Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) are discharged without a known aetiology for their clinical presentation. This study sought to assess the effect of this 'indeterminate MINOCA' diagnosis on the prevalence of recurrent cardiovascular events and presentations to the Cardiac Emergency Department (CED). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all patients meeting the diagnostic MINOCA criteria presenting at a large secondary hospital between January 2017 and April 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were divided into the (1) 'indeterminate MINOCA', or (2) 'MINOCA with diagnosis' group. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and any revascularisation procedure. Secondary outcomes were all recurrent visits at the CED, and MACE including unplanned cardiac hospitalisation. RESULTS: In 62/198 (31.3%) MINOCA patients, a conclusive diagnosis was found (myocardial infarction, (peri)myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, or miscellaneous). MINOCA patients with a confirmed diagnosis were younger compared to those with an indeterminate diagnosis (56.7 vs. 62.3 years, p = 0.007), had higher maximum troponin-T [238 ng/L vs. 69 ng/L, p < 0.001] and creatine kinase (CK) levels [212U/L vs. 152U/L, p = 0.007], and presented more frequently with electrocardiographic signs of ischaemia (71.0% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.002). Indeterminate MINOCA patients more often showed recurrent CED presentations (36.8% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.048), however the occurrence of cardiovascular events was equal (8.8 vs. 8.1%, p = 0.86). Multivariable analysis showed that elevated levels of troponin-T and CK, ST-segment deviation on electrocardiography, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, regional wall motion abnormalities, and performance of additional examination methods were independent predictors for finding the underlying MINOCA cause. CONCLUSIONS: Only in one-third of MINOCA patients a conclusive diagnosis for the acute presentation was identified. Recurrent CED visits were more often observed in the indeterminate MINOCA group, while the occurrence of cardiovascular events was similar across groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Feasibility and safety of cangrelor in patients with suboptimal P2Y12 inhibition undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale of the Dutch Cangrelor Registry.

BACKGROUND: Despite the advances of potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors, their onset of action is delayed, which might have a negative impact on clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Trials conducted in the United States of America have identified cangrelor as a potent and rapid-acting intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor, which has the potential of reducing ischemic events in these patients without an increase in the bleeding. As cangrelor is rarely used in The Netherlands, we conducted a nationwide registry to provide an insight into the use of cangrelor in the management of patients with suboptimal platelet inhibition undergoing (primary) PCI (the Dutch Cangrelor Registry). STUDY DESIGN: The Cangrelor Registry is a prospective, observational, multicenter, single-arm registry with cangrelor administered pre-PCI in: (1) P2Y12 naive patients with ad-hoc PCI, (2) patients with STEMI/NSTEMI with suboptimal P2Y12 inhibition including (3) stable resuscitated/defibrillated patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to acute ischemia and (4) STEMI/NSTEMI patients with a high thrombotic burden. Primary endpoint is 48 h Net Adverse Clinical Events (NACE), which is a composite endpoint of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke, stent thrombosis (ST) and BARC 2-3-5 bleeding. The Dutch Cangrelor Registry will assess the feasibility and safety of cangrelor in patients with suboptimal P2Y12 inhibition undergoing (primary) PCI in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in the Netherlands.

Gender differences with short-term vs 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with the COMBO dual therapy stent: 2-years follow-up results of the REDUCE trial.

