Cranial Electrode Belt Position Improves Diagnostic Possibilities of Electrical Impedance Tomography during Laparoscopic Surgery with Capnoperitoneum.

Laparoscopic surgery with capnoperitoneum brings many advantages to patients, but also emphasizes the negative impact of anesthesia and mechanical ventilation on the lungs. Even though many studies use electrical impedance tomography (EIT) for lung monitoring during these surgeries, it is not clear what the best position of the electrode belt on the patient's thorax is, considering the cranial shift of the diaphragm. We monitored 16 patients undergoing a laparoscopic surgery with capnoperitoneum using EIT with two independent electrode belts at different tomographic levels: in the standard position of the 4th-6th intercostal space, as recommended by the manufacturer, and in a more cranial position at the level of the axilla. Functional residual capacity (FRC) was measured, and a recruitment maneuver was performed at the end of the procedure by raising the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) by 5 cmH2O. The results based on the spectral analysis of the EIT signal show that the ventilation-related impedance changes are not detectable by the belt in the standard position. In general, the cranial belt position might be more suitable for the lung monitoring during the capnoperitoneum since the ventilation signal remains dominant in the obtained impedance waveform. FRC was significantly decreased by the capnoperitoneum and remained lower also after desufflation.

Effects of pleural effusion drainage in the mechanically ventilated patient as monitored by electrical impedance tomography and end-expiratory lung volume: A pilot study.

PURPOSE: In patients with pleural effusion (PLE) monitored by Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) an increase in end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) is observed following evacuation of the PLE. We aimed at differentiating the effect of fluid removal from lung reaeration and describe the change in ventilation distribution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mechanically ventilated patients were monitored by EIT during PLE evacuation. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) was measured concurrently. We included a calibration maneuver consisting of an increase in positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) by 5 cm H2O. The ratio ΔEELI/ΔEELV was used to compare changes of EELI and EELV in response to the calibration maneuver and PLE evacuation. At the same time we assessed distribution of ventilation using changes in tidal variation. RESULTS: PLE removal resulted in a 6-fold greater increase in ΔEELI/ΔEELV when compared to the calibration maneuver (r = 0.84, p < .05). We observed a relative increase in ventilation in the area of the effusion (mean 7.1%, p < .006) and an overall shift of ventilation to the dorsal fraction of the lungs (mean 8%, p < .0002). CONCLUSIONS: The increase in EELI in the EIT image after PLE removal was primarily due to the removal of the conductive effusion fluid.

Ultrasound detection of diaphragm position in the region for lung monitoring by electrical impedance tomography during laparoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: During laparoscopic surgery, a capnoperitoneum is created to optimize the operating space for surgeons. One effect of this is abdominal pressure which alters the physiological thoraco-abdominal configuration and pushes the diaphragm and lungs cranially. Since the lung image acquired by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) depends on the conditions within the thorax and abdomen, it is crucial to know the diaphragm position to determine the effect of diaphragm shift on EIT thorax image. METHODS: The presence of diaphragm in the region of EIT measurement was determined by ultrasound in 20 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Data were obtained in the supine position during spontaneous breathing in a mechanically ventilated patient under general anesthesia with muscle relaxation and in a mechanically ventilated patient under general anesthesia with muscle relaxation during capnoperitoneum. RESULTS: The diaphragm was shifted cranially during capnoperitoneum. The diaphragm detection rate rose by 10% during capnoperitoneum at the fifth intercostal space, from 55% to 65% and by 10% from 0% at mid-sternal level compared to mechanical ventilation without capnoperitoneum. CONCLUSION: The diaphragm was detected in the area contributing to the creation of the thoracic EIT image. Considering the cranial shift of diaphragm caused by excessive intra-abdominal pressure, the impedance changes in the abdomen and the principle of EIT, we assume there could be a significant impact on EIT image of the thorax acquired during capnoperitoneum. For this reason, for lung monitoring using EIT during capnoperitoneum, the manufacturer's recommendation for electrode belt position is not appropriate. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with an identifier NCT03038061.