Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Versus Energy-Integrating Detector Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Calcium Quantitation.

OBJECTIVES: Photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) offers improved spatial and contrast resolution, which can impact quantitative measurements. This work aims to determine in human subjects the effect of dual-source PCD-CT on the quantitation of coronary artery calcification (CAC) compared with dual-source energy-integrating detector (EID) CT in both 1- and 3-mm images. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients receiving a clinical EID-CT CAC examination to undergo a research PCD-CT CAC examination. Axial images were reconstructed with a 512 × 512 matrix, 200-mm field of view, 3-mm section thickness/1.5-mm interval using a quantitative kernel (Qr36). Sharper kernels (Qr56/QIR strength 4 for PCD and Qr49/ADMIRE strength 5 for EID) were used to reconstruct images with 1-mm section thickness/0.5-mm interval. Pooled analysis was performed for all calcifications with nonzero values, and volume and Agatston scores were compared between EID-CT and PCD-CT. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In 21 subjects (median age, 58 years; range, 50-75 years; 13 male [62%]) with a total of 42 calcified arteries detected at 3 mm and 46 calcified arteries at 1-mm images, EID-CT CAC volume and Agatston scores were significantly lower than those of PCD-CT ( P ≤ 0.001). At 3-mm thickness, the mean (standard deviation) volume and Agatston score for EID-CT were 55.5 (63.4) mm 3 and 63.8 (76.9), respectively, and 61.5 (69.4) mm 3 and 70.4 (85.3) for PCD-CT ( P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0013). At 1-mm thickness, the mean (standard deviation) volume and score for EID-CT were 50.0 (56.3) mm 3 and 61.1 (69.3), respectively, and 59.5 (63.9) mm 3 and 72.5 (79.9) for PCD-CT ( P < 0.0001 for both). The applied radiation dose (volume CT dose index) for the PCD-CT scan was 2.1 ± 0.6 mGy, which was 13% lower than for the EID-CT scan (2.4 ± 0.7 mGy, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to EID-CT, PCD-CT demonstrated a small but significant increase in coronary artery calcium volume and Agatston score.

Comparison of Photon-counting Detector and Energy-integrating Detector CT for Visual Estimation of Coronary Percent Luminal Stenosis.

Background Compared with energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, the improved resolution of photon-counting detector (PCD) CT coupled with high-energy virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) has been shown to decrease calcium blooming on images in phantoms and cadaveric specimens. Purpose To determine the impact of dual-source PCD CT on visual and quantitative estimation of percent diameter luminal stenosis compared with dual-source EID CT in patients. Materials and Methods This prospective study recruited consecutive adult patients from an outpatient facility between January and March 2022. Study participants underwent clinical dual-source EID coronary CT angiography followed by a research dual-source PCD CT examination. For PCD CT, multienergy data were used to create VMIs at 50 and 100 keV. Two readers independently reviewed EID CT images followed by PCD CT images after a washout period. Readers visually graded the most severe stenosis in terms of percent diameter luminal stenosis for the left main, left anterior descending, right, and circumflex coronary arteries, unblinded to scanner type. Quantitative measures of percent stenosis were made using commercial software. Visual and quantitative estimates of percent stenosis were compared between EID CT and PCD CT using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results A total of 25 participants (median age, 59 years [range, 18-78 years]; 16 male participants) were enrolled. On EID CT images, readers 1 and 2 identified 39 and 32 luminal stenoses, respectively, with a percent diameter luminal stenosis greater than 0%. Visual estimates of percent stenosis were lower on PCD CT images than EID CT images (reader 1: median 20.6% [IQR, 8.8%-61.2%] vs 31.8% [IQR, 12.9%-69.7%], P < .001; reader 2: 6.5% [IQR, 0.4%-54.1%] vs 22.9% [IQR, 1.8%-67.4%], P = .002). No difference was observed between EID CT and PCD CT for quantitative measures of percent stenosis (median difference, -1.5% [95% CI: -3.0%, 2.5%]; P = .51). Conclusion Relative to using EID CT, using PCD CT led to decreases in visual estimates of percent stenosis. © RSNA, 2023 See also the editorial by Murphy and Donnelly in this issue.

Photon-counting Detector CT with Deep Learning Noise Reduction to Detect Multiple Myeloma.

