Prevalence of Cognitive and Manual Dexterity Disorders Among Men Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement.

PURPOSE: Cognitive ability and manual dexterity sufficient to operate an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) are critical for device function and safety. We aimed to define the incidence of cognitive and/or dexterity disorders among men after AUS. We secondarily aimed to assess for association between these disorders and postimplant complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results)-Medicare linked database (2000-2018). We included men ≥ 66 years diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2001 to 2015 who subsequently underwent AUS placement. We excluded patients with < 1-year continuous fee-for-service Medicare enrollment or cognitive and/or manual dexterity disorder diagnoses prior to AUS implant. Subsequent cognitive/dexterity disorders and implant-related complications were queried using appropriate ICD (International Classification of Diseases)-9/10 and/or CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) codes. Associations between cognitive/dexterity disorders and postimplant complications were assessed using extended Cox proportional hazards modeling. Secondary analysis focused on serious complications (device revision/removal, Fournier's gangrene, urethral erosion). RESULTS: We identified 1560 men who underwent AUS who met inclusion criteria. Median age was 73.0 (IQR 70-77) years. Cumulative incidence function analysis estimated 44% and 17% incidence of cognitive and manual dexterity disorder, respectively, at 15 years post-AUS. Presence of cognitive with/without manual dexterity disorder was associated with increased hazard of any, but not serious, complication during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients develop cognitive and/or manual dexterity disorders following AUS. These data support the need for close longitudinal monitoring after implant.

Pilot Study of a Novel Online Comprehensive Pelvic Floor Program for Urinary Incontinence in Women.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Urinary incontinence (UI) is common in women and has a vast impact on quality of life (QOL), financial health, and work disability. Robust evidence demonstrates the efficacy of comprehensive conservative therapy (pelvic floor muscle training [PFMT], and behavioral and dietary modification) in the treatment of UI. However, numerous barriers impede access to this care, including limited specialized therapists, financial barriers, and scheduling obstacles. To address these barriers, we developed a novel comprehensive online pelvic floor program (oPFP). METHODS: We performed a prospective study assessing continence and QOL outcomes in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI), or mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) treated with oPFP between May 2019 and November 2022. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and following completion of the 2-month program using the validated International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Urgency Perception Scale (UPS), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) questionnaires, and 24-h bladder diary. Data were analyzed using linear, Poisson mixed models, or generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Twenty-eight women (2 SUI, 3 UUI, 23 MUI) were enrolled and 19 (2 SUI, 2 UUI, 15 MUI) completed the study. Following oPFP, participants showed significantly improved SUI domain scores (3.04 ± 0.19 vs 1.81 ± 0.23, p < 0.001), UPS reason score (2.52 ± 0.18 vs 2.05 ± 0.14, p = 0.003), IIQ-7 sum scores (5.16 ± 0.88 vs 3.07 ± 0.70, p = 0.038), and daily incontinence episodes (2.96 ± 0.60 vs 1.06 ± 0.29, p < 0.001). Mean patient-reported improvement was 5.4 ± 2.5 (ten-point Likert scale). Of respondents, 89% reported program satisfaction, ease of use, and would recommend the program to others. CONCLUSION: The oPFP results in significant improvements to a variety of UI and QOL measures. This program provides an important UI treatment option and gives women greater access to effective conservative therapy.