BACKGROUND: Gender differences in the thrombotic and bleeding risk have been suggested to condition the benefits of antithrombotic therapies in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients, and mainly among those undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with drug eluting stents (DES). The impact of gender on the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in ACS patients is still unexplored and was, therefore, the aim of the present sub-study. METHODS: REDUCE was a prospective, multicenter, randomized investigator-initiated study designed to enroll 1500 ACS patients after treatment with the COMBO Dual Stent Therapy, based on a noninferiority design. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either 3 or 12 months of DAPT. Primary study endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), stroke, target-vessel revascularization (TVR) and bleedings (BARC II, III, V) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular mortality and the individual components of the primary endpoint within 24 months. RESULTS: From June 2014 to May 2016 300 women and 1196 men were included in the study. Among them, 43.7% of females and 51.9% of males were assigned to the 3 months DAPT treatment. Baseline characteristics were well matched between the two arms, with the exception of a lower rate of TIMI flow < 3 (p = 0.04), lower systolic blood pressure (p = 0.05) and use of spironolactone (p = 0.006) among women and a more advanced age (p = 0.05) among men receiving a short-term DAPT. At a mean follow-up of 525 (± 198) days, no difference in the primary endpoint was observed according to DAPT duration in both females [6.9% vs 5.9%, HR (95% CI) = 1.19 (0.48-2.9), p = 0.71] and males [8.2% vs 9%, HR (95% CI) = 0.92 (0.63-1.35), p = 0.67; p INT = 0.20]. Results were confirmed after correction for baseline differences [females: adjusted HR (95% CI) = 1.12 (0.45-2.78), p = 0.81; males: adjusted HR (95% CI) = 0.90 (0.61-1.32), p = 0.60]. Comparable rates of survival, thrombotic (MI, stent thrombosis, TVR, stroke) and bleeding events were observed with the two DAPT strategies, with no impact of gender. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that among ACS patients randomized in the REDUCE trial, a 3 months DAPT strategy offers comparable results as compared to a standard 12 months DAPT at 2-years follow-up in both male and female gender.

Sharing primary percutaneous coronary intervention care: first experiences with South Limburg ST-elevation myocardial infarction network.

BACKGROUND: In the region of South Limburg, the Netherlands, a shared ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) networking system (SLIM network) was implemented. During out-of-office hours, two percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centres-Maastricht University Medical Centre and Zuyderland Medical Centre-are supported by the same interventional cardiologist. The aim of this study was to analyse performance indicators within this network and to compare them with contemporary European Society of Cardiology guidelines. METHODS: Key time indicators for an all-comer STEMI population were registered by the emergency medical service and the PCI centres. The time measurements showed a non-Gaussian distribution; they are presented as median with 25th and 75th percentiles. RESULTS: Between 1 February 2018 and 31 March 2019, a total of 570 STEMI patients were admitted to the participating centres. The total system delay (from emergency call to needle time) was 65 min (53-77), with a prehospital system delay of 40 min (34-47) and a door-to-needle time of 22 min (15-34). Compared with in-office hours, out-of-office hours significantly lengthened system delays (55 (47-66) vs 70 min (62-81), p < 0.001), emergency medical service transport times (29 (24-34) vs 35 min (29-40), p < 0.001) and door-to-needle times (17 (14-26) vs 26 min (18-37), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With its effective patient pathway management, the SLIM network was able to meet the quality criteria set by contemporary European revascularisation guidelines.

Correction to: Guidelines for the management of myocardial infarction/injury with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a position paper from the Dutch ACS working group.

Correction to: Neth Heart J 2019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-019-01344-6 The reference to the term acute coronary syndrome with normal or near-normal (non-obstructive) coronary arteries (ACSNNOCA) from Manolis et al. (2018) was inadvertently omitted to the original published article. Therefore, ….

Guidelines for the management of myocardial infarction/injury with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a position paper from the Dutch ACS working group.

Patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), defined as angiographic stenosis <50%, represent a conundrum given the many potential underlying aetiologies. Possible causes of MINOCA can be subdivided into coronary, myocardial and non-cardiac disorders. MINOCA is found in up to 14% of patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome. Clinical outcomes including mortality, and functional and psychosocial status, are comparable to those of patients with myocardial infarction and obstructive coronary arteries. However, many uncertainties remain regarding the definition, clinical features and management of these patients. This position paper of the Dutch ACS working group of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology aims to stress the importance of considering MINOCA as a dynamic working diagnosis and to guide the clinician in the management of patients with MINOCA by proposing a clinical diagnostic algorithm.

Design and rationale of ischaemia-driven complete revascularisation versus usual care in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease: the South Limburg Myocardial Infarction (SLIM) trial.

AIMS: To compare ischaemia-driven complete coronary revascularisation by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with usual care in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD). METHODS: The South Limburg Myocardial Infarction (SLIM) trial (NCT03562572) is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial that compares fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularisation during the index procedure with usual care in non-STEMI patients with MVD. A total of 414 patients will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion. The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and any revascularisation and stroke (MACCE) at 12 months. The secondary endpoints are: MACCE at 24 and 36 months, and the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, any revascularisation, stroke, major bleeding and left ventricular ejection fraction below 45% at 12, 24 and 36 months. Furthermore, quality of life will be assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at 1 and 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The SLIM trial aims to provide evidence whether FFR-guided complete revascularisation by PCI is superior to usual care with respect to clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular events) in non-STEMI patients with MVD.

