Do youth anxiety measures assess the same construct consistently throughout treatment? Results are...complicated.

Interventionists interpret changes in symptoms as reflecting response to treatment. However, changes in symptom functioning and the measurement of the underlying constructs may be reflected in reported change. Longitudinal measurement invariance (LMI) is a statistical approach that assesses the degree to which measures consistently capture the same construct over time. We examined LMI in measures of anxiety severity/symptoms [i.e., Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS), Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC), Screen for Child Anxiety and Related Disorders (SCARED)] in anxious youth at baseline and posttreatment. Initial fit was inadequate for 27 of 38 baseline and posttreatment models, but model modifications resulted in acceptable fit. Tests of LMI supported scalar invariance for the PARS and many, but not all, MASC and SCARED subscales. Findings suggest that the PARS, and many MASC and SCARED subscales can accurately be used to measure change over time, however, others may reflect changes in measurement properties.

Intolerance of Uncertainty and Parental Accommodation: Promising Targets for Personalized Intervention for Youth Anxiety.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: After reviewing predictors of differential outcomes of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for pediatric anxiety, we identify and discuss recent evidence for the role of (a) intolerance of uncertainty (IU) and (b) parental accommodation as meaningful targets for personalized intervention. RECENT FINDINGS: Few studies to date have identified promising, theory-driven predictors of differential CBT outcomes. Recent findings suggest that increased IU and high levels of parental accommodation are associated with a poorer response to CBT. Several adaptations of CBT and new interventions targeting either IU or parental accommodation have been developed and found to be efficacious in preliminary studies. IU and parental accommodation are promising constructs for personalizing intervention, both in the identification of who will respond to treatment and in the development of targeted intervention. We recommend that future work test if individuals high in IU and/or parental accommodation will respond more optimally to treatments that specifically target these constructs. The results of this future work may help to move the field closer to personalized intervention.

Cognitive Functioning in Youth with Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Anxiety disorders are disorders involving cognition. Research on cognition in youth with anxiety can focus on cognitive content (e.g., self-talk) as well cognitive functioning. The present review examines domains of cognitive functioning (i.e., episodic memory, language, attention, executive functioning, motor skills, and visual functioning) in youth diagnosed with an anxiety disorder. A database search of Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed yielded 28 studies that met inclusion criteria of youth aged 17 years or younger, a sample diagnosed with a principal anxiety disorder and a comparison sample of controls, a comparison between those samples, and use of a behavioral measure of neuropsychological performance. Findings did not identify any cognitive functioning strengths for anxious youth. Deficits were found in two domains (i.e., receptive language and motor skills) whereas no deficits were found in attention, visuospatial skills and one domain of executive functioning (i.e., inhibition). Most domains had mixed findings. Additional analysis indicated that anxiety disorders in youth are not associated with diminished IQ. Directions for future research are identified including (a) the prioritization of studies with larger, representative samples (b) the role of cognitive functioning as a predictor of anxiety treatment outcome (c) the examination of the effect of treatment on cognitive performance, and (d) the course of anxiety and potential impairment in cognitive functioning.

Idiographic Coping Outcomes in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Co-Occurring Anxiety: Results from the TAASD Study.

Versions of cognitive behavioral therapy (Coping Cat, CC; Behavioral Interventions for Anxiety in Children with Autism, BIACA) have shown efficacy in treating anxiety among youth with autism spectrum disorder. Measures of efficacy have been primarily nomothetic symptom severity assessments. The current study examined idiographic coping outcomes in the Treatment of Anxiety in Autism Spectrum Disorder study (N = 167). Longitudinal changes in coping with situations individualized to youth fears (Coping Questionnaire) were examined across CC, BIACA and treatment as usual (TAU) in a series of multilevel models. CC and BIACA produced significantly greater improvements than TAU in caregiver-reported coping. Youth report did not reflect significant differences. Results show the efficacy of CC and BIACA in improving idiographic caregiver-, but not youth-, reported youth coping.

What caregivers like the most (and least) about cognitive behavioral therapy for youth anxiety: A mixed methods approach.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious therapy for youth anxiety disorders. Caregivers are key stakeholders in youth therapy, and their feedback on treatment can help to inform intervention personalization. This mixed-methods study applied a systematic inductive thematic analysis to identify themes among most- and least-liked CBT features reported by caregivers using open-ended responses on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). The sample included 139 caregivers of youth ages 7-17 (M = 12.21, SD = 3.05; 59% female; 79.1% Caucasian, 5.8% Black, 2.9% Asian, 2.2% Hispanic, 7.9% Multiracial, 2.2% Other) with principal anxiety diagnoses who completed 16-sessions of CBT. CSQ-8 quantitative satisfaction scores (M = 29.18, SD = 3.30; range: 16-32) and survey-based treatment response rates (responders n = 93, 67%) were high. Most-liked treatment features included: coping skills (i.e., exposure, understanding/identifying anxiety, rewards, homework), therapist factors (interpersonal style/skill, relationship, accessibility), caregiver involvement, one-on-one time with a therapist, structure, consistency, and personally tailored treatment. Least-liked treatment features included: questionnaires, logistical barriers, telehealth, need for more sessions, non-anxiety concerns not addressed, insufficient caregiver involvement, and aspects of exposure tasks. Proportional frequencies of most- and least-liked themes differed by treatment responder status (e.g., responders cited exposure and homework as most-liked more frequently).

Increased self-reported reward responsiveness predicts better response to cognitive behavioral therapy for youth with anxiety.

Few consistent predictors of differential cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) outcome for anxious youth have been identified, although emerging literature points to youth reward responsiveness as a potential predictor. In a sample of youth ages 7-17 with a primary anxiety disorder (N = 136; Mage = 12.18 years, SDage = 3.12; 70 females; Caucasian n = 108, Black n = 12, Asian n = 4, Hispanic n = 5, other n = 7), the current study examined whether youth reward responsiveness assessed via the Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation System Scales for children, reward responsiveness subscale, predicted post-treatment (a) anxiety symptom severity, (b) depressive symptom severity, (c) functioning, (d) responder status and (e) number of homework/exposure tasks completed following 16-weeks of CBT, controlling for pre-treatment age, sex, anxiety/depressive symptom severity, and functioning. Moderation analyses examined whether relationships differed by age. Increased reward responsiveness was associated with lower anxiety and depressive symptom severity, higher functioning, and increased likelihood of being a responder, but not homework or exposure completion. Moderation analyses showed that younger, but not older, youth who were more reward responsive completed more exposures. Findings indicate that increased reward responsiveness is a predictor of better CBT outcomes for anxious youth, particularly functional outcomes, and that reward responsiveness may play a different role in exposure completion across development.