Longitudinal urgency outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a well-known adverse outcome following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Although postoperative SUI has been extensively studied, little focus has been placed on understanding the natural history and impact of urgency symptoms following RALP. The UVA prostatectomy functional outcomes program (PFOP) was developed to comprehensively assess and optimize continence outcomes following RALP. The present study focuses on assessing urgency outcomes in this cohort. METHODS: PFOP patients with a minimum of 6-months follow up following RALP were included. The PFOP includes prospectively assessed incontinence and quality of life outcomes utilizing ICIQ-MLUTS, Urgency Perception Score (UPS), and IIQ-7 questionnaires. The primary study outcome was urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) as determined by ICIQ-MLUTS UUI domain. Secondary outcomes included urgency (UPS score) and quality of life (IIQ-7). RESULTS: Forty patients were included with median age 63.5 years. Fourteen (35%) patients reported UUI at baseline. UUI and QOL scores worsened compared to baseline at all time-points. Urgency worsened at 3-weeks and 3-months but returned to baseline by 6-months. Notably, 63% of patients without baseline UUI reported de-novo UUI at 6 months. Although QOL was lower in patients with versus without UUI (IIQ-7 score 3.0 vs 0.0, p = 0.009), severity of UUI was not associated with QOL when controlling for SUI severity. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate significantly worsened UUI from baseline and a large incidence of de-novo UUI following RALP. Further study is needed to inform how urgency and UUI and its treatment affect health-related quality of life following RALP.

Prevalence and characterization of dyspareunia in a general urology clinic population.

INTRODUCTION: To assess the character and prevalence of dyspareunia in a general urology population presenting for evaluation of unrelated non-painful complaints. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an IRB-approved, prospective, cross-sectional survey-based assessment of dyspareunia in a general cohort of female patients presenting to a urology clinic over a 10-month period (7/2018-5/2019). Patients presenting specifically for acute painful complaints were excluded. Participating patients completed an original 23-item survey with questions pertaining to dyspareunia. Specific focus was placed on pain characteristics, including location, quality, frequency, severity, and quality of life. Descriptive analysis, pain mapping, and plotting analyses were performed to assess pain patterns. RESULTS: A total of 181 women completed the survey, with a mean age of 56 years. Overall, 53 (29%) women reported dyspareunia. However, among currently sexually active women the prevalence of dyspareunia was 46% (38/83). Patients reported a significant variety of pain locations and qualities. Women most commonly reported multiple pain locations (median 2 (IQR 1,4)), with 33 distinct combinations identified. The majority (70%) of women endorsed only one pain quality, although eight unique combinations were nonetheless seen. A significant proportion (34%) reported high or very high pain severity, with 45% having pain most or all times of sexual activity. A majority (53%) of patients indicated moderate to severe dissatisfaction with their sexual activity. Despite this finding, a significant proportion (33%) of patients with dyspareunia reported having at least weekly sexual activity. CONCLUSIONS: A significant percentage of women presenting to a general urology clinic experience dyspareunia. Notably, patient-reported pain characteristics, including location and quality, varied significantly across women assessed. Further study is needed to understand how these characteristics may relate to different and specific etiologies of sexual pain and directed treatment options.

Effect of active versus passive void trials on time to patient discharge, urinary tract infection, and urinary retention: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the effect of active versus passive voiding trials on time to hospital discharge and rates of urinary tract infection (UTI) and urinary retention (UR). METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized trial comparing active (AVT) versus passive (PVT) void trials of inpatients requiring urethral catheter removal. Of 329 eligible patients, 274 were randomized to AVT (bladder filled with saline before catheter removal) or PVT (spontaneous bladder filling after catheter removal). Primary outcome was time to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were UTI (NSQIP criteria) and UR (requiring repeat catheterization) within 2 weeks of void trial. RESULTS: The median time to void was 18 (5-115) versus 236 (136-360) min in the AVT and PVT groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). However, no difference was seen in comparison of the median time to hospital discharge between AVT [28.4 (13.6-69.3) h] and PVT [30.0 (10.4-75.6) h] cohorts, respectively (p = 0.93). Six (4.8%) and 13 (12.9%) patients developed UTI in the AVT and PVT groups, respectively (p = 0.03). Eleven (8.8%) and 12 (11.9%) patients developed UR in the AVT and PVT groups, respectively (p = 0.36). CONCLUSION: Our study comparing AVT versus PVT demonstrated no difference in time to discharge despite a 3.6 h reduction in time to void associated with AVT. AVT was associated with a 63% reduction in UTI, with no difference seen in UR rates across cohorts. Given the reduction in UTI and technical advantages, our data suggest that AVT should be considered as a recommended technique for void trial protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02886143 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Has the use of preoperative urodynamics for stress urinary incontinence surgery changed following the VALUE study?

