Can dysplasia surveillance be better targeted in ulcerative colitis by using faecal calprotectin?

Background: In the inflammatory bowel diseases, chronic inflammation predisposes to dysplasia and colorectal carcinoma, leading to the need of surveillance colonoscopies. The most-used marker of colonic inflammation is faecal calprotectin. Its correlation with endoscopic and histological findings is well-documented. In this study, we evaluated the role of sequential faecal calprotectin measurements in predicting colorectal dysplasia, to identify patients with increased risk of dysplasia or colonic malignancy in ulcerative colitis.Methods: We collected the faecal calprotectin measurements and colorectal histology reports of patients with ulcerative colitis treated in Helsinki University Hospital (Helsinki, Finland) between 2007 and 2017, with a focus on IBD-associated neoplasia, inflammatory activity, and sporadic adenomas. Using the time-weighted AUC of faecal calprotectin as a marker of inflammatory burden, we tested the performance of faecal calprotectin to predict the risk for colorectal neoplasia.Results: In total, 982 patients with ulcerative colitis were included. Of them, 845 had pancolitis and 127 concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis. Forty-one patients (4%) had IBD-associated colorectal dysplasia and seven (0.7%) developed adenocarcinoma. In patients with constantly elevated faecal calprotectin level (>500 µg/g), colorectal neoplasia was more frequent compared to those with low (<200 µg/g) calprotectin (13% and 4%, p < 0.05). Histological inflammatory activity was also related to more frequent dysplastic changes.Conclusions: Colon dysplasia and adenocarcinoma are more common among ulcerative colitis patients with constantly elevated faecal calprotectin than in patients in remission. The role of inflammatory activity in inducing neoplastic changes in colon is further supported by histology, as histological inflammatory activity correlates with dysplasia.

Is home monitoring of inflammatory bowel disease feasible? A randomized controlled study.

Objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the home monitoring with a rapid fecal calprotectin test combined with a symptom questionnaire in patients with colonic IBD in real-life setting. Methods: We randomized 180 patients with colonic IBD in a study or a control group. The home monitoring patients performed the fecal calprotectin test and filled in a symptom questionnaire every second month and in cases with increasing symptoms. The control patients filled in the symptom questionnaire at baseline and at 6 and 12 months as well as for the appointment at the outpatient clinic. The study duration was 12 months. Results: The patient adherence to the self-monitoring program was low. Patients with a higher disease burden were more adherent than patients with better health-related quality of life, but otherwise, there were no significant factors predicting the adherence. The home monitoring patients had fewer contacts with the outpatient clinic, but otherwise, the disease course between the home monitoring and the control group were similar. Conclusions: The self-monitoring of IBD activity with a combination of a rapid fecal calprotectin home test and a symptom questionnaire provides an option for individualized care for IBD patients. However, adherence to the self-monitoring program remains a challenge.

Rapid Fecal Calprotectin Test and Symptom Index in Monitoring the Disease Activity in Colonic Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin is a reliable surrogate marker for inflammatory activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AIMS: For the noninvasive monitoring of the activity of colonic inflammation, we validated a symptom index suitable for ulcerative colitis and colonic Crohn's disease. By combining the symptom index with a rapid semi-quantitative calprotectin test, we constructed a new activity index based on the highest AUCs, using histological remission as a reference. We also evaluated the correlation of the patient-reported influence of the IBD in the daily life, measured by a VAS, with the inflammation activity. METHODS: The disease activity of 72 patients with IBD of the colon was determined by endoscopic activity scores (SES-CD/UCEIS). The patients provided stool samples for determination of calprotectin and filled in a questionnaire about their symptoms during the last week. RESULTS: The results of the symptom index demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with the rapid calprotectin test, histological inflammation activity, and the VAS. No correlations were found between the VAS and calprotectin or the histological inflammation activity. The sensitivity of the combination index to detect active inflammation was slightly superior to fecal calprotectin alone. CONCLUSION: The new symptom index and the combination index are simple, noninvasive means for distinguishing remission from active inflammation in colonic IBD. With the VAS, we can pick up patients who need psychosocial support because of the disease burden, even if their IBD is in remission.

Rapid faecal tests for detecting disease activity in colonic inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have raised the need for a rapid noninvasive means to monitor disease activity. We validated two rapid tests for faecal calprotectin and one for faecal lactoferrin and compared them to the most common clinical and endoscopic scores, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) calprotectin test and systemic inflammation markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical and endoscopic disease activity of 72 patients with colonic IBD, who underwent ileocolonoscopy, was determined. The patients provided stool samples to measure calprotectin and lactoferrin, and blood samples to measure systemic inflammation markers. RESULTS: Rapid calprotectin tests correlated significantly with clinical and endoscopic indices and standard ELISA calprotectin in ulcerative colitis, but not in Crohn's disease. CalDetect correlated more closely with ELISA calprotectin than CerTest FC in concentrations exceeding 200 µg/g. CalDetect was also more sensitive in indicating histological remission or mild disease than was CerTest FC at cut-off of 200 µg/g. CerTest Lactoferrin was comparable to CalDetect in their correlation with clinical, endoscopic and histological scores. CONCLUSIONS: These rapid tests are suitable for identifying patients with inactive or mildly active disease, but as semiquantitative or qualitative tests, they cannot totally replace ELISA calprotectin in decision-making related to therapy.