Content validity testing of the INTERMED Self-Assessment in a sample of adults with rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatology healthcare providers.

BACKGROUND: Care complexity can occur when patients experience health challenges simultaneously with social barriers including food and/or housing insecurity, lack of transportation or other factors that impact care and patient outcomes. People with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may experience care complexity due to the chronicity of their condition and other biopsychosocial factors. There are few standardised instruments that measure care complexity and none that measure care complexity specifically in people with RA. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the content validity of the INTERMEDS Self-Assessment (IMSA) instrument that measures care complexity with a sample of adults with RA and rheumatology healthcare providers (HCPs). Cognitive debriefing interviews utilising a reparative framework were conducted. METHODS: Patient participants were recruited through two existing studies where participants agreed to be contacted about future studies. Study information was also shared through email blasts, posters and brochures at rheumatology clinic sites and trusted arthritis websites. Various rheumatology HCPs were recruited through email blasts, and divisional emails and announcements. Interviews were conducted with nine patients living with RA and five rheumatology HCPs. RESULTS: Three main reparative themes were identified: (1) Lack of item clarity and standardisation including problems with item phrasing, inconsistency of the items and/or answer sets and noninclusive language; (2) item barrelling, where items asked about more than one issue, but only allowed a single answer choice; and (3) timeframes presented in the item or answer choices were either too long or too short, and did not fit the lived experiences of patients. Items predicting future healthcare needs were difficult to answer due to the episodic and fluctuating nature of RA. CONCLUSIONS: Despite international use of the IMSA to measure care complexity, patients with RA and rheumatology HCPs in our setting perceived that it did not have content validity for use in RA and that revision for use in this population under a reparative framework was unfeasible. Future instrument development requires an iterative cognitive debriefing and repair process with the population of interest in the early stages to ensure content validity and comprehension. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient and public contributions included both patient partners on the study team and people with RA who participated in the study. Patient partners were involved in study design, analysis and interpretation of the findings and manuscript preparation. Data analysis was structured according to emergent themes of the data that were grounded in patient perspectives and experiences.

Emergency department triage decision-making by registered nurses: An instrument development study.

AIM: To develop and psychometrically test the triage decision-making instrument, a tool to measure Emergency Department Registered Nurses decision-making. DESIGN: Five phases: (1) defining the concept, (2) item generation, (3) face validity, (4) content validity and (5) pilot testing. METHODS: Concept definition informed by a grounded theory study from which four domains emerged. Items relevant to the four domains were generated and revised. Face validity was established using three focus groups. The target population upon which the reliability and validity of the triage decision-making instrument was explored were triage registered nurses in emergency departments. Three expert judges assessed 89 items for content and domain designation using a 4-point scale. Psychometric properties were assessed by exploratory factor analysis, following which the names of the four domains were modified. RESULTS: The triage decision-making instrument is a 22-item tool with four factors: clinical judgement, managing acuity, professional collaboration and creating space. Focus group data indicated support for the domains. Expert review resulted in 46 items with 100% agreement and 13 with 66% agreement. Fifty-nine items were distributed to a convenience sample of 204 triage nurses from six hospitals in 2019. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measures indicated that the data were sufficient for exploratory factor analysis. Bartlett's test indicated patterned relationships among the items (X2 (231) = 1156.69). An eigenvalue of >1.0 was used and four factors explained 48.64% of the variance. All factor loadings were ≥0.40. Internal consistency was demonstrated by Cronbach's alphas of .596 factor 1, .690 factor 2, .749 factor 3 and .822 for factor 4. CONCLUSION: The triage decision-making instrument meets the criteria for face validity, content validity and internal consistency. It is suitable for further testing and refinement. IMPACT: The instrument is a first step in quantifying triage decision-making in real-world clinical environments. The triage decision-making instrument can be used for targeted triage interventions aimed at improving throughput and staff education. STATISTICAL SUPPORT: Dr. Tak Fung who is a member of the research team is a statistician. STATISTICAL METHODS: Development, validation and assessment of instruments/scales. Descriptive statistics. REPORTING METHOD: STROBE cross-sectional checklist. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The TDI makes the complexity of triage decision-making visible. Identifying the influence of decision-making factors in addition to acuity that affect triage decisions will enable nurse managers and educators to develop targeted interventions and staff development initiatives. By extension, this will enhance patient care and safety.

