and in concordance with the microarray profiles.

Study of mRNA growth factors in urinary cells of kidney transplant recipients as predictors of chronic allograft nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is responsible for a significant proportion of graft loss. Current diagnostic methods for CAN are inadequate, and noninvasive assays for detecting allograft dysfunction/rejection and predicting long-term outcomes are a priority in transplantation. METHODS: Urine samples were collected from 48 kidney transplant recipients (KTR): 18 recipients with stable graft function (creatinine levels<2.0 mg/dL) and proteinuria of less than 500 mg/24 hr (Group 1); 18 recipients with stable graft function and proteinuria of greater than 500 mg/24 hr (Group 2); and 12 recipients with biopsy confirmed CAN. Urinary cell levels of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) mRNA or epidermal growth factor (EGF) mRNA were measured using real-time quantitative PCR assay, and levels were correlated with renal allograft status. The integrity of RNA isolated from urine sediments was also assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. RESULTS: Urinary cell TGF-beta1 mRNA levels were higher in the CAN group compared to Group 1 (P<0.0001) or Group 2 (P<0.0001). Urinary cell EGF mRNA levels were higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (P<0.0001) or the CAN group (P<0.0001). There were no significant differences in the urinary cell levels of EGF mRNA between patients with greater than 500 mg/24 hr proteinuria (Group 2) and the CAN group (P=0.75). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that urinary cell TGF-beta1 mRNA levels distinguish CAN patients from long-term transplant patients with stable renal function and varied levels of proteinuria. Urinary cells may be a good resource for the noninvasive diagnosis of CAN.

Apolipoprotein E genotypes as predictors of high-risk groups for developing hyperlipidemia in kidney transplant recipients undergoing sirolimus treatment.

BACKGROUND: Hypercholesterolemia (HCHL) and hypertriglyceridemia (HTRG) have emerged as the most significant metabolic consequences of therapy with sirolimus. Lipid status can be exacerbated by a variety of factors in the posttransplant setting, including genetic factors. Apoliprotein E (Apo E) polymorphism is an established genetic risk factor for hyperlipidemia. We studied the association between Apo E gene polymorphisms and lipids after kidney transplantation in patients undergoing sirolimus treatment. METHODS: We studied 98 kidney transplant patients (KTP) with stable renal allograft undergoing sirolimus treatment: 39 with HCHL and HTRG within 90 days postsirolimus treatment (PST) and 59 without hyperlipidemia PST. Apo E genotyping was performed using INNO-LiPA-ApoE. RESULTS: The cholesterol and the triglyceride values between the groups were 323.3+/-71.6 vs. 180.9+/-31.2 mg/dL (P<0.001) and 318.9+/-97.2 vs. 159.7+/-38.7 mg/dL (P<0.001). There was a significant difference in the genotype distribution of the hyperlipidemia and normal groups (P=0.009) with the percentages in each group as follows: E2/2 and E3/2: 12.8 vs. 5.1%; E3/3: 69.2% vs. 86.4%; and E4/3 and E4/4: 18.0% vs. 8.5%. We observed a higher number of patients with the genotype E3/3 in the group without hyperlipidemia PST (P=0.039). E3/2 and E4/4 genotype frequencies were higher in patients with hyperlipidemia PST. LDL levels in the hyperlipidemia PST group was statistical significant higher (P<0.001) and we observed an association between Apo E allelic distribution and LDL (P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Genetic factors, as Apo E genotypes, could allow the early identification of patients who are at a high risk for developing hyperlipidemia PST.

Hardikar syndrome: a case requiring liver transplantation.

We report the case of a girl with Hardikar syndrome who underwent living-donor liver transplantation at 2 years of age. This disease, described in 1992, includes a constellation of abnormalities, such as cleft lip and palate, pigmentary retinopathy, and multiple tubular stenoses (e.g., bile ducts, ureters). Other system involvement is variable. Rotation anomalies of the gut and cardiac abnormalities are frequently present. Pathogenesis remains obscure. Our patient was delivered at 33 weeks of gestation by cesarean section, and was jaundiced, with low birth weight and height. On day 5 after birth, the patient underwent Ladd's surgery for intestinal malrotation. One month later, she developed pyelonephritis and urosepsis. She remained jaundiced and a liver biopsy revealed cirrhosis with regenerating nodules, portal chronic inflammation with bile duct proliferation, and lobular cholestasis. The patient underwent several corrective operations, and at 12 months of age she was diagnosed with Hardikar syndrome. She failed to thrive and had progressive cholestasis and jaundice, coagulation disorders, bilateral ureterostomies, repetitive urinary tract infections, bilateral cleft lip and palate, retinopathy, and gut malrotation. She received a liver transplant at 24 months of age from a living donor. She has had an excellent clinical outcome in liver function without further decline of growth and development.