Background Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT and deep learning noise reduction may improve spatial resolution at lower radiation doses compared with energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. Purpose To demonstrate the diagnostic impact of improved spatial resolution in whole-body low-dose CT scans for viewing multiple myeloma by using PCD CT with deep learning denoising compared with conventional EID CT. Materials and Methods Between April and July 2021, adult participants who underwent a whole-body EID CT scan were prospectively enrolled and scanned with a PCD CT system in ultra-high-resolution mode at matched radiation dose (8 mSv for an average adult) at an academic medical center. EID CT and PCD CT images were reconstructed with Br44 and Br64 kernels at 2-mm section thickness. PCD CT images were also reconstructed with Br44 and Br76 kernels at 0.6-mm section thickness. The thinner PCD CT images were denoised by using a convolutional neural network. Image quality was objectively quantified in two phantoms and a randomly selected subset of participants (10 participants; median age, 63.5 years; five men). Two radiologists scored PCD CT images relative to EID CT by using a five-point Likert scale to detect findings reflecting multiple myeloma. The scoring for the matched reconstruction series was blinded to scanner type. Reader-averaged scores were tested with the null hypothesis of equivalent visualization between EID and PCD. Results Twenty-seven participants (median age, 68 years; IQR, 61-72 years; 16 men) were included. The blinded assessment of 2-mm images demonstrated improvement in viewing lytic lesions, intramedullary lesions, fatty metamorphosis, and pathologic fractures for PCD CT versus EID CT (P < .05 for all comparisons). The 0.6-mm PCD CT images with convolutional neural network denoising also demonstrated improvement in viewing all four pathologic abnormalities and detected one or more lytic lesions in 21 of 27 participants compared with the 2-mm EID CT images (P < .001). Conclusion Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector CT improved the visibility of multiple myeloma lesions relative to energy-integrating detector CT. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

The technical development of photon-counting detector CT.

Since 1971 and Hounsfield's first CT system, clinical CT systems have used scintillating energy-integrating detectors (EIDs) that use a two-step detection process. First, the X-ray energy is converted into visible light, and second, the visible light is converted to electronic signals. An alternative, one-step, direct X-ray conversion process using energy-resolving, photon-counting detectors (PCDs) has been studied in detail and early clinical benefits reported using investigational PCD-CT systems. Subsequently, the first clinical PCD-CT system was commercially introduced in 2021. Relative to EIDs, PCDs offer better spatial resolution, higher contrast-to-noise ratio, elimination of electronic noise, improved dose efficiency, and routine multi-energy imaging. In this review article, we provide a technical introduction to the use of PCDs for CT imaging and describe their benefits, limitations, and potential technical improvements. We discuss different implementations of PCD-CT ranging from small-animal systems to whole-body clinical scanners and summarize the imaging benefits of PCDs reported using preclinical and clinical systems. KEY POINTS: • Energy-resolving, photon-counting-detector CT is an important advance in CT technology. • Relative to current energy-integrating scintillating detectors, energy-resolving, photon-counting-detector CT offers improved spatial resolution, improved contrast-to-noise ratio, elimination of electronic noise, increased radiation and iodine dose efficiency, and simultaneous multi-energy imaging. • High-spatial-resolution, multi-energy imaging using energy-resolving, photon-counting-detector CT has been used in investigations into new imaging approaches, including multi-contrast imaging.

Clinical applications of photon counting detector CT.

The X-ray detector is a fundamental component of a CT system that determines the image quality and dose efficiency. Until the approval of the first clinical photon-counting-detector (PCD) system in 2021, all clinical CT scanners used scintillating detectors, which do not capture information about individual photons in the two-step detection process. In contrast, PCDs use a one-step process whereby X-ray energy is converted directly into an electrical signal. This preserves information about individual photons such that the numbers of X-ray in different energy ranges can be counted. Primary advantages of PCDs include the absence of electronic noise, improved radiation dose efficiency, increased iodine signal and the ability to use lower doses of iodinated contrast material, and better spatial resolution. PCDs with more than one energy threshold can sort the detected photons into two or more energy bins, making energy-resolved information available for all acquisitions. This allows for material classification or quantitation tasks to be performed in conjunction with high spatial resolution, and in the case of dual-source CT, high pitch, or high temporal resolution acquisitions. Some of the most promising applications of PCD-CT involve imaging of anatomy where exquisite spatial resolution adds clinical value. These include imaging of the inner ear, bones, small blood vessels, heart, and lung. This review describes the clinical benefits observed to date and future directions for this technical advance in CT imaging. KEY POINTS: • Beneficial characteristics of photon-counting detectors include the absence of electronic noise, increased iodine signal-to-noise ratio, improved spatial resolution, and full-time multi-energy imaging. • Promising applications of PCD-CT involve imaging of anatomy where exquisite spatial resolution adds clinical value and applications requiring multi-energy data simultaneous with high spatial and/or temporal resolution. • Future applications of PCD-CT technology may include extremely high spatial resolution tasks, such as the detection of breast micro-calcifications, and quantitative imaging of native tissue types and novel contrast agents.