AIMS: To assess whether routine urodynamic testing (UDT) in women undergoing slings for uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has decreased following publication of the landmark VALUE study, which recommended against routine UDT in uncomplicated SUI. METHODS: We identified women in the Virginia All Payers Claims Database diagnosed with SUI between 2011 and 2016 using International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes (N39.3, 625.6). Appropriate ICD/CPT (current procedural terminology) codes were used to exclude non-index patients (prior anti-incontinence/prolapse surgery, urge incontinence, neurogenic bladder). Beta regression was used to assess for changes in the monthly proportion of urethral slings with preoperative UDT. Interventional ARIMA modeling was used to assess for a relationship between the date of VALUE (The Value of Urodynamic Evaluation) publication and the incidence of slings with preoperative UDT. RESULTS: Analysis identified 6740 women with SUI undergoing sling placement, with 343 non-index patients excluded. Of 6397 remaining women, 4026 (62.9%) underwent preoperative UDT. The annual number of slings with preoperative UDT declined from 748 to 402 between 2011 and 2016. Beta regression analysis demonstrated a decrease in the proportion of slings with preoperative UDT over the study (68%, 2011; 58%, 2016), with a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of slings with UDT after May 2012 (ß coefficient, -.0093; P < .001). Interventional ARIMA models showed a trend toward decreasing slings with preoperative UDT after the VALUE trial (P = .057). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis demonstrated a decrease in the proportion of women undergoing preoperative UDT in uncomplicated SUI patients following the VALUE study. Further research is needed to examine factors underlying UDT utilization trends and promote value-driven care.

Clinical variables and stone detection in patients with flank pain.

INTRODUCTION: Non-contrast CT (NCT) is commonly used to evaluate flank pain (FP). We sought to evaluate incidence of ureteral calculi on NCT in patients with FP, and to determine if clinical variables are associated with higher detection rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review identified 613 patients undergoing NCT for FP. Patient clinical data, NCT findings, and intervention were analyzed. Focus was placed on variables commonly associated with urolithiasis (Vstone), comprising hematuria, nausea/vomiting, and prior stone history. Statistical analysis was performed to identify risk of ureteral stones based on number and type of Vstone. RESULTS: No stone disease was identified on NCT in 175 patients (28.5%). NCT demonstrated 214 (35%), 72 (12%), and 152 (25%) patients with stones located in the kidney, ureter, or both, respectively. Only 33 (5%) patients had FP as their sole Vstone, with ureteral calculi identified in 6% of this cohort. The rate of ureteral calculi increased with more Vstone. Patients having all four Vstone were found to have the highest rate of ureteral stones (59%). Statistical analysis demonstrated a statistically significantly increased relative risk of stone formation given three or four Vstone when compared with FP alone. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas isolated FP is associated with a lower rate of ureteral calculus detection, a significant increased relative risk of ureteral calculus is seen in patients with additional clinical variables associated with stone disease. Accordingly, it may be possible to improve detection rates of ureteral stones through the use of additional clinical variables to guide NCT selection.

Comprehensive evaluation of anterior elevate system for the treatment of anterior and apical pelvic floor descent: 2-year followup.

