Increasing Activity After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Intensity Walking and Step Activity Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity in people with chronic stroke profoundly affects daily function and increases recurrent stroke risk and mortality, making physical activity improvements an important target of intervention. We compared the effects of a high-intensity walking intervention (FAST), a step activity monitoring behavioral intervention (SAM), or a combined intervention (FAST+SAM) on physical activity (ie, steps/day). We hypothesized the combined intervention would yield the greatest increase in steps/day. METHODS: This assessor-blinded multisite randomized controlled trial was conducted at 4 university/hospital-based laboratories. Participants were 21 to 85 years old, walking without physical assistance following a single, unilateral noncerebellar stroke of ≥6 months duration, and randomly assigned to FAST, SAM, or FAST+SAM for 12 weeks (2-3 sessions/week). FAST training consisted of walking-related activities at 70% to 80% heart rate reserve, while SAM received daily feedback and goal setting of walking activity (steps/day). Assessors and study statistician were masked to group assignment. The a priori-determined primary outcome and end point was a comparison of the change in steps/day between the 3 intervention groups from pre- to post-intervention. Adverse events were tracked after randomization. All randomized participants were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Participants were enrolled from July 18, 2016, to November 16, 2021. Of 2385 participants initially screened, 250 participants were randomized (mean [SE] age, 63 [0.80] years; 116 females/134 males), with 89 assigned to FAST, 81 to SAM, and 80 to FAST+SAM. Steps/day significantly increased in both the SAM (mean [SE], 1542 [267; 95% CI, 1014-2069] P<0.001) and FAST+SAM group (1307 [280; 95% CI, 752-1861] P<0.001) but not in the FAST group (406 [238; 95% CI, -63 to 876] P=0.09). There were no deaths or serious study-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Only individuals with chronic stroke who completed a step activity monitoring behavioral intervention with skilled coaching and goal progression demonstrated improvements in physical activity (steps/day). REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02835313.

Even Faster Door-to-Alteplase Times and Associated Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The timely administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke has been associated with good functional outcomes. Current guidelines recommend alteplase administration within 60 minutes in 75% of eligible patients and within 45 minutes in 50% of patients. There is limited evidence guiding these measures and their effect on outcomes. We report a single-center, retrospective assessment of the safety and efficacy of alteplase treatment within 45 minutes. METHODS: Five hundred and eighty-six patients were treated with alteplase in our emergency departments (EDs) between January 2014 and October 2016; 368 patients were included for analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the association between door-to-alteplase (DTA) times and 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores. Incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) was also documented. RESULTS: The median DTA time was 29 minutes versus 64 minutes in the DTA less than or equal to 45 minutes arm and more than 45 minutes arm, respectively. The primary outcome of 90-day mRS 0-1 was achieved in 56% of patients in the less than or equal to 45 minutes group versus 58% in more than 45 minutes group (P = .67). Odds of achieving mRS 0-1 were not significantly impacted by DTA times. In the multivariate regression analysis, patient characteristics associated with achieving mRS 0-1 were: younger age, male sex, not requiring intubation in the ED, and without prior history of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, or stroke. There was no significant difference in rates of ICH for patients less than or equal to 45 minutes versus more than 45 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid administration of alteplase was not associated with significantly better outcomes nor increased risk of ICH. Conclusions about efficacy are limited due to the retrospective nature of the study, small sample size, and incomplete data points.

Protocol for promoting recovery optimization of walking activity in stroke (PROWALKS): a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Stroke survivors are more physically inactive than even the most sedentary older adults, and low activity is associated with increased risk of recurrent stroke, medical complications, and mortality. We hypothesize that the combination of a fast walking intervention that improves walking capacity, with a step activity monitoring program that facilitates translation of gains from the clinic to the "real-world", would generate greater improvements in real world walking activity than with either intervention alone. METHODS: Using a single-blind randomized controlled experimental design, 225 chronic (> 6 months) stroke survivors complete 12 weeks of fast walking training, a step activity monitoring program or a fast walking training + step activity monitoring program. Main eligibility criteria include: chronic ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (> 6 months post), no evidence of cerebellar stroke, baseline walking speed between 0.3 m/s and 1.0 m/s, and baseline average steps / day < 8000. The primary (steps per day), secondary (self-selected and fastest walking speed, walking endurance, oxygen consumption) and exploratory (vascular events, blood lipids, glucose, blood pressure) outcomes are assessed prior to initiating treatment, after the last treatment and at a 6 and 12-month follow-up. Moderation of the changes in outcomes by baseline characteristics are evaluated to determine for whom the interventions are effective. DISCUSSION: Following completion of this study, we will not only understand the efficacy of the interventions and the individuals for which they are effective, we will have the necessary information to design a study investigating the secondary prevention benefits of improved physical activity post-stroke. This study is, therefore, an important step in the development of both rehabilitative and secondary prevention guidelines for persons with stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02835313 . First Posted: July 18, 2016.

Symptomatic Carotid Occlusion Is Frequently Associated With Microembolization.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Symptomatic carotid artery disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The pathophysiologic mechanisms of cerebral ischemia among patients with carotid occlusion remain underexplored. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of patients hospitalized within 7 days of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack because of ≥50% carotid artery stenosis or occlusion. Transcranial Doppler emboli detection was performed in the middle cerebral artery ipsilateral to the symptomatic carotid. We describe the prevalence of microembolic signals (MES), characterize infarct topography, and report clinical outcomes at 90 days. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients, 19 with carotid occlusion and 28 with carotid stenosis, had complete transcranial Doppler recordings and were included in the final analysis. MES were present in 38%. There was no difference in MES between those with carotid occlusion (7/19, 37%) compared with stenosis (11/28, 39%; P=0.87). In patients with radiographic evidence of infarction (n=39), 38% had a watershed pattern of infarction, 41% had a nonwatershed pattern, and 21% had a combination. MES were present in 40% of patients with a watershed pattern of infarction. Recurrent cerebral ischemia occurred in 9 patients (19%; 6 with transient ischemic attack, 3 with ischemic stroke). There was no difference in the rate of recurrence in those with compared to those without MES. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral embolization plays an important role in the pathophysiology of ischemia in both carotid occlusion and stenosis, even among patients with watershed infarcts. The role of aggressive antithrombotic and antiplatelet therapy for symptomatic carotid occlusions may warrant further investigation given our findings.

