Tendon Healing in a Mouse Model of Loeys-Dietz Syndrome: Controlled Study Using a Patellar Tendon Transection Model.

BACKGROUND: Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) is a rare autosomal-dominant connective tissue disorder caused by genetic mutations in the transforming growth factor-ß (TGFß) signaling pathway. In addition to vascular malformations, patients with LDS commonly present with bone and tendon abnormalities, including joint laxity. While TGFß signaling dysregulation has been implicated in many of these clinical manifestations, the degree to which it influences the tendinopathy and tendon healing issues in LDS has not been determined. METHODS: Wound healing after patellar tendon transection was compared between wild-type (WT) and Tgfbr2-mutant (LDS) mice (7 mice per group). In all mice, the right patellar tendon was transected at midsubstance, while the left was untouched to serve as a control. Mice were euthanized 6 weeks after surgery. Tendon specimens were harvested for histopathologic grading according to a previously validated scoring metric, and gene expression levels of Mmp2, Tgfb2, and other TGFß-signaling genes were assayed. Between-group comparisons were made using 1-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference testing. RESULTS: Expression levels of assayed genes were similar between LDS and WT tendons at baseline; however, at 6 weeks after patellar tendon transection, LDS tendons showed sustained elevations in Mmp2 and Tgfb2 compared with baseline values; these elevations were not seen in normal tendons undergoing the same treatments. Histologically, untreated LDS tendons had significantly greater cellularity and cell rounding compared with untreated WT tendons, and both WT and LDS tendons had significantly worse histologic scores after surgery. CONCLUSION: We present the first mechanistic insight into the effect of LDS on tendons and tendon healing. The morphologic differences between LDS and WT tendons at baseline may help explain the increased risk of tendon/ligament dysfunction in patients with LDS, and the differential healing response to injury in LDS may account for the delayed healing and weaker repair tissue. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Conservative management of spinal pathology with autologous conditioned serum: A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory pain is associated with increased expression of interleukin (IL)-1, an inflammatory cytokine, and activity on its receptor (IL-1R). In response, the body produces IL-1R antagonist (IL-1Ra) to reduce this signaling. Autologous conditioned serum (ACS) is the only biologic therapy for spinal pathologies that enhances the action of endogenous IL-1Ra reserves to improve symptoms. This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of ACS in treating pain and disability caused by spinal pathologies. AIM: To evaluate the use of ACS as a conservative management option for spinal pathology. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed/Medline was performed to identify studies investigating administration of ACS for treatment of any spinal pathology. RESULTS: Six articles were included, comprising 684 patients treated with epidural (n = 133) or transforaminal (n = 551) ACS injections. Patients had an average age of 54.0 years with slight female predominance (53.2%). The lumbar spine was most commonly treated, with 567 patients (82.9%) receiving injections for lumbar radiculopathy (n = 67), degenerative disc disease (DDD) (n = 372), or spinal stenosis (n = 128); cervical injections were performed in 109 patients (15.9%). Mean (SD) follow-up was 21.7 (4.8) weeks from first ACS injection. All studies investigating mechanical lumbar and lumbar or cervical radicular pain reported significant pain reduction at final follow-up compared to baseline. ACS achieved comparable or superior results to lumbar epidural steroid injections. Adverse events were reported in 21 patients (3.1%), with no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: ACS injection is a safe and effective intervention for pain reduction in many spinal pathologies, including cervical and lumbar radiculopathies.

