No convincing association between post-operative delirium and post-operative cognitive dysfunction: a secondary analysis.

BACKGROUND: Post-operative delirium and post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) are both common but it has not been clarified how closely they are associated. We aimed to assess the possible relationship in a secondary analysis of data from the 'Surgery Depth of anaesthesia and Cognitive outcome'- study. METHODS: We included patients aged ≥ 60 years undergoing non-cardiac surgery planned for longer than 60 min. Delirium was assessed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV criteria in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) as well as within the first week after surgery. Cognitive function was assessed with a neuropsychological test battery. Multivariable analysis of POCD was performed with consideration of predisposing and precipitating factors. RESULTS: Of 1277 randomized patients, 850 (66.6%) had complete data. Delirium was found in 270 patients (32.9% of 850). We detected POCD in 162 (20.9% of 776) at 1 week and in 52 (9.4% of 553) at 3 months. In multivariable analysis (n = 808), delirium had no overall effect on POCD (P = 0.30). Patients with no delirium in PACU but with postoperative delirium within 7 days had an increased risk of POCD at 3 months (OR = 2.56 (95%-confidence interval: 1.07-6.16), P = 0.035). No significant association was found for the other subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear evidence that postoperative delirium is independently associated with POCD up to 3 months.

Monitoring depth of anaesthesia in a randomized trial decreases the rate of postoperative delirium but not postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium in elderly patients is a frequent complication and associated with poor outcome. The aim of this parallel group study was to determine whether monitoring depth of anaesthesia influences the incidence of postoperative delirium. METHODS: Patients who were planned for surgery in general anaesthesia expected to last at least 60 min and who were older than 60 yr were included between March 2009 and May 2010. A total of 1277 patients of a consecutive sample were randomized (n=638 open, n=639 blinded) and the data of 1155 patients were analysed (n=575 open, n=580 blinded). In one group, the anaesthesiologists were allowed to use the bispectral index (BIS) data to guide anaesthesia, while in the other group, BIS monitoring was blinded. Cognitive function was evaluated at baseline, 1 week, and 3 months after operation. RESULTS: Delirium incidence was lower in patients guided with BIS. Postoperative delirium was detected in 95 patients (16.7%) in the intervention group compared with 124 patients (21.4%) in the control group (P=0.036). In a multivariate analysis, the percentage of episodes of deep anaesthesia (BIS values <20) were independently predictive for postoperative delirium (P=0.006; odds ratio 1.027). BIS monitoring did not alter the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (7th day P=0.062; 90th day P=0.372). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative neuromonitoring is associated with a lower incidence of delirium, possibly by reducing extreme low BIS values. Therefore, in high-risk surgical patients, this may give the anaesthesiologist a possibility to influence one precipitating factor in the complex genesis of delirium. Clinical trial registration ISRCTN Register: 36437985. http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN36437985/.

Documentation of post-operative nausea and vomiting in routine clinical practice.

This study investigated the quality of documentation of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) by comparing incidences collected by a research team with those reported routinely by nursing personnel. A total of 560 patients passing through an interdisciplinary recovery room were included in the study. The overall recorded incidence of PONV over 24 h was 30.7%, which was in agreement with the predicted value of 32% calculated using incidences from published randomized controlled trials. Out of the total number of 86 cases of PONV in the recovery room only 36 (42%) were detected by nursing staff. Similarly, out of the total number of 129 cases of PONV on the ward over 24 h, only 37 (29%) were recognized by nursing staff during routine care. In conclusion, PONV in routine clinical care is likely to be under-reported. To use PONV as a valid quality measure, patients need to be actively asked about nausea and vomiting at frequent intervals in a standardized fashion. A considerable proportion of patients experience PONV after discharge from the recovery room, so the assessment of PONV should cover at least 24 h post-operatively.

Remifentanil reduces the incidence of post-operative delirium.

A secondary exploratory analysis of data from an observational study was used to study the influence of the opioid used for intraoperative anaesthesia on the incidence of post-operative delirium. Patients who had been admitted to the recovery room following elective general anaesthesia were divided into those who had received fentanyl or remifentanil. For unbiased patient analysis, matched pairs were built with respect to gender, age, physical status, anaesthetic type and surgery duration. In 752 patients, the overall incidence of delirium was 9.9% in the recovery room and 3.8% on the first post-operative day. Compared with the remifentanil group, the fentanyl group had a significantly higher incidence of delirium in the recovery room (12.2% versus 7.7%) and on the first post-operative day (5.8% versus 1.9%). Delirium in the recovery room and on the first post-operative day were both associated with a significantly prolonged post-operative hospital stay. The choice of intraoperative opioid influences the incidence of post-operative delirium. Remifentanil was associated with a lower incidence of post-operative delirium in the early post-operative period.

[Adherence to treatment guidelines for postoperative nausea and vomiting. How well does knowledge transfer result in improved clinical care?]. / Einhaltung der Behandlungsrichtlinien für postoperative Ubelkeit und Erbrechen. Wie gut gelingt der Wissenstransfer hin zu einer besseren klinischen Versorgung?