PURPOSE: The Elevate® Anterior and Apical Prolapse Repair System is a polypropylene mesh that is anchored through sacrospinous ligament and obturator fascia fixation points. We present a comprehensive evaluation of this prolapse repair system through 2 years with a focus on safety, operative characteristics, and anatomical, subjective and quality of life outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 women underwent repair of stage II or greater anterior/apical compartment prolapse using the repair system, of whom 2 were lost to followup. Anatomical outcomes were assessed using POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification) staging. Subjective and quality of life outcomes were assessed by the validated ICIQ (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire)-VS (Vaginal Symptoms), ICIQ-FLUTS (Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms) and IIQ-7 (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7). Additional outcomes included a 3-day bladder diary and cough test with outcomes assessed preoperatively, at 6 weeks, and at 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: Mean ± SD blood loss was 93 ± 55 cc and mean operative time was 58 ± 27 minutes. POP-Q points Aa, Ba and C improved from 0.9, 0.8 and -1.3 preoperatively to -2.1, -2.7 and -6.1 cm at 2 years, respectively (each p <0.05). Four patients experienced anatomical recurrence, which was associated in 2 with symptomatic recurrence on the ICIQ-VS. Statistically significant improvements in the ICIQ-VS, ICIQ-FLUTS and IIQ-7 were seen throughout followup. Adverse events included leg pain, vaginal exposure and urinary retention in 1, 2 and 5 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Elevate Anterior and Apical Prolapse Repair System was associated with good anatomical restoration and significant improvements in validated symptom and quality of life indexes through 2 years of assessments. Our experience suggests that the system is a safe, effective surgical procedure in appropriately selected patients. Long-term followup is important, given the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) warning regarding the use of surgical mesh in the repair of pelvic organ prolapse.

The male suburethral sling: remaining questions.

The AdVance transobturator sling represents an important treatment option for male stress urinary incontinence. Accordingly, recent data suggests AdVance to yield success rates of 62%-77% through 3 year follow up.1,2 Although experience to date is favorable, many questions exist. Foremost, the ideal technique for intraoperative placement and tensioning remains a topic of discussion. The exact mechanism by which sling placement restores continence is unknown, but is hypothesized to comprise an elevation of the bulbar urethra both ventrally and cranially. This "repositioning" may then lead to improved urethral coaptation. Concurrently, urodynamic investigation suggests that sling action does not involve an obstructive effect.3 Despite these findings, other investigation highlights the questions that remain regarding sling mechanism of action and the role that urethral compression may place in continence restoration. Accordingly, study of postoperative MRI findings suggests that urethral bulb indentation may be associated with postoperative continence.4 Further, acute urinary retention (AUR) is frequently observed following sling placement, seen in 12%-21% of cases.2,5 Although it is hypothesized that the high rate of AUR may relate to a detrusor muscle deconditioned during prolonged periods of low outlet resistance, a role of urethral compression cannot be excluded. The authors seek to investigate the hypothesis that postoperative AUR may actually be associated with improved continence outcomes. The authors identify continence rates of 100% and 26% in comparison of patients experiencing postoperative AUR versus patients undergoing successful void trial, respectively.6 While this finding is of value, several issues are important to mention. Foremost, additional research is needed to confirm the primary study finding given that prior multivariate analysis has demonstrated that AUR presence/absence was not an independent risk factor for sling failure.7 Second, given some data suggesting that sling success rates deteriorate over time, longitudinal long term investigation is important to determine whether postoperative AUR may be a predictor for durable success rates.8 Finally, assessment of urgency outcomes following male sling placement is important. De novo irritative symptoms and voiding dysfunction following midurethral sling placement in women are a significant concern. Such adverse effects are thought to arise due to an obstructive or irritative effect of the sling. Although the mechanism of action of the AdVance sling is likely different, data regarding urgency outcomes is nonetheless important. This is especially true of patients experiencing AUR postoperatively, even if transient. Despite the many questions that remain, the primary study finding of improved outcomes in patients experiencing AUR is important. Anecdotally, I have observed this tendency in my own practice and believe this to be an observation warranting investigation.

