Genomic features of predominant non-PCV13 serotypes responsible for adult invasive pneumococcal disease in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Although pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) effectively prevent invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), serotype replacement has occurred. OBJECTIVES: We studied the pangenome, antibiotic resistance mechanisms and presence of mobile elements in predominant non-PCV13 serotypes causing adult IPD after PCV13 vaccine introduction in Spain. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre study comparing three periods in six Spanish hospitals and analysed through whole genome sequencing representative strains collected in the pre-PCV13, early-PCV13 and late-PCV13 periods. RESULTS: Among 2197 cases of adult IPD identified, 110 pneumococci expressing non-PCV13 capsules were sequenced. Seven predominant serotypes accounted for 42.6% of IPD episodes in the late-PCV13 period: serotypes 8 (14.4%), 12F (7.5%), 9N (5.2%), 11A (4.1%), 22F (3.9%), 24F (3.9%) and 16F (3.6%). All predominant non-PCV13 serotypes were highly clonal, comprising one or two clonal complexes (CC). In general, CC538, CC4048, CC3016F, CC43322F and CC669N, related to predominant non-PCV13 serotypes, were antibiotic susceptible. CC15611A was associated with resistance to co-trimoxazole, penicillin and amoxicillin. CC23024F was non-susceptible to penicillin and resistant to erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline. Six composite transposon structures of the Tn5252-family were found in CC23024F, CC98912F and CC3016F carrying different combinations of erm(B), tet(M), and cat. Pangenome analysis revealed differences in accessory genomes among the different CC, with most variety in CC3016F (23.9%) and more conservation in CC15611A (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: We identified highly clonal predominant serotypes responsible for IPD in adults. The detection of not only conjugative elements carrying resistance determinants but also clones previously associated with vaccine serotypes (CC15611A and CC23024F) highlights the importance of the accessory genome.

Molecular diagnosis of bloodstream infections in onco-haematology patients with PCR/ESI-MS technology.

OBJECTIVES: Onco-haematological patients are prone to develop infections, and antibiotic prophylaxis may lead to negative blood cultures. Thus, the microbiological diagnosis and subsequent administration of a targeted antimicrobial therapy is often difficult. The goal of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of IRIDICA (PCR/ESI-MS technology) for the molecular diagnosis of bloodstream infections in this patient group. METHODS: A total of 463 whole blood specimens from different sepsis episodes in 429 patients were analysed using the PCR/ESI-MS platform, comparing the results with those of blood culture and other clinically relevant information. RESULTS: The sensitivity of PCR/ESI-MS by specimen (excluding polymicrobial infections, n = 25) in comparison with blood culture was 64.3% overall, 69.0% in oncological patients, and 59.3% in haematological patients. When comparing with a clinical infection criterion, overall sensitivity rose to 74.7%, being higher in oncological patients (80.0%) than in haematological patients (67.7%). Thirty-one microorganisms isolated by culture were not detected by IRIDICA, whereas 42 clinically relevant pathogens not isolated by culture were detected moleculary. CONCLUSIONS: PCR/ESI-MS offers a reliable identification of pathogens directly from whole blood. While additional studies are needed to confirm our findings, the system showed a lower sensitivity in onco-haematological patients in comparison with previously reported results in patients from the Intensive Care Unit.