Drug Overdose, Loss of Consciousness, and Compartment Syndrome: A Life-Threatening Combination.

Acute extremity compartment syndrome is considered an orthopedic emergency that has serious consequences if a correct diagnosis is not made rapidly. Patients who lose consciousness due to a drug overdose are known to collapse onto their extremities. The limbs are compressed for hours, placing them at an increased risk for acute extremity compartment syndrome and its sequelae. Compartment syndrome due to a compression of a limb from loss of consciousness secondary to drug overdose, presents unique issues to health care providers. In the setting of overdose compartment syndrome, it is similar to the more common traumatic type of compartment syndrome with respect to the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. However, it differs in relation to the muscles affected, physical assessment strategy, and accurately determining the amount of the time from onset of injury to the presentation of symptoms. The purpose of this article is to facilitate emergency department nurses' understanding of the complexities of overdose compartment syndrome, combined with the importance of early recognition of the condition. In addition, the authors review the pathophysiology, the traditional and innovative diagnostic techniques, and the current treatment options available for overdose compartment syndrome.

Rheum4U: Development and testing of a web-based tool for improving the quality of care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a web-based tool (Rheum4U) to capture clinically meaningful data to direct treatment. Rheum4U integrates longitudinal clinical data capture of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity measures and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs). This study tests the feasibility, acceptability and efficiency of Rheum4U among patients and healthcare providers. METHODS: Rheum4U was developed in two phases: P1 design and development; and P2 pilot testing. P1: A working group of rheumatologists and researchers (n=13) performed a prioritisation exercise to determine data elements to be included in the platform. The specifications were finalised and supplied to the platform developer. Alpha testing was performed to correct initial software bugs. 18 testers (physicians, nurses and recruited non-patient lay-testers) beta tested Rheum4U for usability. P2: Rheum4U was piloted in 2 rheumatology clinics and evaluated for feasibility, efficiency and acceptability using interviews, observation and questionnaires with patients and healthcare providers. RESULTS: 110 RA patients, 9 rheumatologists and 9 allied health providers participated in the pilot. Mean patient age was 53 years and 74% were female. The majority (86%) were satisfied or very satisfied with online data entry and 79% preferred it to paper entry. Healthcare providers found Rheum4U easy and clear to use (90%), and they perceived that it improved their job performance (91%). Completeness and easy availability of the patient information improved clinic efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Rheum4U highlights the benefits of a web-based tool for clinical care, quality improvement and research in the clinic and this study provides valuable information to inform full platform implementation.

Unmet social support needs among college students: Relations between social support discrepancy and depressive and anxiety symptoms.

Social support is a widely studied construct due to its associations with physical and emotional well-being outcomes (Uchino, 2006). However, little research examines the context within which receiving support may be helpful (Picard, Lee, & Hunsley, 1997). Whereas examinations of support adequacy are present in the literature (e.g., Song et al., 2012), limited research considers the difference between support needs and support received when the 2 are separated as distinct constructs. The current study consisted of 428 undergraduate college students and examined how the relation between social support needs and received social support relates to depressive and anxiety symptoms via a statistical approach suggested for need-actual discrepancy analysis (polynomial multiple regression, PMR, with response surface analysis; Edwards, 1994; Shanock, Baran, Gentry, Pattison, & Heggestad, 2010). Results indicated that greater discrepancy between needed support and received support was related to greater depressive, but not anxiety, symptoms. Specifically, when emotional support needs exceeded emotional support received, depressive symptoms tended to be highest. Moreover, perceptions of needed support were significantly greater than perceptions of received support, suggesting that college students in general perceive receiving less support than they need, and this discrepancy is related to greater depressive symptoms. (PsycINFO Database Record

Creative adapting in a fluid environment: an explanatory model of paramedic decision making in the pre-hospital setting.

