IMNI PRECISION trial protocol: a phase II, open-label, non-inferior randomized controlled trial of tailoring omission of internal mammary node irradiation for early-stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Since the publication of MA-20 and EORTC-22922 trials, chest wall (CW)/ whole breast (WB) irradiation + comprehensive regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) has been the standard adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer (BC). However, one size does not fit all BC, and the risk of recurrence significantly varies among this patient population. In addition, whether all BC patients presented with one to three positive lymph nodes (pN1) could benefit from IMNI remains controversial. Thus, the optimal adjuvant RNI volume for early-stage BC with T1-2N1 remains undetermined. METHODS: The IMNI PRECISION trial is a single institute, open-labeled, non-inferior, randomized controlled trial. A total of 214 clinically "high risk" BC patients which is characterized as having at least two of the five clinically adverse factors (age ≤ 40, three positive LN, T2 stage, grade 3 and Ki-67 index ≥ 14%), but genomic score "low risk" (the genomic score ≤ 44) N1 breast cancers are randomly assigned to omitting IMNI group (experimental group) or with IMNI (control group) with a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint of this trial is event-free survival, and secondary endpoints include overall survival and locoregional recurrence-free survival. DISCUSSION: The IMNI PRECISION design allows promising clinical-genomic model to stratify the individualized risk of developing recurrence and guides the optimal RNI treatment for early-stage (pT1-2N1) BC patients. We anticipate that our results would provide high-level evidence to tailor IMNI according to individualized recurrence risk of BC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04517266 . Date of registration: August 18, 2020. Status: Recruiting.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: a population-based analysis.

AIM: Currently, the optimal treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) remains controversial. We perform the present study to compare the outcomes of LAEC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neo-CT) or chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population cohort with histologically diagnosed of esophageal cancer was identified from SEER database between 2004 and 2015. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox-regression proportional hazards model were used to assess the impact of neoadjuvant treatment regimens on the cause-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) of LAEC. A propensity score model was utilized to balance baseline covariates. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, a total of 1986 LAEC patients were included for analysis, 1,655 patients treated with neo-CRT and 331 with neo-CT, respectively. The survival outcomes of LAEC treated with neo-CRT were comparable to those treated with neo-CT in terms of 5-year OS (39% vs. 36%, p = 0.63) and CSS (51% vs. 51%, p = 0.77). In the multivariate Cox analyses, sex, histological grade, ypT stage, ypN( +), and number of LN examined were independent factors for predicting OS and CSS among LAEC treated with neoadjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION: The present study based on large cohort demonstrated that no significant survival difference was observed between LAEC patients treated with neo-CRT versus neo-CT. However, the results needed to be confirmed in well-designed prospective trials.

Assessment of systematic inflammatory and nutritional indexes in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy and atezolizumab.

BACKGROUND: The present study aims to investigate the prognostic role of systematic inflammatory and nutritional indexes in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with first-line chemotherapy and atezolizumab. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective cohort population involving 53 patients were identified from NCT03041311 trial. The following peripheral blood-derived inflammatory and nutritional indexes, including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), prognostic nutrition index (PNI), advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), and lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) were evaluated. RESULTS: The optimal cut-off values of the ALI, LMR, NLR, PLR, PNI, SII and SIRI were 323.23, 2.73, 2.57, 119.23, 48, 533.28 and 2.32, respectively. With a median follow-up of 17.1 months, the 1-year OS and PFS were 56% and 8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that PLR was the only independent prognostic factors for OS among ES-SCLC patients treated with chemotherapy and atezolizumab (HR 4.63, 95%CI: 1.00-21.46, p = 0.05). K-M analysis showed that the OS and PFS for patients with high PLR (> 119.23) were significantly poorer than these with low PLR (≤ 119.23) (p = 0.0004 for OS and p = 0.014 for PFS). In external validation set, prognosis of patients with high PLR was also significantly poorer than these with low PLR in terms of OS (p = 0.038) and PFS (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment PLR could serve as a valuable independent prognostic factor for ES-SCLC who receive chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Further, prospective studies are still needed to confirm our findings.