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus: the midterm follow-up of the prospective ABSORB DM Benelux study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remains challenging even with modern drug-eluting stents (DES) due to high rates of repeat revascularization. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (EE-BRS) might allow for repeat intervention prolonging the time interval of percutaneous treatment options. METHODS: The ABSORB DM Benelux Study is a dedicated prospective, international study to evaluate the midterm safety and efficacy of EE-BRS in DM patients. All DM patients that received ≥ 1 EE-BRS for any indication were enrolled and prospectively followed. Study endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE): a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR); target lesion failure (TLF): a composite of cardiac death (CD), target vessel MI, and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), as well as definite or probable scaffold thrombosis (ScT). RESULTS: Between April 2015 till March 2017, 150 DM patients and 188 lesions were treated and followed up to 3 years. Device implantation success was 100%. MACE occurred in 15.2% (event rate of 8.8 per 100 PY). TLF was reported in 11.7% (7.0 events per 100 PY). CD, target vessel MI, ischemic-driven TLR occurred in 3.4%, 3.6% and 5.5% respectively, while ScT was observed in 1.4%. There were no occurrences of late or very late ScT. CONCLUSION: EE-BRS treatment in DM patients shows comparable midterm safety and efficacy outcomes when historically compared with modern DES. New-generation EE-BRS might offer an attractive alternative to metallic DES in treatment of fast progressing atherosclerosis population as in DM patients. Trial registration NTR5447. Registered 05 October 2015, retrospectively registered.

A randomised, investigator-initiated, clinical trial of the effects of fentanyl on P2Y12-receptor inhibition in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who are pre-treated with crushed ticagrelor: rationale and design of the Opioids aNd crushed Ticagrelor In Myocardial infarction Evaluation (ON-TIME 3) trial.

BACKGROUND: Fast and accurate platelet inhibition is an important therapeutic goal in the acute treatment of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Platelet inhibitory effects induced by oral P2Y12-receptor antagonists are delayed in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to haemodynamic changes and delayed gastro-intestinal absorption. Concomitant use of opioids, although recommended in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology STEMI guidelines, further delays gastro-intestinal absorption. To date, trials investigating alternative analgesics in STEMI patients have been scarce. This trial aims to assess the feasibility of a novel drug strategy for treatment of STEMI patients with crushed ticagrelor in combination with paracetamol (acetaminophen) instead of opioids. HYPOTHESIS: STEMI patients who are pre-treated with crushed ticagrelor and paracetamol have a higher level of platelet inhibition after primary PCI than patients pre-treated with crushed ticagrelor and fentanyl. STUDY DESIGN: The Opioids aNd crushed Ticagrelor In Myocardial infarction Evaluation (ON-TIME 3) trial is a randomised controlled trial designed to examine whether administration of paracetamol instead of fentanyl can optimise platelet inhibition in STEMI patients who are pre-treated with crushed ticagrelor in the ambulance. One hundred and ninety patients with STEMI will be randomised (1:1 fashion) to intravenous (IV) fentanyl or IV paracetamol. The primary endpoint is the level of platelet reactivity units measured immediately after primary PCI. The ON-TIME 3 trial (NCT03400267) aims to achieve optimal platelet inhibition and pain relief in STEMI patients receiving crushed ticagrelor in the ambulance by investigating IV fentanyl and IV paracetamol as analgesics.

The 1­year safety and efficacy outcomes of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for coronary artery disease treatment in diabetes mellitus patients: the ABSORB DM Benelux study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) patients show higher rates of repeat revascularisation even in the era of modern drug-eluting stents (DES). The concept of bioresorbable scaffolds is becoming captivating, as it might allow for repeat interventions, prolonging the time span during which patients can be treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). AIMS: We intend to evaluate the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (Absorb BVS) in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in DM patients for any indication. METHODS: The ABSORB DM Benelux is an international prospective study in DM patients who have undergone PCI with ≥1 Absorb BVS. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year was the primary endpoint, defined as a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation (TVR). Secondary endpoints were target lesion failure (TLF) and definite or probable scaffold thrombosis (ScT). RESULTS: Between April 2015 and March 2017, 150 DM patients and 188 non-complex lesions were treated. Device implantation was successful in 100%. MACE occurred in 14 (9.5%) patients, with all-cause death occurring in 4 (2.7%), any MI in 6 (4.1%) and ischaemia-driven TVR in 7 (4.8%) respectively. TLF was reported in 11 (7.5%). Definite and probable ScT was observed in 2 (1.4%). CONCLUSION: Absorb BVS for treatment of anatomically low-risk patients with DM show acceptable safety and efficacy outcomes at 1 year. If these promising results are confirmed after a longer follow-up period, new-generation bioresorbable scaffolds combined with refinement of implantation techniques might open new horizons for CAD treatment in DM patients.

Instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To compare fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurements in an all-comer patient population with moderate coronary artery stenoses. BACKGROUND: Visual assessment of the severity of coronary artery stenoses is often discordant in moderate lesions. FFR allows reliable functional severity assessment in these cases but requires adenosine-induced hyperaemia with associated additional time, costs and side effects. The iFR is a hyperaemia-independent index. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between November 2015 and February 2017, 356 consecutive patients were included in whom 515 coronary stenoses were measured using both iFR and FFR. Mean iFR and FFR were 0.90 ± 0.09 and 0.86 ± 0.08, respectively. iFR correlated well with FFR [r = 0.75; p < 0.001]. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an area under the curve of 0.92. An iFR-only strategy with a treatment cut-off ≤0.89 revealed a diagnostic classification agreement with the FFR-only strategy in 420 lesions (82%) with a sensitivity of 87%, a specificity of 80%, a positive predictive value of 56% and a negative predictive value of 96%. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time iFR measurements have good negative predictive value compared to FFR, but moderate diagnostic accuracy (82%). It exposes fewer patients to adenosine, reduces procedure time and costs. Further prospective trials are needed to evaluate specific clinical settings, cut-off values and endpoints.

Timing of intervention in high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes in PCI versus non-PCI centres : Sub-group analysis of the ELISA-3 trial.

AIMS: To compare the effect of timing of intervention in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus non-PCI centres. METHODS AND RESULTS: A post-hoc sub-analysis was performed of the ELISA III trial, a randomised multicentre trial investigating outcome of early (< 12 h) versus late (> 48 h) angiography and revascularisation in 542 patients with high-risk NSTE-ACS. 90 patients were randomised in non-PCI centres and tended to benefit more from an early invasive strategy than patients included in the PCI centre (relative risk 0.23 vs. 0.85 [p for interaction = 0.089] for incidence of the combined primary endpoint of death, reinfarction and recurrent ischaemia after 30 days of follow-up). This was largely driven by reduction in recurrent ischaemia. In non-PCI centres, patients randomised to the late group had a 4 and 7 day longer period until PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting, respectively. This difference was less pronounced in the PCI centre. CONCLUSIONS: This post-hoc analysis from the ELISA-3 trial suggests that NSTE-ACS patients initially hospitalised in non-PCI centres show the largest benefit from early angiography and revascularisation, associated with a shorter waiting time to revascularisation. Improved patient logistics and transfer between non-PCI and PCI centres might therefore result in better clinical outcome.

Multivessel revascularisation versus infarct-related artery only revascularisation during the index primary PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are controversial data regarding infarct-related artery only (IRA-PCI) revascularisation versus multivessel revascularisation (MV-PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We performed a meta-analysis comparing outcome in same stage MV-PCI versus IRA-PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease. METHODS: Systematic searches of studies comparing MV-PCI with IRA-PCI in the MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of systematic reviews were conducted. A meta-analysis was performed of all available studies. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were re-infarction, revascularisation, bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were identified with a total number of 35,975 patients. Mortality rate was significantly higher in the MV-PCI group compared with the IRA-PCI group, odds ratio (OR): 1.64 (1.46-1.85). Both the incidence of re-infarction and re-PCI were significantly lower in the MV-PCI group compared with the IRA-PCI group: OR 0.54 (0.34-0.88) and OR 0.67 (0.48-0.93), respectively. Bleeding complications occurred more often in the MV-PCI group as compared with the IRA-PCI group: OR 1.24 (1.08-1.42). Rates of MACE were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: MV-PCI during the index of primary PCI in STEMI patients is associated with a higher mortality rate, a higher risk of bleeding complications, but lower risk of re-intervention and re-infarction and comparable rates of MACE.