Photon-Counting Detector CT for Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Clinical Perspective.

Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT has emerged as a novel imaging modality that represents a fundamental shift in the way that CT systems detect x-rays. After pre-clinical and clinical investigations showed benefits of PCD CT for a range of imaging tasks, the U.S. FDA in 2021 approved the first commercial PCD CT system for clinical use. The technologic features of PCD CT are particularly well suited for musculo-skeletal imaging applications. Advantages of PCD CT compared with conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT include smaller detector pixels and excellent geometric dose efficiency that enable imaging of large joints and central skeletal anatomy at ultrahigh spatial resolution; advanced multienergy spectral postprocessing that allows quantification of gout deposits and generation of virtual noncalcium images for visualization of bone edema; improved metal artifact reduction for imaging of orthopedic implants; and higher CNR and suppression of electronic noise. Given substantially improved cortical and trabecular detail, PCD CT images more clearly depict skeletal abnormalities, including fractures, lytic lesions, and mineralized tumor matrix. The purpose of this article is to review, by use of clinical examples comparing EID CT and PCD CT, the technical features of PCD CT and their associated impact on musculoskeletal imaging applications.

Seeing More with Less: Clinical Benefits of Photon-counting Detector CT.

Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT is an emerging technology that has led to continued innovation and progress in diagnostic imaging after it was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for clinical use in September 2021. Conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT measures the total energy of x-rays by converting photons to visible light and subsequently using photodiodes to convert visible light to digital signals. In comparison, PCD CT directly records x-ray photons as electric signals, without intermediate conversion to visible light. The benefits of PCD CT systems include improved spatial resolution due to smaller detector pixels, higher iodine image contrast, increased geometric dose efficiency to allow high-resolution imaging, reduced radiation dose for all body parts, multienergy imaging capabilities, and reduced artifacts. To recognize these benefits, diagnostic applications of PCD CT in musculoskeletal, thoracic, neuroradiologic, cardiovascular, and abdominal imaging must be optimized and adapted for specific diagnostic tasks. The diagnostic benefits and clinical applications resulting from PCD CT in early studies have allowed improved visualization of key anatomic structures and radiologist confidence for some diagnostic tasks, which will continue as PCD CT evolves and clinical use and applications grow. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Ananthakrishnan in this issue.

Photon Counting Detector Computed Tomography: A New Frontier of Myeloma Bone Disease Evaluation.

Photon counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) is a paradigm-shifting innovation in CT imaging which was recently granted approval for clinical use by the US Food and Drug Administration. PCD-CT allows the generation of multi-energy images with increased contrast and scanning speed or ultra-high spatial resolution (UHR) images with lower radiation doses, compared to the currently used energy integrating detector (EID) CT. Since the recognition of bone disease related to multiple myeloma is important for the diagnosis and management of patients, the advent of PCD-CT heralds a new era in superior diagnostic evaluation of myeloma bone disease. In a first-in-human pilot study, patients with multiple myeloma were imaged with UHR-PCD-CT to validate and establish the utility of this technology in routine imaging and clinical care. We describe 2 cases from that cohort to highlight the superior imaging performance and diagnostic potential of PCD-CT for multiple myeloma compared to clinical standard EID-CT. We also discuss how the advanced imaging capabilities from PCD-CT enhances clinical diagnostics to improve care and overall outcomes for patients.

