Human papillomavirus (HPV): making the case for 'Immunisation for All'.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) contributes to the most common sexually transmitted infections, with repeated and persistent infection with particular types causing disease in both men and women. Infection with low-risk HPV types can lead to genital warts and benign lesions of the oral cavity, while high-risk types can cause various HPV-related malignancies. The incidence of head and neck cancers has been rising in the past number of decades mostly due to oropharyngeal cancer linked to HPV infection. HPV vaccination has been shown to be effective for cervical and other anogenital HPV-related cancers, and there is significant potential for HPV vaccination to prevent oropharyngeal cancers, given that the HPV types implicated in this disease can be protected against by the HPV vaccine. Few countries have implemented a universal HPV vaccination programme for males and females, with many countries arguing that female-only vaccination programmes protect males via herd immunity and that men who have sex with men will be protected via targeted vaccination programmes. We argue these may be limited in their effectiveness. We propose that the most effective, practical, ethical and potentially cost-effective solution is universal HPV vaccination that might lead to control of HPV-related diseases in men and women alike.

Codesigning a supportive online resource for Australian cancer carers: a thematic analysis of informal carers' and healthcare professionals' perspectives about carers' responsibilities and content needs.

OBJECTIVE: To gather preliminary qualitative data that will assist in the codesign and development of a new informational and supportive website to assist informal cancer carers in Australia. DESIGN AND SETTING: Utilising a previously tested codesign process, informal carers' experiences and perspectives, including those of healthcare professionals', were examined via focus groups and/or interviews. Data were analysed via thematic analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Rural (n=9) and urban (n=11) carers', and healthcare professionals' (n=8) perspectives were collected. Carers participated in a focus group (n=9) or telephone interview (n=11). Healthcare professionals completed an interview (n=6) or online survey (n=2). RESULTS: Rural and urban carers typically felt ill prepared for their multitudinal caregiving responsibilities. Supporting patient-to-healthcare professional liaisons could especially challenge. Carers' biopsychosocial and fiscal strains were affected by patients' hardships and available informal supports. Rural carers described greater social support than urban carers. Both rural and urban carers also described discontentment related to a carer neglecting healthcare system. Both carers and healthcare professionals endorsed the need for a user-friendly, carer-specific website encompassing practical information and resources, peer-driven advice and evidence-based illness information, tailored to the Australian context. CONCLUSIONS: Carers and healthcare professionals recognise the pressing need for an Australian, cancer carer-specific online resource. Findings will inform the next phase, where a resource will be designed, developed and tested.

Cancer-related fatigue: A critical appraisal.

This aim of this systematic review was to determine the prevalence and pattern of cancer-related fatigue (CRF), and identify factors associated with its development. Relevant literature was identified through an electronic database search using specified keywords. Included studies investigated CRF in adult cancer patients using a multidimensional fatigue measure. The methodological quality was assessed using six published standards. CRF is apparent both during and after anti-cancer therapy, however, the prevalence of CRF varied between studies. The variables associated with the development and persistence of CRF remain to be identified. Inconsistencies were evident in the pattern of CRF and its associated factors. This is likely to have arisen from the inherent difficulties in the measurement of a subjective sensation, further complicated by the myriad of outcome measures used. More methodologically sound research; assessing CRF from the commencement of therapy, considering all pertinent variables is needed.

Fatigue in gynaecological cancer patients: a pilot study.

RATIONALE: Fatigue is a frequent complaint of women with cancer. However, the incidence of fatigue has not been well studied, in particular gynaecological cancer, which despite its prevalence has received minimal investigation. GOALS OF WORK: The study aims were (1) to explore the symptoms experienced in a gynaecological cancer population, primarily fatigue and (2) to determine the acceptability of a fatigue questionnaire for use in a longitudinal survey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over the course of 1 month, women with gynaecological cancer attending a Regional Cancer Centre completed a demographic and symptom questionnaire and the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF). MAIN RESULTS: Of the 32 individuals approached, 30 agreed to participate (mean age, 61 years; the most common treatment received was surgery followed by chemotherapy n=11; mean time from commencement of treatment, including surgery = 3 months). All participants completed the MFSI-SF. Tiredness was the most commonly reported symptom, experienced by 90% of subjects and the most frequently stated worst symptom, reported by 23.3%. Furthermore, 23 of 27 subjects reported that tiredness interfered completely with their daily living. The MFSI-SF mean total fatigue score was 14.4 (SD 15.9), ranging from -15 to 50. The possible total fatigue score ranges from -24 to 96. CONCLUSION: Despite the heterogeneous nature of the group, all participants completed the MFSI-SF. The study suggests that fatigue could be a problem for this population group. Thus, a longitudinal survey using the MFSI-SF to investigate the phenomenon further would appear feasible and justified.