Risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis after pediatric spinal deformity surgery with halo gravity traction.

PURPOSE: To determine risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in pediatric patients with scoliosis undergoing halo gravity traction (HGT) prior to posterior spinal fusion (PSF). METHODS: Data from consecutive patients who underwent PSF after HGT with 2-year follow-up were retrospectively collected from a single center. Patients were divided into two groups: PJK vs. no PJK. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (age 13.6 ± 3.1 years) underwent HGT for a mean of 42 ± 37 days. Eight patients (32%) developed radiographic PJK and 1 (4%) developed proximal junctional failure. PJK patients had greater loss of cervical lordosis (-17.4 ± 23.2 vs. 2.7 ± 16.2°, p < 0.05), greater increase in lumbar lordosis (9.3 ± 19.5 vs. -2.8 ± 12.8°; p = 0.034) during traction, and smaller overall major coronal curve angle correction (-16.8 ± 30.6 vs. -36.6 ± 16.4°; p = 0.026). From postoperative to last follow-up, PJK patients had a greater increase in upper end vertebrae (UEV) slope (3.3 ± 7.8 vs. -4.0 ± 7.7°; p = 0.004). Selection of UIV based on which vertebra was most level either pre-traction or in-traction was not associated with PJK development (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In-traction radiographic changes of decreased cervical lordosis, decreased major coronal curve, increased lumbar lordosis, and disruption of cervical sagittal balance at last follow-up may have implications for level selection and risk of PJK.

Long Term Results of Liner Polyethylene Cementation Technique in Revision for Peri-acetabular Osteolysis.

Patients with peri-acetabular osteolysis around a well fixed cementless acetabular component may be treated with liner exchange. When the locking mechanism is unreliable or unavailable, cementing the liner into the fixed acetabular component is a feasible option. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic long term results of this technique. Forty hip revisions with liner cementation in 37 patients were performed. The minimum follow up was 10 years. Modified Harris Hip Score and recent x rays were reviewed. Four hips were re-revised. Two patients were diagnosed with exacerbation of osteolysis but refused revision. Dislocation rate was relatively high (16%). Liner cementation technique in revision hip surgery is useful in patients with a well fixed metal backed acetabular component.

Who Needs Surgical Stabilization for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis? Retrospective Analysis of Non-Surgically Treated Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series analysis. OBJECTIVE: To identify relevant clinical and radiographic markers for patients presenting with infectious spondylo-discitis associated with spinal instability directly related to the infectious process. METHODS: We evaluated patients presenting with de-novo intervertebral discitis or vertebral osteomyelitis /discitis (VOD) who initiated non-surgical treatment. Patients who failed conservative treatment and required stabilization surgery within 90 days were defined as "failed treatment group" (FTG). Patients who experienced an uneventful course served as controls and were labeled as "nonsurgical group" (NSG). A wide array of baseline clinical and radiographic parameters was retrieved and compared between 2 groups. RESULTS: Overall 35 patients had initiated non-surgical treatment for VOD. 25 patients had an uneventful course (NSG), while 10 patients failed conservative treatment ("FTG") within 90 days. Factors found to be associated with poorer outcome were intra-venous drug abuse (IVDA) as well as the presence of fever upon initial presentation. Radiographically, involvement of the same-level facets and the extent of caudal and rostral VB involvement in both MRI and CT were found to be significantly associated with poorer clinical and radiographic outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We show that clinical factors such as IVDA status and fever as well as the extent of osseous and posterior element involvement may prove to be helpful in favoring surgical treatment early on in the management of spinal infections.

Risk Factors Associated with 90-Day Readmissions Following Occipitocervical Fusion-A Nationwide Readmissions Database Study.