Optimal Virtual Monoenergetic Photon Energy (keV) for Photon-Counting-Detector Computed Tomography Angiography.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the optimal photon energy for virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) in computed tomography angiography (CTA) using photon-counting-detector (PCD) CT. METHODS: Under institutional review board approval, 10 patients (abdominal, n = 4; lower extremity, n = 3; head and neck, n = 3) were scanned on an investigational PCD-CT (Count Plus, Siemens Healthcare) at 120 or 140 kV. All images were iteratively reconstructed with Bv48 kernel and 2-mm slice thickness. Axial and coronal VMI maximum-intensity projections were created in the range 40 to 65 keV (5-keV steps). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for major arteries in each VMI series. Two radiologists blindly ranked each VMI series for overall image quality and visualization of small vessels and pathology. The median and SD of scores for each photon energy were calculated. In addition, readers identified any VMIs that distinguished itself from others in terms of vessel/pathology visualization or artifacts. RESULTS: Mean iodine CNR was highest in 40-keV VMIs for all evaluated arteries. Across readers, the 50-keV VMI had the highest combined score (2.00 ± 1.11). Among different body parts, the 45-keV VMI was ranked highest for the head-and-neck (1.75 ± 0.68) and lower extremity (2.00 ± 1.41) CTA. Meanwhile, 50- and 55-keV VMIs were ranked highest for abdominal (2.50 ± 1.35 and 2.50 ± 1.56) CTA. The 40-keV VMI received the highest score for iodine visualization in vessels, and the 65-keV VMI for reduced metal/calcium-blooming artifacts. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitatively, VMIs at 40 keV had the highest CNR in major arterial vasculature using PCD-CTA. Based on radiologists' preference, the 45- and 50-keV VMIs were optimal for small body parts (eg, head and neck and lower extremity) and large body parts (eg, abdomen), respectively.

Lung Cancer Screening Using Clinical Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography and Energy-Integrating-Detector Computed Tomography: A Prospective Patient Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic quality of photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) in patients undergoing lung cancer screening compared with conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT in a prospective multireader study. MATERIALS: Patients undergoing lung cancer screening with conventional EID-CT were prospectively enrolled and scanned on a PCD-CT system using similar automatic exposure control settings and reconstruction kernels. Three thoracic radiologists blinded to CT system compared PCD-CT and EID-CT images and scored examinations using a 5-point Likert comparison score (-2 [left image is worse] to +2 [left image is better]) for artifacts, sharpness, image noise, diagnostic image quality, emphysema visualization, and lung nodule evaluation focusing on the border. Post hoc correction of Likert scores was performed such that they reflected PCD-CT performance in comparison to EID-CT. A nonreader radiologist measured objective image noise. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (mean, 66.9 ± 5.6 years; 11 female; body mass index; 30.1 ± 5.1 kg/m 2 ) were enrolled. Mean volume CT dose index for PCD-CT was lower (0.61 ± 0.21 vs 0.73 ± 0.22; P < 0.001). Pooled reader results showed significant differences between imaging modalities for all comparative rankings ( P < 0.001), with PCD-CT favored for sharpness, image noise, image quality, and emphysema visualization and lung nodule border, but not artifacts. Photon-counting detector CT had significantly lower image noise (74.4 ± 10.5 HU vs 80.1 ± 8.6 HU; P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Photon-counting detector CT with similar acquisition and reconstruction settings demonstrated improved image quality and less noise despite lower radiation dose, with improved ability to depict pulmonary emphysema and lung nodule borders compared with EID-CT at low-dose lung cancer CT screening.

Improved visualization of the wrist at lower radiation dose with photon-counting-detector CT.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the image quality of ultra-high-resolution wrist CTs acquired on photon-counting detector CT versus conventional energy-integrating-detector CT systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were scanned on a photon-counting-detector CT system after clinical energy-integrating detector CTs. Energy-integrating-detector CT scan parameters: comb filter-based ultra-high-resolution mode, 120 kV, 250 mAs, Ur70 or Ur73 kernel, 0.4- or 0.6-mm section thickness. Photon-counting-detector CT scan parameters: non-comb-based ultra-high-resolution mode, 120 kV, 120 mAs, Br84 kernel, 0.4-mm section thickness. Two musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to CT system, scored specific osseous structures using a 5-point Likert scale (1 to 5). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for statistical analysis of reader scores. Paired t-test was used to compare volume CT dose index, bone CT number, and image noise between CT systems. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Twelve wrists (mean participant age 55.3 ± 17.8, 6 females, 6 males) were included. The mean volume CT dose index was lower for photon-counting detector CT (9.6 ± 0.1 mGy versus 19.0 ± 6.7 mGy, p < .001). Photon-counting-detector CT images had higher Likert scores for visualization of osseous structures (median score = 4, p < 0.001). The mean bone CT number was higher in photon-counting-detector CT images (1946 ± 77 HU versus 1727 ± 49 HU, p < 0.001). Conversely, there was no difference in the mean image noise of the two CT systems (63 ± 6 HU versus 61 ± 6 HU, p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Ultra-high-resolution imaging with photon-counting-detector CT depicted wrist structures more clearly than conventional energy-integrating-detector CT despite a 49% radiation dose reduction.