Glucose dysregulation in nondiabetic patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: acute and chronic glucose dysregulation in STEMI.

BACKGROUND: Admission hyperglycaemia is associated with an increased risk of mortality after myocardial infarction. Whether long-term glucose dysregulation (assessed by HbA1c) is more important than acute hyperglycaemia is unknown. We evaluated the prognostic value of admission glucose and HbA1c levels in nondiabetic patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: In 504 unselected, consecutive patients with STEMI, glucose and HbA1c levels were measured on admission. Glucose was categorised as <11.1 mmol/l (n=422) and >or= 11.1 mmol/l (n=82). HbA1c levels were categorised as <6.0% (n=416) and >or=6.0% (n=88). Mean follow-up was 1.6+/-0.6 years. RESULTS: Patients with hyperglycaemia on admission were comparable with those with normoglycaemia. However,patients with HbA1c >or=6.0%, as compared with those with HbA1c <6%, were older, were more often on beta-blockers and more frequently had multivessel disease. Thirty-day mortality in the subsequent glucose categories (<11.1 mmol/l and >or=11.1 mmol/l) was 4% and 19% (p<0.001) and in the subsequent HbA1c categories (<6% and >or=6%) was 5% and 12% (p=0.03). After multivariable analyses, admission glucose (OR 4.91,95% CI 2.03 to 11.9, p< 0.001) but not HbA1c (OR 1.33, 95%CI 0.48 to 3.71, p=0.58) was significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Among 30-day survivors, neither admission glucose nor HbA1c were predictors of long-term mortality. CONCLUSION: Elevated admission glucose is an important predictor of 30-day outcome after STEMI, while prior long-term glucose dysregulation is a covariate of other high-risk clinical characteristics. Among 30-day survivors, neither admission blood glucose nor HbA1c were predictors of long-term outcome.

Circumflex artery-related acute myocardial infarction: limited ECG abnormalities but poor outcome.

BACKGROUND: Circumflex (CX) artery-related myocardial infarction (MI) is less well represented in trials on ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), most often due to the absence of significant ST-segment elevation, and therefore the outcome of these patients is less well known. We aimed to compare the outcome of patients with CX versus right coronary artery (RCA) related STEMI in a large cohort of patients treated with primary angioplasty. METHODS: A total of 1683 consecutive patients with STEMI were studied. Patients who lacked STsegment elevation were also included if they had persistent chest pain with signs of ischaemia or regional wall motion abnormalities on echocardiography. Coronary angioplasty was performed according to standard procedures. After the intervention, all patients received aspirin and clopidogrel or ticlopidine. RESULTS: The infarct-related vessel was the CX in 229 patients (14%) and the RCA in 600 patients (36%). No differences in baseline characteristics were present. Mean extent of ST-segment elevation or deviation was significantly higher in patients with the RCA as infarct-related vessel. Enzymatic infarct size was significantly higher in the CXrelated MI (1338+/-1117 IU/l vs. 1806+/-1498 IU/l, p<0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction <45% was more often present in patients with CXrelated MI (37 vs. 26%, p<0.01). Both short- and long-term mortality were significantly higher in the CX-related MI. CONCLUSION: This study emphasises the fact that CX-related infarction has a worse prognosis compared with RCA-related infarction. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:286-90.).

A quantitative analysis of the effect of glucose-insulin-potassium in acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: To review the currently available data to investigate the clinical benefit of high- and low-dose glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). DESIGN: Quantitative analysis of all randomised trials on GIK in patients with STEMI. Electronic and manual searches for randomised controlled trials of GIK in STEMI were performed with regard to inclusion criteria, dose of GIK and additional use of reperfusion therapy, and a meta-analysis with the primary endpoint 30-day mortality was performed. PATIENTS: Data from 16 randomised trials, involving 26,273 patients, were included. RESULTS: Studies were conducted between 1962 and 2005. Overall, hospital mortality was 9.6% after GIK compared with 10.2% in controls (p=0.088). GIK infusion was not associated with an increase in major adverse events. CONCLUSION: This quantitative analysis of GIK in patients with STEMI did not show a beneficial or detrimental effect of GIK infusion on 30-day mortality. GIK infusion should not be part of the standard therapy for patients with STEMI.