Serum cotinine levels and nicotine addiction potential of e-cigarettes: an NHANES analysis.

This study aims to compare serum cotinine levels in e-cigarette and combustible cigarette smokers, in an attempt to quantify the potential chronic nicotine addiction risk that e-cigarettes pose. We analyzed 428 participants in 2015-2016 NHANES: 379 (87.03%) smoked combustible cigarettes alone and 49 (12.97%) smoked e-cigarettes. Serum cotinine levels were measured by isotope-dilution high-performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometric method with a detection limit of 0.015 ng/ml. Electronic cigarette smokers were younger than combustible cigarette smokers (mean age 36.79 versus 42.69 years, P = 0.03), more likely to be male (64.93% versus 48.32%, P = 0.09) and significantly less likely to live with other smokers (50.17% versus 90.07%, P < 0.01). Serum cotinine levels increased linearly with self-reported days of smoking in both electronic cigarette and combustible cigarette smokers, after accounting for living with a smoker. The analysis of the subgroup who reported daily use show non-statistically significantly higher serum cotinine levels in electronic cigarette smokers versus combustible cigarette smokers (ß adj = 52.50, P = 0.10). This analysis of recent US data demonstrates that electronic cigarettes expose users to nicotine levels proportionate to, and potentially higher than combustible cigarettes, and thus pose a serious risk of chronic nicotine addiction. This could be particularly relevant in otherwise tobacco naive individuals; future risk of tobacco-related dependence, addiction and relapse, as well as of tobacco-related cancers in these subjects needs to be investigated.

Clinical Course of Cancer Patients With COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Complications in cancer patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have not been examined. This analysis aimed to compare characteristics of COVID-19 patients with and without cancer and assess whether cancer is associated with COVID-19 morbidity or mortality. Methods: COVID-19-positive patients with an inpatient or emergency encounter at the Mount Sinai Health System between March 1, 2020, and May 27, 2020, were included and compared across cancer status on demographics and clinical characteristics. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to model the associations of cancer with sepsis, venous thromboembolism, acute kidney injury, intensive care unit admission, and all-cause mortality. Results: There were 5556 COVID-19-positive patients included, 421 (7.6%) with cancer (325 solid, 96 nonsolid). Those with cancer were statistically significantly older, more likely to be non-Hispanic Black and to be admitted to the hospital during their encounter, and had more comorbidities than noncancer COVID-19 patients. Cancer patients were statistically significantly more likely to develop sepsis (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06 to 1.61) and venous thromboembolism (ORadj = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.01 to 3.09); there was no statistically significant difference in acute kidney injury (ORadj = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.39), intensive care unit admissions (ORadj = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.34), or mortality (ORadj = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.81 to 1.29). Conclusions: COVID-19 patients with cancer may have a higher risk for adverse outcomes. Although there was no statistically significant difference in mortality, COVID-19 patients with cancer have statistically significantly higher risk of thromboembolism and sepsis. Further research is warranted into the potential effects of cancer treatments on inflammatory and immune responses to COVID-19 and on the efficacy of anticoagulant therapy in these patients.

Changes in E-Cigarette Perceptions Over Time: A National Youth Tobacco Survey Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This multiyear, cross-sectional study explores the changes over time in how U.S. middle- and high-school students perceive the harm and addiction risk of E-cigarettes. METHODS: This study analyzed 83,779 participants in the National Youth Tobacco Survey from 2015 to 2019. Associations of survey year with perceived harm and addiction risk of E-cigarettes were assessed using multivariable multinomial logistic regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: Smoking decreased over the 5 years (-1.85 percentage points, p=0.07); vaping increased (9.03 percentage points, p<0.01). Perceived harm of both combustible cigarettes and E-cigarettes increased with time. Male, older, and non-White students perceived less harm from smoking or vaping. Perceptions of the addictiveness of E-cigarettes increased over time: 26.31% of students considered E-cigarettes to be more addictive than combustible cigarettes in 2019, compared with 7.26% in 2016. Female and non-White students were more likely to think that E-cigarettes were at least as addictive as combustible cigarettes but also reported less knowledge about them. CONCLUSIONS: The perceptions of both harm and addictiveness of E-cigarettes have increased over time, independent of current use. Perceptions vary on the basis of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and current use. Efforts should be made to further educate adolescents about E-cigarettes and to regulate their sale and advertisement. Efforts to reduce the uptake of combustible cigarettes among adolescents have been successful and should be duplicated for E-cigarettes.