BACKGROUND: Paramedics work in a highly complex and unpredictable environment which is characterized by ongoing decision-making. Decisions made by paramedics in the prehospital setting have implications for patient safety, transport, treatment, and health resource utilization. The objective of this study was; a) to understand how paramedics conduct decision-making in the field, and b) to develop a grounded theory of paramedic decision-making in the prehospital setting. METHOD: This study was conducted using classical grounded theory. Paramedics (n = 13) with five or more years' experience, who worked in a large urban center in Western Canada were interviewed. Field observations were conducted, each lasting 12 h, with five different ambulance crews. The data were analyzed and coded using the constant comparative method. RESULTS: The resultant theory, Creative Adapting in a Fluid Environment, indicates paramedic decision-making is a fluid iterative process. Unpredictable and dynamic features of the prehospital environment require paramedics to use a flexible and creative approach to decision-making. The model consists of the three categories constructing a malleable model, revising the model, and situation-specific action. Two additional components, safety and extrication, are considered at each stage of the call. These two components in conjunction with the three categories influence how decisions are made and enacted. CONCLUSION: Paramedic decision-making is highly contextual and requires accurate interpretation and flexible cognitive constructs that are rapidly adaptable. Evaluation of paramedic decision-making needs to account for the complex and dynamic interaction between the environment, patient characteristics, available resources, and provider experience and knowledge.

Arthropathies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review for Clinicians.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a systemic, chronic autoimmune disease of the digestive tract. The etiology and pathophysiology of IBD is not fully understood, though it is believed to be due to a complex interaction among the patient's genotype, immune system, and environmental factors. Inflammatory bowel disease is frequently accompanied by extraintestinal manifestations that occur in almost half of all patients. The most common extraintestinal manifestation that occurs is joint disease, collectively termed the arthropathies of IBD. While epidemiological studies have estimated that the arthropathies of IBD occur in over 46% of the IBD population, there is a paucity of nursing literature concerning the extraintestinal manifestations of IBD and the role of nurses in patient care. Thus, the purpose of this article is to facilitate a greater understanding for nurses and nurse clinicians regarding the arthropathies associated with IBD including classifications, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.

Bed Sharing, SIDS Research, and the Concept of Confounding: A Review for Public Health Nurses.

Confounding is an important concept for public health nurses (PHNs) to understand when considering the results of epidemiological research. The term confounding is derived from Latin, confundere, which means to "mix-up" or "mix together". Epidemiologists attempt to derive a cause and effect relationship between two variables traditionally known as the exposure and disease (e.g., smoking and lung cancer). Confounding occurs when a third factor, known as a confounder, leads to an over- or underestimate of the magnitude of the association between the exposure and disease. An understanding of confounding will facilitate critical appraisal of epidemiological research findings. This knowledge will enable PHNs to strengthen their evidence-based practice and better prepare them for policy development and implementation. In recent years, researchers and clinicians have examined the relationship between bed sharing and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The discussion regarding the risk of bed sharing and SIDS provides ample opportunity to discuss the various aspects of confounding. The purpose of this article is to use the bed sharing and SIDS literature to assist PHNs to understand confounding and to apply this knowledge when appraising epidemiological research. In addition, strategies that are used to control confounding are discussed.

Endovascular Aortic Repair of Primary Adult Coarctation: Implications and Challenges for Postoperative Nursing.

Endovascular aortic repair is a relatively new surgical technique used to treat a variety of aortic pathologies. Aortic coarctation traditionally has been managed with open surgical repair, involving a large posterolateral thoracotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, and replacement of the narrowed section of the aorta with a dacron graft. Recent advances in minimally invasive aortic surgery have allowed for repair of the diseased section with an endovascular stent placed percutaneously through the groin under intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance. In this paper, the authors willfocus on the implicationsfor postoperative nursing care after endovascular repair of aortic coarctation using a case study of a 17-year-old male. This novel technique required education of the health care team with respect to implications for practice, understanding potential complications, discharge planning and follow-up. With any new surgical technique there are many questions and challenges that health care professionals raise. The main concerns expressed from the health care team stemmed from a lack of understanding of the disease pathology, and the different risk profile associated with an endovascular repair in contrast to an open repair. The authors will address these concerns in detail.