BACKGROUND: Occipitocervical fusion (OCF) procedures are increasing due to an aging population and the prevalence of trauma, rheumatoid arthritis, and tumors. Reoperation rates and readmission risk factors for cervical fusions have been established, but in relation to OCF they have not been explored. This study investigates the patterns of readmissions and complications following OCF using a national database. METHODS: The 2016 U.S. Nationwide Readmissions Database was used for sample collection. Adults (>18 years) who underwent OCF were identified using the 2016 ICD-10 coding system, and we examined the readmission rates (30-day and 90-day) and reoperation rates. RESULTS: Between January and September 2016, a total of 477 patients underwent OCF; the 30-day and 90-day readmission rates were 10.4% and 22.4%, respectively. The 90-day reoperation rate related to the index surgery was 5.7%. Mean age (68.58 years) was significantly greater in the readmitted group versus nonreadmitted group (61.76 years) (P < 0.001). The readmitted group had a significantly higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (5.00 and 2.41, respectively) than the nonreadmitted group (3.25 and 1.15, respectively; P < 0.001). Nonelective OCF showed a higher readmission rate (29.18%) versus elective OCF (12.23%) (P < 0.001). Medicare and Medicaid patients showed the highest rates of readmission (27.27% and 20.41%, respectively). Readmitted patients had higher total health care costs. CONCLUSIONS: Nonelective OCF was found to have a readmission rate of almost 2½× that of elective OCF. Understanding risk factors associated with OCF will help with operative planning and patient optimization.

Surgical Management of Charcot Spinal Arthropathy in the Face of Possible Infection.

BACKGROUND: The design is a retrospective cohort study. Charcot spinal arthropathy (CSA) is a rare and poorly understood progressive destructive spine condition that usually affects patients with preexisting spinal cord injury. The complexity of this condition, especially when additionally burdened by superimposed infection in the CSA zone, can potentially lead to suboptimal management such as protracted antibiotic therapy, predisposition to hardware failure, and pseudarthrosis. While in noninfected CSA primary stabilization is the major goal, staged surgical management has not been stratified based upon presence of a superinfected CSA. We compare clinical and radiological outcomes of surgical treatment in CSA patients with and without concurrent spinal infections. METHODS: Our single-institution database was reviewed for all patients diagnosed with CSA and surgically treated, who were subsequently divided into 2 cohorts: spinal arthropathy with superimposed infection and those without. Those were comparatively studied for complications and reoperation rate. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with CSA underwent surgical intervention; mean follow up of 15.3 months (range, 0-43). Eleven patients received stabilization with a quadruple-rod thoracolumbopelvic construct, while 4 patients with superinfected CSA underwent a staged procedure. Patients treated with a staged approach experienced fewer intraoperative complications (0% versus 18%) and fewer revision surgeries (25% versus 36%). Both cohorts had the same eventual healing. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management in CSA patients with primary emphasis on stability and modified surgical treatment based on presence of an active infection in the zone of neuropathic destruction will lead to similar eventual successful results with relatively few and manageable complications in this challenging patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The proposed treatment algorithm including the use of a quadruple-rod construct with lumbopelivic fixation and a staged approach in patients with superinfected CSA represents a reasonable option in the surgical treatment of CSA.

Automatic detection and diagnosis of sacroiliitis in CT scans as incidental findings.

Early diagnosis of sacroiliitis may lead to preventive treatment which can significantly improve the patient's quality of life in the long run. Oftentimes, a CT scan of the lower back or abdomen is acquired for suspected back pain. However, since the differences between a healthy and an inflamed sacroiliac joint in the early stages are subtle, the condition may be missed. We have developed a new automatic algorithm for the diagnosis and grading of sacroiliitis CT scans as incidental findings, for patients who underwent CT scanning as part of their lower back pain workout. The method is based on supervised machine and deep learning techniques. The input is a CT scan that includes the patient's pelvis. The output is a diagnosis for each sacroiliac joint. The algorithm consists of four steps: (1) computation of an initial region of interest (ROI) that includes the pelvic joints region using heuristics and a U-Net classifier; (2) refinement of the ROI to detect both sacroiliiac joints using a four-tree random forest; (3) individual sacroiliitis grading of each sacroiliiac joint in each CT slice with a custom slice CNN classifier, and; (4) sacroiliitis diagnosis and grading by combining the individual slice grades using a random forest. Experimental results on 484 sacroiliiac joints yield a binary and a 3-class case classification accuracy of 91.9% and 86%, a sensitivity of 95% and 82%, and an Area-Under-the-Curve of 0.97 and 0.57, respectively. Automatic computer-based analysis of CT scans has the potential of being a useful method for the diagnosis and grading of sacroiliitis as an incidental finding.