Feasibility of photon-counting CT for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome evaluation: lower radiation dose and improved diagnostic confidence.

OBJECTIVE: The feasibility of low-dose photon-counting detector (PCD) CT to measure alpha and acetabular version angles of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: FAI patients undergoing an energy-integrating detector (EID) CT underwent an IRB-approved prospective ultra-high-resolution (UHR) PCD-CT between 5/2021 and 12/2021. PCD-CT was dose-matched to the EID-CT or acquired at 50% dose. Simulated 50% dose EID-CT images were generated. Two radiologists evaluated randomized EID-CT and PCD-CT images and measured alpha and acetabular version angles on axial image slices. Image quality (noise, artifacts, and visualization of cortex) and confidence in non-FAI pathology were rated on a 4-point scale (3 = adequate). Preference tests of standard dose PCD-CT, 50% dose PCD-CT, and 50% dose EID-CT relative to standard dose EID-CT were performed using Wilcoxon Rank test. RESULTS: 20 patients underwent standard dose EID-CT (~ CTDIvol, 4.5 mGy); 10 patients, standard dose PCD-CT (4.0 mGy); 10 patients, 50% PCD-CT (2.6 mGy). Standard dose EID-CT images were scored as adequate for diagnostic task in all categories (range 2.8-3.0). Standard dose PCD-CT images scored higher than the reference in all categories (range 3.5-4, p < 0.0033). Half-dose PCD-CT images also scored higher for noise and cortex visualization (p < 0.0033) and equivalent for artifacts and visualization of non-FAI pathology. Finally, simulated 50% EID-CT images scored lower in all categories (range 1.8-2.4, p < 0.0033). CONCLUSIONS: Dose-matched PCD-CT is superior to EID-CT for alpha angle and acetabular version measurement in the work up of FAI. UHR-PCD-CT enables 50% radiation dose reduction compared to EID while remaining adequate for the imaging task.

Establishing a quality assurance program for photon counting detector (PCD) CT: Tips and caveats.

PURPOSE: To determine the suitability of a quality assurance (QA) program based on the American College of Radiology's (ACR) CT quality control (QC) manual to fully evaluate the unique capabilities of a clinical photon-counting-detector (PCD) CT system. METHODS: A daily QA program was established to evaluate CT number accuracy and artifacts for both standard and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) scan modes. A complete system performance evaluation was conducted in accordance with the ACR CT QC manual by scanning the CT Accreditation Phantom with routine clinical protocols and reconstructing low-energy-threshold (T3D) and virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) between 40 and 120 keV. Spatial resolution was evaluated by computing the modulation transfer function (MTF) for the UHR mode, and multi-energy performance was evaluated by scanning a body phantom containing four iodine inserts with concentrations between 2 and 15 mg I/cc. RESULTS: The daily QA program identified instances when the detector needed recalibration or replacement. CT number accuracy was impacted by image type: CT numbers at 70 keV VMI were within the acceptable range (defined for 120 kV). Other keV VMIs and the T3D reconstruction had at least one insert with CT number outside the acceptable range. The limiting resolution was nearly 40 lp/cm based on MTF measurements, which far exceeds the 12 lp/cm maximum capability of the ACR phantom. The CT numbers in the iodine inserts were accurate on all VMIs (3.8% average percentage error), while the iodine concentrations had an average root mean squared error of 0.3 mg I/cc. CONCLUSION: Protocols and parameters must be properly selected on PCD-CT to meet current accreditation requirements with the ACR CT phantom. Use of the 70 keV VMI allowed passing all tests prescribed in the ACR CT manual. Additional evaluations such an MTF measurement and multi-energy phantom scans are also recommended to comprehensively evaluate PCD-CT scanner performance.

First Clinical Photon-counting Detector CT System: Technical Evaluation.