Mild anemia as a single independent predictor of mortality in patients with COVID-19.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to an unprecedented international health crisis. COVID-19 clinical presentations cover a wide range from asymptomatic to severe illness and death. Given the limited therapeutic resources and unexpected clinical features of the disease, readily accessible predictive biomarkers are urgently needed to improve patient care and management. We asked the degree to which anemia may influence the outcome of patients with COVID-19. To this end, we identified 3777 patients who were positively diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 1 and April 1 2020 in New York City. We evaluated 2,562 patients with available red blood cell, hemoglobin, and related laboratory values. Multivariable cox proportional hazards regression showed that anemia was a significant independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 1.26, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.06-1.51), independent of age, sex, and comorbidities. There was a direct correlation between the degree of anemia and the risk of mortality when hemoglobin was treated as a continuous variable (HRadj 1.05; [CI]: 1.01-1.09). The hemoglobin level that was maximally predictive of mortality, was 11.5 g/dL in males and 11.8 g/dL in females. These findings identify a routinely measured biomarker that is predictive of disease outcomes and will aid in refining clinical care algorithms and optimize resource allocation. Mechanisms of impacts of anemia on COVID-19 outcome are likely to be multiple in nature and require further investigation.

Disparities in Surgical Recommendation for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Sociodemographic disparities in lung cancer prevalence, treatment options offered, and outcomes have been well documented. In stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the standard of care is surgical resection. This study explores disparities in surgical recommendations in stage I NSCLC, when surgery is considered curative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with primary stage I NSCLC from 2007 to 2016 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (N=56,534). Associations between sociodemographic variables and surgical recommendation were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models. Survival impact was investigated using Cox-proportional hazards regression and propensity matching techniques. RESULTS: Of the 76.9% patients recommended surgery, 95% underwent surgery. Recommended surgery was inversely associated with increasing age (P<0.01), non-Hispanic Black race (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.70), Hispanic ethnicity (ORadj 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67-0.84), nonprivate/Medicare insurance (Medicaid: ORadj 0.55, 95% CI: 0.51-0.60; insured with unknown plan: ORadj 0.74, 95% CI: 0.69-0.79; uninsured: ORadj 0.45, 95% CI: 0.36-0.55), and single status (ORadj 0.66, 95% CI: 0.63-0.70). Patients who were not recommended surgery were at increased risk of death compared with those who were recommended. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of NSCLC patients, nonclinical factors identified a subgroup of patients who were less likely to be recommended surgery.

Prevalence of Cytopenia in the General Population-A National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cytopenia, a reduced count of blood cells manifesting as anemia, neutropenia, and/or thrombocytopenia is frequently associated with other medical conditions. However, a cytopenia may not be accompanied by a known determinant and in some of these cases, may be a precursor to pre-malignancies or hematologic cancers. Little is known about the prevalence of these unexplained cytopenias and their distribution in the population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 1999 to 2002 was used to identify those with a cytopenia in the general population. Those without an identifiable determinant in the NHANES were classified as having unexplained cytopenia. Weighted frequencies were examined to assess the prevalence of unexplained cytopenia in the population. Distribution of blood counts comparing those with unexplained cytopenia to the general population was examined. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess the association between unexplained cytopenia and demographic factors. RESULTS: Of the 7,962 people in the sample, 236 (2.0%) had any cytopenia and 86 (0.9%) had an unexplained cytopenia. Approximately 43% of all cytopenias were not accompanied by a clinical determinant. Unexplained cytopenia was more common in men (1.1%) than in women (0.7%) and in Non-Hispanic Black participants (3.4%). Among those with an unexplained cytopenia, the majority (74.8%) manifested as neutropenia. Compared to those with no cytopenia, those with unexplained cytopenia were significantly less likely to be female, have body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, and work in the service industry, and were significantly more likely to be non-Hispanic Black. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to examine the prevalence of unexplained cytopenia in a nationally representative sample and may serve as a baseline for comparison with other populations. Future research to identify risk factors for development of malignant hematological disorders among those with unexplained cytopenia is warranted.