The Diagnostic Characteristic and Reproducibility of Bone Scintigraphy Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Aseptic Loosening of Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic characteristics of bone scintigraphy single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (BS-SPECT/CT) for diagnosing aseptic loosening after uncemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to evaluate the following aspects: how to manage inconclusive results, the interobserver reliability, and the location of tracer uptake between symptomatic cases with and without aseptic loosening. METHODS: In this study, 180 patients who had uncemented TKA and persistent knee pain suspected of aseptic loosening were included. As part of routine medical care, BS-SPECT/CT was used, and its results were compared with the reference standard, which involved revision surgery for aseptic loosening or a 12-month follow-up without revision or imaging. Inconclusive BS-SPECT/CT results were considered either negative (best-case scenario) or positive (worst-case scenario). Sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratios (LRs), and positive/negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by comparing the diagnostic characteristics between cases with a follow-up of less and more than 2 years of follow-up. The anatomical distribution of tracer uptake and interobserver reliability were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 180 BS-SPECT/CT scans conducted, 22 were determined positive, 113 negative, and 45 inconclusive. The best-case scenario showed a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 93.8%, +LR 10.8, -LR 0.4, PPV 54.6%, and NPV 96.2%. In contrast, the worst-case scenario had a sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 69.1%, +LR 3.1, -LR 0.1, PPV 25.4%, and NPV 99.1%. Sensitivity analyses revealed no relevant differences in characteristics between the 2 TKA-interval groups. The interobserver reliability was fair-to-moderate (κ = 0.39; 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.60), with an estimated agreement of 79% (95% confidence interval 70 to 87). Four prosthetic zones had a notably higher proportion of cases with tracer uptake in those with aseptic loosening compared to those without. CONCLUSIONS: The test characteristics of BS-SPECT/CT were deemed appropriate in patients who have complaints of uncemented TKA suspected of aseptic loosening. Inconclusive cases were best categorized as negative, especially in patients who have a short interval between TKA and the first BS-SPECT/CT. Increased tracer uptake in 4 prosthetic zones was observed in cases of aseptic loosening, although interobserver reliability was fair to moderate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Diagnostic Retrospective Cohort Study.

Association Between Surface Modifications for Biologic Fixation and Aseptic Loosening of Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: Various surface modifications are used in uncemented total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) to enhance bony ingrowth and longevity of implants. This study aimed to identify which surface modifications are used, whether they are associated with different revision rates for aseptic loosening, and which are underperforming compared to cemented implants. METHODS: Data on all cemented and uncemented TKAs used between 2007 and 2021 were obtained from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Uncemented TKAs were divided into groups based on their surface modifications. Revision rates for aseptic loosening and major revisions were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier, Competing-Risk, Log-rank tests, and Cox regression analyses were used. In total, 235,500 cemented and 10,749 uncemented primary TKAs were included. The different uncemented TKA groups included the following: 1,140 porous-hydroxyapatite (HA); 8,450 Porous-uncoated; 702 Grit-blasted-uncoated; and 172 Grit-blasted-Titanium-nitride (TiN) implants. RESULTS: The 10-year revision rates for aseptic loosening and major revision of the cemented TKAs were 1.3 and 3.1%, and for uncemented TKAs 0.2 and 2.3% (porous-HA), 1.3 and 2.9% (porous-uncoated), 2.8 and 4.0% (grit-blasted-uncoated), and 7.9% and 17.4% (grit-blasted-TiN), respectively. Both type of revision rates varied significantly between the uncemented groups (log-rank tests, P < .001, P < .001). All grit-blasted implants had a significantly higher risk of aseptic loosening (P < .01), and porous-uncoated implants had a significantly lower risk of aseptic loosening than cemented implants (P = .03) after 10 years. CONCLUSION: There were 4 main uncemented surface modifications identified, with different revision rates for aseptic loosening. Implants with porous-HA and porous-uncoated had the best revision rates, at least equal to cemented TKAs. Grit-blasted implants with and without TiN underperformed, possibly due to the interaction of other factors.