Urologic Consultations for Urethral Catheter Placement: A Cost Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively analyze the cumulative costs associated with Foley consultations throughout their event lifespan. Urologic consultation for Foley catheter (Foley) management is common. Such consultations are heterogeneous, with some requiring only simple catheter placement. Others (eg, traumatic Foley) necessitate more complex procedural intervention and may also result in downstream care and/or intervention needs. METHODS: This study analyzed a retrospective database of consecutive urologic Foley consultations at a single academic institution (2017-2019), collecting comprehensive data on patient characteristics, related procedures/materials, and downstream care (eg, hospitalization, laboratory/radiology testing, evaluation and management services). A process map and related modeling were used to assess categorical and cumulative event costs. Allocated costs and charges were utilized for materials/institutional resources and for services rendered, respectively. Statistical analysis performed using SAS and statistical inferences were based on significance level of 10%. RESULTS: A total of 244 patient encounters were included in the analysis. The mean overall cost of all care related to Foley consultation was $2389.23 (±$4045.89). A total of 62 (25.4%) patients required only consultation/Foley without additional intervention, with a total cost of $738.90 (±$94.10). The remaining 182 (75.6%) patients required additional intervention and related cost (total cost $3413.27 (±$4850.41)). Traumatic catheterization was associated with higher cost compared with atraumatic cases ($3201.50 (±$6158.4) vs $1926.40 (±$1776.20), respectively, P = .05). Downstream care comprised a significant portion of overall cost. In 61 (25%) cases no nurse attempt was performed prior to consultation. CONCLUSION: Urologic Foley consultation is associated with significant health system cost. Quality initiatives to optimizing Foley placement and management are critical to improving quality of care and associated downstream costs.

Pelvic floor therapy program for the treatment of female urinary incontinence in Belize: a pilot study.

Introduction: Urinary incontinence (UI) is highly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Concurrently, the availability of surgical or conservative UI treatments in LMIC is limited. Methods: We conducted a prospective feasibility study of Belize women with UI treated with pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) and education (PFE). Patients received individual PFPT/PFE over 2 days, consisting of biofeedback-enhanced PFMT in addition to behavioral, dietary, and general pelvic education. Patient completed a daily 6-month home regimen including 7 PFMT exercises (total 70 repetitions) comprising both endurance and quick flick exercises. Patients also performed comprehensive dietary and behavioral modification activities. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 6-months, including validated symptom (ICIQ-FLUTS) and QOL (IIQ-7) questionnaires, and strength testing (PERFECT score, perineometry). Results: Twenty-eight patients underwent baseline assessment. Four patients were lost to in-person 6-month follow-up, with two of these patients completing subjective assessment only by telephone. The mean (±SD) patient age, BMI, and parity were 50.0 (±10.0) years, 33.2 (±5.8), and 2.8 (±1.5). Provider assessment demonstrated patient comprehension of basic, endurance, and quick flick pelvic floor contractions in 28 (100%), 24 (86%), and 24 (86%) patients, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, significant improvements were seen across multiple validated questionnaire and strength measurement assessments. Median patient-reported improvement level was 7.0 on a 10-point Likert scale. Discussion: Study patients demonstrated good understanding of PFMT/PFE and program completion was associated with significant improvements across a variety of subjective incontinence and quality of life outcomes, as well as objective strength testing.

Comparison of In-person Versus Online Comprehensive Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Program Following Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare continence outcomes in post-prostatectomy patients undergoing supervised in-person versus online pelvic floor muscle training and pelvic floor education (iPMFT vs oPFMT/PFE). Despite the proven benefit of in-person PFMT for urinary incontinence (UI) following prostatectomy, numerous barriers impede access. We developed a comprehensive online program to deliver oPFMT/PFE. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients receiving iPFMT versus oPFMT/PFE with minimum 12-month follow-up. Outcomes were assessed at 3 weeks, 3-, 6-, and 12 months following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using validated ICIQ-MLUTS and IIQ-7 questionnaires and additional items (daily pad use [PPD] and satisfaction). The primary study outcome was ICIQ-MLUTS SUI domain score (SDS). Secondary outcomes were PPD, PPD cure (0 PPD at 12 months), SUI cure (12-month SDS=baseline score), and QOL score (IIQ-7 Sum). RESULTS: Analysis included 41 men. Though men enrolled in oPFMT/PFE demonstrated lower SUI domain scores than iPFMT at most time points (3wk P <.01, 3 mo P = .04, 6 mo P = .15, 12 mo P = .04), the rate of improvement from 3 weeks to other time points was similar between groups (P = NS at all time points). SDS Cure was no different for oPFMT/PFE (75%, 15/20) compared to iPFMT (60%, 12/20, P = .3). PPD and IIQ-7 were also similar at all time points and demonstrated a similar rate of decrease over time through 12 months. CONCLUSION: Significant and similar improvements in UI and QOL are seen both in men completing iPFMT or oPFMT/PFE programs. Our novel online program provides another option to improve PFMT/PFE access in men undergoing RALP.