BACKGROUND: In order to reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) a standard operating procedure (SOP) was developed in our department. This consists basically in the administration of one antiemetic intervention for moderate risk (2 risk factors), two interventions for high risk (3-4 risk factors) and no prophylaxis in patients who have no or only one risk factor. The aim of this study was to find out whether PONV prophylaxis according to our SOP was followed and led to a lower incidence of PONV. METHOD AND PATIENTS: A total of 2,729 patients were examined in a prospective observational study with post-ad hoc analysis in our department. Inclusion criteria were age over 14 years after general anesthesia and postoperative care in the recovery room. This group was examined in relation to compliance with the SOP. RESULTS: A total of 725 (26.6%), 1050 (38.5%) and 954 (35.0%) patients were grouped according to risk classification into groups with low, medium and high risks, respectively. An SOP compliant regime occurred in 668 patients (92.1%) of the low risk groups, in 373 patients (35.6%) of the moderate risk group and 177 patients (18.6%) of patients at high risk for PONV. In the high risk group 565 patients (59.2%) received at least one antiemetic medication. Patients with PONV were on average cared for 12 min longer in the recovery room (p=0.048). CONCLUSION: Patients with medium and high risk have a lower incidence of PONV than expected per risk calculation by complying with the SOP. However, the recommended risk-adapted approach was inadequately implemented. Considering this there is room for improvement. Moreover taking into account these implementation issues a general PONV prophylaxis may be beneficial.

Comparison of three scores to screen for delirium in the recovery room.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is often seen in the recovery room and is a predictor for postoperative delirium on the ward. However, monitoring to detect delirium in the recovery room as a basic prerequisite for early intervention is rarely used. The aim of this study was to identify a valid and easy-to-use test for early screening of delirium in the recovery room. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four adult patients admitted to the recovery room during regular working hours were included. A screening assessment for delirium was performed in the recovery room by a trained research team at the time when the patient was judged to be 'ready for discharge'. Delirium monitoring was performed with the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), the Delirium Detection Score (DDS), and the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV criteria were used as the gold standard. RESULTS: Delirium in the recovery room was seen in 21 patients (14%) with the DSM-IV criteria, in 11 patients (7%) with the CAM, in four patients (3%) with the DDS, and in 37 patients (24%) with the Nu-DESC. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.43 and 0.98 for the CAM, 0.14 and 0.99 for the DDS, and 0.95 and 0.87 for the Nu-DESC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All scores used were very specific, but the CAM and the DDS were less sensitive compared with the gold standard. Overall, the Nu-DESC was the most sensitive test in the recovery room to detect delirium.

Incidence and risk factors for cognitive dysfunction in patients with severe systemic disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relevance of surgery and other causative factors to the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in patients with severe systemic disease. METHODS: This observational study included 107 noncardiac surgical patients and 26 nonsurgical control subjects, all of whom had an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification status of 3. Cognitive assessment was performed preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively, or with a 7-day interval for the control group. POCD was calculated as a combined Z-score. Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to exclude patients with pre-existing cognitive deficit (MMSE score ≤ 23). Surgical and other factors including duration of surgery/anaesthesia and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) were recorded. RESULTS: After 7 days, POCD was found in 40/107 (37.4%) surgical patients compared with 4/26 (15.4%) nonsurgical controls. Preoperative MMSE score, duration of surgery/anaesthesia, and length of stay in the ICU and hospital were associated with POCD. Logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative MMSE score was an independent predictor of POCD. CONCLUSION: Lower baseline MMSE score was the only independent predictor for POCD in patients with severe systemic disease.

Documented intraoperative hypotension according to the three most common definitions does not match the application of antihypotensive medication.

This observational study investigated which of the three most common definitions of intraoperative hypotension (IOH), reported in a published systematic literature review, were associated best with anaesthetists' administration of antihypo tensive medication (AHM). IOH and AHM use in anaesthetic procedures in a mixed surgical population (n = 2350) were also reviewed. The definitions were: arterial systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 100 mmHg or a fall in SBP of > 30% of the preoperative SBP baseline; arterial SBP < 80 mmHg; a fall in SBP of > 20% of the preoperative SBP. Accuracy of predicting AHM using these three definitions was 67%, 54% and 65%, respectively. Prediction by a new fourth definition, using an optimal threshold of minimal SBP falling to < 92 mmHg or by > 24% of preoperative baseline, was 68% accurate. In multivariate logistic analysis, age, volatile versus intravenous anaesthetics, medical history of arterial hypertension and all four definitions of IOH were associated with intraoperative AHM, however IOH was not associated with postoperative in-patient stay. The three original definitions correlated poorly with the anaesthetist's judgement about applying AHM. Anaesthetists make complex decisions regarding the relevance of IOH, considering various perioperative factors in addition to SBP. Age, physical status and duration and type of surgery showed better correlations with postoperative in-patient stay than IOH.

Risk factors for inadequate emergence after anesthesia: emergence delirium and hypoactive emergence.

AIM: Inadequate emergence after anesthesia in the adult patient may be distinguished by the patients' activity level into two subtypes: emergence delirium and hypoactive emergence. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of inadequate emergence in its different forms, to identify causative factors and to examine the possible influence on postoperative length of stay in the recovery room and in the hospital. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 1868 non-intubated adult patients who had been admitted to the recovery room were analyzed. Inadequate emergence was classified in its different forms according to the Richmond agitation and sedation scale (RASS) 10 minutes after admission to the recovery room. Emergence delirium was defined as a RASS score >or=+1, and hypoactive emergence was defined as a RASS score