Increased risk of aseptic loosening for posterior stabilized compared with posterior cruciate-retaining uncemented total knee replacements: a cohort study of 13,667 knees from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: While registry studies have suggested a higher risk of revision for posterior-stabilized (PS) compared with posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee replacements (TKR) using cement, it is unknown whether this is also the case for uncemented TKR. We aimed to compare the revision rates of PS and CR designs in patients receiving primary uncemented TKR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from the Dutch arthroplasty register (LROI) was analyzed, comprising 12,226 uncemented primary CR TKRs and 750 uncemented PS TKRs registered between 2007 and 2022. Competing risk and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to compare revision rates, risks of revision, and reasons for revision between groups. Sensitivity analyses were performed to analyze the risk, concerning the 5 most commonly used implants and performing hospitals for each group. RESULTS: Uncemented PS TKRs had higher 10-year revision rates for any reason and aseptic loosening (6.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-9.2 and 3.9%, CI 2.6-6.7) compared with uncemented CR TKRs (4.2%, CI 3.8-4.7 and 1.4%, CI 1.2-1.7). PS TKRs were 1.4 and 2.5 times more likely to be revised for any reason and aseptic loosening, respectively. These results remained consistent after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, previous surgeries, bearing mobility, and surface modification, with sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: We found that uncemented PS implants have a higher rate of revision than uncemented CR implants, mainly due to a higher risk of aseptic loosening.

6-month migration sufficient for evaluation of total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This updated meta-analysis evaluates the migration pattern of the tibial component of primary total knee replacements measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). We aimed to evaluate whether 6-month maximum total point motion (MTPM) values could be used instead of 1-year MTPM for RSA threshold testing and to present the pooled migration patterns for different implant designs that can be used as a benchmark. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The search included all published RSA studies on migration patterns of tibial components until 2023. Study groups were classified according to their prosthesis brand, fixation, and insert (PFI). Sub-analyses were performed to compare the mean tibial component migration patterns of different implant variables, stratified according to fixation. RESULTS: 96 studies (43 new studies), including 197 study groups and 4,706 knees, were included. Most migration occurred within the first 6 postoperative months (126 study groups: mean 0.58 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.65), followed by minimal migration between 6 and 12 months (197 study groups: mean 0.04 mm, CI 0.03-0.06), irrespective of the fixation method used. Distinct migration patterns were observed among the different fixation methods. No differences were found in migration patterns among cemented components in any of the sub-group analyses conducted. For uncemented implants, trabecular metal surfaced components seemed to migrate less than porous-coated or uncoated components Conclusion: Based on the small difference between MTPM values at 6 months and 1 year, MTPM at 6 months could be used instead of MTPM at 1 year for RSA threshold testing. The pooled migration patterns can be used as benchmark for evaluation of new implants by defining fixation-specific RSA thresholds when combined with implant survival.

No common peroneal nerve palsies found after a peroneal nerve release prior to TKA in fixed valgus deformities (a retrospective cohort study).

PURPOSE: The main purpose of this study was to analyse the incidence of Common Peroneal Nerve Palsy (CPNP) after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) for all alignments. Secondarily, the efficiency and safety of a Peroneal Nerve Release (PNR) prior to TKA in preoperative severe fixed valgus deformities were evaluated to prevent a CPNP. METHODS: Overall, 7612 TKAs were performed in the institution from 2009 to 2021. 1913 TKAs were performed by three surgeons, who consistently performed a PNR in case of a fixed valgus deformity of (1) more than 15°, or (2) more than 10° but in combination with a flexion contracture of more than 15°. Patients with fixed valgus deformities of more than 10° were identified (81 knees) and a comparison was made between the patients who received a PNR (26 knees) and those who did not receive a PNR (55 knees). Data for the analysis were collected from patient medical files and were compared with the Chi2-test or Fisher Exact test. RESULTS: A CPNP incidence of 0.2% (16/7612) was found after TKA for all alignments together. No CPNP cases (0%) were developed in the PNR-group, compared to five (9%) in the non-PNR group (p = NS). A larger preoperative valgus angle (17° vs 13°, p < 0.001) and flexion contracture (10° vs 3°, p < 0.001) was present in the PNR group compared with the non-PNR group. No PNR-related complications were reported. CONCLUSION: The CPNP incidence in this study is consistent with the previous literature. Furthermore, although not significant, the group that received a PNR procedure developed fewer CPNPs compared to the group without PNR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, III.