Characterization and Outcomes of Iatrogenic Urethral Catheterization Injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic injury during urethral catheterization is a common reason for inpatient urologic consultation and is associated with increased morbidity and resource utilization. Literature defining the patient population, interventions, or outcomes associated with traumatic catheterization is scarce. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of consults for adult urethral catheterization at a single tertiary care center (July 2017-December 2019), with focus on patient characteristics and complications. Traumatic urethral catheterization was defined as catheterization by the primary team with at least 1 of these conditions: gross hematuria, meatal blood, or cystoscopic evidence of urethral trauma. Characteristics collected included urologic history, catheterization circumstances, procedural intervention, and subsequent visits. RESULTS: Three hundred urology consults for urethral catheterization were identified, including 98 (33%) traumatic events (5.3 incidents/1000 catheters placed). All traumatic catheterization consults were in men (median age 69 years). Most (71%) patients sustaining injury had significant urologic history (eg, benign prostatic hyperplasia, urethral stricture). Sixty-three (64%) consults were determined to be uncomplicated (not requiring any procedural intervention for catheter placement). Gross hematuria was the most common sequela (50% of patients). The 30-day catheter-associated urinary tract infection rate was 13%, and 2 patients developed sepsis. Complications required a total of 52 additional hospital admission days, 19 of which were intensive-care level, as well 113 outpatient urology visits. CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic urethral catheterization is associated with increased need for procedural intervention, risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and additional resource utilization. Further studies on traumatic catheterization are needed to guide systemic efforts for minimizing injury and cost.

Predictors of urinary outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Introduction: Incontinence and urgency are common after prostatectomy. The University of Virginia prostatectomy functional outcomes program (PFOP) was developed to comprehensively assess and optimise continence outcomes following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). Patients are prospectively evaluated by a Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery specialist. This study assessed for predictors of 3- and 6-month stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urgency symptom outcomes following RALP. Methods: We performed a post hoc review of patients from our PFOP receiving a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Urinary symptoms are prospectively assessed using the validated International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-MLUTS) questionnaire and daily pad use (pads per day [PPD]). Primary study outcomes included ICIQ-MLUTS SUI and urgency domain scores and PPD. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify variables associated with outcomes at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Variables included patient, oncologic and surgical factors. Each variable was run in a separate model with pelvic floor muscle therapy and surgeon to reduce confounding and prevent overfitting. Results: Forty men were included. In assessment of ICIQ-MLUTS SUI domain score, at 3 months, body mass index (BMI) was associated with worse scores, and at 6 months, BMI, hypertension and estimated blood loss (EBL) were associated with worse scores, whereas bilateral nerve-sparing technique was associated with better scores. For ICIQ-MLUTS Urgency domain score, at 3 months, preoperative use of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) medication was associated with better scores. No covariates predicted 6-month ICIQ-MLUTS Urgency domain scores. For PPD use, at both 3 and 6 months, BMI was a positive predictor, while preoperative use of BPH medication was a negative predictor. Conclusion: Increased BMI, EBL and hypertension are associated with worsened SUI outcomes following RALP, whereas bilateral nerve-sparing technique and preoperative BPH medication are associated with improved SUI outcomes. These data may inform patient counselling and help identify patients who may benefit from closer surveillance and earlier anti-incontinence intervention.