Background The first clinical CT system to use photon-counting detector (PCD) technology has become available for patient care. Purpose To assess the technical performance of the PCD CT system with use of phantoms and representative participant examinations. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and written informed consent from four participants were obtained. Technical performance of a dual-source PCD CT system was measured for standard and high-spatial-resolution (HR) collimations. Noise power spectrum, modulation transfer function, section sensitivity profile, iodine CT number accuracy in virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs), and iodine concentration accuracy were measured. Four participants were enrolled (between May 2021 and August 2021) in this prospective study and scanned using similar or lower radiation doses as their respective clinical examinations performed on the same day using energy-integrating detector (EID) CT. Image quality and findings from the participants' PCD CT and EID CT examinations were compared. Results All standard technical performance measures met accreditation and regulatory requirements. Relative to filtered back-projection reconstructions, images from iterative reconstruction had lower noise magnitude but preserved noise power spectrum shape and peak frequency. Maximum in-plane spatial resolutions of 125 and 208 µm were measured for HR and standard PCD CT scans, respectively. Minimum values for section sensitivity profile full width at half maximum measurements were 0.34 mm (0.2-mm nominal section thickness) and 0.64 mm (0.4-mm nominal section thickness) for HR and standard PCD CT scans, respectively. In a 120-kV standard PCD CT scan of a 40-cm phantom, VMI iodine CT numbers had a mean percentage error of 5.7%, and iodine concentration had root mean squared error of 0.5 mg/cm3, similar to previously reported values for EID CT. VMIs, iodine maps, and virtual noncontrast images were created for a coronary CT angiogram acquired with 66-msec temporal resolution. Participant PCD CT images showed up to 47% lower noise and/or improved spatial resolution compared with EID CT. Conclusion Technical performance of clinical photon-counting detector (PCD) CT is improved relative to that of a current state-of-the-art CT system. The dual-source PCD geometry facilitated 66-msec temporal resolution multienergy cardiac imaging. Study participant images illustrated the effect of the improved technical performance. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Willemink and Grist in this issue.

Ultra-high-resolution imaging of the shoulder and pelvis using photon-counting-detector CT: a feasibility study in patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ultra-high-resolution (UHR) imaging of large joints using an investigational photon-counting detector (PCD) CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing clinical shoulder or pelvis energy-integrating-detector (EID) CT exam were scanned using the UHR mode of the PCD-CT system. Axial EID-CT images (1-mm sections) and PCD-CT images (0.6-mm sections) were reconstructed using Br62/Br64 and Br76 kernels, respectively. Two musculoskeletal radiologists rated visualization of anatomic structures using a 5-point Likert scale. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for statistical analysis of reader scores, and paired t-test was used for comparing bone CT numbers and image noise from PCD-CT and EID-CT. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (17 shoulders and 15 pelvis) were prospectively recruited for this feasibility study. Mean age for shoulder exams was 67.3 ± 15.5 years (11 females) and 47.2 ± 15.8 years (11 females) for pelvis exams. The mean volume CT dose index was lower on PCD-CT compared to that on EID-CT (shoulders: 18 mGy vs. 34 mGy, pelvis: 11.6 mGy vs. 16.7 mGy). PCD-CT was rated significantly better than EID-CT (p < 0.001) for anatomic-structure visualization. Trabecular delineation in shoulders (mean score = 4.24 ± 0.73) and femoroacetabular joint visualization in the pelvis (mean score = 3.67 ± 1.03) received the highest scores. PCD-CT demonstrated significant increase in bone CT number (p < 0.001) relative to EID-CT; no significant difference in image noise was found between PCD-CT and EID-CT. CONCLUSION: The evaluated PCD-CT system provided improved visualization of osseous structures in the shoulders and pelvises at a 31-47% lower radiation dose compared to EID-CT. KEY POINTS: • A full field-of-view PCD-CT with 0.151 mm × 0.176 mm detector pixel size (isocenter) facilitates bilateral, high-resolution imaging of shoulders and pelvis. • The evaluated investigational PCD-CT system was rated superior by two musculoskeletal radiologists for anatomic structure visualization in shoulders and pelvises despite a 31-47% lower radiation dose compared to EID-CT. • PCD-CT demonstrated significantly higher bone CT number compared to EID-CT, while no significant difference in image noise was observed between PCD-CT and EID-CT despite a 31-47% dose reduction on PCD-CT.

