Interaction of mediators and effector cells in cashew nut-induced anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: The underlying mechanisms of an immediate food-induced allergic reaction involve mast cell degranulation and recruitment of other effector cells, such as lymphocytes, eosinophils, and basophils. How the interaction of various mediators and cells results in anaphylaxis is not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in platelet-activating factor (PAF), platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH), tryptase, eosinophils, basophils, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in cashew nut-induced anaphylaxis. METHODS: Open cashew nut challenges were performed on 106 children (aged 1-16 years), sensitized to cashew nut, with earlier allergic reaction to cashew nut or no known exposure. PAF, PAF-AH, tryptase, ECP, eosinophils, and basophils were measured at 4 time points. RESULTS: Of 72 challenges with positive results, 34 were defined as anaphylactic. Eosinophil count decreased progressively during an anaphylactic reaction at all 4 time points (P < .005*) compared with baseline. Although significant PAF elevation was observed 1 hour from moderate-to-severe reaction (P = .04*), PAF seemed to peak especially in anaphylaxis but did not achieve statistical significance. PAF peak ratio (peak PAF/baseline PAF) was significantly greater in anaphylactic reactions compared with the no-anaphylaxis group (P = .008*). Maximal percentage change in eosinophils revealed negative correlation to severity score and PAF peak ratio (Spearman's rho -0.424 and -0.516, respectively). Basophils decreased significantly in moderate-to-severe reactions and in anaphylaxis (P < .05*) compared with baseline. Delta-tryptase (peak tryptase minus baseline) did not differ significantly between anaphylaxis and the no-anaphylaxis subgroups (P = .05). CONCLUSION: PAF is a specific anaphylaxis biomarker. Marked decline of eosinophils during anaphylaxis may be related to robust secretion of PAF reflecting migration of eosinophils to target tissues.

Optimizing tools for evaluating challenge outcomes in children with cashew nut allergy.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cashew nut anaphylaxis is increasing and there is a need for accurate diagnostic tests. Age-specific cutoffs in children are lacking. Changes in serum tryptase levels are not well documented in pediatric food allergy, except in anaphylaxis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of various tests to diagnose cashew nut allergy and to predict reaction severity. We also investigated changes in tryptase and their correlation to reaction severity. METHODS: We performed an open cashew nut challenge on 106 children (aged 1-16 years), who were sensitized to cashew nut with either previous allergic reaction to cashew nut or no known exposure. We analyzed the accuracy of Ana o 3 immunoglobulin E (IgE), cashew nut IgE, skin prick test, basophil activation test (BAT), and combinations thereof to diagnose cashew nut allergy and to predict reaction severity. Tryptase level was measured at the baseline and during an allergic reaction. RESULTS: A total of 72 children had positive challenge outcomes. Ana o 3 IgE seemed to be the best single test to diagnose cashew allergy, with a 0.97 kU/L cutoff exhibiting 94.1% specificity and 61.1% sensitivity. Though BAT values of at least 22.8% best predicted reaction severity, with 91.7% specificity and 60.7% sensitivity, the cutoffs were age-specific. Tryptase levels increased substantially 1 to 2 hours after the first allergic symptoms compared with baseline. CONCLUSION: Ana o 3 IgE seems to be the best diagnostic test in pediatric cashew nut allergy, and test combinations do not seem to improve the diagnostics. Cutoffs are age-specific. BAT is promising in predicting reaction severity. Tryptase levels should be measured 1 to 2 hours after initiation of an allergic reaction.