Eighteen-Year Outcome of an Uncemented "Meniscal Bearing", Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee System.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival, radiographic, and functional outcomes of the uncemented "meniscal bearing" cruciate-retaining Low Contact Stress (LCS) (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA) total knee system after a long-term follow-up period. METHODS: A total of 56 patients (67 knees) who received an uncemented "meniscal bearing" cruciate-retaining LCS total knee system between 2000 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were 64 ± 7 years old with osteoarthritis as the indication for arthroplasty. The survivorship, radiographs, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed. RESULTS: The all-cause survival after 5, 10, 15, and 18 years was 97.0%, 93.8%, 92.0%, and 92.0%, respectively. Survival with revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 98.4% at 5 years and 96.7% at 10, 15, and 18 years. Reasons of revisions and their interventions consisted of anterior knee pain requiring secondary patellar resurfacing (n = 3, 60%), polyethylene wear requiring an insert exchange (n = 2, 40%), and bearing spin-out requiring an insert exchange (n = 1, 20%). Two of the 5 revision cases developed aseptic loosening of the tibial component later on during the study period. A radiographic analysis demonstrated radiolucent lines in 14/47 implants (30%) after 12.0 ± 3.8 years, but were not revised, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 18.5 years, PROMs (n = 20) were found comparable with the 1-year postoperative PROMs of all implants reported by the LROI (Dutch Arthroplasty Register). CONCLUSION: This present study demonstrates good results of the uncemented "meniscal bearing" cruciate-retaining LCS total knee system toward survival and functional outcomes after a long-term median follow-up of 17.5 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic retrospective cohort study, LEVEL III.

Long-Term Clinical Performance of an Uncemented, Mobile Bearing, Anterior Stabilized Knee System and the Impact of Previous Knee Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to report long-term survival and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the uncemented low contact stress total knee system and explore the potential association between prior knee surgery and outcomes. METHODS: A total of 1,289 procedures in 1,068 patients performed between 2000 and 2010 (mean follow-up 11.1 years) were retrospectively identified. All patients received an uncemented, mobile bearing, anterior stabilized (cruciate sacrificing) knee implant with a porous coating on the bone-prosthesis surface. Implant survival was calculated using competing risk analyses at 5, 10, and 15 years. PROMs include the Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score (domain function), EuroQol 5D-3L, and Numeric Rating Scale for pain during rest and activity, and for overall satisfaction. The association between previous surgery (no surgery versus meniscectomy versus arthroscopy versus corrective osteotomies) and implant survival was assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis; the association with PROMs was assessed with multivariable linear regression analyses. RESULTS: Survival after 5, 10, and 15 years was 97.0% (95% CI 96.0-98.0), 96.3% (95% CI 95.3-97.3), and 96.0% (95% CI 94.8-97.2), respectively. The most common reason for revision was aseptic loosening of the tibial tray (23/49 revisions, 47%). All PROMs were comparable with the reference values of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. History of knee surgery prior to TKA was not associated with survival or PROMs. CONCLUSION: The low contact stress uncemented mobile bearing knee implant provides excellent survival and patient satisfaction in our cohort. Previous surgery does not seem to compromise results in our population.

Diagnostic value of a preoperative acromioclavicular injection for symptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis: a retrospective study of cross-sectional midterm outcomes.

BACKGROUND: It is essential to distinguish between symptomatic- and asymptomatic radiographic acromioclavicular (AC) osteoarthritis (OA) because AC-targeted physical examinations are dubious. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of a preoperative AC injection in discriminating between symptomatic- and asymptomatic radiographic AC OA based on patient arthroscopic distal clavicle resection (aDCR) outcomes. METHODS: Forty-eight patients who underwent aDCR for AC OA were included. Their satisfaction was objectified using a 5-point Likert scale and patient willingness to repeat the surgery. The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) were used to assess postoperative shoulder function and pain. Patients were subdivided into groups based on their good or minimal reaction to an AC injection (good reaction: ≥7 consecutive days of pain reduction, Minimal reaction: <7 consecutive days of pain reduction). RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients had a good reaction and 21 patients had a minimal reaction to the AC injection (median follow-up, 45.0 months; range, 31.0-52.8 months). No significant differences were found in level of satisfaction (P=0.234) or willingness to repeat the surgery (P=0.861). No significant differences were found in OSS (P=0.612), SSV (P=0.641), NRS at rest (P=0.684) or during activity (P=0.422). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no significant differences between patients with a good reaction or a minimal reaction to an AC injection after aDCR surgery. The outcomes of this study seem to suggest that a distinction between symptomatic and asymptomatic radiographic AC OA is unnecessary, as all patients were equally satisfied with the outcome. Level of evidence: IV.