Intraoperative Methadone in Spine Surgery ERAS Protocols: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the use of intraoperative methadone in spine surgery and examine its effects on postoperative opioid use, pain, length of stay, and operative time. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine surgery patients commonly have a history of chronic pain and opioid use, and as a result, they are at an increased risk of severe postoperative pain. While pure mu opioids remain the standard for acute surgical pain management, they are associated with significant short-term and long-term adverse events. Methadone presents an alternative to pure mu opioids which may improve postoperative management of pain following intraoperative use. METHODS: A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted to review existing literature detailing operating time, postoperative pain, opioid usage, and hospital length of stay (LOS) following intraoperative methadone administration in spine surgery. RESULTS: Following screening of 994 articles and application of inclusion criteria, 8 articles were included, 4 of which were retrospective. Conventional spine surgery intraoperative analgesic strategies used as comparators for intraoperative methadone included hydromorphone, ketamine, and sufentanil. Considering patient outcomes, included studies observed that patients treated with intraoperative methadone had statistically similar or significantly reduced pain scores, opioid usage, and LOS compared with comparator analgesics. However, one study observed that intraoperative methadone used in a multimodal analgesia regimen strategy with ketamine resulted in a shortened LOS compared with the use of intraoperative methadone alone. Differences in operating time between cases that used intraoperative methadone and cases that used comparator analgesics were not statistically significant among included studies. CONCLUSION: Methadone may present an alternative option for both intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in spine surgery recovery protocols and may reduce postoperative pain, opioid use, and LOS while maintaining consistent operating time and reduced side effects of pure mu opioids. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Management of spinal trauma in pregnant patients: A systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Despite the high incidence of spine trauma globally, traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) during pregnancy is considered a rare medical emergency. The literature on acute management of these patients is sparse compared with that of mothers with preexisting tSCI. This systematic review aims to evaluate management strategies for tSCI during pregnancy in improving neurologic, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE was performed without language restriction from inception until November 2, 2023 for patients who acquired tSCI during pregnancy. Excluded articles described postpartum trauma, trauma before pregnancy, or SCI of nontraumatic etiology such as neoplastic, vascular, hemorrhagic, or ischemic origin. Primary outcomes investigated were maternal American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade, pregnancy termination, cesarean delivery, prematurity, and neonatal adverse events. RESULTS: Data from 73 patients were extracted from 43 articles from 1955 to 2023. The mothers' median age was 24 years (interquartile range, 23-30 years), and the average gestational age at the time of injury was 21.1 ± 7.7 weeks. The thoracic spine was the most common segment affected (41.1%) and had the greatest proportion of complete tSCI (46.6%). Furthermore, ASIA score improvement was observed in 17 patients with 3 patients experiencing a 2-score improvement and 1 patient experiencing a 3-score improvement. Among these patients, 86% of ASIA B and 100% of ASIA C patients showed neurologic improvement, compared to only 17% of ASIA A patients. Surgically managed patients had a lower rate of neonatal adverse events than conservatively managed patients (11% vs. 34%). CONCLUSION: Acute tSCI requires a coordinated effort between a multidisciplinary team with careful consideration. While maternal neurologic improvement was observed more often following a better ASIA grade on presentation, the presence of neonatal adverse events was less common in patients treated with surgery than in patients who were managed conservatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review; Level IV.

Synthesis and evaluation of a novel vancomycin-infused, biomimetic bone graft using a rat model of spinal implant-associated infection.

Background: Postoperative infection is a complication of spinal fusion surgery resulting in increased patient morbidity. Strategies including intraoperative application of powdered vancomycin have been proposed to reduce the incidence of infection; however, such antimicrobial effects are short-lived. Methods: Instrumentation of the L4-L5 vertebrae was performed mimicking pedicle screw and rod fixation in 30 rats. Titanium instrumentation inoculated with either PBS or 1×105 CFU bioluminescent MRSA, along with biomimetic bone grafts infused with varying concentrations of vancomycin and 125 µg of rhBMP-2 (BioMim-rhBMP-2-VCM) were implanted prior to closure. Infection was quantified during the six-week postoperative period using bioluminescent imaging. Arthrodesis was evaluated using micro-CT. Results: Infected animals receiving a bone graft infused with low-dose (0.18 mg/g) or high-dose vancomycin (0.89 mg/g) both exhibited significantly lower bioluminescent signal over the six-week postoperative period than control animals inoculated with MRSA and implanted with bone grafts lacking vancomycin (p=.019 and p=.007, respectively). Both low and high-dose vancomycin-infused grafts also resulted in a statistically significant reduction in average bioluminescence when compared to control animals (p=.027 and p=.047, respectively), independent of time. MicroCT analysis of animals from each group revealed pseudoarthrosis only in the control group, suggesting a correlation between infection and pseudoarthrosis. MRSA-inoculated control animals also had significantly less bone volume formation on micro-CT than the PBS-inoculated control cohort (p<.001), the MRSA+low-dose vancomycin-infused bone graft cohort (p<.001), and the MRSA+high-dose vancomycin-infused bone graft cohort (p<.001). Conclusion: BioMim-rhBMP-2-VCM presents a novel tissue engineering approach to simultaneously promoting arthrodesis and antimicrobial prophylaxis in spinal fusion. Despite mixed evidence of potential osteotoxicity of vancomycin reported in literature, BioMim-rhBMP-2-VCM preserved arthrodesis and osteogenesis with increasing vancomycin loading doses due to the graft's osteoinductive composition.

