The Effect of Language on the Decision to Image in the Evaluation of Atraumatic Headache.

BACKGROUND: Patients with limited English proficiency seen in the emergency department (ED) experience lower quality of care and higher diagnostic resource utilization unless they are evaluated in their own language. Despite a low rate of serious pathology identified and the availability of guidelines to direct its use, computed tomography (CT) is commonly used to evaluate atraumatic headache in the ED. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether Spanish-speaking patients with atraumatic headache were more likely than their English-speaking counterparts to undergo head CT, and whether evaluation by a clinician who passed a Spanish proficiency test mitigated this difference. METHODS: This retrospective observational study used electronic health record data of adult patients presenting with atraumatic headache to a level I trauma center during a 2-year period. Spanish-language testing of clinicians consisted of a brief, unvalidated, in-person, nonmedical verbal test administered by human resources staff. RESULTS: A total of 3030 patients with atraumatic headache were identified; 1437 were English speaking and 1593 were Spanish speaking. Spanish-speaking patients were older (48.3 vs. 41.9 years), more likely to be women (68.8% vs. 60.5%), and more likely to undergo head CT (31.8% vs. 26.4%). Evaluation by a clinician who passed the Spanish proficiency test had no significant influence on the likelihood of head CT for Spanish-speaking patients after controlling for confounding variables (adjusted odds ratio 0.95; 95% CI 0.75-1.20). CONCLUSIONS: Spanish-speaking patients are more likely to undergo head CT when evaluated for atraumatic headache than English-speaking patients. Evaluation by a clinician who passed a brief Spanish proficiency test did not mitigate this disparity.

Structural competency in emergency medical education: A scoping review and operational framework.

Objectives: Existing curricula and recommendations on the incorporation of structural competency and vulnerability into medical education have not provided clear guidance on how best to do so within emergency medicine (EM). The goal of this scoping review and consensus building process was to provide a comprehensive overview of structural competency, link structural competency to educational and patient care outcomes, and identify existing gaps in the literature to inform curricular implementation and future research in EM. Methods: A scoping review focused on structural competency and vulnerability following Arksey and O'Malley's six-step framework was performed in concurrence with a multistep consensus process culminating in the 2021 SAEM Consensus Conference. Feedback was incorporated in developing a framework for a national structural competency curriculum in EM. Results: A literature search identified 291 articles that underwent initial screening. Of these, 51 were determined to be relevant to EM education. The papers consistently conceptualized structural competency as an interdisciplinary framework that requires learners and educators to consider historical power and privilege to develop a professional commitment to justice. However, the papers varied in their operationalization, and no consensus existed on how to observe or measure the effects of structural competency on learners or patients. None of the studies examined the structural constraints of the learners studied. Conclusions: Findings emphasize the need for training structurally competent physicians via national structural competency curricula focusing on standardized core competency proficiencies. Moreover, the findings highlight the need to assess the impact of such curricula on patient outcomes and learners' knowledge, attitudes, and clinical care delivery. The framework aims to standardize EM education while highlighting the need for further research in how structural competency interventions would translate to an ED setting and affect patient outcomes and experiences.

An Emergency Medicine Virtual Clerkship: Made for COVID, Here to Stay.

INTRODUCTION: Safety concerns surrounding the coronavirus 2019 pandemic led to the prohibition of student rotations outside their home institutions. This resulted in emergency medicine (EM)-bound students having less specialty experience and exposure to outside programs and practice environments, and fewer opportunities to gain additional Standardized Letters of Evaluation, a cornerstone of the EM residency application. We filled this void by implementing a virtual clerkship. METHODS: We created a two-week virtual, fourth-year visiting clerkship focused on advanced medical knowledge topics, social determinants of health, professional development, and professional identity formation. Students completed asynchronous assignments and participated in small group-facilitated didactic sessions. We evaluated the virtual clerkship with pre- and post-medical knowledge tests and evaluative surveys. RESULTS: We hosted 26 senior medical students over two administrations of the same two-week virtual clerkship. Students had a statistically significant improvement on the medical knowledge post-tests compared to pre-tests (71.7% [21.5/30] to 76.3% [22.9/30]). Students reported being exposed to social determinants of health concepts they had not previously been exposed to. Students appreciated the interactive nature of the sessions; networking with other students, residents, and faculty; introduction to novel content regarding social determinants of health; and exposure to future career opportunities. Screen time, technological issues, and mismatch between volume of content and time allotted were identified as potential challenges and areas for improvement. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that a virtual EM visiting clerkship is feasible to implement, supports knowledge acquisition, and is perceived as valuable by participants. The benefits seen and challenges faced in the development and implementation of our clerkship can serve to inform future virtual clerkships, which we feel is a complement to traditional visiting clerkships even though in-person clerkships have been re-established.