Focus group research: what is it and how can it be used?

The focus group research method has been used in a variety of settings over the years. The method of using group interviews was described as long ago as 1926. Focus groups have been used by large corporations to gather the public's opinions regarding their products. In the past 20 years the focus group method has been increasingly used in health care research in a variety of settings. Researchers use the focus group method in order to obtain in-depth knowledge concerning attitudes, perceptions, beliefs and opinions of individuals regarding a specific health issue. The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the focus group research method. The authors discuss the process, analysis, advantages and disadvantages of this qualitative method.

Can emergency nurses' triage skills be improved by online learning? Results of an experiment.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency nurses deal with increasing complexity of patients. In 2003 there were over 14 million ED visits in Canada. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) is a 5-level system used by ED triage nurses to classify patients. There is a need for standardized training for all triage systems. In an effort to improve access to CTAS training, a 6-week Web-based CTAS workshop was developed. We determined the impact of Web learning on the accuracy of the triage skills of registered nurses (RNs). METHODS: An experimental method was used in which 132 RNs were randomized to an intervention group (n = 65) or control group (n = 67). All RNs received exactly the same content and learning activities. The experimental group differed from the control group in 3 ways: a mandatory tutorial, awarding of marks for online discussion, and completion of a workplace project. Data were collected using standard instruments, chart audit, and interviews. RESULTS: The Web course provided a standardized and effective educational experience that enhanced emergency nurses' triage accuracy. The mandatory online tutorial, online discussion, and workplace project increased the RNs' preparation for online learning, and these educational methods were successful in transferring triage learning to practice. DISCUSSION: Web learning can help professionals maintain competency and support professional practice. Further research is needed to provide evidence for best practices in E-learning for RNs. The accuracy of the RN's triage assessment impacts patient health, hospital accreditation, and funding.

Intimate partner violence: A practice development issue for orthopaedic nurses.

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is an underrecognized healthcare phenomenon that causes significant harm to the health of those affected. The lifetime estimated global prevalence of IPV is one in three for women and one in twelve for men. Orthopaedic fracture clinics care for patients affected by IPV and, in fact, orthopaedic patients themselves believe they should be screened for IPV. Almost three percent of women seen for an acute musculoskeletal injury is a direct consequence of IPV. A major concern is that, in the absence of screening and no outward signs of IPV, healthcare providers do not screen patients. Current screening practices and policies are influenced by the nurses' practice or the organizational structure in which nurses work. The purpose of this article is to raise awareness of IPV in the orthopaedic patient population and to provide a review on IPV for orthopaedic nurses. It is important for organizational leaders to recognize the relationship between the barriers and facilitators in relation to IPV intervention. Facilitators and barriers to addressing IPV are discussed. In addition, the need to implement change in practice combined with empowering nurses to address IPV is described. Empowering orthopaedic nurses necessarily involves the provision of appropriate resources, information, and support to overcome barriers. The authors discuss unit policies, guidelines, and resources to address IPV.

Mass casualty triage for the Emergency Department using the RATE protocol: Validation and results of a quasi-experiment.

BACKGROUND: Triage practices in the Emergency Department (ED) need to be modified during a mass casualty incident (MCI) to accommodate the influx of patients. A triage protocol known as Rapid Assessment Triage for Emergency Department/Urgent Care (RATE) was developed specifically for use in EDs during MCIs. METHODS: Phase 1: validation of the RATE protocol by triage experts. Phase 2: a pretest/ post-test quasi-experiment comparing a RATE infographic with a RATE e-learning module in a convenience sample of 64 triage Registered Nurses from two EDs. RESULTS: Phase 1: the five experts reached 100% consensus for 20 patient vignettes. Phase 2: there were no statistically significant differences on pre-test and post-test scores within and between RN groups controlling for age, years as an RN, years as an ED RN, and years as a triage RN (all p values > 0.05). There was no group by time interaction (p = 0.49). CONCLUSION: The RATE protocol was validated. As there were no statistically significant differences between the groups using the RATE infographic or the elearning module, either method can be used for training purposes. The infographic is cost effective and may be preferred in resource poor environments or when just-in-time training is required.