Novel online comprehensive pelvic floor therapy program following prostatectomy.

Background: Although pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is widely shown to improve post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI), numerous barriers impede access to formal PFMT and include the limited availability of specialized therapists and financial or scheduling barriers. To address these barriers, we developed a novel online program delivering comprehensive long-term PFMT, pelvic floor education (PFE), and dietary/behavioral modification education. This study is a prospective interim analysis of online PFMT/PFE (oPFMT/PFE), with focus on feasibility, satisfaction, and continence outcomes. Methods: Patients anticipating robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) were recruited (6/2021-9/2022) for oPFMT/PFE. oPFMT/PFE comprises a 12-month program of 3 phases, including multiple exercises with varied contraction types and duration, and comprehensive dietary and behavioral technique education. Incontinence and quality of life (QOL) outcomes are assessed at 3 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months following RALP using validated International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-MLUTS) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) questionnaires and additional items assessing satisfaction, improvement, and daily pad use. Primary study outcomes included ICIQ-MLUTS stress urinary incontinence (SUI) domain score (SDS) and SUI cure [ICIQ SUI domain score (SDS) =0]. Interim 6-month analysis was performed using mixed effects linear regression and mixed effects Poisson regression. Results: Analysis included 21 men (64±6 years). At 6-month follow-up, men undergoing oPFMT/PFE showed significant improvement in SDS compared to the 3-week time point [mean ± standard error (SE) =1.05±0.24 vs. 0.45±0.17, P=0.011], but still experienced higher scores than at baseline (P=0.017). Six-month patient-reported improvement averaged 7.42±0.74 (10-point Likert scale). All (100%) of 19 respondents (2 missing data) found the program easy to use, educational, and would recommend it to others, with 89% expressing satisfaction with the program. During patient interview at 6-month follow-up, no men reported inability to access the program online or any adverse events. Finally, IIQ-7 score improved significantly from the 3-week timepoint (4.47±1.10) at both time points (3-month 1.14±0.44, P<0.001 and 6-month 1.10±0.37, P<0.001), and neither 3- nor 6-month scores differed from baseline (P=0.808 and P=0.444, respectively). Conclusions: Our novel oPFMT/PFE yields significant improvements to validated urinary incontinence (UI) and QOL measures, providing a valuable and accessible treatment option for PPI.

Comparison of In-person FPMRS-directed Pelvic Floor Therapy Program Versus Unsupervised Pelvic Floor Exercises Following Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare comprehensive continence outcomes in patients receiving pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) vs standard unsupervised home pelvic floor exercise therapy (UPFE). METHODS: As part of the UVA prostatectomy functional outcomes program, participating patients complete a 12-month PFMT program under FPMRS specialist supervision. We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected longitudinal outcomes in patients receiving PFMT vs UPFE through 12-month follow-up. Primary study outcome was ICIQ-MLUTS SUI domain score (SDS). Secondary outcomes included daily pad use (PPD), SUI Cure (SDS=0), and quality of life score (IIQ-7). Multilevel mixed effects linear regression was used to model SDS over time. RESULTS: Analysis included 40 men. No difference in patient characteristics was seen in comparison of PFMT vs UPFE cohorts (P = NS, all comparisons). Mean predicted SDS was significantly better in the PFMT vs UPFE cohorts at 6-month (0.81 ± 0.21 vs 1.75 ± 0.34, respectively) (P = .014) and 12-month (0.72 ± 0.17 vs 1.67 ± 0.30, respectively) (P = .004) time points. At 12-month follow-up, 11 (55%) vs 4 (20%) patients reported absence of SUI in PFMT vs UPFE cohorts, respectively. Predicted probabilities of SUI cure in PFMT vs UPFE cohorts at 12months were 0.52 ± 0.14 vs 0.23 ± 0.13, respectively (P = .14). At 12-month follow-up, the mean predicted PPD and IIQ score was 0.19 ± 0.10 vs 0.79 ± 0.33 and 2.86 ± 0.86 vs 2.55 ± 1.07 in PFMT vs UPFE cohorts, respectively (P = NS). CONCLUSION: In-person, FMPRS-directed PFMT is associated with improved SUI domain scores following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, a finding durable through 12-month follow-up.