How Does the Interval Between Completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Initiation of Radiotherapy Impact Clinical Outcomes in Operable Breast Cancer Patients?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of time to radiotherapy (TTR) after completion of chemotherapy (CT), and TTR after surgery, in breast cancer (BC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Continuous breast cancer patients treated with surgery and CT followed by radiotherapy (RT) from 2009 through 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into four groups with respect to TTR after CT, i.e. <4, 4-8, 8-12, and >12 weeks, and TTR after surgery, i.e. <147, 147-180, 180-202, and >202 days. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the independent effect of TTRs. RESULTS: Overall, 989 patients were enrolled. Patients with a TTR of >12 weeks after CT showed significantly worse breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those who had a TTR of <4 weeks (BCSS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-0.76; OS: HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.88), 4-8 weeks (BCSS: HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.66; OS: HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11-0.8), and 8-12 weeks (BCSS: HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05-0.96; OS: HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.99). TTR after surgery showed no significant association with survival outcomes in the entire cohort, except in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease and those receiving mastectomy. In HR-positive tumors, a TTR after CT of >12 weeks remained an independent predictor for adverse BCSS and OS. CONCLUSION: Initiation of RT beyond 12 weeks after CT might compromise survival outcomes. Efforts should be made to avoid delaying RT, especially after completion of CT and in patients with HR-positive tumors, positive lymph nodes, and those receiving mastectomy.

Epidemiology and prognosis of lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: a comprehensive analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database.

AIM: Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) is a rare histological types of solid tumors. The present study aims to comprehensively describe the demographic and clinical features of LELC using surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database, with an emphasis on the prognostic difference according to primary tumor sites of LELC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population cohort with histologically diagnosed LELC were identified from SEER database between 1973 and 2016. Age-adjusted incidence rates and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were determined. Cox-regression proportional hazards model was used for both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: In total, 2106 patients with LELC were identified, with the most common diagnosed primary tumor site of nasopharyngeal LELC (56.22%), followed by non-nasopharyngeal head and neck LELC (21.32%) and respiratory system (7.83%). The overall age-adjusted incidence of LELC was 0.091 per 100,000. The CSS rates of LELC patients at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years were 76%, 69%, 65%, and 61%, respectively. A tendency of decreasing incidence of LELC was observed in the past decade. Univariate analysis indicated that sex [hazard ratio (HR) 1.21, p = 0.031], year of diagnosis (HR 0.60 and 0.63, p < 0.001), race (HR 1.29, p = 0.0021), age (HR 1.25, p = 0.0072), summary tumor stage (HR 1.97, and 4.57, both p < 0.001), number of positive LN(HR2.21, p < 0.001), surgery (HR 0.58, p = 0.0033), chemotherapy (HR 1.19, p = 0.037) and primary tumor site (p < 0.001) were significant factors associated with prognosis of LELC. In multivariate analysis, age (HR 1.75, p = 0.03), distant stage (HR 6.57, p = 0.0001), number of positive LN (HR 2.63, p = 0.0015) and non-nasopharyngeal head and neck LELC (HR 0.37, p = 0.0031) were significantly independent predictors for CSS of LELC. In sub-group analysis, radiotherapy significantly improves CSS for nasopharyngeal LELC (HR 0.57, p = 0.0002), while surgery significantly improve CSS for non-nasopharyngeal LELC (HR 0.33, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Based on SEER data analysis, age older than 50 years, distant stage and more than three positive LN are significantly associated with worse CSS for LELC, while the prognosis of non-nasopharyngeal head and neck LELC is significantly better than nasopharyngeal LELC. Local treatments for LELC could be recommended according to primary tumor sites.

Risk factors for developing cardiac toxicities in cancer patients treated with panitumumab combination therapy.

Aim: To evaluate the incidence and risk of cardiac toxicities associated with panitumumab in advanced cancer of Caucasian patients. Materials & methods: The incidence of cardiac toxicity was assessed by simple incidence rates and rates per 100 person-years. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was conducted. Results: Panitumumab-containing therapy significantly increased the risk of developing cardiac arrhythmias (p = 0.036), but not for any cardiac event (p = 0.24) or ischemic event (p = 0.087). The absolute rate of developing cardiac arrhythmia was 10.0 events versus 7.5 events per 100 person-years. Pre-existing hypertension (p = 0.033), history of cardiac disease (p = 0.055) or panitumumab usage (p = 0.046) were risk factors for cardiac arrhythmias. Conclusion: The addition of panitumumab to chemotherapy increases the risk of developing cardiac arrhythmia, but not for any cardiac toxicity or ischemic events.