Development and testing of the rheumatoid arthritis quality of care survey.

OBJECTIVES: The Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Quality of Care Survey (RAQCS) was developed to measure care quality according to a previously developed national RA quality improvement framework. METHODS: The development of the RAQCS occurred over 3 phases. First, the survey was developed by a team of healthcare providers, researchers, and two patient partners based on the existing national quality framework's 21 performance measures (PMs) and strategic objectives. Second, cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with individuals living with RA to identify survey clarity, appropriateness of survey questions, and response options. Third, the survey was revised and distributed to participants recruited from Rheum4U (rheumatology longitudinal cohort). Results were tabulated and compared with a chart audit of participant medical records. RESULTS: Fifty-three participants completed the RAQCS. High performance (i.e., ≥70% meeting PM) was observed for 13 of 20 PMs. Lower performance was seen for the remaining PMs, which included documentation of body mass index (BMI) and smoking status, discussion of physical activity goals, comorbidity management including risk assessments for cardiovascular health and fragility fractures and disease activity assessment. There was high agreement (≥70%) between the RAQCS and chart review for 9 of 20 PMs. CONCLUSIONS: High agreement was observed between the RAQCS and chart review for selected PMs. The RAQCS may also be a valuable tool for quality improvement for measures where data are not usually available through other sources. Further testing of the RAQCS is needed to ascertain its reliability and validity as a patient self-reported tool to measure RA care quality.

Development of a Patient-centered Quality Measurement Framework for Measuring, Monitoring, and Optimizing Rheumatoid Arthritis Care in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a patient-centered quality measurement framework to address a predefined vision statement and 7 strategic objectives for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care that was developed in prior qualitative work with arthritis stakeholders. METHODS: One hundred forty-seven RA-related performance measures (PMs) were identified from a systematic review. A candidate list of 26 PMs meeting predefined criteria and addressing the strategic objectives previously defined was then assessed during a 3-round (R) modified Delphi. Seventeen panelists with expertise in RA, quality measurement, and/or lived experience with RA rated each PM on a 1-9 scale based on the items of importance, feasibility, and priority for inclusion in the framework during R1 and R3, with a moderated discussion in R2. PMs with median scores ≥ 7 on all 3 items without disagreement were included in the final set, which then underwent public comment. RESULTS: Twenty-one measures were included in the final framework (15 PMs from the Delphi and 6 published system-level measures on access to care and treatment). The measures included 4 addressing early access to care and timely diagnosis, 12 evidence-based care for RA and related comorbidities, 1 addressing patient participation as an informed partner in care, and 4 on patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: The proposed framework builds upon existing measures capturing early access to care and treatment in RA and adds important PMs to promote high-quality RA care and outcome measurement. In the next phase, the authors will test the framework in clinical practice in addition to addressing certain areas where no suitable PMs were identified.

Priorities for High-quality Care in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of Patient, Health Professional, and Policy Maker Perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the essential elements of high-quality rheumatoid arthritis (RA) care in order to develop a vision statement and a set of strategic objectives for a national RA quality framework. METHODS: Focus groups and interviews were conducted by experienced qualitative researchers using a semistructured interview or focus group guide with healthcare professionals, patients, clinic managers, healthcare leaders, and policy makers to obtain their perspectives on elements essential to RA care. Purposive sampling provided representation of stakeholder types and regions. Recorded data was transcribed verbatim. Two teams of 2 coders independently analyzed the deidentified transcripts using thematic analysis. Strategic objectives and the vision statement were drafted based on the overarching themes from the qualitative analysis and finalized by a working group. RESULTS: A total of 54 stakeholders from 9 Canadian provinces participated in the project (3 focus groups and 19 interviews). Seven strategic objectives were derived from the qualitative analysis representing the following themes: (1) early access and timeliness of care; (2) evidence-informed, high-quality care for the ongoing management of RA and comorbidities; (3) availability of patient self-management tools and educational materials for shared decision making; (4) multidisciplinary care; (5) patient outcomes; (6) patient experience and satisfaction with care; and (7) equity, the last of which emerged as an overarching theme. The ultimate vision obtained was "ensuring patient-centered, high-quality care for people living with rheumatoid arthritis." CONCLUSION: The 7 strategic objectives that were identified highlight priorities for RA quality of care to be used in developing the National RA Quality Measurement Framework.