The impact of cognitive impairment in urologic implants: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: With the general population aging and thus more patients developing bothersome erectile dysfunction, stress urinary incontinence and overactive bladder, there will likely be a higher demand for three common interactive implants in urology, the penile prosthesis, artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and sacral neuromodulation (SNM). Further, the prevalence of mild and major neurocognitive disorders (also known as mild cognitive impairment and dementia, respectively) is expected to increase. While the aforementioned urologic implants have excellent short and long term outcomes, there are also known device issues such as malfunction or misuse that may require surgical removal and/or revision. The objective of this narrative review is to describe the association of cognitive impairment and urologic implants. Methods: We performed a search on PubMed between the years 1975-2023 for English language articles that reported on any type or severity of cognitive impairment and its association with penile prosthesis, AUS and/or SNM. While peer-reviewed published manuscripts were prioritized, abstracts that fit our search criteria were also included. Key Content and Findings: Data assessing outcomes of patients with cognitive impairment who undergo placement of a urologic implant are limited. There is an association between AUS failure or misuse with cognitive impairment. SNM is efficacious in this population in the short term. In patients who develop dementia, an inflatable penile prosthesis can be deflated via in-office needle puncture and an AUS can be deactivated. The Memory Alteration Test, Quick Screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment and the Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination are relatively quick screening tests with good sensitivity and specificity for mild cognitive impairment. Conclusions: While data on the association between urologic implants and cognitive impairment are sparse, there are tools that urologists can use to screen patients for cognitive impairment. With screening, urologists can provide appropriate preoperative counseling (including recommending against implantation) and can provide closer postoperative monitoring. Further study is required to assess which patients should be excluded from device implantation and how to properly assess for cognitive impairment in a manner that is both beneficial for the patient and convenient and efficient for a urologist.

Low-intensity shockwave therapy improves baseline erectile function: a randomized sham-controlled crossover trial.

Background: Low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction is emerging as a promising treatment option. Aim: This randomized sham-controlled crossover trial assessed the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Methods: Thirty-three participants with organic erectile dysfunction were enrolled and randomized to shockwave therapy (n = 17) or sham (n = 16). The sham group was allowed to cross over to receive shockwave therapy after 1 month. Outcomes: Primary outcomes were the changes in Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score and Erection Hardness Score at 1 month following shockwave therapy vs sham, and secondary outcomes were erectile function measurements at 1, 3, and 6 months following shockwave therapy. Results: At 1 month, mean SHIM scores were significantly increased in the shockwave therapy arm as compared with the sham arm (+3.0 vs -0.7, P = .024). Participants at 6 months posttreatment (n = 33) showed a mean increase of 5.5 points vs baseline (P < .001), with 20 (54.6%) having an increase ≥5. Of the 25 men with an initial Erection Hardness Score <3, 68% improved to a score ≥3 at 6 months. When compared with baseline, the entire cohort demonstrated significant increases in erectile function outcomes at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. Clinical Implications: In this randomized sham-controlled crossover trial, we showed that 54.6% of participants with organic erectile dysfunction met the minimal clinically important difference in SHIM scores after treatment with low-intensity shockwave therapy. Strengths and Limitations: Strengths of this study include a sham-controlled group that crossed over to treatment. Limitations include a modest sample size at a single institution. Conclusions: Low-intensity shockwave therapy improves erectile function in men with erectile dysfunction as compared with sham treatment, which persists even 6 months after treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04434352.