Effectiveness of a non-physician community health-care provider-led intensive blood pressure intervention versus usual care on cardiovascular disease (CRHCP): an open-label, blinded-endpoint, cluster-randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of a non-physician community health-care provider-led intensive blood pressure intervention on cardiovascular disease has not been established. We aimed to test the effectiveness of such an intervention compared with usual care on risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause death among individuals with hypertension. METHODS: In this open-label, blinded-endpoint, cluster-randomised trial, we recruited individuals aged at least 40 years with an untreated systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mm Hg (≥130 mm Hg and ≥80 mm Hg for those at high risk for cardiovascular disease or if currently taking antihypertensive medication). We randomly assigned (1:1) 326 villages to a non-physician community health-care provider-led intervention or usual care, stratified by provinces, counties, and townships. In the intervention group, trained non-physician community health-care providers initiated and titrated antihypertensive medications according to a simple stepped-care protocol to achieve a systolic blood pressure goal of less than 130 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure goal of less than 80 mm Hg with supervision from primary care physicians. They also delivered discounted or free antihypertensive medications and health coaching for patients. The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure requiring hospitalisation, and cardiovascular disease death during the 36-month follow-up in the study participants. Safety was assessed every 6 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03527719. FINDINGS: Between May 8 and Nov 28, 2018, we enrolled 163 villages per group with 33 995 participants. Over 36 months, the net group difference in systolic blood pressure reduction was -23·1 mm Hg (95% CI -24·4 to -21·9; p<0·0001) and in diastolic blood pressure reduction, it was -9·9 mm Hg (-10·6 to -9·3; p<0·0001). Fewer patients in the intervention group than the usual care group had a primary outcome (1·62% vs 2·40% per year; hazard ratio [HR] 0·67, 95% CI 0·61-0·73; p<0·0001). Secondary outcomes were also reduced in the intervention group: myocardial infarction (HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·60-0·98; p=0·037), stroke (0·66, 0·60-0·73; p<0·0001), heart failure (0·58, 0·42-0·81; p=0·0016), cardiovascular disease death (0·70, 0·58-0·83; p<0·0001), and all-cause death (0·85, 0·76-0·95; p=0·0037). The risk reduction of the primary outcome was consistent across subgroups of age, sex, education, antihypertensive medication use, and baseline cardiovascular disease risk. Hypotension was higher in the intervention than in the usual care group (1·75% vs 0·89%; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: The non-physician community health-care provider-led intensive blood pressure intervention is effective in reducing cardiovascular disease and death. FUNDING: The Ministry of Science and Technology of China and the Science and Technology Program of Liaoning Province, China.

Impact of baseline cardiovascular risk on the outcomes of intensive blood pressure intervention: a post hoc analysis of the China rural hypertension control project.

BACKGROUND: The 2018/2023 ESC/ESH Guidelines underlined a gap how baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk predicted blood pressure (BP) lowering benefits. Further, 2017 ACC/AHA Guideline and 2021 WHO Guideline recommended implementation studies about intensive BP control. Now, to bridge these guideline gaps, we conducted a post hoc analysis to validate whether the baseline CVD risk influences the effectiveness of the intensive BP control strategy, which was designed by China Rural Hypertension Control Project (CRHCP). METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of CRHCP, among which participants were enrolled except those having CVD history, over 80 years old, or missing data. Subjects were stratified into quartiles by baseline estimated CVD risk and then grouped into intervention and usual care group according to original assignment in CRHCP. Participants in the intervention group received an integrated, multi-faceted treatment strategy, executed by trained non-physician community health-care providers, aiming to achieve a BP target of < 130/80 mmHg. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratios of outcomes for intervention in each quartile, while interaction effect between intervention and estimated CVD risk quartiles was additionally assessed. The primary outcome comprised myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or CVD deaths. RESULTS: Significant lower rates of primary outcomes for intervention group compared with usual care for each estimated CVD risk quartile were reported. The hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) in the four quartiles (from Q1 to Q4) were 0.59 (0.40, 0.87), 0.54 (0.40, 0.72), 0.72 (0.57, 0.91) and 0.65 (0.53, 0.80), respectively (all Ps < 0.01). There's no significant difference of hazard ratios by intervention across risk quartiles (P for interaction = 0.370). Only the relative risk of hypotension, not symptomatic hypotension, was elevated in the intervention group among upper three quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive BP lowering strategy designed by CRHCP group was effective and safe in preventing cardiovascular events independent of baseline CVD risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03527719.

