Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Respirology ; 22(4): 778-785, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28093834

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Seasonal distribution of microbial aetiology in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) may add important information both for epidemiologists and clinicians. We investigate the seasonal distribution of microbial aetiology in CAP. METHODS: This prospective observational study was carried out in the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain (January 2003-December 2014). RESULTS: We studied 4431 patients with CAP, of whom 2689 (61%) were males. Microbial aetiology was identified in 1756 patients (40%). CAP was most frequent in winter (34%) but two-third of patients with CAP presented in other seasons. Seasonal variations included Streptococcus pneumoniae (winter 21% vs spring 17% vs summer 14% vs autumn 13%, overall P < 0.001). Influenza viruses were most prevalent in autumn (6%) and winter (5%) compared with spring (3%) and summer (1%) (overall P < 0.001). Legionella pneumophila was most frequent in autumn (4%) and summer (4%) compared with spring (2%) and winter (1%) (overall P < 0.001). Incidence of polymicrobial pneumonia also differed between seasons (winter 7% vs spring 5% vs summer 3% vs autumn 6%, overall P = 0.001). We observed a significant correlation between the lowest seasonal average temperature and polymicrobial pneumonia, pneumococcal pneumonia, and influenza viruses; conversely, L. pneumophila was more common when temperatures were higher. CONCLUSION: CAP should not be regarded as a seasonal disease but occurs throughout all seasons. However, S. pneumoniae, influenza viruses, polymicrobial pneumonia and L. pneumophila are clearly subject to seasonal variations.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Estações do Ano , Adulto , Idoso , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia
2.
Chest ; 151(6): 1311-1319, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28093269

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The burden of pneumococcal disease is measured only through patients with invasive pneumococcal disease. The urinary antigen test (UAT) for pneumococcus has exhibited high sensitivity and specificity. We aimed to compare the pneumococcal pneumonias diagnosed as invasive disease with pneumococcal pneumonias defined by UAT results. METHODS: A prospective observational study of consecutive nonimmunosuppressed patients with community-acquired pneumonia was performed from January 2000 to December 2014. Patients were stratified into two groups: invasive pneumococcal pneumonia (IPP) defined as a positive blood culture or pleural fluid culture result and noninvasive pneumococcal pneumonia (NIPP) defined as a positive UAT result with negative blood or pleural fluid culture result. RESULTS: We analyzed 779 patients (15%) of 5,132, where 361 (46%) had IPP and 418 (54%) had NIPP. Compared with the patients with IPP, those with NIPP presented more frequent chronic pulmonary disease and received previous antibiotics more frequently. Patients with IPP presented more severe community-acquired pneumonia, higher levels of inflammatory markers, and worse oxygenation at admission; more pulmonary complications; greater extrapulmonary complications; longer time to clinical stability; and longer length of hospital stay compared with the NIPP group. Age, chronic liver disease, mechanical ventilation, and acute renal failure were independent risk factors for 30-day crude mortality. Neither IPP nor NIPP was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of confirmed pneumococcal pneumonia is diagnosed by UAT. Despite differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes, IPP is not an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality compared with NIPP, reinforcing the importance of NIPP for pneumococcal pneumonia.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antígenos de Bactérias/urina , Bacteriemia/sangue , Hemocultura , Doença Crônica , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/sangue , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/urina , Feminino , Humanos , Hepatopatias/epidemiologia , Pneumopatias/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Infecções Pneumocócicas/sangue , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/mortalidade , Infecções Pneumocócicas/urina , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/sangue , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/mortalidade , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/urina , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração Artificial , Fatores de Risco , Espanha/epidemiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA