RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Universal Screening programmes to identify subjects with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) have been the subject of much recent interest. However, any screening programme can cause harm as well as having potential benefits. Here we review recent papers using different ages and strategies to identify subjects with FH, and examine to what extent the publications provide quantitative or qualitative evidence of benefit or harm to children and adults. RECENT FINDINGS: Three studies have been published over the last 2âyears where Universal Screening for FH has been carried out in infancy, at the time of routine vaccinations, or at preschool age. Next-generation sequencing of all known FH-causing genes has been used to determine the proportion of screened individuals, who have total or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations above a predetermined threshold (such as >95th percentile), with genetically confirmed FH. SUMMARY: While we fully support the concept of Universal Screening for FH, which appears feasible and of potential clinical utility at all of the different ages examined, there is little data to document potential benefit or how to mitigate potential harms. Future study protocols should include collection of such data to strengthen the case of roll out of Universal Screening programmes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Statins, ezetimibe and statins-ezetimibe combination therapy are recommended lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH). However, their relative effectiveness is not well understood. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of these therapies using direct and indirect comparisons. METHODS: We conducted systematic review, pairwise and network meta-analyses (NMAs) of randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) of statins, ezetimibe and statins-ezetimibe combination therapy in people <18 years with HeFH. Comprehensive bibliographic searches were conducted in December 2022, and a Medline update in January 2024. NMA models accounted for drug class, statin type and dosage. RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs were included (n = 1649, median age 13 years, follow-up 6 weeks-2 years). All LLTs reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol; statins led to increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and reductions in triglycerides. Statins reduced LDL-C by 33.61 % against placebo (95 % CI 27.58 to 39.63, I2 = 83 %). Adding ezetimibe to statins reduced LDL-C by an additional 15.85 % (95 % CI 11.91 to 19.79). NMAs showed intermediate-dose statins reduced LDL-C by an additional 4.77 % compared with lower-doses statins (95 % CrI -11.22 to 1.05); higher-dose statins and intermediate-dose statins + ezetimibe may be similarly effective and are probably superior to ezetimibe, intermediate-and lower-dose statins. There was no evidence of differences in maturation, safety or tolerability between LLTs and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Statins, ezetimibe and statins-ezetimibe are all effective treatments for children with HeFH, but the magnitude of LDL-C reductions varies and may depend on treatment dosage and combination. No safety or tolerability issues were found. Longer-term safety and effectiveness are uncertain.
RESUMO
This consensus statement on the management of children and young people with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) addresses management of paediatric FH in the UK, identified by cascade testing when a parent is diagnosed with FH and for those diagnosed following incidental lipid tests. Lifestyle and dietary advice appropriate for children with FH; suggested low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets and the most appropriate lipid-lowering therapies to achieve these are discussed in this statement of care. Based on the population prevalence of FH as ~1/250 and the UK paediatric population, there are approximately 50,000 FH children under 18 years. Currently only about 550 of these children and young people have been identified and are under paediatric care.