Creation and preclinical evaluation of a novel mussel-inspired, biomimetic, bioactive bone graft scaffold: direct comparison with Infuse bone graft using a rat model of spinal fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Infuse bone graft is a widely used osteoinductive adjuvant; however, the simple collagen sponge scaffold used in the implant has minimal inherent osteoinductive properties and poorly controls the delivery of the adsorbed recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). In this study, the authors sought to create a novel bone graft substitute material that overcomes the limitations of Infuse and compare the ability of this material with that of Infuse to facilitate union following spine surgery in a clinically translatable rat model of spinal fusion. METHODS: The authors created a polydopamine (PDA)-infused, porous, homogeneously dispersed solid mixture of extracellular matrix and calcium phosphates (BioMim-PDA) and then compared the efficacy of this material directly with Infuse in the setting of different concentrations of rhBMP-2 using a rat model of spinal fusion. Sixty male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to each of six equal groups: 1) collagen + 0.2 µg rhBMP-2/side, 2) BioMim-PDA + 0.2 µg rhBMP-2/side, 3) collagen + 2.0 µg rhBMP-2/side, 4) BioMim-PDA + 2.0 µg rhBMP-2/side, 5) collagen + 20 µg rhBMP-2/side, and 6) BioMim-PDA + 20 µg rhBMP-2/side. All animals underwent posterolateral intertransverse process fusion at L4-5 using the assigned bone graft. Animals were euthanized 8 weeks postoperatively, and their lumbar spines were analyzed via microcomputed tomography (µCT) and histology. Spinal fusion was defined as continuous bridging bone bilaterally across the fusion site evaluated via µCT. RESULTS: The fusion rate was 100% in all groups except group 1 (70%) and group 4 (90%). Use of BioMim-PDA with 0.2 µg rhBMP-2 led to significantly greater results for bone volume (BV), percentage BV, and trabecular number, as well as significantly smaller trabecular separation, compared with the use of the collagen sponge with 2.0 µg rhBMP-2. The same results were observed when the use of BioMim-PDA with 2.0 µg rhBMP-2 was compared with the use of the collagen sponge with 20 µg rhBMP-2. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of rhBMP-2-adsorbed BioMim-PDA scaffolds resulted in BV and bone quality superior to that afforded by treatment with rhBMP-2 concentrations 10-fold higher implanted on a conventional collagen sponge. Using BioMim-PDA (vs a collagen sponge) for rhBMP-2 delivery could significantly lower the amount of rhBMP-2 required for successful bone grafting clinically, improving device safety and decreasing costs.

A novel rodent model of chronic spinal implant-associated infection.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Bacterial infection of spinal instrumentation is a significant challenge in spinal fusion surgery. Although the intraoperative local application of powdered vancomycin is common practice for mitigating infection, the antimicrobial effects of this route of administration are short-lived. Therefore, novel antibiotic-loaded bone grafts as well as a reliable animal model to permit the testing of such therapies are needed to improve the efficacy of infection reduction practices in spinal fusion surgery. PURPOSE: This study aims to establish a clinically relevant rat model of spinal implant-associated infection to permit the evaluation of antimicrobial bone graft materials used in spinal fusion. STUDY DESIGN: Rodent study of chronic spinal implant-associated infection. METHODS: Instrumentation anchored in and spanning the vertebral bodies of L4 and L5 was inoculated with bioluminescent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteria (MRSA). Infection was monitored using an in vivo imaging system (IVIS) for 8 weeks. Spines were harvested and evaluated histologically, and colony-forming units (CFUs) were quantified in harvested implants and spinal tissue. RESULTS: Postsurgical analysis of bacterial infection in vivo demonstrated stratification between MRSA and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control groups during the first 4 weeks of the 8-week infection period, indicating the successful establishment of acute infection. Over the 8-week chronic infection period, groups inoculated with 1 × 105 MRSA CFU and 1 × 106 MRSA CFU demonstrated significantly higher bioluminescence than groups inoculated with PBS control (p = 0.009 and p = 0.041 respectively). Histological examination at 8 weeks postimplantation revealed the presence of abscesses localized to implant placement in all MRSA inoculation groups, with the most pervasive abscess formation in samples inoculated with 1 × 105 MRSA CFU and 1 × 106 MRSA CFU. Quantification of CFU plated from harvested spinal tissue at 8 weeks post-implantation revealed the 1 × 105 MRSA CFU inoculation group as the only group with a significantly greater average CFU count compared to PBS control (p = 0.017). Further, CFU quantification from harvested spinal tissue was greater than CFU quantification from harvested implants across all inoculation groups. CONCLUSION: Our model demonstrated that the inoculation dosage of 1 × 105 MRSA CFU exhibited the most robust chronic infection within instrumented vertebral bodies. This dosage had the greatest difference in bioluminescence signal from control (p < 0.01), the lowest mortality (0% compared to 50% for samples inoculated with 1 × 106 MRSA CFU), and a significantly higher amount of CFUs from harvested spine samples than CFUs from control harvested spine samples. Further, histological analysis confirmed the reliability of this novel rodent model of implanted-associated infection to establish infection and biofilm formation of MRSA for all inoculation groups. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This model is intended to simulate the infection of instrumentation used in spinal fusion surgeries concerning implant locality and material. This model may evaluate potential antimicrobial and osteogenic biomaterials and investigate the relationship between implant-associated infection and failed fusion.