Prevalence of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease among asthmatic patients: A meta-analysis of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is manifested by adult-onset asthma, nasal polyposis, chronic rhinosinusitis, and aspirin sensitivity. Previously reported prevalence rates have been widely variable based on the population studied, method of diagnosis, and definition of aspirin sensitivity. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the prevalence of AERD among asthmatic adults. METHODS: A systematic review of databases was performed to identify all clinical trials published on or before June 16, 2013, that evaluated the prevalence of AERD. The studies were clustered into 7 different groups based on underlying disease (asthma, nasal polyps or chronic rhinosinusitis, or both), as well as on the methodology of prevalence determination. RESULTS: A total of 1770 articles were identified, with 27 considered appropriate for inclusion. Prevalence rates of AERD ranged from 5.5% to 12.4% based on study type. Among all studies in asthmatic patients, regardless of method, the prevalence of AERD was 7.15% (95% CI, 5.26% to 9.03%). The prevalence of AERD was highest among patients with severe asthma (14.89% [95% CI, 6.48% to 23.29%]). Among patients with nasal polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis, the prevalence was 9.69% (95% CI, 2.16% to 17.22%) and 8.7% (95% CI, -1.02% to 18.34%), respectively. CONCLUSION: AERD is a distinct and important subtype of asthma and polypoid sinus disease. The prevalence of AERD is 7% in typical adult asthmatic patients and twice that number in patients with severe asthma, which underscores the importance of recognizing this disorder. Early identification of this syndrome is critical in view of the increased morbidity and costs associated with asthma exacerbations and the option to treat patients with AERD with long-term aspirin treatment after desensitization.

A 68-year old woman with asymptomatic hypereosinophilia.

Eosinophilia is known to have a wide variety of etiologies including atopic diseases, infections, endocrine abnormalities, hematologic/neoplastic causes, and certain immunodeficiency disorders. In contrast, hypereosinophilic syndromes refer to a group of heterogeneous disorders with persistent eosinophilia and organ involvement. The treatment of eosinophilia varies widely based on its etiology and therefore should be evaluated thoroughly at onset. We present the case of a 68-year-old woman with isolated asymptomatic hypereosinophilia.

Prevalence of sensitivity to food and drug additives in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) is defined as the presence of urticaria most days of the week for a period of 6 weeks or longer. There have been reports of food additive sensitivity in CIU previously, but the prevalence has not been precisely determined. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of reactions to food and drug additives in patients with CIU. METHODS: We challenged 100 patients in our allergy/immunology division with CIU to the 11 additives most commonly associated with reactions: tartrazine (FD&C Yellow 5), potassium metabisulfite, monosodium glutamate, aspartame, sodium benzoate, methyl paraben, butylated hydroxy anisole, butylated hydroxy toluene, FD&C Yellow 6, sodium nitrate, sodium nitrite. All of the patients had a history of CIU for longer than 6 weeks, and 43 reported possible history of food or drug additive sensitivity. Single-blind challenges to all of the additives were performed in the clinic and skin scores were recorded. Subjects with positive challenge tests underwent double-blind placebo controlled challenges. RESULTS: Of 100 subjects, only 2 had a positive urticarial response on single-blind challenge. Neither of these patients had a positive urticarial response on double-blind placebo-controlled challenge. There were no gastrointestinal, respiratory, or other symptom, and no patients reported late reactions. CONCLUSION: We were able to conclude, with 95% confidence intervals that sensitivity to any of the 11 food and drug additives occurs in fewer than 1% of patients with CIU. Food and drug additives appear to be a rare cause of CIU, and avoidance is not recommended.