Sex-specific differences in pulmonary embolism.

INTRODUCTION: Sex-specific differences regarding risk factors, symptoms and prognosis have been reported for several cardiovascular diseases. For patients with pulmonary embolism (PE), sex-specific data are limited and inconsistent. We aimed to investigate sex-specific differences in PE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 10-year period (01/2003-09/2013), patients with confirmed PE were enrolled in a prospective single-centre cohort study. RESULTS: We prospectively examined 569 PE patients (55.9% women). Men more often had cancer (20.7% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.024) and unprovoked PE (61.0% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.001) while women more frequently presented with risk factors for venous thromboembolism such as older age (median, 71 [IQR, 55-79] vs. 67 [53-75] years, p = 0.008), surgery/trauma/immobilisation (38.4% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.026) and sex-hormone therapy (14.8% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001). Overall, 84 patients (14.8%) had an adverse 30-day outcome and 43 (7.6%) died within 30 days; outcomes did not differ between males and females and were not influenced by the patients' sex. Risk stratification markers and models such as right ventricular dysfunction on TTE/CT, cardiac troponin, sPESI, Bova score and 2014 ESC guidelines algorithm predicted adverse outcome in normotensive female patients only, while tachycardia, hypoxia, NT-proBNP and modified FAST score were able to predict an adverse outcome in both sexes. Using sex-specific biomarker cut-off values, the 2014 ESC guidelines algorithm was able to predict adverse outcome in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: The 30-day adverse outcomes did not differ between male and female PE patients and were not influenced by the patients' sex despite sex-specific differences in the prognostic performance of risk stratification markers/models.

Quality of life and functional limitations after pulmonary embolism and its prognostic relevance.

BACKGROUND: While the importance of patients' quality of life (QoL) in chronic cardiac or pulmonary disease is uncontroversial, the burden of an acute pulmonary embolism (PE) on QoL has received little attention thus far. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to validate the German PEmb-QoL questionnaire, identify associations between QoL and clinical/functional parameters, and investigate the prognostic relevance of QoL for long-term survival in survivors of an acute PE episode. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients were invited for a clinical follow-up visit including assessment of QoL using the German PEmb-QoL questionnaire 6 months after an objectively confirmed PE at a single center. Internal consistency reliability, construct-related validity, and regressions between PEmb-QoL and clinical patient-characteristics were assessed using standard scale construction techniques. RESULTS: Overall, 101 patients [median age, 69 ([interquartile range] IQR 57-75) years; women, 48.5%] were examined 208 (IQR 185-242) days after PE. Internal consistency reliability and construct-related validity of the PEmb-QoL questionnaire were acceptable. As many as 47.0% of patients reported dyspnea, 27.5% had right ventricular (RV) dysfunction on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and 25.3% were diagnosed with post-PE impairment (PPEI) at 6-month follow-up. Furthermore, 15.9% of patients were diagnosed with depression 6 months after an acute PE. The QoL was affected by dyspnea, preexisting pulmonary disease, and PPEI, and a reduced QoL was associated with an increased risk for long-term mortality after an observation period of 3.6 years. CONCLUSIONS: The German PEmb-QoL questionnaire is a reliable instrument for assessing QoL 6 months after PE. The QoL was affected by dyspnea, preexisting pulmonary disease, and PPEI and was associated with long-term mortality.