A Pseudoaneurysm of the Inferior Lateral Geniculate Artery Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Vascular complications after total knee arthroplasty are rare. We present a case of an inferior lateral geniculate artery pseudoaneurysm which became symptomatic 10 days after total knee arthroplasty in a patient with a cardiac comorbidity and using dabigatran. The pseudoaneurysm was most likely caused by iatrogenic injury during surgery. Fourteen days after the index surgery, the patient was seen with a painful but normal post-total knee arthroplasty effused knee, with a maximum flexion angle of 80 degrees. No signs of infection, hemarthrosis, or neurovascular deficit were present. Radiographic imaging included ultrasonography and computed tomography angiography. The pseudoaneurysm was successfully treated with coil embolization. The etiology, presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of a geniculate artery pseudoaneurysm are discussed in this case report.

Common peroneal nerve palsy after TKA in valgus deformities; a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the prevalence of Common Peroneal Nerve Palsy after total knee arthroplasty in valgus deformities. Furthermore, the effectiveness of a peroneal nerve release prior to arthroplasty to prevent the palsy will be investigated. METHODS: PubMed and Google Scholar were searched. Search terms regarding valgus deformity and total knee arthroplasty were used. Data analysis and extraction were performed using the web application 'Rayyan QCRI' according to PRISMA guidelines and screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were included, representing 1397 valgus knees. Knee balancing was performed in 19 studies with lateral soft tissue releases (1164 knees) and 8 studies (233 knees) with an additional osteotomy. Two studies (41 knees) in the lateral soft tissue release group conducted a peroneal nerve release simultaneous to arthroplasty. Common peroneal nerve palsies occurred in 26 cases (1.9%). Overall, no significant difference in palsy ratio between studies was found by using a peroneal nerve release (p = 0.90), between lateral soft tissue releases and osteotomies (p = 0.11) or between releases of specific ligaments. CONCLUSION: Common peroneal nerve palsies occur in 1.9% of the cases after total knee arthroplasty in valgus deformities. No difference in the number of palsies was seen when using a peroneal nerve release or using different balancing techniques. However, literature about peroneal nerve releases was very limited, therefore, the effectiveness of a peroneal nerve release remains unclear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: LEVEL III: Systematic review.

Evaluation of the 'Spaarne soft tissue procedure' as a treatment for recurrent patellar dislocations: a four-in-one technique.

PURPOSE: The 'Spaarne soft tissue procedure', is a 4-in-1 soft tissue procedure that treats recurrent patellar dislocations in the young and active population. The procedure has not yet described elsewhere. The purpose of this study is to analyse the redislocation rate and to evaluate the postoperative knee function and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (34 knees) underwent the four-in-one SST-procedure. The 4-step technique required a minor change in 2010, including the use of a smaller strip of the patellar tendon for transposition. After a median follow-up of 10.4 years, the redislocation rate was evaluated as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were functional outcome (IKDC, Kujala, Lysholm and Tegner activity scale) and Numeric Rating Scales for satisfaction and pain. RESULTS: Redislocation occurred in 8 cases (23.5%) and subluxation occurred in 13 cases (38.2%) post-surgery. A significant higher number of redislocations and subluxations were seen before 2010 (p = 0.04, p = 0.03). The median postoperative IKDC, Lysholm and Kujala scores for the total group were 54, 76 and 81 respectively. Pre- and postoperative Tegner activity scale were both level 3. Median NRS scores during rest, walking and sports were 1, 3 and 5 respectively. Satisfaction with the procedure was reported as 'excellent' or 'good' by 79% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Despite the high overall redislocation rate and increased pain scores, the SST-procedure shows to be a safe procedure in patients with recurrent patellar dislocations based on the cases after 2010. Mid- and long-term results show moderate to good functional outcomes and satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic retrospective cohort study, LEVEL III.