Risk factors for developing osteonecrosis of jaw in advanced cancer patients underwent zoledronic acid treatment.

Aim: To investigate the risk factors for developing osteonecrosis of jaw (ONJ) in advanced cancer patients with bone metastases underwent zoledronic acid (ZA) treatment. Materials & methods: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate factors associated with developing ONJ in advanced cancer patients. Results: A total of 2214 advanced cancer patients were included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for risk factors associated with ONJ were older age (≥66 years, hazards ratio [HR]: 3.21; p = 0.007), anemia (HR: 3.29; p = 0.006) and duration of ZA exposure (between 1 and 2 years, HR: 3.91, p = 0.01; ≥2 years, HR: 8.07, p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Patients with older age, anemia and/or more than 1 year of ZA treatment are at high risk of developing ONJ.

Incidence and risk of severe infections associated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) have been widely used in a variety of malignancies. Severe infections (≥grade 3) are potentially life-threatening adverse events with these drugs. However, the contribution of anti-EGFR MoAbs to infections is still unknown. We performed this meta-analysis to determine the overall incidence and risk of severe infections in cancer patients treated with these drugs. METHODS: The databases of PubMed and abstracts presented at oncology conferences and published in the proceedings were searched for relevant studies from January 2000 to May 2014. Summary incidences, relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using either random effects or fixed effect models according to the heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 14,066 patients from 26 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The use of anti-EGFR-MoAbs significantly increased the risk of developing severe infections (RR 1.34, 95%CI: 1.10 to 1.62, P=0.003) in cancer patients, but not for fatal infections (RR 1.62, 95%CI: 0.81 to 3.26, P=0.18). Meta-regression indicated the infections might possibly occur early in the treatment with anti-EGFR MoAbs. On sub-group analysis, the risk of severe infections significantly varied with tumor type (P=0.001). When stratified by specific anti-EGFR MoAbs, a significantly increased risk of infections with cetuximab was observed (P<0.001), but not for panitumumab (P=0.98). Additionally, the use of anti-EGFR MoAbs significantly increased the risk of severe infections when used in conjunction with cisplatin (RR 1.48, 95%CI 1.22 to 1.79, P<0.001) or irinotecan (RR 1.53, 95%CI 1.12 to 2.10, P=0.008). When stratified by specific infectious events, anti-EGFR-MoAbs significantly increased the risk of developing severe sepsis (RR 4.30, 95%CI: 1.80 to 10.27; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-EGFR MoAbs treatment significantly increases the risk of developing severe infectious events in cancer patients. The risk may vary with tumor types. Clinicians should be aware of the risks of severe infections with the administration of these drugs in cancer patients.

Risk of gastrointestinal perforation in cancer patients treated with aflibercept: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gastrointestinal (GI) perforation is a serious adverse event associated with aflibercept, a novel vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agent currently approved as second-line treatment for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer, but the incidence and risk of GI perforation associated with aflibercept has not been well determined. We thus conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the overall incidence and risk of developing GI perforation associated with aflibercept. Databases from PubMed, Web of Science, and abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) meeting up to January, 2014 were searched to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included prospective phase II and III trials evaluating aflibercept in cancer patients with adequate data on GI perforation. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, odds ratio, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using either random effects or fixed effect models according to the heterogeneity of included studies. A total of 4,101 patients with a variety of solid tumors from eight clinical trials were included in our analysis. The incidence of GI perforation associated with aflibercept was 1.9% (95%CI, 1.0-3.8%), with a mortality of 10.8% (95%CI, 4.1-25.5%). In addition, patients treated with aflibercept had a significantly increased risk of developing all-grade (OR 3.76; 95%CI, 1.94-7.25; p < 0.001) and high-grade GI (OR 4.14; 95%CI; 2.12-8.06; p < 0.001) perforation compared with patients treated with control medication. No evidence of publication bias was observed. The use of aflibercept is associated with a significantly increased risk of GI perforation compared to controls.

