Intraoperative impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation and delayed neurocognitive recovery after major oncologic surgery: a secondary analysis of pooled data.

Cerebral blood flow is tightly regulated by cerebrovascular autoregulation (CVA), and intraoperative impairment of CVA has been linked with perioperative neurocognitive disorders. We aim to assess whether impairment of CVA during major oncologic surgery is associated with delayed neurocognitive recovery (DNCR) postoperatively. We performed a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data. Patients were included if they had undergone complete pre- and postoperative neuropsychological assessments, continuous intraoperative measurement of CVA, and major oncologic surgery for visceral, urological, or gynecological cancer. Intraoperative CVA was measured using the time-correlation method based on near-infrared-spectroscopy, and DNCR was assessed with a neuropsychological test battery. A decline in cognitive function before hospital discharge compared with a preoperative baseline assessment was defined as DNCR. One hundred ninety-five patients were included in the analysis. The median age of the study population was 65 years (IQR: 60-68); 11 patients (5.6%) were female. Forty-one patients (21.0%) fulfilled the criteria for DNCR in the early postoperative period. We found a significant association between impaired intraoperative CVA and DNCR before hospital discharge (OR = 1.042 [95% CI: 1.005; 1.080], p = 0.028). The type of surgery (radical prostatectomy vs. other major oncologic surgery; OR = 0.269 [95% CI: 0.099; 0.728], p = 0.010) and premedication with midazolam (OR = 3.360 [95% CI: 1.039; 10.870], p = 0.043) were significantly associated with the occurrence of DNCR in the early postoperative period. Intraoperative impairment of CVA is associated with postoperative neurocognitive function early after oncologic surgery. Therefore, intraoperative monitoring of CVA may be a target for neuroprotective interventions. The initial studies were retrospectively registered with primary clinical trial registries recognized by the World Health Organization (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: DRKS00010014, 21.03.2016 and NCT04101006, 24.07.2019).

Comparing the effect of positioning on cerebral autoregulation during radical prostatectomy: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Surgery in the prolonged extreme Trendelenburg position may lead to elevated intracranial pressure and compromise cerebral hemodynamic regulation. We hypothesized that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with head-down tilt causes impairment of cerebral autoregulation compared with open retropubic radical prostatectomy in the supine position. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective radical prostatectomy were included at a tertiary care prostate cancer clinic. Continuous monitoring of the cerebral autoregulation was performed using the correlation method. Based on measurements of cerebral oxygenation with near-infrared spectroscopy and invasive mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), a moving correlation coefficient was calculated to obtain the cerebral oxygenation index as an indicator of cerebral autoregulation. Cerebral autoregulation was measured continuously from induction until recovery from anesthesia. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in cerebral autoregulation between robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy during induction (p = 0.089), intraoperatively (p = 0.162), and during recovery from anesthesia (p = 0.620). Age (B = 0.311 [95% CI 0.039; 0.583], p = 0.025) and a higher difference between baseline MAP and intraoperative MAP (B = 0.200 [95% CI 0.073; 0.327], p = 0.002) were associated with impaired cerebral autoregulation, whereas surgical technique was not (B = 3.339 [95% CI 1.275; 7.952], p = 0.155). CONCLUSION: Compared with open radical prostatectomy in the supine position, robot-assisted surgery in the extreme Trendelenburg position with capnoperitoneum did not lead to an impairment of cerebral autoregulation during the perioperative period in our study population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00010014, date of registration: 21.03.2016, retrospectively registered.

Comparison of Cognitive Function After Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy and Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Observational Single-Center Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Trendelenburg position on postoperative neurocognitive outcomes this study compared cognitive function between patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and those who underwent open retropubic radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Objective evaluations of pre- and postoperative cognitive function were performed upon admission and before hospital discharge, by using a neuropsychological test battery. We collected self-reported data on cognitive failures at 3 months postoperatively. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effects of surgical technique on postoperative cognitive performance. RESULTS: The pre- and postoperative neuropsychological assessments were completed by 367 patients with a median age of 64 years (range 44-76). The incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction was 23.9% after robot-assisted (39/165) and 22.3% after open radical prostatectomy (45/202). There was no significant difference in postoperative cognitive function during the early postoperative period (P = 0.758) and self-reported cognitive failures at 3 months (P = 0.303) between robot-assisted and open surgery. Surgical technique was not associated with early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in multivariable analysis (OR 1.012, 95%CI: 0.608-1.685, P = 0.962). CONCLUSION: Compared with open surgery in supine position postoperative neurocognitive disorders do not occur more frequently after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the extreme Trendelenburg position. Based on these findings potential adverse effects on cognitive function do not have to be considered in the choice of surgical approach for radical prostatectomy.

Postanesthesia care unit delirium following robot-assisted vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of early postoperative delirium in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the extreme Trendelenburg position and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) in supine position. METHODS: Patients were screened for delirium signs 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes following extubation. RESULTS: PACU delirium was present in 39.3% of RARP (64/163) patients and 41.8% of ORP (77/184) patients. Higher age (OR 1.072, 95%CI: 1.034-1.111, P < .001), total intravenous anesthesia (OR 2.001, 95%CI: 1.243-3.221, P = .004), and anesthesia duration (OR 1.255, 95%CI: 1.067-1.476, P = .006) were associated with PACU delirium, but no association was found between surgical technique and PACU delirium. CONCLUSION: Compared with inhalational anesthesia, total intravenous anesthesia using propofol-sufentanil, higher age, and longer duration of anesthesia were associated with PACU delirium. Based on these findings, adverse effects on postoperative recovery and delirium signs do not have to be considered in the choice of surgical approach for radical prostatectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.drks.de/, identifier: DRKS00010014.