Improved coronary calcification quantification using photon-counting-detector CT: an ex vivo study in cadaveric specimens.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of coronary calcium quantification of cadaveric specimens imaged from a photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT and an energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT. METHODS: Excised coronary specimens were scanned on a PCD-CT scanner, using both the PCD and EID subsystems. The scanning and reconstruction parameters for EID-CT and PCD-CT were matched: 120 kV, 9.3-9.4 mGy CTDIvol, and a quantitative kernel (D50). PCD-CT images were also reconstructed using a sharper kernel (D60). Scanning the same specimens using micro-CT served as a reference standard for calcified volumes. Calcifications were segmented with a half-maximum thresholding technique. Segmented calcified volume differences were analyzed using the Friedman test and post hoc pairwise Wilcoxon signed rank test with the Bonferroni correction. Image noise measurements were compared between EID-CT and PCD-CT with a repeated-measures ANOVA test and post hoc pairwise comparison with the Bonferroni correction. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The volume measurements in 12/13 calcifications followed a similar trend: EID-D50 > PCD-D50 > PCD-D60 > micro-CT. The median calcified volumes in EID-D50, PCD-D50, PCD-D60, and micro-CT were 22.1 (IQR 10.2-64.8), 21.0 (IQR 9.0-56.5), 18.2 (IQR 8.3-49.3), and 14.6 (IQR 5.1-42.4) mm3, respectively (p < 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons). The average image noise in EID-D50, PCD-D50, and PCD-D60 was 60.4 (± 3.5), 56.0 (± 4.2), and 113.6 (± 8.5) HU, respectively (p < 0.01 for all pairwise comparisons). CONCLUSION: The PCT-CT system quantified coronary calcifications more accurately than EID-CT, and a sharp PCD-CT kernel further improved the accuracy. The PCD-CT images exhibited lower noise than the EID-CT images. KEY POINTS: • High spatial resolution offered by PCD-CT reduces partial volume averaging and consequently leads to better morphological depiction of coronary calcifications. • Improved quantitative accuracy for coronary calcification volumes could be achieved using high-resolution PCD-CT compared to conventional EID-CT. • PCD-CT images exhibit lower image noise than conventional EID-CT at matched radiation dose and reconstruction kernel.

Photon-counting Detector CT: System Design and Clinical Applications of an Emerging Technology.

Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT is an emerging technology that has shown tremendous progress in the last decade. Various types of PCD CT systems have been developed to investigate the benefits of this technology, which include reduced electronic noise, increased contrast-to-noise ratio with iodinated contrast material and radiation dose efficiency, reduced beam-hardening and metal artifacts, extremely high spatial resolution (33 line pairs per centimeter), simultaneous multienergy data acquisition, and the ability to image with and differentiate among multiple CT contrast agents. PCD technology is described and compared with conventional CT detector technology. With the use of a whole-body research PCD CT system as an example, PCD technology and its use for in vivo high-spatial-resolution multienergy CT imaging is discussed. The potential clinical applications, diagnostic benefits, and challenges associated with this technology are then discussed, and examples with phantom, animal, and patient studies are provided. ©RSNA, 2019.

Quantitative imaging of excised osteoarthritic cartilage using spectral CT.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify iodine uptake in articular cartilage as a marker of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content using multi-energy spectral CT. METHODS: We incubated a 25-mm strip of excised osteoarthritic human tibial plateau in 50 % ionic iodine contrast and imaged it using a small-animal spectral scanner with a cadmium telluride photon-processing detector to quantify the iodine through the thickness of the articular cartilage. We imaged both spectroscopic phantoms and osteoarthritic tibial plateau samples. The iodine distribution as an inverse marker of GAG content was presented in the form of 2D and 3D images after applying a basis material decomposition technique to separate iodine in cartilage from bone. We compared this result with a histological section stained for GAG. RESULTS: The iodine in cartilage could be distinguished from subchondral bone and quantified using multi-energy CT. The articular cartilage showed variation in iodine concentration throughout its thickness which appeared to be inversely related to GAG distribution observed in histological sections. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-energy CT can quantify ionic iodine contrast (as a marker of GAG content) within articular cartilage and distinguish it from bone by exploiting the energy-specific attenuation profiles of the associated materials. KEY POINTS: • Contrast-enhanced articular cartilage and subchondral bone can be distinguished using multi-energy CT. • Iodine as a marker of glycosaminoglycan content is quantifiable with multi-energy CT. • Multi-energy CT could track alterations in GAG content occurring in osteoarthritis.