Rate of conversion to secondary arthroplasty after femoral neck fractures in 796 younger patients treated with internal fixation: a Swedish national register-based study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In younger patients with a femoral neck fracture (FNF), internal fixation is the recommended treatment regardless of displacement. Healing complications are often treated with arthroplasty. We determined the rate of conversion to arthroplasty up to 5 years after fixation of either undisplaced FNFs (uFNFs) or displaced FNFs (dFNFs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was based on prospectively collected data from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) and the Swedish Arthroplasty Register (SAR). FNFs in patients aged < 60 treated with parallel pins/screws or sliding hip screws (SHS) registered in SFR 2012-2018 were cross-referenced with conversions to arthroplasty registered in SAR until 2019. The cumulative conversion and mortality rates were determined by Kaplan-Meier analyses and patient- and surgery-dependent risk factors for conversion by Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: We included 407 uFNFs and 389 dFNFs (median age 52, 59% men). The 1-year conversion rate was 3% (95% CI 1-5) for uFNFs and 9% (CI 6-12) for dFNFs. Corresponding results at 5 years were 8% (CI 5-11) and 25% (CI 20-30). Besides a displaced fracture, age 50-59 was associated with an increased rate of conversion in uFNFs. This older group also had a higher mortality rate, compared with patients aged < 50. There was no sex difference for mortality. INTERPRETATION: Adults aged under 60 with uFNFs and dFNFs face an 8-25% risk, respectively, of conversion to arthroplasty within 5 years after internal fixation. This is new and pertinent information for surgeons as well as patients.

Alcohol and drug use in adults younger than 60 years with hip fracture - A comparison of validated instruments and the clinical eye: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 218 patients.

BACKGROUND: It is a common preconception that young individuals sustaining hip fractures have alcohol and/or drug use disorder. It is important to evaluate the actual use to avoid complications and plan the rehabilitation. AIM: The primary objective was to assess alcohol and drug consumption in hip fracture patients <60 years using the validated Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) scores. We secondarily investigated the agreement between the instruments and the physicians' clinical evaluation of usage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a sub-study of 91 women and 127 men from a multicenter cohort study of patients with an acute hip fracture treated at four hospitals in Denmark and Sweden. AUDIT and DUDIT forms were completed by the patients. In addition, the researchers made an evaluation of the patients' alcohol/drug use based on direct patient contact and information on previous alcohol/drug use from medical charts. AUDIT ranges 0-40 with 6 (women) and 8 (men) as the cut-off for hazardous use. DUDIT ranges 0-44 with cut-offs of 2 and 6 indicating drug-related problems. RESULTS: According to the AUDIT, 29 % of the patients had a hazardous alcohol use (25 % women, 31 % men), whilst the clinical evaluation identified 26 % (24 % women, 28 % men). However, there was a low agreement between "the clinical eye" and AUDIT, as the clinical evaluation only correctly identified 35 of 56 individuals with AUDIT-scores indicating hazardous alcohol use. DUDIT equaled drug related problems in 8 % (5 % women, 10 % men), the clinical evaluation depicted 8 % with drug related problems (4 % women, 10 % men). The agreement was low between "the clinical eye" and DUDIT; only 7 of 15 with DUDIT-scores indicating drug related problems were correctly identified. CONCLUSION: Hazardous alcohol consumption is more common in non-elderly hip fracture patients than in the general population. Considering both self-reported alcohol use and clinical evaluation, women have almost as high rate as men. DUDIT indicated drug related problems to be slightly more common than in the population. Still, a majority did not exhibit troublesome use of neither alcohol nor drugs. The two screening methods do not identify the same individuals, and further investigation in clinical practice is needed.

Physical activity in young hip fracture patients is associated with health-related quality of life and strength; results from a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends a minimum of 150 min of moderate intensity exercise per week or 75 min of strenuous activity weekly for adults. Younger hip fracture patients are often assumed less active than the general population, however, knowledge on physical activity (PA) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in younger hip fracture patients is limited. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to 1) investigate the variation in pre-fracture PA for adult patients with hip fractures under the age of 60; and 2) to quantify the association with patient characteristics, including outcomes of HRQOL and handgrip strength. DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter cohort study of 207 adult hip fracture patients under 60 years admitted to four study hospitals from July 2015 to December 2018. Data was collected through medical records, questionnaires, physical tests and interviews. PA level was assessed using a validated questionnaire from the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, providing a total score from 3 to 19. A score ≥11 corresponds to fulfillment of the WHO recommendation for weekly PA. Handgrip strength was measured in kilograms using a handheld dynamometer following a standardized protocol. Recall pre-fracture HRQoL was assessed using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent had a PA score ≤10 out of these 46% had an ASA grade of 3 or 4, 38% had a BMI over 25 and 81% had a low energy fracture. A PA score ≤10 was associated with a lower HRQoL compared to those who had a PA score ≥11. PA score ≤10 points was associated with weaker hand grip strength and a worse health status (higher ASA-grade) p<0.001. CONCLUSION: We found that close to two-thirds of the patients had a pre-fracture PA level below WHO recommendations. Being more active was associated with better handgrip strength, HRQoL, and ASA score. Our findings indicate that individuals under 60 years who sustain a hip fracture form a heterogeneous group, some severely comorbid and others highly active and seemingly healthy. This suggests a more nuanced approach to rehabilitation, as the more active patient might need a more individualized plan than the standard program can offer.

Hip fractures in the non-elderly-Who, why and whither?

Nonelderly hip fracture patients have gathered little scientific attention, and our understanding of the group may be biased by patient case-mix and lack of follow-up. Preconceptions may thwart adequate investigation of bone health and other comorbidities. This literature review focusses on who these patients between 20 and 60 years are, how to treat them and how to evaluate the outcome. 2-11% of the hip fractures occur in non-elderly, equally common in men and women. Every second to forth patient smoke, have chronic diseases, and abuse alcohol. Poor self-rated health, sleep disturbances, low cognitive function and education are associated with increased hip fracture risk in young adults. Bone health is poorly investigated, but literature suggest young patients to have lower bone mineral density regardless of trauma mechanism. Studies contradict on whether surgery within 8-12 h reduce the risk of avascular necrosis in femoral neck fractures (FNF). Based on rationality, surgery ought to be performed promptly, in order to reduce pain and permit rehabilitation. There is no convincing support from the existing literature to use open reduction. Good reduction is mandatory, preferably using a closed reduction technique. The failure rate following internal fixation of displaced FNF in younger patients can be as high as 59%. In some cases a displaced FNF is better treated with a primary arthroplasty; in case of rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis for example. Complications after extracapsular fractures vary from 6 to 23%. The relatively few studies looking at functional outcome in non-elderly use a multitude of outcome measures, precluding comparisons. Many non-elderly patients seem not to fully recover. While some non-elderly hip fracture patients are healthy individuals sustaining high energy trauma, others have low-energy fractures and comorbidities including reduced bone strength (either as a primary or secondary condition). i.e. non-delaying medical optimization, proper surgical technique, bone health investigation and secondary fracture prevention is necessary. Younger hip fracture patients are at risk of permanent loss of function, and negative socioeconomic and psychological consequences. High-energy trauma does not exclude the presence of osteopenia. A hip fracture in adulthood and middle-age is very seldom caused by bad luck only!