A prospective survey on therapeutic inertia in psoriatic arthritis (OPTI'PsA).

OBJECTIVES: Clinical inertia, or therapeutic inertia (TI), is the medical behaviour of not initiating or intensifying treatment when recommended by clinical recommendations. To our knowledge, our survey is the first to assess TI around psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Eight hundred and twenty-five French rheumatologists were contacted via email between January and March 2021 and invited to complete an online questionnaire consisting of seven clinical vignettes: five cases ('oligoarthritis', 'enthesitis', 'polyarthritis', 'neoplastic history', 'cardiovascular risk') requiring treatment OPTImization, and two 'control' cases (distal interphalangeal arthritis, atypical axial involvement) not requiring any change of treatment-according to the most recent PsA recommendations. Rheumatologists were also questioned about their routine practice, continuing medical education and perception of PsA. RESULTS: One hundred and one rheumatologists completed this OPTI'PsA survey. Almost half the respondents (47%) demonstrated TI on at least one of the five vignettes that warranted treatment optimization. The complex profiles inducing the most TI were 'oligoarthritis' and 'enthesitis' with 20% and 19% of respondents not modifying treatment, respectively. Conversely, clinical profiles for which there was the least uncertainty ('polyarthritis in relapse', 'neoplastic history' and 'cardiovascular risk') generated less TI with 11%, 8% and 6% of respondents, respectively, choosing not to change the current treatment. CONCLUSION: The rate of TI we observed for PsA is similar to published data for other chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, gout or multiple sclerosis. Our study is the first to show marked clinical inertia in PsA, and further research is warranted to ascertain the reasons behind this inertia.

Systemic Antifungal Prophylaxis in Patients Hospitalized in Hematology Units in France: The AFHEM Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: The frequency of invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) has increased in recent years. Within a context where both treatments and guidelines are fast evolving, we aim to shed new light on IFD management in hematologic departments in France. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional observational study was prospectively conducted in 24 French centers in September and October 2013. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-four hospitalized children and adult patients suffering from hematologic malignancy were enrolled: 147 (30%) were allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, 131 (27%) were patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), 71 (14%) were patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who did not undergo allogeneic HSCT, and the 145 (29%) remaining patients did not belong to the three above groups. Two hundred forty-six patients (50%) received antifungal treatment, which was prophylactic in 187 (76%) treated patients. These rates were similar across all groups (63-80%). Patients received prophylaxis with an azole (79%), intravenous amphotericin B formulation (10%), echinocandin (9%), or two combination drugs (2%). CONCLUSION: Results indicate that prophylaxis is the leading antifungal strategy in French hematology units, regardless of the disease condition, representing 76% of prescriptions for antifungal therapy. FUNDING: Astellas Pharma France.