The role of anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Inhibition of vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathways has proven to be an effective strategy for the treatment of several common solid tumors, but its role in the management of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is yet to be defined. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of AGC. Several databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) or relative risk (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials. Seven RCTs which involved 2,340 patients were ultimately identified. The pooled analysis demonstrated that anti-VEGF therapy significantly improved OS (HR 0.74, 95 % CI 0.61-0.91, p = 0.003), PFS (HR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.44-0.78, p < 0.001), and ORR (RR 1.43, 95 % CI 1.14-1.79, p = 0.002) when compared to non-anti-VEGF therapy. Sensitivity analysis further confirmed this association. Additionally, more incidences of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and hypertension were observed in anti-VEGF therapy. The anti-VEGF therapy offers a significant survival benefit in patients with AGC, especially for those previously treated patients, when compared to non-anti-VEGF therapy. With the present available data from randomized clinical trials, we could not clearly set the role of specific anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of AGC. Further studies are recommended to identify patients who could derive greater benefits from specific anti-VEGF agents.

Congestive heart failure risk in cancer patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 clinical trials.

AIMS: Congestive heart failure (CHF) associated with vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) has emerged as a relevant problem in clinical and scientific communities. We performed an up-to-date, comprehensive meta-analysis to determine the overall incidence and risk of CHF in cancer patients receiving VEGFR-TKIs. METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Web of Science and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology up to August 31 2013 were searched for relevant articles. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using either random effects or fixed effect models according to the heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 10 553 patients from 36 clinical trials were included. The overall incidence of all grade and high grade CHF associated with VEGFR-TKIs was 3.2% (95% CI 1.8%, 5.8%) and 1.4% (95% CI 0.9%, 2.3%), respectively. The use of VEGFR-TKIs significantly increased the risk of developing all grade (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.76, 3.20, P < 0.001) and high grade (OR 3.51, 95% CI 1.74, 7.05, P < 0.001) CHF. In subgroup analyses, the risk of CHF did not significantly vary with tumour types (P = 0.071 for all grade; P = 0.72 for high grade) and VEGFR-TKIs (P = 0.55 for all grade; P = 0.99 for high grade). Meta-regression indicated that CHF might possibly occur early in the treatment of VEGFR-TKIs. No evidence of publication bias was observed. CONCLUSION: The use of VEGFR-TKIs is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing congestive heart failure in cancer patients. Clinicians should be aware of this risk and provide close monitoring in patients receiving these therapies.

p21-activated kinase 7 is an oncogene in human osteosarcoma.

p21-activated kinase 7 (PAK7), also named as PAK5, is a member of Rac/Cdc42-associated Ser/Thr protein kinases. It is overexpressed in some types of cancer such as colorectal and pancreatic cancers. However, the expression status and biological function of PAK7 in osteosarcoma are still ambiguous. To evaluate the expression levels of PAK7 in osteosarcoma tissues and cell lines, immunohistochemistry was used. To investigate the role of PAK7 in cell proliferation, apoptosis and tumorigenicity in vitro and vivo, a recombinant lentivirus expressing PAK7 short hairpin RNA (Lv-shPAK7) was developed and transfected into Saos-2 cells. The silencing effect of PAK7 was confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and Western blot technique. PAK7 was overexpressed in osteosarcoma tissue and cell line. By knocking-down of PAK7, the proliferation and colony formation of Saos-2 cells were inhibited and apoptosis enhanced significantly. The in vivo tumorigenic ability in xenograft model of Saos-2 cells was also notably inhibited when PAK7 was knocked down. Our results imply that PAK7 promotes cell proliferation and tumorigenesis and may be an attractive candidate for the therapeutic target of osteosarcoma.

Bevacizumab increases the risk of gastrointestinal perforation in cancer patients: a meta-analysis with a focus on different subgroups.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to gather current data and evaluate not only the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) perforation with bevacizumab, but also the potential risk factors for this adverse event. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a literature search in PubMed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported from January 2000 to December 2013. Summary incidence, relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 26,833 patients from 33 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Bevacizumab-containing therapy significantly increased the risk of developing all-grade (RR 3.35, 95% CI 2.35-4.79, P < 0.001) and fatal GI perforation (RR 3.08, 95%CI: 1.04-9.08, P = 0.042). On subgroup analysis, no significant risk differences were found based on bevacizumab dosage, treatment duration, treatment line, type of clinical trial and median age. When stratified by tumor types, a significantly increased risk of GI perforation with bevacizumab was observed in colorectal cancer (RR 2.84, 95% CI 1.43-5.61, P = 0.003), gynecologic cancer (RR 3.37, 95% CI 1.71-6.62, P < 0.001) and prostate cancer (RR 6.01, 95% CI 1.78-20.28, P = 0.004). Additionally, the use of bevacizumab significantly increased the risk of GI perforation when used in conjunction with taxanes (RR 3.09, 95% CI 1.92-4.96, P < 0.001) or oxaliplatin (RR 2.85, 95% CI 1.07-7.57, P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab treatment is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing GI perforation, and clinicians should be aware of the risks of GI perforation with the administration of this drug in cancer patients.

