Circulating microRNAs as biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma.

GOALS: We investigated whether measurement of serum levels of the microRNAs (miRNAs) miR-16, miR-195, and miR-199a, alone or in combination with conventional serum markers, can help to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from chronic liver diseases (CLDs). BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest a link between aberrant expression of miRNA, and HCC. STUDY: This retrospective analysis was conducted using sera from 105 HCC patients, 107 CLD patients, and 71 normal control subjects. The miRNAs were measured using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The conventional HCC markers α-fetoprotein (AFP), lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive AFP (AFP-L3%), and des-γ-carboxyprothrombin (DCP) were measured with commercial kits. RESULTS: Serum levels of miR-16 and miR-199a were significantly lower in HCC than in CLD patients or control subjects (P<0.01). As a single marker, miR-16 had the highest sensitivity for HCC, followed by miR-199a, AFP, DCP, AFP-L3%, and miR-195. The combination of miR-16, AFP, AFP-L3%, and DCP yielded the optimal combination of sensitivity (92.4%) and specificity (78.5%) for HCC, overall and when analysis was restricted to patients with tumors size smaller than 3 cm. As a second-line HCC marker, miR-16 yielded positive HCC predictions in 18 of the 26 (69.2%) HCC patients with negative results on all 3 conventional markers, most of whom had tumors size smaller than 3 cm; miR-16 was falsely positive in only 12 of 96 (12.5%) CLD patients. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of miR-16 to conventional serum markers improved sensitivity and specificity for HCC. Use of miR-16 for second-line testing in cases considered negative on the basis of conventional HCC markers should be explored in larger, prospective studies.

Ubiquitin-proteasome profiling for enhanced detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A reliable test for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) could improve disease management. Recent reports suggested a link between abnormalities in the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and HCC. We investigated the potential of using UPS markers, along with HCC markers, to differentiate HCC from chronic liver disease (CLD). METHODS: Sera from 135 HCC and 262 CLD patients were retrospectively analyzed for levels of UPS markers (proteasome, ubiquitin, and proteasome enzymatic activities) and the conventional HCC markers alpha fetoprotein (AFP), AFP-L3, and des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (DCP). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to develop a model for differentiating HCC from CLD. The model was developed using a subset of 98 HCC patients and 104 CLD patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis (Metavir F3-4) and then validated using an independent set (37 HCC and 44 CLD (F3-4)). RESULTS: A UPS signature model incorporating six markers (trypsin-like, caspase-like, chymotrypsin-like, and normalized chymotrypsin-like activities of proteasomes; AFP; and DCP) accurately differentiated HCC from CLD (area under the curve = 0.938 [95% confidence interval, 0.884-0.991]). When analysis was restricted to patients with tumors ≤ 3 cm, the UPS model exhibited higher sensitivity (83.1% vs 51.8%) and specificity (90.2% vs 83.7%) than the three conventional markers, with good positive predictive values (34.2% vs 15.1%). These results were confirmed in the independent validation set. CONCLUSION: The UPS signature in combination with AFP and DCP provides sensitive and specific differentiation of HCC in patients with CLD. The importance of the UPS in HCC suggests that therapeutic approaches targeting the UPS should be explored.

Mutation Yield of a 34-Gene Solid Tumor Panel in Community-Based Tumor Samples.

BACKGROUND: Several targeted therapies have been approved for treatment of solid tumors. Identification of gene mutations that indicate response to these therapies is rapidly progressing. A 34-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, developed and validated by us, was evaluated to detect additional mutations in community-based cancer specimens initially sent to our reference laboratory for routine molecular testing. METHODS: Consecutive de-identified clinical specimens (n = 121) from melanoma cases (n = 31), lung cancer cases (n = 27), colorectal cancer cases (n = 33), and breast cancer cases (n = 30) were profiled by NGS, and the results were compared with routine molecular testing. RESULTS: Upon initial mutation testing, 20 % (24/121) were positive. NGS detected ≥1 additional mutation not identified by routine testing in 74 % of specimens (90/121). Of the specimens with additional mutations, 16 harbored mutations in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline genes. These various additional mutations were in gene regions not routinely covered, in genes not routinely tested, and/or present at low allele frequencies. Moreover, NGS yielded no false negatives. Overall, NGS detected mutations in 59 % of the genes (20/34) included in the panel, 75 % of which (15/20) were detected in multiple tumor types. Mutations in TP53 were found in 51 % of tumors tested (62/121). Mutations in at least one other (non-TP53) gene present in the panel were detected in 64 % of cases (77/121). CONCLUSION: This assay provides improved breadth and sensitivity for profiling clinically relevant genes in these prevalent solid tumor types.

Detection of BRAF V600 mutations in metastatic melanoma: comparison of the Cobas 4800 and Sanger sequencing assays.

Detection of the BRAF V600E mutation is required for use of the BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib, in patients with metastatic melanoma. Although the Roche Cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test is approved, it detects primarily the single-nucleotide V600E mutation and could miss other potentially relevant V600 mutations. To assess the detection rate of the cobas assay for V600 mutations in clinical specimens, we compared the results of this assay with Sanger sequencing in 295 melanoma FFPE samples. Twenty samples were excluded because of invalid results on the cobas (n = 3), sequencing (n = 15), or both (n = 2). V600 mutations were detected by the cobas test in 96 (34.9%) of 275 samples and by Sanger sequencing in 118 (42.9%) of 275 samples. Thus, relative to Sanger sequencing, the cobas test exhibited 80.5% sensitivity (95% CI, 72.4% to 86.6%) and 99.4% specificity (95% CI, 96.5% to 99.9%). Of 23 samples with positive sequencing results but negative cobas results, 21 harbored dinucleotide mutations (V600E in 6, V600K in 10, and V600R in 5); the other two involved single-nucleotide mutations (V600E and V600G). These findings indicate that the cobas assay may miss many V600 mutations in clinical specimens. In our study, the addition of Sanger sequencing for samples with negative cobas results increased the detection rate to 42.9%. This approach could help maximize the number of patients who benefit from BRAF inhibitor treatment.

Distribution of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism in Caucasian and Asian populations in the US: a genomic analysis of 138 healthy individuals.

The hepatic isoform 1A1 of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase is responsible for glucuronidation and detoxification of SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. The presence of an additional TA repeat in the TATA sequence of the UGT1A1 promoter leads to a significant decrease in SN-38 glucuronidation. Patients with the UGT1A1 (TA)7 allele are more likely to experience severe neutropenia and diarrhea following irinotecan chemotherapy. We assessed the distribution of the UGT1A1 (TA)n polymorphism in healthy male and female US residents of European and Asian descent. We used a fluorescent polymerase chain reaction-based assay to detect UGT1A1 (TA)n polymorphisms in 138 healthy volunteers (56 Caucasians, 37 Chinese, 37 Filipino and eight Japanese) between the ages of 18 and 65 years. The chi-test was used to assess between-group differences in the distribution of UGT1A1 (TA)n genotypes. The UGT1A1 (TA)6/6 genotype was significantly more common in Asians than in Caucasians (76 vs. 46%), whereas the (TA)6/7 (39 vs. 20%) and (TA)7/7 (13 vs. 5%) genotypes were more common in Caucasians than in Asians. Genotype distributions did not differ significantly between men and women in either group. The UGT1A1 (TA)5/5 genotype was detected in one Caucasian woman. In conclusion, consistent with previous reports, the UGT1A1 (TA)7/7 genotype was significantly more common in Caucasians than in Asians. UGT1A1 (TA)n/n genotype distribution did not vary with sex in individuals of European or Asian descent.