Anatomical variations of the greater palatine canal in cone-beam computed tomography.

PURPOSE: To analyze anatomical variations of the greater palatine canal (GPC) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. METHODS: This study included 110 CBCTs. Axial slices were used to determine the shape of GPC and the number of lesser palatine foramina (LPF). Sagittal slices were used to assess the shape of the GPC and the number of lesser palatine canals (LPCs). RESULTS: The most prevalent axial and sagittal GPC shapes were oval (46.36%) and hourglass (23.64%). Most GPCs presented one LPF (47.27%) and one LPC (90.91%). CONCLUSIONS: GPC anatomy is highly variable. CBCT is a useful tool for evaluating the anatomical variations of GPC.

Morphometric differences of nasopalatine canal based on 3D classifications: descriptive analysis on CBCT.

PURPOSE: This descriptive retrospective study analyzed differences among sagittal, coronal and axial NC groups based on the dimensions of nasopalatine canal (NC), buccal bone plate (BBP) and palatal bone plate (PBP) to canal. METHODS: Measurements were made on 224 CBCTs for NC, BBP and PBP on the three anatomic planes at three levels: level 1, when the incisive foramen is completely closed on the axial plane; level 2, at the midpoint of NC length (NCL) on the sagittal plane; and level 3, at the foramina of Stenson on the sagittal plane. ANOVA tests with post hoc tests were used. The intraclass correlation coefficient and Kappa test were used for evaluating the intraobserver agreement. RESULTS: Regarding coronal classification, these significant differences were found: BBP length (BL)level 1 was lower for the two parallel canals group; PBP length (PL)level 1 was lower for single canal group; and NCL was lower for Y-type canal group. Regarding axial classification, these significant differences were found: LPlevel 1 was lower for 3.1-3 group; PBP width (PW)level 3 was the greatest for 3.1-3; and LPlevel 3 was lower for 1.1. CONCLUSIONS: Presurgical evaluation with CBCT in premaxillae region should include analysis on coronal and axial planes and not only on sagittal plane seeing as morphometric differences were found on coronal and axial planes. Following the morphological coronal classification, two parallel canals presented a higher NCL, a higher LP and a lower LV at inferior edge of alveolar ridge.

Morphometric study of the greater palatine canal: cone-beam computed tomography.

PURPOSE: To analyze greater palatine canal (GPC) dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, and to evaluate the position of the greater palatine foramen (GPF) with respect to various landmarks selected in relation to dental status. METHODS: This study included 150 CBCTs. Axial slices were used to determine the position and dimensions of the GPF. Sagittal slices were used to assess GPC length. Reference lines were established to evaluate the GPC diameter in sagittal and coronal slices. RESULTS: From the 77 GPF analyzed, 76 were located on level 2. Average posterior GPF distance was 6.59 ± 3.27 mm on right side and 7.35 ± 3.40 mm on left side. Several measurements to determine the position and dimensions of the GPF presented significant values (p ≤ 0.05). GPC length was 12.31 ± 1.96 mm on right side and 12.52 ± 2.15 mm on left side, statistically significant differences were detected between genders only on right canal (p ≤ 0.004). Sagittal and coronal reference lines presented significantly higher values for men except for the S3 (p < 0.062) and C1 (p < 0.067) in the left GPC. CONCLUSIONS: CBCT is a useful tool for evaluating GPC morphometrically in the three anatomical slices. The sagittal nasal plane and posterior nasal plane are two intraoral anatomical landmarks for the location of the GPF. Their scant variability allows accurate identification of GPFs in both dentate as well as edentulous patients.

miRNAs in liquid biopsy for oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is often diagnosed at advanced stages and is associated with poor survival rates. Increasing evidence suggests that microRNAs (miRNAs) present in liquid biopsies could be potential biomarkers for non-invasive OSCC diagnosis. Here, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the overall diagnostic accuracy of blood and salivary miRNAs in detecting OSCC. A literature search using PubMed EMBASE, Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was undertaken up to February 2019. Study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy-2, and sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a bivariate random-effect meta-analysis model. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to assess the heterogeneity. Twenty-five study units from 16 articles with 2562 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of blood and salivary miRNAs in the diagnosis of OSCC were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.80) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.79-0.84), respectively, and the pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios were 4.31 (95% CI: 3.38-5.51) and 0.25 (95% CI: 0.20-0.32), respectively. The overall area under the curve was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93), with a diagnostic odds ratio of 21.46 (95% CI: 13.37-34.45). These findings provide evidence regarding the potential clinical application of blood and salivary miRNAs as a novel, non-invasive, and accurate diagnostic tool for OSCC.