Multifaceted Intensive Blood Pressure Control Model in Older and Younger Individuals With Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The sustainable effectiveness and safety of a nonphysician community health care practitioner-led intensive blood pressure intervention on cardiovascular disease have not, to the authors' knowledge, been studied, especially in the older adult population. Objective: To evaluate such a multifaceted model with a more stringent blood pressure treatment goal (<130/80 mm Hg) among patients aged 60 years and older with hypertension. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a 48-month follow-up study of the China Rural Hypertension Control Project (CRHCP), an open-cluster randomized clinical trial, conducted from 2018 to 2023. Participants 60 years and older and younger than 60 years with a diagnosis of hypertension from the CRHCP trial were included for analysis. Individuals were recruited from 326 villages in rural China. Interventions: The well-trained, nonphysician, community health care practitioner implemented a multifaceted intervention program (eg, initiation or titration of antihypertensive medications) to achieve a blood pressure level of less than 130/80 mm Hg, supervised by primary care physicians. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cardiovascular disease (a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure requiring hospitalization, and cardiovascular disease death). Results: A total of 22 386 individuals 60 years and older with hypertension and 11 609 individuals younger than 60 years with hypertension were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 63.0 (9.0) years and included 20 825 females (61.3%). Among the older individuals with hypertension, a total of 11 289 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 11 097 to the usual-care group. During a median (IQR) of 4.0 (4.0-4.1) years, there was a significantly lower rate of total cardiovascular disease (1133 [2.7%] vs 1433 [3.5%] per year; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.81; P < .001) and all-cause mortality (1111 [2.5%] vs 1210 [2.8%] per year; HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.98; P = .01) in the intervention group than in the usual-care group. For patients younger than 60 years, the risk reductions were also significant for total cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.56-0.75; P < .001), stroke (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55-0.76; P < .001), heart failure (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.87; P = .02), and cardiovascular death (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.77; P < .001), with all interaction P values for age groups greater than .05. In both age categories, the incidences of injurious falls, symptomatic hypotension, syncope, and the results for kidney outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In both the aging and younger general population with hypertension, the nonphysician health care practitioner-led, multifaceted, intensive blood pressure intervention model could effectively and safely reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause death. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03527719.

Adipose­derived mesenchymal stem cell­derived HCAR1 regulates immune response in the attenuation of sepsis.

Sepsis serves as a leading cause of admission to and death of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and is described as a systemic inflammatory response syndrome caused by abnormal host response to infection. Adipose­derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) have exhibited reliable and promising clinical application potential in multiple disorders. However, the function and the mechanism of ADSCs in sepsis remain elusive. In the present study, the crucial inhibitory effect of ADSC­derived hydroxy­carboxylic acid receptor 1 (HCAR1) on sepsis was identified. Reverse transcription quantitative­PCR determined that the mRNA expression of HCAR1 was reduced while the mRNA expression of Toll­like receptor 4 (TLR4), major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II), NOD­like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3), and the levels of interleukin­1ß (IL­1ß), tumor necrosis factor­α (TNF­α), interleukin­10 (IL­10), and interleukin­18 (IL­18) were enhanced in the peripheral blood of patients with sepsis. The expression of HCAR1 was negatively correlated with TLR4 (r=­0.666), MHC II (r=­0.587), and NLRP3 (r=­0.621) expression and the expression of TLR4 was positively correlated with NLRP3 (r=0.641), IL­1ß (r=0.666), TNF­α (r=0.606), and IL­18 (r=0.624) levels in the samples. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of HCAR1, TLR4, MHC II and NLRP3 mRNA expression was 0.830, 0.853, 0.735 and 0.945, respectively, in which NLRP3 exhibited the highest diagnostic value, and the AUC values of IL­1ß, IL­18, TNF­α, and IL­10 were 0.751, 0.841, 0.924 and 0.729, respectively, in which TNF­α exhibited the highest diagnostic value. A sepsis rat model was established by injecting lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and the rats were randomly divided into 5 groups, including a normal control group (NC group; n=6), a sepsis model group (LPS group; n=6), an ADSC transplantation group (L + M group; n=6), a combined HCAR1 receptor agonist group [L + HCAR1 inducer (Gi) + M group; n=6], and a combined HCAR1 receptor inhibitor group [L + HCAR1 blocker (Gk) + M group; n=6]. Hematoxylin and eosin staining determined that ADSCs attenuated the lung injury of septic rats and ADSC­derived HCAR1 enhanced the effect of ADSCs. The expression of HCAR1, TLR4, MHC II, NLRP3, IL­1ß, IL­18 and TNF­α levels were suppressed by ADSCs and the effect was further induced by ADSC­derived HCAR1. However, ADSC­derived HCAR1 induced the levels of anti­inflammatory factor IL­10. The negative correlation of HCAR1 expression with TLR4, MHC II, and NLRP3 expression in the peripheral blood and lung tissues of the rats was then identified. It is thus concluded that ADSC­derived HCAR1 regulates immune response in the attenuation of sepsis. ADSC­derived HCAR1 may be a promising therapeutic strategy for sepsis.