Treatment-related mortality with aflibercept in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Aflibercept, a fully humanized vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agent, has emerged as an effective therapy in the treatment of various solid tumors. We carried out an up-to-date meta-analysis to determine the risk of fatal adverse events (FAEs) in cancer patients treated with aflibercept. METHODS: We searched databases such as PubMed and Web of Science, and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) meetings for records up to August 2013 to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included prospective phase II and III trials evaluating aflibercept in cancer patients with adequate data on FAEs. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) by using either random effects or fixed-effect models according to the heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 3,060 patients with a variety of solid tumors from ten clinical trials were included in our analysis. The overall incidence of FAEs associated with aflibercept was 5.1 % (95%CI: 3.8-6.8 %). The use of aflibercept significantly increased the risk of FAEs compared to patients treated with control medication (OR 1.81, 95 % CI: 1.20-2.72, p = 0.004). Additionally, the most common causes of FAEs were infection (38.8 %), hemorrhage (5.9 %) and GI perforation (5.9 %), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With available evidence, the use of aflibercept is associated with an increased risk of FAEs compared to controls. Further studies are still needed to investigate this association. In the appropriate clinical scenario, the use of aflibercept remains justified in its approved indications.

Risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw in cancer patients receiving denosumab: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to gain a better understanding of the overall incidence and risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in cancer patients receiving denosumab. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials identified in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Abstracts presented at the conferences were also searched. Overall incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials. RESULTS: A total of 8963 patients with a variety of solid tumors from 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included for the meta-analysis. The overall incidence of ONJ in cancer patients receiving denosumab was 1.7 % [95 % CI: 0.9-3.1 %]. Also, the use of denosumab was associated with significantly increased risk of ONJ in comparison with bisphosphonates (BPs)/placebo treatment (RR 1.61, 95 % CI: 1.05-2.48, P = 0.029). Subgroup analysis based on controlled therapies demonstrated an increased risk of ONJ in denosumab therapy, when compared with BPs (RR 1.48, 95 % CI: 0.96-2.29, P = 0.078) or placebo (RR 16.28, 95 % CI: 1.68-158.05, P = 0.017). Similar results were observed in prostate cancer (RR 3.358, 95 % CI: 1.573-7.166, P = 0.002) while there was a non-significantly increased risk of denosumab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (DONJ) in non-prostate cancers (RR 1.142, 95 % CI: 0.678-1.921, P = 0.618). CONCLUSIONS: The use of denosumab is associated with an increased risk of developing ONJ when compared with BP treatment or placebo, although the increased risk was not statistically significant between denosumab and BP treatment. Further studies are still needed to establish guidelines for the prevention and effective treatment of ONJ.

A machine learning approach using 18F-FDG PET and enhanced CT scan-based radiomics combined with clinical model to predict pathological complete response in ESCC patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and anti-PD-1 inhibitors.

Background: We aim to evaluate the value of an integrated multimodal radiomics with machine learning model to predict the pathological complete response (pCR) of primary tumor in a prospective cohort of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and anti-PD-1 inhibitors. Materials and methods: Clinical information of 126 ESCC patients were included for analysis. Radiomics features were extracted from 18F-FDG PET and enhanced plan CT images. Four machine learning algorithms, including SVM (Support Vector Machine), Random Forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and logistic regression (LR), were applied using k-fold cross-validation to predict pCR after nCRT. The predictive ability of the models was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. Results: A total of 842 features were extracted. Among the four machine learning algorithms, SVM achieved the most promising performance on the test set for PET(AUC:0.775), CT (AUC:0.710) and clinical model (AUC:0.722). For all combinations of various modalities-based models, the combination model of 18 F-FDG PET, CT and clinical features with SVM machine learning had the highest AUC of 0.852 in the test set when compared to single-modality models in various algorithms. The other combined models had AUC ranged 0.716 to 0.775. Conclusion: Machine learning models utilizing radiomics features from 18F-FDG PET and enhanced plan CT exhibit promising performance in predicting pCR in ESCC after nCRT and anti-PD-1 inhibitors. The fusion of features from multiple modalities radiomics and clinical features enhances the better predictive performance compared to using a single modality alone.

