Fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions: a randomized study with long-term follow-up comparing standard and flexible needles.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasingly found on cross-sectional imaging, with the majority having a low risk for malignancy. The added value of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in risk stratification remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of three FNA needles on diagnostic accuracy, clinical management, and the ability to accrue fluid for tumor markers. METHODS: A multicenter prospective trial randomized 250 patients with PCLs ≥ 13 mm 2:1:1 to 19G Flex, 19G, and 22G needles with crossover for repeated FNA procedures. Diagnostic accuracy was established at 2-year follow-up, with the final diagnosis from surgical histopathology or consensus diagnosis by experts based sequentially on clinical presentation, imaging, and aspirate analysis in blinded review. RESULTS: Enrolled patients (36 % symptomatic) had PCLs in the head (44 %), body (28 %), and tail (26 %). Percentage of cyst volume aspirated was 78 % (72 % - 84 %) for 19G Flex, 74 % (64 % - 84 %) for 22G, and 73 % (63 % - 83 %) for 19G (P = 0.84). Successful FNA was significantly higher for 19G Flex (89 % [82 % - 94 %]) and 22G (82 % [70 % - 90 %]) compared with 19G (75 % [63 % - 85 %]) (P = 0.02). Repeated FNA was required more frequently in head/uncinate lesions than in body and tail (P < 0.01). Diagnostic accuracy of the cyst aspirate was 84 % (73 % - 91 %) against histopathology at 2-year follow-up (n = 79), and 77 % (70 % - 83 %) against consensus diagnosis among nonsurgical cases (n = 171). Related serious adverse events occurred in 1.2 % (0.2 % - 3.5 %) of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results demonstrate a statistically significant difference among the three needles in the overall success rate for aspiration, but not in the percentage of cyst volume aspirated. Flexible needles may be particularly valuable in sampling cystic PCLs in the pancreatic head/uncinate process.

Long-term clinical outcomes of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in painful chronic calcific pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term results of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for large pancreatic duct (PD) stones in patients with idiopathic calcific pancreatitis (CP) are scanty. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate intermediate and long-term results of ESWL in a large cohort of patients with idiopathic CP. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; retrospective chart review. SETTING: A high-volume, tertiary-care center for endoscopy and GI diseases. PATIENTS: A total of 636 patients with idiopathic CP who underwent ESWL and ERCP were followed-up. Patients were divided into intermediate (24-60 months) and long-term (>60 months) follow-up groups. INTERVENTION: ESWL and ERCP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Improvement in pain, analgesic use, hospitalization for pain, recurrence of calculi, need for additional intervention, and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 636 of 1006 patients who underwent ESWL between 2004 and 2009 were followed for a maximum of 96 months. There were 364 patients in the intermediate follow-up group and 272 in the long-term follow-up group. After ESWL and ERCP, absence of pain was seen in 250 patients (68.7%), mild-to-moderate pain in 94 patients (25.4%), and severe pain in 20 patients (5.5%) of the intermediate group. In the long-term group, 164 patients (60.3%) had no pain, 97 patients (35.7%) had mild or moderate episodes of pain, whereas 11 patients (4.04%) had episodic severe pain. Recurrence of calculi was seen in 51 patients (14.01%) in the intermediate follow-up group and in 62 patients (22.8%) in the long-term group. Quality of life improved in a significant number of patients in both groups. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study, single center, recall bias, and subjective pain and quality-of-life measurement scale. CONCLUSION: ESWL for large PD calculi offers good results in patients of idiopathic CP on intermediate and long-term follow-up.