Convergent validity and interrater reliability of estimating the ABCD2 score from medical records.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ABCD(2) score is increasingly used for risk stratification of transient ischemic attack patients. We sought to determine the reliability and convergent validity of retrospective ABCD(2) score estimation from medical records. METHODS: We compared ABCD(2) scores that were prospectively determined by a vascular neurology attending to scores determined retrospectively from medical record review. Emergency department records and neurology consult notes for patients with acute transient ischemic attack were abstracted with explicit ABCD(2) scoring redacted. Scores were estimated by 2 independent raters using these records. Estimated ABCD(2) component scores, total scores, and risk category were compared both between retrospective raters and with prospectively obtained scores. Reliability was assessed using unweighted κ statistics. RESULTS: Interrater reliability was substantial with 72% exact agreement in total score between retrospective raters (κ=0.64) and nearly perfect with 82% agreement for ABCD(2) category (κ=0.71). Interrater agreement was best for age and diabetes mellitus and poorest for clinical features and duration. Agreement between the retrospective raters and prospectively obtained score was >90% for age, blood pressure, and diabetes mellitus, but only ≈70% for clinical features and duration. Retrospectively, estimated total ABCD(2) score exactly matched the prospective score in 58% of patients for rater 1 and 44% of patients for rater 2. Retrospectively, estimated ABCD(2) category matched the prospectively scored category in 67% of patients for rater 1 and 71% of patients for rater 2. CONCLUSIONS: The ABCD(2) score can be abstracted from medical records with substantial interrater reliability but limited convergent validity. This may lead to misclassification of risk category in more than one third of patients.

Increasing activity after stroke: a randomized controlled trial of highintensity walking and step activity intervention.

Background: Physical inactivity in people with chronic stroke profoundly affects daily function and increases recurrent stroke risk and mortality, making physical activity improvements an important target of intervention. We compared the effects of a highintensity walking intervention (FAST), a step activity monitoring behavioral intervention (SAM), or a combined intervention (FAST+SAM) on physical activity (i.e., steps per day). We hypothesized the combined intervention would yield the greatest increase in steps per day. Methods: This assessor-blinded multi-site randomized controlled trial was conducted at four university/hospital-based laboratories. Participants were 21-85 years old, walking without physical assistance following a single, unilateral non-cerebellar stroke of ≥6 months duration, and randomly assigned to FAST, SAM, or FAST+SAM for 12 weeks (2-3 sessions/week). FAST training consisted of walking-related activities for 40 minutes/session at 70-80% heart rate reserve, while SAM received daily feedback and goal-setting of walking activity (steps per day). Assessors and study statistician were masked to group assignment.The a priori-determined primary outcome and primary endpoint was change in steps per day from pre- to post-intervention. Adverse events (AEs) were tracked after randomization. All randomized participants were included in the intent-to-treat analysis.This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02835313. Findings: Participants were enrolled from July 18, 2016-November 16, 2021. Of 250 randomized participants (mean[SE] age 63[0.80], 116F/134M), 89 were assigned to FAST, 81 to SAM, and 80 to FAST+SAM. Steps per day significantly increased in both the SAM (mean[SE] 1542[267], 95%CI:1014-2069, p<0.001) and FAST+SAM groups (1307[280], 752-1861, p<0.001), but not in the FAST group (406[238], 63-876, p=0.09). There were no deaths or serious study-related AEs and all other minor AEs were similar between groups. Interpretation: Only individuals with chronic stroke who completed a step activity monitoring behavioral intervention with skilled coaching and goal progression demonstrated improvements in physical activity (steps per day).

Implementation of an Advanced Practice Registered Nurse-Led Clinic to Improve Follow-up Care for Post-Ischemic Stroke Patients.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke continues to be a leading cause of serious disability within the United States, affecting 795 000 people annually. Approximately 12% to 21% of post-ischemic stroke patients will be readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. Studies suggest that implementation of a follow-up appointment within 7 to 14 days of discharge improves 30-day readmission rates; however, implementation of these guidelines is uncommon, and follow-up visits within the recommended window are not often achieved. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the impact of an advanced practice registered nurse (APRN)-led stroke clinic on follow-up care for post-ischemic stroke patients. The aims were to improve time to follow-up visit and reduce 30-day unplanned readmissions. METHODS: A pre/post intervention design was used to evaluate the impact of a process to access the APRN-led stroke clinic. The intervention included a scheduling process redesign, and subsequent APRN and scheduler education. RESULTS: The time to clinic follow-up preintervention averaged 116.9 days, which significantly reduced to 33.6 days post intervention, P = .0001. Unplanned readmissions within 30 days declined from 11.5% to 9.9%; however, it was not statistically significant, P = .149. Age was not statistically different between preintervention and postintervention groups, P = .092, and other demographics were similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: An APRN-led clinic can improve follow-up care and may reduce unplanned 30-day readmissions for post-ischemic stroke patients. Further work is needed to determine the impact of alternative approaches such as telehealth.