Exploration of anatomical distribution of brain metastasis from breast cancer at first diagnosis assisted by artificial intelligence.

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the spatial distribution of brain metastases (BMs) from breast cancer (BC) and to identify the high-risk sub-structures in BMs that are involved at first diagnosis. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were retrospectively reviewed at our centre. The brain was divided into eight regions according to its anatomy and function, and the volume of each region was calculated. The identification and volume calculation of metastatic brain lesions were accomplished using an automatically segmented 3D BUC-Net model. The observed and expected rates of BMs were compared using 2-tailed proportional hypothesis testing. Results: A total of 250 patients with BC who presented with 1694 BMs were retrospectively identified. The overall observed incidences of the substructures were as follows: cerebellum, 42.1 %; frontal lobe, 20.1 %; occipital lobe, 9.7 %; temporal lobe, 8.0 %; parietal lobe, 13.1 %; thalamus, 4.7 %; brainstem, 0.9 %; and hippocampus, 1.3 %. Compared with the expected rate based on the volume of different brain regions, the cerebellum, occipital lobe, and thalamus were identified as higher risk regions for BMs (P value ≤ 5.6*10-3). Sub-group analysis according to the type of BC indicated that patients with triple-negative BC had a high risk of involvement of the hippocampus and brainstem. Conclusions: Among patients with BC, the cerebellum, occipital lobe and thalamus were identified as higher-risk regions than expected for BMs. The brainstem and hippocampus were high-risk areas of the BMs in triple negative breast cancer. However, further validation of this conclusion requires a larger sample size.

Overall survival benefits for irinotecan-containing regimens as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis of ten randomized controlled trials.

The standard treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is still debated, and the available data on the benefit of irinotecan-containing regimen as first-line treatment for those patients are controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine the survival benefits of irinotecan-containing regimens in this setting. A total of 1,837 patients from ten trials were included in the analysis. Our results showed that irinotecan-containing regimens significantly improved overall survival [OS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.86, 95% CI = 0.78-0.94, p = 0.002] and progression-free survival [HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.69-0.97, p = 0.026); however, the improvement of time to failure (HR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.77-1.04, p = 0.15), 1-year survival rate [1-year SR: relative risk (RR) 1.10, 95% CI = 0.97-1.24, p = 0.13] and overall response rate (RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.91-1.49, p = 0.24] were nonsignificant. Equivalent frequencies of toxicities were found between the two groups excluding more Grade 3 or 4 fatigue (p = 0.001) in irinotecan-containing regimens. This updated meta-analysis provided strong evidence for a survival benefit of irinotecan-containing regimen as first-line treatment for AGC. A clear advantage of irinotecan-containing over nonirinotecan-containing regimen had not been established. These results should help to inform decisions about patient management and design of future trials.

Risk of venous thromboembolic events associated with VEGFR-TKIs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been widely used in advanced cancers. Concerns have arisen regarding the risk of venous thromboembolism with the use of these drugs. Currently, the contribution of VEGFR-TKIs to venous thromboembolism is still unknown. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the incidence and relative risk (RR) of venous thromboembolism events (VTEs) associated with these agents. Eligible studies included phase II and III prospective trials evaluating US Food and Drug Administration approved VEGFR-TKIs (pazopanib, sunitinib, sorafenib and vandetanib), and data on VTEs were available. Overall incidence rates, RR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of included trials. A total of 14 studies (4,430 patients) were selected for this meta-analysis. The incidence of VTEs related to VEGFR-TKIs was 3% (95%CI: 1.7-5.1%), and there was no statistically significant increase in the risk of VTEs for VEGFR-TKIs versus controls in overall population (RR0.912, 95%CI: 0.617-1.348, p = 0.643). On subgroup analysis, no significant increase in the risk of VTEs was found among different VEGFR-TKIs or tumor types. No evidence of publication bias was observed. The use of VEGFR-TKIs does not significantly increase the risk of VTEs, the risk of VTEs in patients with cancer is driven predominantly by tumor types, host factors and concomitant usage of anticancer agents. These results would provide important information for clinicians who use VEGFR-TKIs to treat patients with solid cancer.