Triage emergency nurse decision-making: Incidental findings from a focus group study.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency Department (ED) triage decision-making is a complex process. Triage scales are used to determine patient acuity level, however, they do not provide information on how nurses make triage decisions. This focus group study was part of a larger project to develop a psychometrically sound instrument to measure triage decision-making by nurses; the Triage Decision-Making Instrument. We report important incidental findings that emerged during the study that the participants identified as factors impeding triage decision-making. METHODS: Three focus groups were conducted with 11 triage Registered Nurses. They commented on the instrument items and identified factors that influence triage decision-making. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three powerful inter-related themes emerged central to encumbering triage decision-making: competing systems (pre-hospital versus the ED), fluctuating patient volume resulting in 'intra-Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale' triaging, and personal capacity including experience and 'triage fatigue'. DISCUSSION: The findings demonstrate how interrelated system factors impede nurses triage decision-making. Triage nurses require support in their role and initiatives are needed to reduce the pressure they feel in relation to resolving system issues. Larger system issues and the capacity of the individual decision-makers must be accounted for within the context of increasing effectiveness and safety of ED triage.

Implementation and Evaluation of Audit and Feedback for Monitoring Treat-to-Target (T2T) Strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Performance Measures.

INTRODUCTION: In collaboration with the Alberta Medical Association's Physician Learning Program we developed individualized physician reports and held a group feedback session on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) performance measures (PM) to facilitate treat-to-target (T2T) strategies and evaluated physician experiences with this process. METHODS: 5 PMs addressing T2T concepts from an established Canadian quality framework were operationalized for physician practice reports at 2 university-affiliated rheumatology clinics. Rheum4U, a quality improvement and research platform, was the data source. The audit results were reviewed in a facilitated group feedback session. Rheumatologists provided experiential feedback on the process through survey and/or an interview. Transcripts from interviews were analyzed using a 6-step thematic analysis. RESULTS: 11 of 12 eligible rheumatologists consented to receive practice reports and provided feedback through surveys (n = 5) and interviews (n = 6). The practice reports from Rheum4U (n = 448 patients) revealed high rates of yearly follow-up (> 85%, PM1) and 100% performance on documentation of disease activity at ≥ 50% of visits (PM2). Only 34% of patients were seen within 3 months if not in remission (PM3) with 62% (2017) and 69% (2018) of those with active RA achieving a LDA state within 6 months (PM4). Approximately 70% of patients were in remission at any time point (PM5). All survey respondents agreed or strongly agreed comparison to peers was valuable and helped them reflect on their practice. Several strategies for improvement were identified, including but not limited to, leveraging of electronic records for future audit and feedback reports, providing additional granularity of results, additional stratification of results, and using high-performing peers as the comparator rather than the group mean. CONCLUSIONS: Audit and feedback was perceived by clinicians as a useful strategy for evaluating T2T efforts in RA. Future work will focus on longitudinal evaluation of the clinical impact of this quality improvement initiative.

Screening of Broader Autism Phenotype Symptoms in Siblings: Support for a Distinct Model of Symptomatology.

Research on siblings of youth with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) suggests that some phenotypic presentation, known as the broader autism phenotype (BAP), is common among siblings without an ASD diagnosis (e.g., Ruzich et al. in Autism Res 9(6):658-665, 2016). Whereas the symptoms that underlie both ASD and the BAP share commonality, the structure of these symptoms in youth with ASD and their siblings may differ. The current study assessed whether differences arise in the factor structure of the Children's Social Behavior Questionnaire (CSBQ) between youth with ASD and their siblings in a sample of 221 sibling dyads. Results suggest similar factor structures for ASD and BAP; however, number of symptoms endorsed, as opposed to the degree of severity, may better differentiate BAP.